Radiofrequency Ablation Assisted Hepatectomy Versus Hepatectomy Alone for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Primary Purpose
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
RFA assisted Hepatectomy
Hepatectomy
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Hepatocellular Carcinoma focused on measuring Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Radiofrequency Ablation, Hepatectomy, Recurrence
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of HCC confirmed at our hospital.
- Intrahepatic tumor count no higher than 3 and a minimum tumor diameter > 3 cm, but no more than 8cm.
- Liver function of Child-Pugh Class A or B.
- Tumors lacked intrahepatic and extrahepatic metastasis.
- Tumors had not invaded the portal vein, the hepatic vein trunk or the secondary branches.
- Indocyanine green retention at 15 minutes (ICG-15) of <10%.
- No evidence of coagulopathy: platelet count > 50 × 109/L and a prolonged prothrombin time of < 5 seconds.
- No other anti-tumor therapy received before the treatment. -
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients met the inclusion criteria but declined to participate.
- Patients with severe portal hypertension, a history of esophageal variceal hemorrhage, severe hypersplenism syndrome, or refractory ascites.
- Patients whose permanent pathology after treatment suggested metastatic liver cancer or primary liver cancer of another tissue type.
Sites / Locations
- Institute of hepatobiliary surgery,Southwest HospitalRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
Hepatectomy
RFA assisted Hepatectomy
Arm Description
Using Hepatectomy for the treatment of advanced HCC
Ablating the liver tissue around the tumor before hepatectomy.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Recurrence-free Survival
Secondary Outcome Measures
Overall Survival
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01713244
First Posted
October 21, 2012
Last Updated
November 19, 2015
Sponsor
Southwest Hospital, China
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01713244
Brief Title
Radiofrequency Ablation Assisted Hepatectomy Versus Hepatectomy Alone for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Official Title
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Radiofrequency Ablation Assisted Hepatectomy and Hepatectomy Alone in the Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
November 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
October 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 2016 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
November 2016 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Southwest Hospital, China
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
RFA has become a standard method in the treatment of small HCC(≤2 cm) due to its ease of use, safety, cost-effectiveness, and minimal invasiveness. It can ablated and blocked the small vessels while destroyed the tumor cell in situ. Surgical resection is the most widely accepted treatment for the patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in the Asian countries. But the effectiveness of hepatectomy was depressed because of the high recurrence rate. The spreading of the cancer cell along the portal vein or the hepatic vein system during the operation account for the tumor recurrence. Using RFA to ablate and block the small vessels around the tumor before resection will reduce the spreading of the cancer cell. Investigators hypothesized that the RFA assisted hepatectomy might result in lower recurrence rate than hepatectomy alone in the treatment of advanced HCC. Thus, the purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the effects of RFA assisted hepatectomy with hepatectomy alone for the treatment of advanced HCC.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Keywords
Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Radiofrequency Ablation, Hepatectomy, Recurrence
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
150 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Hepatectomy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Using Hepatectomy for the treatment of advanced HCC
Arm Title
RFA assisted Hepatectomy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Ablating the liver tissue around the tumor before hepatectomy.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
RFA assisted Hepatectomy
Intervention Description
Using RFA to ablate and block the small vessels around the tumor before resection to reduce the spreading of the cancer cell.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Hepatectomy
Intervention Description
Treat the advanced HCC with the hepatectomy only.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Recurrence-free Survival
Time Frame
2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall Survival
Time Frame
2 years
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Number of participants with adverse events
Time Frame
2 years
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Diagnosis of HCC confirmed at our hospital.
Intrahepatic tumor count no higher than 3 and a minimum tumor diameter > 3 cm, but no more than 8cm.
Liver function of Child-Pugh Class A or B.
Tumors lacked intrahepatic and extrahepatic metastasis.
Tumors had not invaded the portal vein, the hepatic vein trunk or the secondary branches.
Indocyanine green retention at 15 minutes (ICG-15) of <10%.
No evidence of coagulopathy: platelet count > 50 × 109/L and a prolonged prothrombin time of < 5 seconds.
No other anti-tumor therapy received before the treatment. -
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients met the inclusion criteria but declined to participate.
Patients with severe portal hypertension, a history of esophageal variceal hemorrhage, severe hypersplenism syndrome, or refractory ascites.
Patients whose permanent pathology after treatment suggested metastatic liver cancer or primary liver cancer of another tissue type.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Kai Feng, M.D
Phone
+86-23-13228683383
Email
fengkai7688@hotmail.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kuansheng Ma, Ph.D
Organizational Affiliation
Institute of hepatobiliary surgery,Southwest Hospital
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Institute of hepatobiliary surgery,Southwest Hospital
City
Chongqing
State/Province
Chongqing
ZIP/Postal Code
400038
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kai Feng, M.D
Phone
+86-23-13228683383
Email
fengkai7688@hotmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kai Feng, M.D
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Radiofrequency Ablation Assisted Hepatectomy Versus Hepatectomy Alone for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs