search
Back to results

LYmphadenectomy After NeoAdjuvant Chemotherapy (LYANA)

Primary Purpose

Advanced Ovarian Cancer (Stage III or IV) After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Systematic pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy
Sponsored by
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Advanced Ovarian Cancer (Stage III or IV) After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy focused on measuring Interval debulking surgery, IDS, NACT, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Lymphadenectomy, Ovarian cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18 and 75 years
  • Patients affected by advanced ovarian cancer (FIGO stage III-IV) who underwent > 2 to <7 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on platinum and taxanes.
  • Clinical response (instrumental and serological) complete or partial.
  • Residual intra-abdominal tumor <1 cm.
  • Absence of disease macroscopically evident in lymph nodes (> 1 cm)
  • Life expectancy of at least 4 weeks
  • ECOG PS ≤ 2
  • Adequate respiratory function, hepatic, cardiac, bone marrow and renal function (creatinine clearance> 60 mL / min according to the Cockroft formula)
  • Patient psychologically able to follow the study procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with severe impairment of lung function, or liver failure, such as not to allow access in safety in the operating room.
  • Not epithelial ovarian neoplasms or borderline tumors
  • Other invasive cancer in the last 5 years or signs of recurrence or activity
  • Patients with intra-abdominal residual tumor> 1 cm
  • Patients with the presence of bulky nodes (> 1 cm) in the intra-operative evaluation
  • Diseases of the lymphatic system (including lymphatic edema of unknown origin)

Sites / Locations

  • Catholic University of Sacred HeartRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Systematic Lymphadenectomy

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of positive lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Evaluation of complications related to the surgical procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Evaluation of disease-free interval (DFS)
Assessment of overall survival (OS)

Full Information

First Posted
November 8, 2012
Last Updated
November 9, 2012
Sponsor
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01724944
Brief Title
LYmphadenectomy After NeoAdjuvant Chemotherapy
Acronym
LYANA
Official Title
Lymphadenectomy After Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Ovarian Neoplasm
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
February 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2013 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
undefined (undefined)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the role of lymphadenectomy in advenced ovarian cancer patients at the time of interval debulking surgery after neoadjuvant chemiotherapy. Moreover it is a prospective trial, aimed to investigate the prognostic role of sistematic lymphadenectomy in terms of percentage of micrometastases detected, morbidity (complications rate), progression free interval, overall survival, recurrence pattern.
Detailed Description
In patients with advanced ovarian cancer (FIGO stage III-IV), a percentage between 50% and 80% had lymph node metastases at diagnosis, mainly in para-aorto-caval (48 %) and iliac areas (49%). In 1988, FIGO has included lymph node metastasis in stage IIIC, although some authors argue that only node involvement constitutes a clinical course different from IIIC cancer patients with abdominal diffusion. Although it has been demonstrated that lymphadenectomy is technically feasible and relatively safe in this subset of patients, however, it is burdened by a certain percentage of complications including limphocyst, lymphedema, hemorrhage, ranging from 6% to 45%. In addition, the actual therapeutic role is still controversial and it is not clear whether this surgical procedure should be part of the staging of these tumors. Retrospective studies have shown a benefit on overall survival in patients with ovarian cancer who underwent lymphadenectomy associated with optimal debulking (residual tumor <1 cm). In a recent publication by SEER is found that the number of lymph nodes removed during surgery for advanced ovarian cancer is an independent prognostic factor. In the literature there is only one prospective randomized study on lymphadenectomy in advanced ovarian cancer without node lesions macroscopically observed (bulky nodes) during the first surgery. The authors reported a significant benefit in terms of disease free survival (DFS), but not in terms of overall survival (OS) in patients who underwent systematic lymphadenectomy and who had a residual tumor <1 cm. Patients with intra-abdominal residual tumor <1 cm could theoretically not benefit from a systematic lymphadenectomy since most of lymph node metastases undetectable to intraoperative assessment are smaller than 1 cm. About 20% of ovarian cancer patients stage III-IV, however, are not operable at the time of diagnosis because of the spread of the disease. In these cases, the gold standard treatment consists of submitting the patient to Interval Debulking Surgery (IDS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The prognosis of these patients compared to those who are subjected to primary surgery, with the same residual tumor after surgery, is currently a topic of controversial debate. Recently, a multicenter, randomized EORTC showed no difference in prognosis between primary surgery and Interval Debulking Surgery in a population stratified by residual tumor. There are few retrospective studies that consider the presence of lymph node metastases in patients undergoing Interval Debulking Surgery: the percentage of lymph node metastases in this subset varies from 37.5% to 75%. The purpose of the study is to assess whether systematic pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy should be part of standard surgical procedures in patients with ovarian cancer who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with intra-abdominal residual tumor <1 cm. All patients candidate for Interval Debulking Surgery which do not present bulky nodes at surgery and which have an intra-abdominal residual tumor <1 cm at the end of the surgery will be enrolled in the study. The baseline assessment of patients is to perform general blood tests, CA 125, CT thorax, abdomen, pelvis, anesthetic assessment and, if eligible, the patients will be subjected to the treatment above. The enrollment period will last for 2 years until the achieving of 65 patients as the study population. The median follow-up of 6 months for all patients for the primary objectives and a median of 36 months for the secondary objectives.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Advanced Ovarian Cancer (Stage III or IV) After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Keywords
Interval debulking surgery, IDS, NACT, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Lymphadenectomy, Ovarian cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 1, Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
65 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Systematic Lymphadenectomy
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Systematic pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy
Intervention Description
Pelvic lymphadenectomy dissection began at the origin of the external iliac vessels and continued caudally along the medial border of the psoas muscle, with the lower limit of the external iliac lymphadenectomy being represented by the deep inferior epigastric vessels. The lateral boundaries of lymphadenectomy were delineated superficially by the fascia covering the psoas muscle and deeply by the fascia covering the internal obturator and levator ani muscles. Lymph nodes along the external iliac vessels were removed en bloc with those adjacent to the common iliac vessels. Aortic lymphadenectomy dissection began at the aortic bifurcation by removing the superficial intercavoaortic, precaval, and preaortic nodal groups. Lymph nodes located lateral to the vena (i.e., paracaval nodal group) were separated from the vena cava, then removed en bloc. Lymph nodes behind the vena cava are removed if enlarged. Removal of the lateroaortic nodes was performed up to the level of the left renal vein.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of positive lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Evaluation of complications related to the surgical procedure
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Evaluation of disease-free interval (DFS)
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Assessment of overall survival (OS)
Time Frame
36 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age between 18 and 75 years Patients affected by advanced ovarian cancer (FIGO stage III-IV) who underwent > 2 to <7 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on platinum and taxanes. Clinical response (instrumental and serological) complete or partial. Residual intra-abdominal tumor <1 cm. Absence of disease macroscopically evident in lymph nodes (> 1 cm) Life expectancy of at least 4 weeks ECOG PS ≤ 2 Adequate respiratory function, hepatic, cardiac, bone marrow and renal function (creatinine clearance> 60 mL / min according to the Cockroft formula) Patient psychologically able to follow the study procedures Exclusion Criteria: Patients with severe impairment of lung function, or liver failure, such as not to allow access in safety in the operating room. Not epithelial ovarian neoplasms or borderline tumors Other invasive cancer in the last 5 years or signs of recurrence or activity Patients with intra-abdominal residual tumor> 1 cm Patients with the presence of bulky nodes (> 1 cm) in the intra-operative evaluation Diseases of the lymphatic system (including lymphatic edema of unknown origin)
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Catholic University of Sacred Heart
Phone
+39 063 015 627 9
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Catholic University of Sacred Heart
City
Rome
ZIP/Postal Code
00100
Country
Italy
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Fagotti Anna, MD, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Fanfani Francesco, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Costantini Barbara, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Vizzielli Giuseppe, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Perelli Federica, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

LYmphadenectomy After NeoAdjuvant Chemotherapy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs