search
Back to results

Steroid-Releasing S8 Sinus Implant for Recurrent Nasal Polyps (RESOLVE)

Primary Purpose

Chronic Sinusitis, Nasal Polyps

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
S8 Sinus Implant
Sham procedure
Mometasone furoate nasal spray
Sponsored by
Intersect ENT
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Chronic Sinusitis focused on measuring corticosteroid-eluting sinus implant, chronic rhinosinusitis, mometasone furoate, polyposis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria

Candidates for this study had to meet ALL of the following inclusion criteria:

1. General Inclusion Criteria

  1. Patient has provided written informed consent using a form approved by the reviewing IRB.
  2. Patient is ≥ 18 years of age.
  3. Patient is willing and able to comply with protocol requirements.
  4. Patient has a previous confirmed diagnosis of CS defined as inflammation of the mucosa of the paranasal sinuses.
  5. Patient has undergone bilateral total ethmoidectomy (must be at least 90 day beyond the date of last sinus surgery).
  6. Patient has recurrent bilateral sinus obstruction due to polyposis (Grades 1 through 3 only).
  7. Patient must have a Grade 2 polyposis on at least 1 ethmoid side.
  8. Patient is able to tolerate the use of Nasonex topical intranasal steroid spray once daily.
  9. Patient is indicated for a repeat ESS per the study definition. Patient must have: (i) a minimum symptom burden on the SNOT 22, consisting of a minimum score of 2 on at least 2 of the 5 hallmark symptoms of CS (nasal blockage, post-nasal discharge, thick nasal discharge, facial pain/pressure, and decreased sense of smell); (ii) persistent symptoms of CS despite ongoing treatment with topical intranasal steroid irrigations or sprays at least once daily for at least 2 weeks preceding enrollment; (iii) had treatment with a high-dose form of steroids (e.g., oral, parenteral, injection into polyps) and/or sinus steroid irrigations within the preceding 2 years, or refused such therapy due to intolerance/side effects; (iv) a known history of repeated courses of treatment with aggressive steroid therapy for recurrent sinusitis; and (v) endoscopic evidence of polyp recurrence, scarring, and/or obstructive mucosal edema.
  10. Patient is able to tolerate use of topical/local anesthesia and the implant procedure in an office or clinic setting.
  11. In the opinion of the physician, treatment with S8 Sinus Implant or sham procedure is technically feasible (able to pass 5-9 mm device into middle meatus) bilaterally.
  12. Female patients of child-bearing potential must not be pregnant and must agree to not become pregnant during the course of the study.
  13. Female patients of child-bearing potential must agree to use consistent and acceptable method/s of birth control during the course of the study.

Exclusion Criteria

Candidates were excluded if they met ANY of the following criteria:

General Exclusion Criteria

  1. Patient had bilateral total ethmoidectomy less than 90 days previously.
  2. Patient had Propel implanted postoperatively less than 90 days previously.
  3. Patient has presence of adhesions/synechiae Grades 3 or 4.
  4. Patient has presence of severe scarring or adhesions within the ethmoid cavity itself.
  5. Patient has presence of Grade 4 polyposis.
  6. Patient has known history of immune deficiency (e.g., IGG] subclass deficiency or IGA deficiency, HIV).
  7. Patient has concurrent condition requiring active chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy management for the disease (e.g., cancer, HIV, etc.).
  8. Patient has oral-steroid dependent condition such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma or other condition.
  9. Patient has known history of allergy or intolerance to corticosteroids or mometasone furoate (MF).
  10. Patient has known history of resistance or poor response to oral steroids.
  11. Patient has presence of physical obstruction that would preclude access to either ethmoid sinus for device delivery (e.g., severe septal deviation, septal spur, very small middle meatus, total obstruction of the nasal passage with severe scarring, polyposis).
  12. Patient has clinical evidence of acute bacterial sinusitis (e.g., acute increase in purulent discharge, fever, facial pain etc.).
  13. Patient has clinical evidence or suspicion of invasive fungal sinusitis (e.g., bone erosion on prior CT scan, necrotic sinus tissue, etc.).
  14. Patient has evidence of disease or condition expected to compromise survival or ability to complete follow-up assessments during the 6 month follow-up period.
  15. Patient is currently participating in or recently participated in another clinical trial (within the last 30 days).
  16. Patient has history of insulin dependent diabetes mellitus.
  17. Patient has previously undergone ESS and experienced a CSF leak or has residual compromised vision as a result of a complication in a prior ESS procedure.
  18. Patient has completely resected middle turbinate.
  19. Patient has known dehiscence of the lamina papyracea.
  20. Patient has evidence of active viral illness (e.g., tuberculosis, ocular herpes simplex, chickenpox, or measles).

    Ocular Exclusion Criteria

  21. Patient has history or diagnosis of glaucoma or ocular hypertension (baseline or a known prior ocular exam indicating IOP >21 mm Hg)
  22. Patient has closed angle (with or without the presence of peripheral anterior synechiae on gonioscopy)
  23. Patient has presence in either eye of: (i) posterior subcapsular cataract, (ii) nuclear sclerosis of Grade +3 or higher; or (iii) cortical cataract of Grade +3 or higher.

Sites / Locations

  • California Sinus Centers
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Sinus Center of Excellence
  • Sacramento Ear, Nose and Throat
  • Colorado Ear, Nose, Throat & Allergy
  • South Florida ENT Associates
  • ENT of Georgia
  • Northwestern University, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery
  • Advanced ENT & Allergy
  • Summit Medical Group
  • Albany ENT & Allergy Services
  • ENT and Allergy Associates
  • Piedmont Ear, Nose & Throat Associates
  • Oregon Health and Science University-Dept. of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
  • Bethlehem ENT Specialty Physicians Associates
  • University of Pennsylvania, Dept of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery
  • Medical University of South Carolina
  • Intermountain Ear, Nose & Throat Center
  • Eastern Virginia Medical School Department of Otolaryngology
  • Medical College of Wisconsin

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

S8 Sinus Implant

Control

Arm Description

In-office bilateral placement of the S8 Sinus Implant (mometasone furoate, 1350 mcg) in the ethmoid sinuses Mometasone furoate nasal spray (200mcg) once daily

In-office bilateral sham procedure Mometasone furoate nasal spray (200mcg) once daily

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Nasal Obstruction/Congestion Score
Nasal Obstruction by patients using a paper questionnaire on a scale from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). Negative values for change from baseline represented reduction (improvement) in
Bilateral Polyp Grade
Polyp grade was determined by a panel of 3 independent sinus surgeons based on a centralized, blinded videoendoscopy review. Each sinus was graded from 0 (no visible polyps) to 4 (nasal polyps completely obstructing nasal cavity) and then the left and right values were added to obtain a total bilateral polyp grade, ranging from 0 to 8. Negative values for change from baseline represented reduction (improvement) in bilateral polyp grade.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Ethmoid Sinus Obstruction
Percentage of the ethmoid sinus volume obstructed by scarring, polyps, or edema on endoscopy, as determined by a panel of 3 independent sinus surgeons based on a centralized, blinded videoendoscopy review using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (absence of obstruction) to 100 (complete obstruction). Negative values for change from baseline represented reduction (improvement) in ethmoid sinus obstruction.
Bilateral Polyp Grade
Polyps were graded by clinical investigators on a scale from 0 (no visible polyps) to 4 (nasal polyps completely obstructing nasal cavity) and then the left and right values were added to obtain a total bilateral polyp grade, ranging from 0 to 8. Negative values for change from baseline indicate reduction (improvement) in nasal polyps.
Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Score
NOSE scale is a validated symptom scoring instrument consisting of 5 questions each scored by patients on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (not a problem) to 4 (severe problem), then multiplied by 5 and resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 100. Negative values for change from baseline represented reduction (improvement) in NOSE score.
Percentage of Patients Indicated for Revision Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (RESS)
To be indicated for RESS, the following criteria had to be met: Continued to use topical intranasal steroids daily; Continued to complain of at least 2 symptoms of chronic sinusitis despite ongoing topical intranasal steroid use Needed or had received at least 1 course of aggressive steroid therapy or had refused such therapy due to intolerance/side effects; and Had endoscopic evidence of persisting ethmoid sinus obstruction (bilateral polyp grade >=2 on at least one side)

Full Information

First Posted
November 14, 2012
Last Updated
July 18, 2018
Sponsor
Intersect ENT
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01732536
Brief Title
Steroid-Releasing S8 Sinus Implant for Recurrent Nasal Polyps
Acronym
RESOLVE
Official Title
A Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of the Steroid-Releasing S8 Sinus Implant Used in Post-Sinus Surgery Patients With Recurrent Sinus Obstruction
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2013 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Intersect ENT

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The RESOLVE Study is a randomized controlled trial with the S8 Sinus Implant in 100 chronic sinusitis patients with recurrent nasal polyps.
Detailed Description
RESOLVE is a randomized (1:1), sham-controlled, parallel group, double-blind multicenter study in 100 chronic sinusitis patients who had prior endoscopic sinus surgery and presented with recurrent nasal polyps. The objective of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the S8 Sinus Implant, a steroid-eluting sinus implant, consisting of a bioabsorbable self-expanding sinus implant coated with 1350 mcg of mometasone furoate (MF) and a single-use delivery system. Implant is placed in-office in the ethmoid sinus under local anesthesia. The coating on the S8 implant provides controlled release of MF to the sinus mucosa over 90 days, with the majority of drug released within 60 days.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Chronic Sinusitis, Nasal Polyps
Keywords
corticosteroid-eluting sinus implant, chronic rhinosinusitis, mometasone furoate, polyposis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2, Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Participants were blindfolded and earmuffed during the baseline procedure and follow-up endoscopic examinations. Implants were removed at Day 60 to allow blinded assessment of bilateral polyp grade at Day 90 by a centralized videoendoscopy review by a panel of 3 independent sinus surgeons.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
100 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
S8 Sinus Implant
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
In-office bilateral placement of the S8 Sinus Implant (mometasone furoate, 1350 mcg) in the ethmoid sinuses Mometasone furoate nasal spray (200mcg) once daily
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
In-office bilateral sham procedure Mometasone furoate nasal spray (200mcg) once daily
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
S8 Sinus Implant
Other Intervention Name(s)
SINUVA (mometasone furoate) sinus implant
Intervention Description
In-office bilateral placement of the S8 Sinus Implant (mometasone furoate, 1350 mcg) in the ethmoid sinuses
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Sham procedure
Intervention Description
In-office bilateral sham procedure
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Mometasone furoate nasal spray
Other Intervention Name(s)
Nasonex Nasal Spray
Intervention Description
Two sprays in each nostril once daily, totaling 200 mcg of mometasone furoate throughout Day 90
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Nasal Obstruction/Congestion Score
Description
Nasal Obstruction by patients using a paper questionnaire on a scale from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). Negative values for change from baseline represented reduction (improvement) in
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Bilateral Polyp Grade
Description
Polyp grade was determined by a panel of 3 independent sinus surgeons based on a centralized, blinded videoendoscopy review. Each sinus was graded from 0 (no visible polyps) to 4 (nasal polyps completely obstructing nasal cavity) and then the left and right values were added to obtain a total bilateral polyp grade, ranging from 0 to 8. Negative values for change from baseline represented reduction (improvement) in bilateral polyp grade.
Time Frame
90 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Ethmoid Sinus Obstruction
Description
Percentage of the ethmoid sinus volume obstructed by scarring, polyps, or edema on endoscopy, as determined by a panel of 3 independent sinus surgeons based on a centralized, blinded videoendoscopy review using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (absence of obstruction) to 100 (complete obstruction). Negative values for change from baseline represented reduction (improvement) in ethmoid sinus obstruction.
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Bilateral Polyp Grade
Description
Polyps were graded by clinical investigators on a scale from 0 (no visible polyps) to 4 (nasal polyps completely obstructing nasal cavity) and then the left and right values were added to obtain a total bilateral polyp grade, ranging from 0 to 8. Negative values for change from baseline indicate reduction (improvement) in nasal polyps.
Time Frame
90 days, 6 months
Title
Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Score
Description
NOSE scale is a validated symptom scoring instrument consisting of 5 questions each scored by patients on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (not a problem) to 4 (severe problem), then multiplied by 5 and resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 100. Negative values for change from baseline represented reduction (improvement) in NOSE score.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Percentage of Patients Indicated for Revision Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (RESS)
Description
To be indicated for RESS, the following criteria had to be met: Continued to use topical intranasal steroids daily; Continued to complain of at least 2 symptoms of chronic sinusitis despite ongoing topical intranasal steroid use Needed or had received at least 1 course of aggressive steroid therapy or had refused such therapy due to intolerance/side effects; and Had endoscopic evidence of persisting ethmoid sinus obstruction (bilateral polyp grade >=2 on at least one side)
Time Frame
90 days, 6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria Candidates for this study had to meet ALL of the following inclusion criteria: 1. General Inclusion Criteria Patient has provided written informed consent using a form approved by the reviewing IRB. Patient is ≥ 18 years of age. Patient is willing and able to comply with protocol requirements. Patient has a previous confirmed diagnosis of CS defined as inflammation of the mucosa of the paranasal sinuses. Patient has undergone bilateral total ethmoidectomy (must be at least 90 day beyond the date of last sinus surgery). Patient has recurrent bilateral sinus obstruction due to polyposis (Grades 1 through 3 only). Patient must have a Grade 2 polyposis on at least 1 ethmoid side. Patient is able to tolerate the use of Nasonex topical intranasal steroid spray once daily. Patient is indicated for a repeat ESS per the study definition. Patient must have: (i) a minimum symptom burden on the SNOT 22, consisting of a minimum score of 2 on at least 2 of the 5 hallmark symptoms of CS (nasal blockage, post-nasal discharge, thick nasal discharge, facial pain/pressure, and decreased sense of smell); (ii) persistent symptoms of CS despite ongoing treatment with topical intranasal steroid irrigations or sprays at least once daily for at least 2 weeks preceding enrollment; (iii) had treatment with a high-dose form of steroids (e.g., oral, parenteral, injection into polyps) and/or sinus steroid irrigations within the preceding 2 years, or refused such therapy due to intolerance/side effects; (iv) a known history of repeated courses of treatment with aggressive steroid therapy for recurrent sinusitis; and (v) endoscopic evidence of polyp recurrence, scarring, and/or obstructive mucosal edema. Patient is able to tolerate use of topical/local anesthesia and the implant procedure in an office or clinic setting. In the opinion of the physician, treatment with S8 Sinus Implant or sham procedure is technically feasible (able to pass 5-9 mm device into middle meatus) bilaterally. Female patients of child-bearing potential must not be pregnant and must agree to not become pregnant during the course of the study. Female patients of child-bearing potential must agree to use consistent and acceptable method/s of birth control during the course of the study. Exclusion Criteria Candidates were excluded if they met ANY of the following criteria: General Exclusion Criteria Patient had bilateral total ethmoidectomy less than 90 days previously. Patient had Propel implanted postoperatively less than 90 days previously. Patient has presence of adhesions/synechiae Grades 3 or 4. Patient has presence of severe scarring or adhesions within the ethmoid cavity itself. Patient has presence of Grade 4 polyposis. Patient has known history of immune deficiency (e.g., IGG] subclass deficiency or IGA deficiency, HIV). Patient has concurrent condition requiring active chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy management for the disease (e.g., cancer, HIV, etc.). Patient has oral-steroid dependent condition such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma or other condition. Patient has known history of allergy or intolerance to corticosteroids or mometasone furoate (MF). Patient has known history of resistance or poor response to oral steroids. Patient has presence of physical obstruction that would preclude access to either ethmoid sinus for device delivery (e.g., severe septal deviation, septal spur, very small middle meatus, total obstruction of the nasal passage with severe scarring, polyposis). Patient has clinical evidence of acute bacterial sinusitis (e.g., acute increase in purulent discharge, fever, facial pain etc.). Patient has clinical evidence or suspicion of invasive fungal sinusitis (e.g., bone erosion on prior CT scan, necrotic sinus tissue, etc.). Patient has evidence of disease or condition expected to compromise survival or ability to complete follow-up assessments during the 6 month follow-up period. Patient is currently participating in or recently participated in another clinical trial (within the last 30 days). Patient has history of insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Patient has previously undergone ESS and experienced a CSF leak or has residual compromised vision as a result of a complication in a prior ESS procedure. Patient has completely resected middle turbinate. Patient has known dehiscence of the lamina papyracea. Patient has evidence of active viral illness (e.g., tuberculosis, ocular herpes simplex, chickenpox, or measles). Ocular Exclusion Criteria Patient has history or diagnosis of glaucoma or ocular hypertension (baseline or a known prior ocular exam indicating IOP >21 mm Hg) Patient has closed angle (with or without the presence of peripheral anterior synechiae on gonioscopy) Patient has presence in either eye of: (i) posterior subcapsular cataract, (ii) nuclear sclerosis of Grade +3 or higher; or (iii) cortical cataract of Grade +3 or higher.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Keith D Forwith, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Advanced ENT and Allergy
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joseph K Han, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Eastern Virginia Medical School Department of Otolaryngology
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
California Sinus Centers
City
Atherton
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94027
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Sinus Center of Excellence
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90048
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sacramento Ear, Nose and Throat
City
Sacramento
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95815
Country
United States
Facility Name
Colorado Ear, Nose, Throat & Allergy
City
Colorado Springs
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80909
Country
United States
Facility Name
South Florida ENT Associates
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33176
Country
United States
Facility Name
ENT of Georgia
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30342
Country
United States
Facility Name
Northwestern University, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States
Facility Name
Advanced ENT & Allergy
City
Louisville
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40207
Country
United States
Facility Name
Summit Medical Group
City
Berkeley Heights
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07922
Country
United States
Facility Name
Albany ENT & Allergy Services
City
Albany
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
12206
Country
United States
Facility Name
ENT and Allergy Associates
City
Lake Success
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11042
Country
United States
Facility Name
Piedmont Ear, Nose & Throat Associates
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Oregon Health and Science University-Dept. of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97239
Country
United States
Facility Name
Bethlehem ENT Specialty Physicians Associates
City
Bethlehem
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
18017
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pennsylvania, Dept of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medical University of South Carolina
City
Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29425
Country
United States
Facility Name
Intermountain Ear, Nose & Throat Center
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84102
Country
United States
Facility Name
Eastern Virginia Medical School Department of Otolaryngology
City
Norfolk
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23507
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medical College of Wisconsin
City
Milwaukee
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53266
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
No plan
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25266981
Citation
Han JK, Forwith KD, Smith TL, Kern RC, Brown WJ, Miller SK, Ow RA, Poetker DM, Karanfilov B, Matheny KE, Stambaugh J, Gawlicka AK. RESOLVE: a randomized, controlled, blinded study of bioabsorbable steroid-eluting sinus implants for in-office treatment of recurrent sinonasal polyposis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014 Nov;4(11):861-70. doi: 10.1002/alr.21426. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26992115
Citation
Forwith KD, Han JK, Stolovitzky JP, Yen DM, Chandra RK, Karanfilov B, Matheny KE, Stambaugh JW, Gawlicka AK. RESOLVE: bioabsorbable steroid-eluting sinus implants for in-office treatment of recurrent sinonasal polyposis after sinus surgery: 6-month outcomes from a randomized, controlled, blinded study. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016 Jun;6(6):573-81. doi: 10.1002/alr.21741. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Steroid-Releasing S8 Sinus Implant for Recurrent Nasal Polyps

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs