search
Back to results

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Lastacaft® Compared to Pataday™ and Placebo in Patients With Acute Allergic Conjunctivitis

Primary Purpose

Conjunctivitis, Allergic

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Alcaftadine 0.25%
Olopatadine 0.2%
dextran 70 0.1%/hydroxypropyl methylcellulose 0.3%
Sponsored by
Allergan
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Conjunctivitis, Allergic

Eligibility Criteria

10 Years - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • History of ocular allergies within the past 24 months.
  • Able to avoid wearing contact lenses for at least 72 hours prior to and during the study trial period.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any presence of active ocular infection or history of an ocular herpetic infection.
  • Ocular surgery within 3 months prior to the first visit or refractive surgery within the past 6 months.
  • Have any planned surgery during the study or 30 days after the study.

Sites / Locations

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Lastacaft®

Pataday™

Placebo (dextran 70 0.1%/hydroxypropyl methylcellulose 0.3%)

Arm Description

One drop of Lastacaft® (Alcaftadine 0.25%) administered in both eyes on Day 0.

One drop of Pataday™ (Olopatadine 0.2%) administered in both eyes on Day 0.

One drop of Placebo (dextran 70 0.1%/hydroxypropyl methylcellulose 0.3%) administered in both eyes on Day 0.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Ocular Itching Evaluated by the Subject 3 Minutes Post Challenge on Day 0
Ocular itching is evaluated by the subject at 3 minutes post challenge on Day 0 (Visit 3B). Subjects score their ocular itching on a 9-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None to 4=Incapacitating Itch with an Irresistible Urge to Rub (0.5 increments are allowed). For each subject, the score for both eyes is averaged (i.e., one score per subject). A lower score is indicative of less itching.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Ocular Itching Evaluated by the Subject at 5 and 7 Minutes Post Challenge on Day 0
Ocular itching is evaluated by the subject at 5 and 7 minutes post challenge on Day 0 (Visit 3B). Subjects score their ocular itching on a 9-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None to 4=Incapacitating Itch with an Irresistible Urge to Rub (0.5 increments are allowed). For each subject, the score for both eyes is averaged (i.e., one score per subject). A lower score is indicative of less itching.
Percentage of Subjects With Minimal Itching Score at 3, 5, and 7 Minutes Post Challenge on Day 0
Ocular itching is evaluated by the subject at 3, 5, and 7 minutes post challenge on Day 0 (Visit 3B). Subjects score their ocular itching on a 9-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None to 4=Incapacitating Itch with an Irresistible Urge to Rub (0.5 increments are allowed). For each subject, the score for both eyes is averaged (i.e., one score per subject). Minimal itching is considered a score <1.
Percentage of Subjects With a Zero Itch Score at 3, 5, and 7 Minutes Post Challenge on Day 0
Ocular itching is evaluated by the subject at 3, 5, and 7 minutes post challenge on Day 0 (Visit 3B). Subjects score their ocular itching on a 9-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None to 4=Incapacitating Itch with an Irresistible Urge to Rub (0.5 increments are allowed). For each subject, the score for both eyes is averaged (i.e., one score per subject). Zero itch is considered a score = 0.
Percentage of Subject Eyes in Each Category of the Itching Score Distribution Post Challenge on Day 0
Ocular itching is evaluated by the subject at Hour 16 post challenge on Day 0. Subjects score their ocular itching on a 9-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None to 4=Incapacitating Itch with an Irresistible Urge to Rub (0.5 increments are allowed).
Conjunctival Redness Evaluated by the Investigator at 7, 15, and 20 Minutes Post Challenge on Day 0
The conjunctiva is a thin membrane that covers the inner surface of the eyelid and the white part of the eye. Conjunctival redness is evaluated by the investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge on Day 0 (Visit 3B). Investigators score conjunctival redness on a 9-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None to 4=Extremely Severe (0.5 increments are allowed). For each subject, the score for both eyes is averaged (i.e., one score per subject). A lower score is indicative of less conjunctival redness.
Ciliary Redness Evaluated by the Investigator at 7, 15, and 20 Minutes Post Challenge on Day 0
Ciliary redness is redness spreading out around the cornea of the eye. Ciliary redness is evaluated by the investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge on Day 0 (Visit 3B). Investigators score ciliary redness on a 9-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None to 4=Extremely Severe (0.5 increments are allowed). For each subject, the score for both eyes is averaged (i.e., one score per subject). A lower score is indicative of less ciliary redness.
Episcleral Redness Evaluated by the Investigator at 7, 15, and 20 Minutes Post Challenge on Day 0
The episclera is the tissue that lies over the white part of the eye. Episcleral redness is evaluated by the investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge on Day 0 (Visit 3B). Investigators score episcleral redness on a 9-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None to 4=Extremely Severe (0.5 increments are allowed). For each subject, the score for both eyes is averaged (i.e., one score per subject). A lower score is indicative of less episcleral redness.
Chemosis Evaluated by the Investigator at 7, 15, and 20 Minutes Post Challenge on Day 0
Chemosis is swelling of the tissue that lines the eyelids and surface of the eye. Chemosis is evaluated by the investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge on Day 0 (Visit 3B). Investigators score chemosis on a 9-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None to 4=Severe (0.5 increments are allowed). For each subject, the score for both eyes is averaged (i.e., one score per subject). A lower score is indicative of less chemosis.
Eyelid Swelling Evaluated by the Subject at 7, 15, and 20 Minutes Post Challenge on Day 0
Eyelid swelling is evaluated by the subject at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge on Day 0 (Visit 3B). Subjects score eyelid swelling on a 4-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None to 3=Severe. For each subject, the score for both eyes is averaged (i.e., one score per subject). A lower score is indicative of less lid swelling.
Tearing Evaluated by the Subject at 7, 15, and 20 Minutes Post Challenge on Day 0
Tearing is evaluated by the subject at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge on Day 0 (Visit 3B). Subjects score tearing on a 5-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None/Normal to 4=Very Severe. For each subject, the score for both eyes is averaged (i.e., one score per subject). A lower score is indicative of less tearing.

Full Information

First Posted
November 19, 2012
Last Updated
November 27, 2013
Sponsor
Allergan
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01732757
Brief Title
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Lastacaft® Compared to Pataday™ and Placebo in Patients With Acute Allergic Conjunctivitis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2012 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Allergan

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study will evaluate the efficacy of Lastacaft® (Alcaftadine 0.25%) and Pataday™ (Olopatadine 0.2%) as compared to each other and to placebo in the prevention of ocular itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Conjunctivitis, Allergic

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
157 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Lastacaft®
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
One drop of Lastacaft® (Alcaftadine 0.25%) administered in both eyes on Day 0.
Arm Title
Pataday™
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
One drop of Pataday™ (Olopatadine 0.2%) administered in both eyes on Day 0.
Arm Title
Placebo (dextran 70 0.1%/hydroxypropyl methylcellulose 0.3%)
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
One drop of Placebo (dextran 70 0.1%/hydroxypropyl methylcellulose 0.3%) administered in both eyes on Day 0.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Alcaftadine 0.25%
Other Intervention Name(s)
Lastacaft®
Intervention Description
One drop of Lastacaft® (Alcaftadine 0.25%) administered in both eyes on Day 0.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Olopatadine 0.2%
Other Intervention Name(s)
Pataday™
Intervention Description
One drop of Pataday™ (Olopatadine 0.2%) administered in both eyes on Day 0.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
dextran 70 0.1%/hydroxypropyl methylcellulose 0.3%
Other Intervention Name(s)
Tears Naturale II
Intervention Description
One drop of placebo (dextran 70 0.1%/hydroxypropyl methylcellulose 0.3%) administered in both eyes on Day 0.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Ocular Itching Evaluated by the Subject 3 Minutes Post Challenge on Day 0
Description
Ocular itching is evaluated by the subject at 3 minutes post challenge on Day 0 (Visit 3B). Subjects score their ocular itching on a 9-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None to 4=Incapacitating Itch with an Irresistible Urge to Rub (0.5 increments are allowed). For each subject, the score for both eyes is averaged (i.e., one score per subject). A lower score is indicative of less itching.
Time Frame
Day 0 at 3 Minutes Post Challenge
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Ocular Itching Evaluated by the Subject at 5 and 7 Minutes Post Challenge on Day 0
Description
Ocular itching is evaluated by the subject at 5 and 7 minutes post challenge on Day 0 (Visit 3B). Subjects score their ocular itching on a 9-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None to 4=Incapacitating Itch with an Irresistible Urge to Rub (0.5 increments are allowed). For each subject, the score for both eyes is averaged (i.e., one score per subject). A lower score is indicative of less itching.
Time Frame
Day 0
Title
Percentage of Subjects With Minimal Itching Score at 3, 5, and 7 Minutes Post Challenge on Day 0
Description
Ocular itching is evaluated by the subject at 3, 5, and 7 minutes post challenge on Day 0 (Visit 3B). Subjects score their ocular itching on a 9-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None to 4=Incapacitating Itch with an Irresistible Urge to Rub (0.5 increments are allowed). For each subject, the score for both eyes is averaged (i.e., one score per subject). Minimal itching is considered a score <1.
Time Frame
Day 0
Title
Percentage of Subjects With a Zero Itch Score at 3, 5, and 7 Minutes Post Challenge on Day 0
Description
Ocular itching is evaluated by the subject at 3, 5, and 7 minutes post challenge on Day 0 (Visit 3B). Subjects score their ocular itching on a 9-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None to 4=Incapacitating Itch with an Irresistible Urge to Rub (0.5 increments are allowed). For each subject, the score for both eyes is averaged (i.e., one score per subject). Zero itch is considered a score = 0.
Time Frame
Day 0
Title
Percentage of Subject Eyes in Each Category of the Itching Score Distribution Post Challenge on Day 0
Description
Ocular itching is evaluated by the subject at Hour 16 post challenge on Day 0. Subjects score their ocular itching on a 9-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None to 4=Incapacitating Itch with an Irresistible Urge to Rub (0.5 increments are allowed).
Time Frame
Day 0
Title
Conjunctival Redness Evaluated by the Investigator at 7, 15, and 20 Minutes Post Challenge on Day 0
Description
The conjunctiva is a thin membrane that covers the inner surface of the eyelid and the white part of the eye. Conjunctival redness is evaluated by the investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge on Day 0 (Visit 3B). Investigators score conjunctival redness on a 9-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None to 4=Extremely Severe (0.5 increments are allowed). For each subject, the score for both eyes is averaged (i.e., one score per subject). A lower score is indicative of less conjunctival redness.
Time Frame
Day 0
Title
Ciliary Redness Evaluated by the Investigator at 7, 15, and 20 Minutes Post Challenge on Day 0
Description
Ciliary redness is redness spreading out around the cornea of the eye. Ciliary redness is evaluated by the investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge on Day 0 (Visit 3B). Investigators score ciliary redness on a 9-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None to 4=Extremely Severe (0.5 increments are allowed). For each subject, the score for both eyes is averaged (i.e., one score per subject). A lower score is indicative of less ciliary redness.
Time Frame
Day 0
Title
Episcleral Redness Evaluated by the Investigator at 7, 15, and 20 Minutes Post Challenge on Day 0
Description
The episclera is the tissue that lies over the white part of the eye. Episcleral redness is evaluated by the investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge on Day 0 (Visit 3B). Investigators score episcleral redness on a 9-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None to 4=Extremely Severe (0.5 increments are allowed). For each subject, the score for both eyes is averaged (i.e., one score per subject). A lower score is indicative of less episcleral redness.
Time Frame
Day 0
Title
Chemosis Evaluated by the Investigator at 7, 15, and 20 Minutes Post Challenge on Day 0
Description
Chemosis is swelling of the tissue that lines the eyelids and surface of the eye. Chemosis is evaluated by the investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge on Day 0 (Visit 3B). Investigators score chemosis on a 9-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None to 4=Severe (0.5 increments are allowed). For each subject, the score for both eyes is averaged (i.e., one score per subject). A lower score is indicative of less chemosis.
Time Frame
Day 0
Title
Eyelid Swelling Evaluated by the Subject at 7, 15, and 20 Minutes Post Challenge on Day 0
Description
Eyelid swelling is evaluated by the subject at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge on Day 0 (Visit 3B). Subjects score eyelid swelling on a 4-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None to 3=Severe. For each subject, the score for both eyes is averaged (i.e., one score per subject). A lower score is indicative of less lid swelling.
Time Frame
Day 0
Title
Tearing Evaluated by the Subject at 7, 15, and 20 Minutes Post Challenge on Day 0
Description
Tearing is evaluated by the subject at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge on Day 0 (Visit 3B). Subjects score tearing on a 5-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None/Normal to 4=Very Severe. For each subject, the score for both eyes is averaged (i.e., one score per subject). A lower score is indicative of less tearing.
Time Frame
Day 0

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
10 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: History of ocular allergies within the past 24 months. Able to avoid wearing contact lenses for at least 72 hours prior to and during the study trial period. Exclusion Criteria: Any presence of active ocular infection or history of an ocular herpetic infection. Ocular surgery within 3 months prior to the first visit or refractive surgery within the past 6 months. Have any planned surgery during the study or 30 days after the study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Medical Director
Organizational Affiliation
Allergan
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Memphis
State/Province
Tennessee
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25260889
Citation
McLaurin EB, Marsico NP, Ackerman SL, Ciolino JB, Williams JM, Villanueva L, Hollander DA. Ocular itch relief with alcaftadine 0.25% versus olopatadine 0.2% in allergic conjunctivitis: pooled analysis of two multicenter randomized clinical trials. Adv Ther. 2014 Oct;31(10):1059-71. doi: 10.1007/s12325-014-0155-3. Epub 2014 Sep 27.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Lastacaft® Compared to Pataday™ and Placebo in Patients With Acute Allergic Conjunctivitis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs