search
Back to results

Prophylactic Pancreatic Duct Stent Placement After ESP of Major Papillary Tumors; Prospective, Randomized Study (PDS)

Primary Purpose

Ampulla of Vater Adenoma

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Korea, Republic of
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Endoscopic snare papillectomy
Sponsored by
Soonchunhyang University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Ampulla of Vater Adenoma focused on measuring Ampulla of Vater adenoma

Eligibility Criteria

20 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: 20 to 80 years, Histopathologically proven ampullary adenoma

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lesions with irregular margin, ulceration and spontaneous or easy to bleeding which presenting malignancy.
  • Extensive lesion into PD or BD on ERCP, EUS or IDUS.
  • Tumor size > 4cm
  • Bleeding tendency

Sites / Locations

  • Institute for Digestive Research, Digestive Disease center, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Group A

Group B

Arm Description

Endoscopic snare papillectomy (ESP) was performed by using diagnostic or therapeutic duodenoscope (JF-240, TJF-240, JF-260, TJF-260; Olympus Optical Co, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan). A pancreatic duct stent was inserted immediately after the excision.

Endoscopic snare papillectomy (ESP) was performed by using diagnostic or therapeutic duodenoscope (JF-240, TJF-240, JF-260, TJF-260; Olympus Optical Co, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan). A pancreatic duct stent was not inserted immediately after the excision.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Prophylactic pancreatic duct stent placement after endoscopic snare papillectomy of duodenal major papillary tumors; prospective, randomized, controlled study
The incidence of post-ESP pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia

Secondary Outcome Measures

Prophylactic pancreatic duct stent placement after endoscopic snare papillectomy of duodenal major papillary tumors; prospective, randomized, controlled study
The incidence of post-ESP pancreatitis, hyperamylasemia and post-ESP pancreatitis risk factors was compared between the groups.

Full Information

First Posted
November 16, 2012
Last Updated
December 1, 2012
Sponsor
Soonchunhyang University Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01737463
Brief Title
Prophylactic Pancreatic Duct Stent Placement After ESP of Major Papillary Tumors; Prospective, Randomized Study
Acronym
PDS
Official Title
Prophylactic Pancreatic Duct Stent Placement After Endoscopic Snare Papillectomy of Duodenal Major Papillary Tumors; Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
March 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 2013 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 2014 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Soonchunhyang University Hospital

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Endoscopic snare papillectomy (ESP) is an efficient treatment for benign tumors of the duodenal major papilla. But post-ESP pancreatitis is the most common and serious complication. Since one prospective randomized controlled trial showed that pancreatic duct stent placement reduced post-ESP pancreatitis, almost physicians have tried to place the pancreatic duct stent after EPS. The aim of this prospective, randomized, multicenter trial is to compare the rates of post-ESP pancreatitis in patients who did or did not prophylactic pancreatic duct stent placement. Consecutive patients who were to undergo ESP were to randomized to pancreatic duct stent placement group (stent group) after endoscopic snare papillectomy or to no pancreatic duct stent placement group (no stent group).
Detailed Description
The patient was adequately sedated by intravenous administration of midazolam with or without meperidine. ESP and pancreatic duct stent insertion were undertaken using two methods: conventional and wire-guieded ESP. The conventional ESP method was performed as in the follows. After placing the tip of the duodenoscope on the tumor, the snare was deployed so that it grasped the base of the tumor. Constant tension was applied to the snare loop during excision until the lesion was transected. Excision was performed with a small sized electrosurgical snare. A pancreatic duct stent was or was not inserted immediately after the excision. The wire-guided ESP method was performed as follows. An ERCP catheter was inserted into the pancreatic duct. Then, a 0.035-inch guidewire was inserted through the catheter and deep into the main pancreatic duct. After the ERCP catheter was removed, the loop of an electrosurgical snare with a maximum sheath diameter of 1.8 mm was passed over the guidewire, in monorail fashion, and the snare was closed lightly. The snare was introduced next to the guidewire into the accessory channel of the duodenoscope. After the tip of the duodenoscope was placed on the tumor, the snare was deployed so that it grasped the base of the tumor. Constant tension was applied to the snare loop during excision until the lesion was transected. After the excision was completed, a pancreatic duct stent was immediately passed over the guidewire previously placed in the pancreatic duct and was positioned across the pancreatic-duct orifice. ESP was performed by using the blend mode or endocut mode setting on the electrosurgical generator. A straight or single pigtail type, 3- to 9-cm, 3 to 7F polyethylene pancreatic duct stent was used. Post-papillectomy bleeding was treated with argon plasma coagulation (APC) and/or endoscopic clipping or epinephrine injection. APC was carried out with a power setting of 60 W and a gas flow of 2 L/min. One to seven days after stent placement, a plain abdominal radiograph was obtained to determine its position. If it had not passed spontaneously, it was removed endoscopically from those patients with no evidence of pancreatitis.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Ampulla of Vater Adenoma
Keywords
Ampulla of Vater adenoma

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
100 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Group A
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Endoscopic snare papillectomy (ESP) was performed by using diagnostic or therapeutic duodenoscope (JF-240, TJF-240, JF-260, TJF-260; Olympus Optical Co, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan). A pancreatic duct stent was inserted immediately after the excision.
Arm Title
Group B
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Endoscopic snare papillectomy (ESP) was performed by using diagnostic or therapeutic duodenoscope (JF-240, TJF-240, JF-260, TJF-260; Olympus Optical Co, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan). A pancreatic duct stent was not inserted immediately after the excision.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Endoscopic snare papillectomy
Intervention Description
Endoscopic snare papillectomy (ESP) was performed by using diagnostic or therapeutic duodenoscope. A pancreatic duct stent was or was not inserted immediately after the excision.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Prophylactic pancreatic duct stent placement after endoscopic snare papillectomy of duodenal major papillary tumors; prospective, randomized, controlled study
Description
The incidence of post-ESP pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia
Time Frame
after October 1, 2012 (up to 2 years)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Prophylactic pancreatic duct stent placement after endoscopic snare papillectomy of duodenal major papillary tumors; prospective, randomized, controlled study
Description
The incidence of post-ESP pancreatitis, hyperamylasemia and post-ESP pancreatitis risk factors was compared between the groups.
Time Frame
after October 1, 2012 (up to 2 years)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age: 20 to 80 years, Histopathologically proven ampullary adenoma Exclusion Criteria: Lesions with irregular margin, ulceration and spontaneous or easy to bleeding which presenting malignancy. Extensive lesion into PD or BD on ERCP, EUS or IDUS. Tumor size > 4cm Bleeding tendency
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sang-Woo Cha, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Institute for Digestive Research, Digestive Disease Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Institute for Digestive Research, Digestive Disease center, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine
City
Yongsan-gu
State/Province
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
140-743
Country
Korea, Republic of

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Prophylactic Pancreatic Duct Stent Placement After ESP of Major Papillary Tumors; Prospective, Randomized Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs