Study of the Efficacy of Dienogest in the Treatment of Uterine Leiomyomas When Compared to Desogestrel and Goserelin
Primary Purpose
Uterine Leiomyoma
Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Dienogest
Goserelin
Desogestrel
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Uterine Leiomyoma
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women with 35 - 55 years of age
- Uterine volume between 50cc and 500cc
- Abnormal uterine bleeding probably associated to intramural uterine leiomyomas
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy
- Liver or kidney dysfunction
- Women with only submucosal or subserosal uterine leiomyomas
- Women with contraindications to any of the drugs (categories 3 and 4 of WHO eligibility criteria)
- Use of anticoagulants
- Others causes of abnormal uterine bleeding (endometrial pathology, cervical pathology)
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Dienogest
Goserelin
Desogestrel
Arm Description
Dienogest 2mg pills daily during 6 months
Goserelin 10.8mg preloaded syringe subcutaneously at the start of the study and after 3 months
Desogestrel 75mcg pills daily during six months
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Leiomyoma Volume
Secondary Outcome Measures
Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart (PBAC) Score Reduction
Number of episodes of vaginal bleeding
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01738724
First Posted
November 23, 2012
Last Updated
August 11, 2020
Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01738724
Brief Title
Study of the Efficacy of Dienogest in the Treatment of Uterine Leiomyomas When Compared to Desogestrel and Goserelin
Official Title
Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Women With Uterine Leiomyomas: Open Randomized Clinical Trial Of Non Inferiority Between Oral Dienogest, Oral Desogestrel and Subcutaneous Goserelin
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
PI went for a post-doc course and when he came back he moved for another job
Study Start Date
January 2012 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2017 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The investigators´aim is to assess whether the progestagen dienogest reduces leiomyoma volume and its associated symptoms to the same extent as gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogs or the progestagen desogestrel or whether it is inferior to other drugs already in use.
Detailed Description
Uterine leiomyoma is a very prevalent condition among women and, although it is mainly asymptomatic, it may be related to bothersome or debilitating symptoms, such as uterine bleeding and pelvic pain or pressure. The standard treatment is surgical (hysterectomy or myomectomy), but there has been continued interest on medical treatments. Progestagens have long been used to control bleeding associated to leiomyomas, but they have not been able to decrease myoma volume. GnRH analogs are well stablished agents, capable of controlling symptoms and decreasing the tumors´volume, but their use is limited by bone loss and menopausal symptoms. A newly introduced progestagen, dienogest, has been studied to treat endometriosis, but its effects on leiomyoma are only starting to be assessed. The investigators are aiming to compare dienogest with the GnRH analog goserelin and the progestagen desogestrel in a randomized trial to see how this new treatment compares with previously used drugs and whether it is similar, inferior or superior to them on controlling leiomyoma associated symptoms and decreasing leiomyoma volume.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Uterine Leiomyoma
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
14 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Dienogest
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Dienogest 2mg pills daily during 6 months
Arm Title
Goserelin
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Goserelin 10.8mg preloaded syringe subcutaneously at the start of the study and after 3 months
Arm Title
Desogestrel
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Desogestrel 75mcg pills daily during six months
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Dienogest
Other Intervention Name(s)
Allurene, Visanne
Intervention Description
Dienogest 2mg pills daily during 6 months
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Goserelin
Other Intervention Name(s)
Zoladex
Intervention Description
Goserelin 10.8mg preloaded syringe subcutaneously at the start of the study and after 3 months
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Desogestrel
Other Intervention Name(s)
Cerazette
Intervention Description
Desogestrel 75mcg pills daily during six months
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Leiomyoma Volume
Time Frame
After 6 months of medical therapy
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart (PBAC) Score Reduction
Time Frame
After 6 months of medical therapy
Title
Number of episodes of vaginal bleeding
Time Frame
After 6 months of medical therapy
10. Eligibility
Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
35 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
55 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Women with 35 - 55 years of age
Uterine volume between 50cc and 500cc
Abnormal uterine bleeding probably associated to intramural uterine leiomyomas
Exclusion Criteria:
Pregnancy
Liver or kidney dysfunction
Women with only submucosal or subserosal uterine leiomyomas
Women with contraindications to any of the drugs (categories 3 and 4 of WHO eligibility criteria)
Use of anticoagulants
Others causes of abnormal uterine bleeding (endometrial pathology, cervical pathology)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Luiz Gustavo O Brito, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
FMRP-USP
Official's Role
Study Chair
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Study of the Efficacy of Dienogest in the Treatment of Uterine Leiomyomas When Compared to Desogestrel and Goserelin
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs