search
Back to results

A Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib (E7080) Versus Sorafenib in First-line Treatment of Participants With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Primary Purpose

Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Lenvatinib
Sorafenib
Sponsored by
Eisai Limited
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) focused on measuring Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Neoplasms, Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers
  1. Participants must have confirmed diagnosis of unresectable HCC with any of the following criteria:

    • Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of HCC.
    • Clinically confirmed diagnosis of HCC according to American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) criteria, including cirrhosis of any etiology or with chronic hepatitis B or C infection criteria
  2. At least one measurable target lesion according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) meeting the following criteria:

    • Hepatic lesion

    1. The lesion can be accurately measured in at least one dimension as >=1.0 centimeter (cm) (viable tumor for typical; and longest diameter for atypical), and
    2. The lesion is suitable for repeat measurement.

      • Nonhepatic lesion

    3. Lymph node (LN) lesion that measures at least one dimension as >=1.5 cm in the short axis, except for porta hepatis LN that measures >=2.0 cm in the short axis.
    4. Non-nodal lesion that measures >=1.0 cm in the longest diameter Lesions previously treated with radiotherapy or locoregional therapy must show radiographic evidence of disease progression to be deemed a target lesion.
  3. Participants categorized to stage B (not applicable for transarterial chemoembolization [TACE]) or stage C based on Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system.
  4. Adequate bone marrow function, defined as:

    • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >=1.5 X 10^9 per liter (/L)
    • Hemoglobin (Hb) >=8.5 gram per deciliter (g/dL)
    • Platelet count >=75 X 10^9/L.
  5. Adequate liver function, defined as:

    • Albumin >=2.8 g/dL
    • Bilirubin less than or equal to (<=) 3.0 mg/dL
    • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) <=5 X the upper limit of normal (ULN).
  6. Adequate blood coagulation function, defined as international normalized ratio (INR) <=2.3.
  7. Adequate renal function defined as creatinine clearance greater than (>) 40 milliliter per minute (mL/min) calculated per the Cockcroft and Gault formula.
  8. Adequate pancreatic function, defined as amylase and lipase <=1.5 X ULN.
  9. Adequately controlled blood pressure (BP) with up to 3 antihypertensive agents, defined as BP <=150/90 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) at Screening and no change in antihypertensive therapy within 1 week prior to the Cycle1/Day1.
  10. Child-Pugh score A.
  11. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)- performance status (PS) 0 or 1.
  12. Males or females aged at least 18 years (or any age >18 years as determined by country legislation) at the time of informed consent.
  13. Females must not be lactating or pregnant at Screening or Baseline (as documented by a negative beta-human chorionic gonadotropin [B-hCG] test with a minimum sensitivity of 25 International Units Per Liter (IU/L) or equivalent units of BhCG).

    A separate baseline assessment is required if a negative screening pregnancy test was obtained more than 72 hours before the first dose of study drug.

  14. All females will be considered to be of childbearing potential unless they are postmenopausal (amenorrheic for at least 12 consecutive months, in the appropriate age group and without other known or suspected cause) or have been sterilized surgically (ie, bilateral tubal ligation, total hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy, all with surgery at least 1 month before dosing).
  15. Females of childbearing potential must not have had unprotected sexual intercourse within 30 days before study entry and must agree to use a highly effective method of contraception (e.g., total abstinence, an intrauterine device, a double barrier method [such as condom plus diaphragm with spermicide], a contraceptive implant, an oral contraceptive, or have a vasectomized partner with confirmed azoospermia) throughout the entire study period and for 30 days after study drug discontinuation. If currently abstinent, the participant must agree to use a double barrier method as described above if she becomes sexually active during the study period or for 30 days after study drug discontinuation. Females who are using hormonal contraceptives must have been on a stable dose of the same hormonal contraceptive product for at least 4 weeks before dosing and must continue to use the same contraceptive during the study and for 30 days after study drug discontinuation.
  16. Male participants must have had a successful vasectomy (confirmed azoospermia) or they and their female partners must meet the criteria above (i.e., not of childbearing potential or practicing highly effective contraception throughout the study period and for 30 days after study drug discontinuation). No sperm donation is allowed during the study period and for 30 days after study drug discontinuation.
  17. Provide written informed consent.
  18. Willing and able to comply with all aspects of the protocol.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Imaging findings for HCC corresponding to any of the following:

    • HCC with >=50 percent liver occupation
    • Clear invasion into the bile duct
    • Portal vein invasion at the main portal branch (Vp4).
  2. Participants who have received any systemic chemotherapy, including anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy, or any systemic investigational anticancer agents, including lenvatinib, for advanced/unresectable HCC. Note: Participants who have received local hepatic injection chemotherapy are eligible.
  3. Participants who have received any anticancer therapy (including surgery, percutaneous ethanol injection, radio frequency ablation, transarterial [chemo] embolization, hepatic intra-arterial chemotherapy, biological, immunotherapy, hormonal, or radiotherapy) or any blood enhancing treatment (including blood transfusion, blood products, or agents that stimulate blood cell production, eg, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF]) within 28 days prior to randomization.
  4. Participants who have not recovered from toxicities as a result of prior anticancer therapy, except alopecia and infertility. Recovery is defined as < Grade 2 severity per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (CTCAE v4.0).
  5. Significant cardiovascular impairment: history of congestive heart failure > New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II, unstable angina, myocardial infarction or stroke within 6 months of the first dose of study drug, or cardiac arrhythmia requiring medical treatment at Screening.
  6. Prolongation of corrected QT interval (QTc) interval to >480 millisecond (ms)
  7. Gastrointestinal malabsorption or any other condition that might affect the absorption of lenvatinib in the opinion of the investigator.
  8. Bleeding or thrombotic disorders or use of anticoagulants requiring therapeutic INR monitoring, eg, warfarin or similar agents. Treatment with low molecular weight heparin and factor X inhibitors which do not require INR monitoring is permitted. Antiplatelet agents are prohibited throughout the study.
  9. Gastrointestinal bleeding event or active hemoptysis (bright red blood of at least 0.5 teaspoon) within 28 days prior to randomization.
  10. Gastric or esophageal varices that require interventional treatment within 28 days prior to randomization. Prophylaxis with pharmacologic therapy (eg, nonselective beta-blocker) is permitted.
  11. Active malignancy (except for HCC or definitively treated melanoma in-situ, basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or carcinoma in-situ of the cervix) within the past 36 months.
  12. Participants whose only target lesion(s) is in bone will be excluded.
  13. Meningeal carcinomatosis.
  14. Any history of or current brain or subdural metastases.
  15. Participants having >1+ proteinuria on urine dipstick testing will undergo a 24-hour urine collection for quantitative assessment of proteinuria. Participants with a urine protein >=1g/24 hours will be ineligible.
  16. Surgical arterial-portal venous shunt or arterial-venous shunt.
  17. Any medical or other condition that in the opinion of the investigator would preclude the participant's participation in a clinical study.
  18. Known intolerance to lenvatinib or sorafenib (or any of the excipients).
  19. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive or active infection requiring treatment (except for hepatitis virus).
  20. Any history of drug or alcohol dependency or abuse within the prior 6 months.
  21. Any participant who cannot be evaluated by either triphasic liver computed tomography (CT) or triphasic liver Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) because of allergy or other contraindication to both CT and MRI contrast agents.
  22. Major surgery within 3 weeks prior to randomization or scheduled for surgery during the study.
  23. Participants has had a liver transplant.

Sites / Locations

  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 2
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 2
  • Facility # 3
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 2
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 3
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 2
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 2
  • Facility # 3
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 2
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 2
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 2
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 2
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 2
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 2
  • Facility # 3
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 2
  • Facility # 3
  • Facility # 4
  • Facility # 5
  • Facility # 6
  • Facility # 7
  • Facility # 8
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 2
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 2
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 2
  • Facility # 3
  • Facility # 4
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 2
  • Facility # 3
  • Facility # 4
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 2
  • Facility # 3
  • Facility # 4
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 2
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 2
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 2
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 2
  • Facility # 3
  • Facility # 4
  • Facility # 5
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 2
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 3
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1
  • Facility # 1

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Lenvatinib

Sorafenib

Arm Description

Participants received lenvatinib capsules 12 milligram (mg) based on the participant's body weight greater than or equal to (>=) 60 kilogram (kg) or 8 mg based on the participant's body weight less than (<) 60 kg at baseline, orally, once daily (QD) in continuous 28-day treatment cycles up to documented disease progression, development of unacceptable toxicity, participant request, or withdrawal of consent.

Participants received sorafenib 400 mg tablets, orally, twice daily (BID) in continuous 28-day treatment cycles up to documented disease progression, development of unacceptable toxicity, participant request, or withdrawal of consent.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the duration from the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause. Participants who were lost to follow-up were censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, and participants who remained alive were censored at the time of data cutoff.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Progression Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression based on modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), or date of death, whichever occurred first. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters of target lesions. As planned, data for this secondary endpoint was collected and analyzed up to the primary completion date.
Time to Progression (TTP)
TTP was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression based on mRECIST. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters of target lesions. As planned, data for this secondary endpoint was collected and analyzed up to the primary completion date.
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on mRECIST. CR was defined as disappearance of any intratumoral arterial enhancement in all target lesions. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of viable (enhancement of arterial phase) target lesions taking as reference to the baseline sum of the diameters of target lesions. As planned, data for this secondary endpoint was collected and analyzed up to the primary completion date.
Time to Clinically Meaningful Worsening of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Assessed Using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
The EORTC QLQ-C30 included 30 questions comprising 9 multi-item scales: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social) and 9 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting, dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties) and a single global health and QOL status score. Most questions used a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much); 2 questions used a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). All domain scores were calculated as an average of item scores and transformed to 0 to 100 score range. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status/quality of life (QoL) represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problem. As planned, data for this secondary endpoint was collected and analyzed up to the primary completion date.
Time to Clinically Meaningful Worsening of HRQoL Assessed Using - EORTC QLQ- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Domain (HCC 18)
The EORTC QLQ-HCC-18 was an 18-item questionnaire design used along with the 30-item EORTC QLQ-C30. EORTC QLQ-HCC 18 questionnaire included 8 symptom scales such as fatigue, jaundice, body image, nutrition, pain, fever, sex life and abdominal swelling. Each individual item ranges from 1 to 4, where 1 = "not at all" and 4 = "very much." All domain scores were calculated as an average of item scores and transformed to 0 to 100 score range. A high score for a functional scale represented a high/healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status/quality of life (QoL) represented a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale/item represented a high level of symptomatology/problem. As planned, data for this secondary endpoint was collected and analyzed up to the primary completion date.
Time to Clinically Meaningful Worsening of HRQoL Assessed Using EuroQol Five Dimension Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L)
The EuroQol five dimension health questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) assesses quality of life along 5 dimensions. Participants rate 5 aspects of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) by choosing from 3 answering options (1=no problems; 2=some problems; 3=extreme problems). The summed score ranges from 3-15 with "3" corresponding to no problems and "15" corresponding to severe problems in the 5 dimensions. EQ-5D-3L also included an EQ visual analogue scale (VAS) that ranges between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health). Decrease from baseline in EQ-5D-3L signifies improvement. Total index EQ-5D-3L summary score was weighted with a range of -0.594 (worst) to 1.0 (best). EQ-5D-3L also included an EQ health utilities index (HUI) where 1.00 indicated perfect health while a score of 0.00 indicated death. As planned, data for this secondary endpoint was collected and analyzed up to the primary completion date.
Area Under the Plasma Drug Concentration-time Curve (AUC) for Lenvatinib
AUC was assessed on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 1 and Cycle 1 Day 15. Summarized data for all time points was reported. As planned, data for this secondary endpoint was collected and analyzed up to the primary completion date.

Full Information

First Posted
January 2, 2013
Last Updated
March 8, 2022
Sponsor
Eisai Limited
Collaborators
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01761266
Brief Title
A Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib (E7080) Versus Sorafenib in First-line Treatment of Participants With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Official Title
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib (E7080) Versus Sorafenib in First-Line Treatment of Subjects With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 1, 2013 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 13, 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 10, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Eisai Limited
Collaborators
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
E7080-G000-304 is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, noninferiority Phase 3 study to compare the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib versus sorafenib as a first-line systemic treatment in participants with unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
Keywords
Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Neoplasms, Cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
954 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Lenvatinib
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants received lenvatinib capsules 12 milligram (mg) based on the participant's body weight greater than or equal to (>=) 60 kilogram (kg) or 8 mg based on the participant's body weight less than (<) 60 kg at baseline, orally, once daily (QD) in continuous 28-day treatment cycles up to documented disease progression, development of unacceptable toxicity, participant request, or withdrawal of consent.
Arm Title
Sorafenib
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants received sorafenib 400 mg tablets, orally, twice daily (BID) in continuous 28-day treatment cycles up to documented disease progression, development of unacceptable toxicity, participant request, or withdrawal of consent.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Lenvatinib
Other Intervention Name(s)
E7080, Lenvima
Intervention Description
12 mg (or 8 mg) once daily (QD) oral dosing.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Sorafenib
Intervention Description
400 mg twice daily (BID) oral dosing.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall Survival (OS)
Description
OS was defined as the duration from the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause. Participants who were lost to follow-up were censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, and participants who remained alive were censored at the time of data cutoff.
Time Frame
From date of randomization until date of death from any cause (approximately up to 3.8 years)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Description
PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression based on modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), or date of death, whichever occurred first. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters of target lesions. As planned, data for this secondary endpoint was collected and analyzed up to the primary completion date.
Time Frame
From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression, or date of death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 3.8 years)
Title
Time to Progression (TTP)
Description
TTP was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression based on mRECIST. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters of target lesions. As planned, data for this secondary endpoint was collected and analyzed up to the primary completion date.
Time Frame
The time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression (approximately up to 3.8 years)
Title
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Description
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on mRECIST. CR was defined as disappearance of any intratumoral arterial enhancement in all target lesions. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of viable (enhancement of arterial phase) target lesions taking as reference to the baseline sum of the diameters of target lesions. As planned, data for this secondary endpoint was collected and analyzed up to the primary completion date.
Time Frame
From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression, or date of death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 3.8 years)
Title
Time to Clinically Meaningful Worsening of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Assessed Using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Description
The EORTC QLQ-C30 included 30 questions comprising 9 multi-item scales: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social) and 9 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting, dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties) and a single global health and QOL status score. Most questions used a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much); 2 questions used a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). All domain scores were calculated as an average of item scores and transformed to 0 to 100 score range. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status/quality of life (QoL) represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problem. As planned, data for this secondary endpoint was collected and analyzed up to the primary completion date.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Off-Treatment Visit (approximately up to 3.8 years)
Title
Time to Clinically Meaningful Worsening of HRQoL Assessed Using - EORTC QLQ- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Domain (HCC 18)
Description
The EORTC QLQ-HCC-18 was an 18-item questionnaire design used along with the 30-item EORTC QLQ-C30. EORTC QLQ-HCC 18 questionnaire included 8 symptom scales such as fatigue, jaundice, body image, nutrition, pain, fever, sex life and abdominal swelling. Each individual item ranges from 1 to 4, where 1 = "not at all" and 4 = "very much." All domain scores were calculated as an average of item scores and transformed to 0 to 100 score range. A high score for a functional scale represented a high/healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status/quality of life (QoL) represented a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale/item represented a high level of symptomatology/problem. As planned, data for this secondary endpoint was collected and analyzed up to the primary completion date.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Off-Treatment Visit (approximately up to 3.8 years)
Title
Time to Clinically Meaningful Worsening of HRQoL Assessed Using EuroQol Five Dimension Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L)
Description
The EuroQol five dimension health questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) assesses quality of life along 5 dimensions. Participants rate 5 aspects of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) by choosing from 3 answering options (1=no problems; 2=some problems; 3=extreme problems). The summed score ranges from 3-15 with "3" corresponding to no problems and "15" corresponding to severe problems in the 5 dimensions. EQ-5D-3L also included an EQ visual analogue scale (VAS) that ranges between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health). Decrease from baseline in EQ-5D-3L signifies improvement. Total index EQ-5D-3L summary score was weighted with a range of -0.594 (worst) to 1.0 (best). EQ-5D-3L also included an EQ health utilities index (HUI) where 1.00 indicated perfect health while a score of 0.00 indicated death. As planned, data for this secondary endpoint was collected and analyzed up to the primary completion date.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Off-Treatment Visit (approximately up to 3.8 years)
Title
Area Under the Plasma Drug Concentration-time Curve (AUC) for Lenvatinib
Description
AUC was assessed on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 1 and Cycle 1 Day 15. Summarized data for all time points was reported. As planned, data for this secondary endpoint was collected and analyzed up to the primary completion date.
Time Frame
Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 1: pre-dose, 0.5-4 and 6-10 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 15: pre-dose, 2-12 hours post-dose (cycle length= 28 days)
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Description
DCR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR, or stable disease (SD). Best overall response of SD must have been >=7 weeks after randomization. CR was defined as disappearance of any intratumoral arterial enhancement in all target lesions. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of viable (enhancement of arterial phase) target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum of the diameters of target lesions. SD was when a case does not qualify for either PR or PD and was new non-target lesions. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters of target lesions. As planned, data for this pre-specified endpoint was collected and analyzed up to the primary completion date.
Time Frame
From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression, or date of death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 3.8 years)
Title
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
Description
CBR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR or durable SD (duration of SD >=23 weeks after randomization). For participants whose best overall response (BOR) was SD, the duration of SD was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first documented PD or death, whichever occurred first. CR was defined as disappearance of any intratumoral arterial enhancement in all target lesions. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of viable (enhancement of arterial phase) target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum of the diameters of target lesions. SD was when a case does not qualify for either PR or PD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters of target lesions. As planned, data for this pre-specified endpoint was collected and analyzed up to the primary completion date.
Time Frame
From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression, or date of death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 3.8 years)
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Biomarker
Description
The serum biomarkers analysed were angiopoietin-2 (ANG2), fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19), fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21), fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) as blood serum biomarkers, and protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II) as a blood tumor marker in serum. As planned, data for this pre-specified endpoint was collected and analyzed up to the primary completion date.
Time Frame
Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1, Cycle 7 Day 1, Cycle 8 Day 1, Cycle 9 Day 1 and at the Off-Treatment Visit (approximately up to 3.8 years)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Participants must have confirmed diagnosis of unresectable HCC with any of the following criteria: Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of HCC. Clinically confirmed diagnosis of HCC according to American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) criteria, including cirrhosis of any etiology or with chronic hepatitis B or C infection criteria At least one measurable target lesion according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) meeting the following criteria: • Hepatic lesion The lesion can be accurately measured in at least one dimension as >=1.0 centimeter (cm) (viable tumor for typical; and longest diameter for atypical), and The lesion is suitable for repeat measurement. • Nonhepatic lesion Lymph node (LN) lesion that measures at least one dimension as >=1.5 cm in the short axis, except for porta hepatis LN that measures >=2.0 cm in the short axis. Non-nodal lesion that measures >=1.0 cm in the longest diameter Lesions previously treated with radiotherapy or locoregional therapy must show radiographic evidence of disease progression to be deemed a target lesion. Participants categorized to stage B (not applicable for transarterial chemoembolization [TACE]) or stage C based on Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system. Adequate bone marrow function, defined as: Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >=1.5 X 10^9 per liter (/L) Hemoglobin (Hb) >=8.5 gram per deciliter (g/dL) Platelet count >=75 X 10^9/L. Adequate liver function, defined as: Albumin >=2.8 g/dL Bilirubin less than or equal to (<=) 3.0 mg/dL Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) <=5 X the upper limit of normal (ULN). Adequate blood coagulation function, defined as international normalized ratio (INR) <=2.3. Adequate renal function defined as creatinine clearance greater than (>) 40 milliliter per minute (mL/min) calculated per the Cockcroft and Gault formula. Adequate pancreatic function, defined as amylase and lipase <=1.5 X ULN. Adequately controlled blood pressure (BP) with up to 3 antihypertensive agents, defined as BP <=150/90 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) at Screening and no change in antihypertensive therapy within 1 week prior to the Cycle1/Day1. Child-Pugh score A. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)- performance status (PS) 0 or 1. Males or females aged at least 18 years (or any age >18 years as determined by country legislation) at the time of informed consent. Females must not be lactating or pregnant at Screening or Baseline (as documented by a negative beta-human chorionic gonadotropin [B-hCG] test with a minimum sensitivity of 25 International Units Per Liter (IU/L) or equivalent units of BhCG). A separate baseline assessment is required if a negative screening pregnancy test was obtained more than 72 hours before the first dose of study drug. All females will be considered to be of childbearing potential unless they are postmenopausal (amenorrheic for at least 12 consecutive months, in the appropriate age group and without other known or suspected cause) or have been sterilized surgically (ie, bilateral tubal ligation, total hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy, all with surgery at least 1 month before dosing). Females of childbearing potential must not have had unprotected sexual intercourse within 30 days before study entry and must agree to use a highly effective method of contraception (e.g., total abstinence, an intrauterine device, a double barrier method [such as condom plus diaphragm with spermicide], a contraceptive implant, an oral contraceptive, or have a vasectomized partner with confirmed azoospermia) throughout the entire study period and for 30 days after study drug discontinuation. If currently abstinent, the participant must agree to use a double barrier method as described above if she becomes sexually active during the study period or for 30 days after study drug discontinuation. Females who are using hormonal contraceptives must have been on a stable dose of the same hormonal contraceptive product for at least 4 weeks before dosing and must continue to use the same contraceptive during the study and for 30 days after study drug discontinuation. Male participants must have had a successful vasectomy (confirmed azoospermia) or they and their female partners must meet the criteria above (i.e., not of childbearing potential or practicing highly effective contraception throughout the study period and for 30 days after study drug discontinuation). No sperm donation is allowed during the study period and for 30 days after study drug discontinuation. Provide written informed consent. Willing and able to comply with all aspects of the protocol. Exclusion Criteria Imaging findings for HCC corresponding to any of the following: HCC with >=50 percent liver occupation Clear invasion into the bile duct Portal vein invasion at the main portal branch (Vp4). Participants who have received any systemic chemotherapy, including anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy, or any systemic investigational anticancer agents, including lenvatinib, for advanced/unresectable HCC. Note: Participants who have received local hepatic injection chemotherapy are eligible. Participants who have received any anticancer therapy (including surgery, percutaneous ethanol injection, radio frequency ablation, transarterial [chemo] embolization, hepatic intra-arterial chemotherapy, biological, immunotherapy, hormonal, or radiotherapy) or any blood enhancing treatment (including blood transfusion, blood products, or agents that stimulate blood cell production, eg, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF]) within 28 days prior to randomization. Participants who have not recovered from toxicities as a result of prior anticancer therapy, except alopecia and infertility. Recovery is defined as < Grade 2 severity per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (CTCAE v4.0). Significant cardiovascular impairment: history of congestive heart failure > New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II, unstable angina, myocardial infarction or stroke within 6 months of the first dose of study drug, or cardiac arrhythmia requiring medical treatment at Screening. Prolongation of corrected QT interval (QTc) interval to >480 millisecond (ms) Gastrointestinal malabsorption or any other condition that might affect the absorption of lenvatinib in the opinion of the investigator. Bleeding or thrombotic disorders or use of anticoagulants requiring therapeutic INR monitoring, eg, warfarin or similar agents. Treatment with low molecular weight heparin and factor X inhibitors which do not require INR monitoring is permitted. Antiplatelet agents are prohibited throughout the study. Gastrointestinal bleeding event or active hemoptysis (bright red blood of at least 0.5 teaspoon) within 28 days prior to randomization. Gastric or esophageal varices that require interventional treatment within 28 days prior to randomization. Prophylaxis with pharmacologic therapy (eg, nonselective beta-blocker) is permitted. Active malignancy (except for HCC or definitively treated melanoma in-situ, basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or carcinoma in-situ of the cervix) within the past 36 months. Participants whose only target lesion(s) is in bone will be excluded. Meningeal carcinomatosis. Any history of or current brain or subdural metastases. Participants having >1+ proteinuria on urine dipstick testing will undergo a 24-hour urine collection for quantitative assessment of proteinuria. Participants with a urine protein >=1g/24 hours will be ineligible. Surgical arterial-portal venous shunt or arterial-venous shunt. Any medical or other condition that in the opinion of the investigator would preclude the participant's participation in a clinical study. Known intolerance to lenvatinib or sorafenib (or any of the excipients). Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive or active infection requiring treatment (except for hepatitis virus). Any history of drug or alcohol dependency or abuse within the prior 6 months. Any participant who cannot be evaluated by either triphasic liver computed tomography (CT) or triphasic liver Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) because of allergy or other contraindication to both CT and MRI contrast agents. Major surgery within 3 weeks prior to randomization or scheduled for surgery during the study. Participants has had a liver transplant.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Sacramento
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Washington
State/Province
District of Columbia
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Duluth
State/Province
Georgia
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Lawrenceville
State/Province
Georgia
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Missouri
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
East Orange
State/Province
New Jersey
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Brooklyn
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Lake Success
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
New York
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Lubbock
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Camperdown
State/Province
New South Wales
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Wentworthville
State/Province
New South Wales
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Woolloongabba
State/Province
Queensland
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Fitzroy
State/Province
Victoria
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Melbourne
State/Province
Victoria
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Facility # 2
City
Melbourne
State/Province
Victoria
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Nedlands
State/Province
Western Australia
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Bruxelles
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Edegem
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Liege
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Hefei
State/Province
Anhui
Country
China
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Beijing
State/Province
Beijing
Country
China
Facility Name
Facility # 2
City
Beijing
State/Province
Beijing
Country
China
Facility Name
Facility # 3
City
Beijing
State/Province
Beijing
Country
China
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Chongqing
State/Province
Chongqing
Country
China
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Fuzhou
State/Province
Fujian
Country
China
Facility Name
Facility # 2
City
Fuzhou
State/Province
Fujian
Country
China
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Guangzhou
State/Province
Guangdong
Country
China
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Harbin
State/Province
Heilongjiang
Country
China
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Changsha
State/Province
Hunan
Country
China
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Nanjing
State/Province
Jiangsu
Country
China
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Suzhou
State/Province
Jiangsu
Country
China
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Changchun
State/Province
Jilin
Country
China
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Dalian
State/Province
Liaoning
Country
China
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Jinan
State/Province
Shandong
Country
China
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Shanghai
State/Province
Shanghai
Country
China
Facility Name
Facility # 3
City
Shanghai
State/Province
Shanghai
Country
China
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Xi'an
State/Province
Shanxi
Country
China
Facility Name
Facility # 2
City
Xi'an
State/Province
Shanxi
Country
China
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Hangzhou
State/Province
Zhejiang
Country
China
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Tianjin
State/Province
Zhejiang
Country
China
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Nice Cedex 3
State/Province
Alpes Maritimes
Country
France
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Pessac Cedex
State/Province
Gironde
Country
France
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Pessac
State/Province
Gironde
Country
France
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Toulouse
State/Province
Haute Garonne
Country
France
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Montpellier cedex 5
State/Province
Herault
Country
France
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Rennes cedex
State/Province
Ille Et Vilaine
Country
France
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Vandoeuvre les Nancy
State/Province
Meurthe Et Moselle
Country
France
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Amiens cedex 1
State/Province
Somme
Country
France
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Creteil Cedex
State/Province
Val De Marne
Country
France
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Bordeaux
Country
France
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Lille cedex
Country
France
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Lyon
Country
France
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Nord
ZIP/Postal Code
59037
Country
France
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Paris cedex 12
ZIP/Postal Code
75020
Country
France
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75013
Country
France
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Rhone
Country
France
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Heidelberg
State/Province
Baden Wuerttemberg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Tuebingen
State/Province
Baden Wuerttemberg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Marburg
State/Province
Hessen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Hannover
State/Province
Niedersachsen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Essen
State/Province
Nordrhein Westfalen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Koeln
State/Province
Nordrhein Westfalen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Mainz
State/Province
Rheinland Pfalz
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Hong Kong
Country
Hong Kong
Facility Name
Facility # 2
City
Hong Kong
Country
Hong Kong
Facility Name
Facility # 3
City
Hong Kong
Country
Hong Kong
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Kowloon
Country
Hong Kong
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Petach Tikva
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Petah Tiqwa
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Torrette
State/Province
Ancona
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Bari
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Benevento
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Bologna
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Napoli
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Facility # 2
City
Napoli
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Palermo
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Roma
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Nagoya
State/Province
Aichi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Kashiwa
State/Province
Chiba
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Matsuyama
State/Province
Ehime
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Kurume
State/Province
Fukuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Sapporo
State/Province
Hokkaido
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Facility # 2
City
Sapporo
State/Province
Hokkaido
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Nishinomiya
State/Province
Hyogo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Kanazawa
State/Province
Ishikawa
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Kawasaki
State/Province
Kanagawa
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Yokohama
State/Province
Kanagawa
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Tsu
State/Province
Mie
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Omura
State/Province
Nagasaki
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Osaka-Sayama
State/Province
Osaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Bunkyo-Ku
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Chuo-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Koto-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Minato-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Musashino
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Shimonoseki
State/Province
Yamaguchi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Fukuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Hiroshima
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Okayama
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Facility # 2
City
Osaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Saga
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Facility # 2
City
Saga
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Goyang-si
State/Province
Gyeonggi-do
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Seongnam-Si
State/Province
Gyeonggi-do
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Facility # 2
City
Seongnam-Si
State/Province
Gyeonggi-do
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Suwon
State/Province
Gyeonggi-do
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Daegu
State/Province
Gyeongsangbuk-do
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Hwasun
State/Province
Jeollanam-do
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Busan
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Facility # 2
City
Busan
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Facility # 3
City
Busan
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Incheon
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Facility # 2
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Facility # 3
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Facility # 4
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Facility # 5
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Facility # 6
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Facility # 7
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Facility # 8
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Kuantan
State/Province
Pahang
Country
Malaysia
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Penang
State/Province
Pulau Pinang
Country
Malaysia
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Miri
State/Province
Sarawak
Country
Malaysia
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Batu Caves
State/Province
Selangor
Country
Malaysia
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Kuala Lumpur
Country
Malaysia
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Cebu City
Country
Philippines
Facility Name
Facility # 2
City
Cebu City
Country
Philippines
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Davao City
Country
Philippines
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Quezon City
Country
Philippines
Facility Name
Facility # 2
City
Quezon City
Country
Philippines
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Gdansk
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Warszawa
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Wroclaw
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Arkhangelsk
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Moscow
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Facility # 2
City
Moscow
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Facility # 3
City
Saint Petersburg
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Facility # 4
City
Saint Petersburg
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Ufa
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Singapore
Country
Singapore
Facility Name
Facility # 2
City
Singapore
Country
Singapore
Facility Name
Facility # 3
City
Singapore
Country
Singapore
Facility Name
Facility # 4
City
Singapore
Country
Singapore
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat
State/Province
Barcelona
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Santander
State/Province
Cantabria
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Badajoz
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Girona
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Facility # 2
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Facility # 3
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Facility # 4
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Kaohsiung
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Facility # 2
City
Kaohsiung
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Taichung
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Facility # 2
City
Taichung
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Tainan
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Facility # 2
City
Tainan
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Taipei
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Facility # 2
City
Taipei
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Facility # 3
City
Taipei
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Facility # 4
City
Taipei
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Facility # 5
City
Taipei
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Taoyuan City
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Bangkoknoi
State/Province
Bangkok
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Pathum Wan
State/Province
Bangkok
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Ratchathewi
State/Province
Bangkok
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Muang
State/Province
Chiang Mai
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Muang
State/Province
Chiang Rai
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
Facility # 2
City
London
State/Province
Greater London
ZIP/Postal Code
W12 OHS
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
London
State/Province
Greater London
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Facility # 3
City
London
State/Province
Greater London
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Manchester
State/Province
Greater Manchester
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Liverpool
State/Province
Merseyside
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Glasgow
State/Province
Strathclyde
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Facility # 1
City
Birmingham
State/Province
West Midlands
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
36341767
Citation
Kudo M, Finn RS, Qin S, Han KH, Ikeda K, Cheng AL, Vogel A, Tovoli F, Ueshima K, Aikata H, Lopez CL, Pracht M, Meng Z, Daniele B, Park JW, Palmer D, Tamai T, Saito K, Dutcus CE, Lencioni R. Overall survival and objective response in advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A subanalysis of the REFLECT study. J Hepatol. 2023 Jan;78(1):133-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.09.006. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
36051472
Citation
Huynh J, Cho MT, Kim EJ, Ren M, Ramji Z, Vogel A. Lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed to Child-Pugh B liver function. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2022 Aug 24;14:17588359221116608. doi: 10.1177/17588359221116608. eCollection 2022.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34087115
Citation
Vogel A, Qin S, Kudo M, Su Y, Hudgens S, Yamashita T, Yoon JH, Fartoux L, Simon K, Lopez C, Sung M, Mody K, Ohtsuka T, Tamai T, Bennett L, Meier G, Breder V. Lenvatinib versus sorafenib for first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: patient-reported outcomes from a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Aug;6(8):649-658. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00110-2. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33948712
Citation
Okusaka T, Ikeda K, Kudo M, Finn R, Qin S, Han KH, Cheng AL, Piscaglia F, Kobayashi M, Sung M, Chen M, Wyrwicz L, Yoon JH, Ren Z, Mody K, Dutcus C, Tamai T, Ren M, Hayato S, Kumada H. Safety and efficacy of lenvatinib by starting dose based on body weight in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in REFLECT. J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun;56(6):570-580. doi: 10.1007/s00535-021-01785-0. Epub 2021 May 4.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32265508
Citation
Briggs A, Daniele B, Dick K, Evans TRJ, Galle PR, Hubner RA, Lopez C, Siebert U, Tremblay G. Covariate-adjusted analysis of the Phase 3 REFLECT study of lenvatinib versus sorafenib in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2020 Jun;122(12):1754-1759. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0817-7. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31720835
Citation
Yamashita T, Kudo M, Ikeda K, Izumi N, Tateishi R, Ikeda M, Aikata H, Kawaguchi Y, Wada Y, Numata K, Inaba Y, Kuromatsu R, Kobayashi M, Okusaka T, Tamai T, Kitamura C, Saito K, Haruna K, Okita K, Kumada H. REFLECT-a phase 3 trial comparing efficacy and safety of lenvatinib to sorafenib for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: an analysis of Japanese subset. J Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan;55(1):113-122. doi: 10.1007/s00535-019-01642-1. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31249394
Citation
Evans TRJ, Kudo M, Finn RS, Han KH, Cheng AL, Ikeda M, Kraljevic S, Ren M, Dutcus CE, Piscaglia F, Sung MW. Urine protein:creatinine ratio vs 24-hour urine protein for proteinuria management: analysis from the phase 3 REFLECT study of lenvatinib vs sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2019 Jul;121(3):218-221. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0506-6. Epub 2019 Jun 28. Erratum In: Br J Cancer. 2019 Jul 30;:
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29433850
Citation
Kudo M, Finn RS, Qin S, Han KH, Ikeda K, Piscaglia F, Baron A, Park JW, Han G, Jassem J, Blanc JF, Vogel A, Komov D, Evans TRJ, Lopez C, Dutcus C, Guo M, Saito K, Kraljevic S, Tamai T, Ren M, Cheng AL. Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018 Mar 24;391(10126):1163-1173. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30207-1.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

A Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib (E7080) Versus Sorafenib in First-line Treatment of Participants With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs