search
Back to results

Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Sarcomas

Primary Purpose

Sarcoma, Metastatic Disease, Bony Sites

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
SBRT
Sponsored by
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Sarcoma focused on measuring Stereotactic, Radiotherapy, Hypofractionated

Eligibility Criteria

4 Years - 40 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic sarcoma of the soft tissue or bone
  • must have measurable disease
  • disease must be surgically unresectable as determined by a tumor board or surgeon
  • greater than 3 years of age
  • less than or equal to 40 years of age
  • life expectancy of at least 9 months
  • adequate performance status (Lansky Performance Status greater than or equal to 50).
  • ability to understand and willingness to sign informed consent document

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients who have had chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 2 weeks prior to entering the study
  • patients who have had any prior radiotherapy to the treatment site(s)
  • patients may not participate on any other treatment protocol while they are receiving treatment on this protocol and for up to 3 months after these protocol treatments have ended
  • pregnant women
  • refusal of women of child bearing potential to take a pregnancy test prior to treatment

Sites / Locations

  • Stanford Medical Center
  • Sibley Memorial Hospital
  • The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
  • Mayo Clinic
  • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Hypofractionated SBRT

Arm Description

800 cGy delivered in 5 fractions every day to total dose of 4000 cGy

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Lesion-specific Local Control at 6 Months Post-SBRT as Assessed by Percentage of Lesions Locally Controlled
Local control was defined as the absence of local progression. Local progression was defined as: (1) the development of a new soft tissue mass ≥1 cm at a site without a soft tissue component or with a soft tissue component <1 cm in at baseline (2) an increase in the largest axial dimension of the soft tissue component by >20% in lesions with a ≥ 1 cm in soft tissue component at baseline (3) a previous bone metastasis that was avid on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET), became non-avid after SBRT, and then became avid again. The Kaplan-Meier method was used.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Patient-specific Local Control at 6 Months Post-SBRT as Assessed by the Percentage of Patients Locally Controlled
Patient-specific local control was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method from initiation of SBRT to time of local failure. Patients who did not experience local failure were censored at the time of last follow up.
Percentage of Patients With Progression-free Survival at 6 Months Post-SBRT
To assess long-term clinical outcomes of this patient population after completion of SBRT by measuring progression-free survival. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine progression-free for survival from initiation of SBRT to progression (local or distant) or death due to any cause. Patients that did not have evidence of progression or who did not die, where censored at the time of last follow up.
Percentage of Patients With Overall Survival at 6 Months Post-SBRT
The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival from initiation of SBRT to death due to any cause. Patients who had not died at the time of the analysis were censored at the time of last follow up.
Change in Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory
Quality of life was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) form which assesses the severity of pain and impact on functioning on an 11-point scale at each follow up visit. Paired sample Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed to assess changes in pain scores on the Brief Pain Inventory; 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain.
Number of Participants Experiencing Toxicity of SBRT
To describe the toxicity of SBRT delivered to study patients measured by the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0

Full Information

First Posted
January 7, 2013
Last Updated
August 13, 2020
Sponsor
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01763970
Brief Title
Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Sarcomas
Official Title
A Phase II Study of Hyperfractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Metastatic Pediatric Sarcomas of Bony Sites
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 2013 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 24, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) literature focuses on clinical outcomes in the adult population. However, SBRT has a particularly strong rationale for application in pediatrics given that high biologically effective doses have been shown to increase control in histologies, such as sarcoma, which are common in the pediatrics population. With stereotactic radiation therapy techniques, a reduction in normal tissue dose surrounding the target lesion of interest may also be accomplished resulting in lower toxicity. Given that pediatric patients with sarcomas, presenting with limited metastases in lung and bone, are still considered to be a curable population with aggressive local therapy, SBRT could have a significant impact on outcomes in oligometastatic patients who may be otherwise unresectable.
Detailed Description
Pediatric patients with sarcoma who have limited metastases are still potentially curable with aggressive local therapy. However, conventional moderate dose radiation is unlikely to provide durable local control. Given the recent technologic advances in radiation delivery, it is now possible to deliver tumoricidal doses, using stereotactic radiation over a short time course with highly focal techniques. Stereotactic radiation has proven efficacious in the intracranial setting and in multiple extracranial sites in adults. It has not yet been well studied in the pediatrics population where there is a particularly strong rationale due to the ablative doses that can be delivered to tumor while simultaneously reducing high dose to normal tissues. The proposed trial is a single arm phase II study to determine the efficacy of SBRT in pediatric sarcomas with surgically unresectable metastatic disease. Oligometastatic sites eligible for treatment in this study include bony sites of disease. SBRT will be delivered to each eligible site to a total dose of 4000 delivered in 5 fractions of 800 per fractions each day. Following completion of SBRT, patients will undergo treatment response assessment with the use of diagnostic imaging, clinical examination, and completion of the Brief Pain Inventory to assess quality of life. The primary objective of this study is to determine the efficacy of SBRT delivered to a dose of 4000 centigray (cGy) in 5 fractions of 800 cGy each for patients greater than 3 years of age and < 40 years of age with metastatic disease of bone secondary to pediatric sarcoma. The secondary objectives of this study include describing the toxicity of SBRT with this regimen; assessing clinical response rate of each target lesion; assessing long-term clinical outcomes; and assessing quality of life following completion of treatment. For patients with potentially curable oligometastatic disease, surgical resection in conjunction with systemic therapy remains the standard of care. Patients on this study will continue to receive chemotherapy outside of the 2 week window for SBRT. Issues that may limit participation include our inability to assess late effects that may not develop till at least 10 years after therapy. For this reason, we will limit the population in this study to patients who are surgically unresectable and would be otherwise incurable with current standard systemic therapies.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Sarcoma, Metastatic Disease, Bony Sites
Keywords
Stereotactic, Radiotherapy, Hypofractionated

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
14 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Hypofractionated SBRT
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
800 cGy delivered in 5 fractions every day to total dose of 4000 cGy
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
SBRT
Other Intervention Name(s)
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Lesion-specific Local Control at 6 Months Post-SBRT as Assessed by Percentage of Lesions Locally Controlled
Description
Local control was defined as the absence of local progression. Local progression was defined as: (1) the development of a new soft tissue mass ≥1 cm at a site without a soft tissue component or with a soft tissue component <1 cm in at baseline (2) an increase in the largest axial dimension of the soft tissue component by >20% in lesions with a ≥ 1 cm in soft tissue component at baseline (3) a previous bone metastasis that was avid on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET), became non-avid after SBRT, and then became avid again. The Kaplan-Meier method was used.
Time Frame
6 months post-SBRT
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Patient-specific Local Control at 6 Months Post-SBRT as Assessed by the Percentage of Patients Locally Controlled
Description
Patient-specific local control was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method from initiation of SBRT to time of local failure. Patients who did not experience local failure were censored at the time of last follow up.
Time Frame
6 months post-SBRT
Title
Percentage of Patients With Progression-free Survival at 6 Months Post-SBRT
Description
To assess long-term clinical outcomes of this patient population after completion of SBRT by measuring progression-free survival. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine progression-free for survival from initiation of SBRT to progression (local or distant) or death due to any cause. Patients that did not have evidence of progression or who did not die, where censored at the time of last follow up.
Time Frame
6 months post-SBRT
Title
Percentage of Patients With Overall Survival at 6 Months Post-SBRT
Description
The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival from initiation of SBRT to death due to any cause. Patients who had not died at the time of the analysis were censored at the time of last follow up.
Time Frame
6 months post-SBRT
Title
Change in Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory
Description
Quality of life was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) form which assesses the severity of pain and impact on functioning on an 11-point scale at each follow up visit. Paired sample Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed to assess changes in pain scores on the Brief Pain Inventory; 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain.
Time Frame
Baseline and one-month post-SBRT
Title
Number of Participants Experiencing Toxicity of SBRT
Description
To describe the toxicity of SBRT delivered to study patients measured by the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0
Time Frame
12 months after treatment starts

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
4 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic sarcoma of the soft tissue or bone must have measurable disease disease must be surgically unresectable as determined by a tumor board or surgeon greater than 3 years of age less than or equal to 40 years of age life expectancy of at least 9 months adequate performance status (Lansky Performance Status greater than or equal to 50). ability to understand and willingness to sign informed consent document Exclusion Criteria: patients who have had chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 2 weeks prior to entering the study patients who have had any prior radiotherapy to the treatment site(s) patients may not participate on any other treatment protocol while they are receiving treatment on this protocol and for up to 3 months after these protocol treatments have ended pregnant women refusal of women of child bearing potential to take a pregnancy test prior to treatment
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Matthew Ladra, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Stanford Medical Center
City
Stanford
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94305-5847
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sibley Memorial Hospital
City
Washington
State/Province
District of Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
20016
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21231
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55902
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
City
Memphis
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
38105-3678
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided

Learn more about this trial

Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Sarcomas

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs