Nudging Guideline-concordant Antibiotic Prescribing Using Public Commitments
Primary Purpose
Acute Respiratory Infections (ARIs)
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Posted commitment letter
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional health services research trial for Acute Respiratory Infections (ARIs) focused on measuring ARIs, antibiotics, public commitment, quality improvement
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Medical professionals licensed to provide care and prescribe medications (including antibiotics)
- Treating adult patients (18 years of age and older) from 5 Los Angeles community clinics
Exclusion Criteria:
- none
Sites / Locations
- QueensCare Family Clinics
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
No Intervention
Arm Label
Posted commitment letter
Control
Arm Description
The poster-sized (18x24 inches) commitment letter, written at the 8th grade reading-level and displayed in English and Spanish, emphasize clinician commitment to guidelines for appropriate antibiotic prescribing and explain why antibiotics are not appropriate in many cases. These letters, featuring clinician photographs and signatures, are displayed in clinician exam rooms for a 16-week period.
Usual care with no posted letters.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescribing for Patients With Acute Respiratory Infections (ARI)
Using data from electronic health records, we will calculate clinician antibiotic prescribing rates for antibiotic-inappropriate ARI diagnoses: acute nasopharyngitis (ICD-9 460.x), acute laryngitis without obstruction (465.8), acute laryngopharyngitis (465.0), acute bronchitis (466.x), acute upper respiratory infections of other multiple sites (465.8), acute upper respiratory infections not otherwise specified (465.9), bronchitis not specified as acute or chronic (490.x), non-streptococcal pharyngitis (462.xx), and influenza with other respiratory manifestations (487.1). To control for temporal trends in antibiotic prescribing and provider-fixed effects, we will fit a logistic mixed effects model that predicts inappropriate antibiotic prescribing as a function of study arm and an indicator for baseline versus intervention period (a difference-in-differences regression).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01767064
First Posted
January 10, 2013
Last Updated
July 5, 2017
Sponsor
University of Southern California
Collaborators
National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute on Aging (NIA)
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01767064
Brief Title
Nudging Guideline-concordant Antibiotic Prescribing Using Public Commitments
Official Title
Nudging Guideline-concordant Antibiotic Prescribing Using Public Commitments
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
July 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2013 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Southern California
Collaborators
National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute on Aging (NIA)
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections (ARIs) persists despite decades of intervention efforts. Negative outcomes of inappropriate antibiotics include increased costs of care, adverse drug reactions, and rising prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. To address this public health problem, we apply the principles of commitment and consistency in an effort to influence clinician decision-making through the implementation of a low-cost behavioral "nudge" in the form of a simple public commitment device. Clinicians were asked to post in their exam room a signed letter indicating their commitments to reducing inappropriate antibiotic use for ARIs. Our hypothesis is that clinicians displaying the poster-sized commitment letters will decrease their inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for ARIs as compared to clinicians in the control condition (with no posted letter).
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Acute Respiratory Infections (ARIs)
Keywords
ARIs, antibiotics, public commitment, quality improvement
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
14 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Posted commitment letter
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The poster-sized (18x24 inches) commitment letter, written at the 8th grade reading-level and displayed in English and Spanish, emphasize clinician commitment to guidelines for appropriate antibiotic prescribing and explain why antibiotics are not appropriate in many cases. These letters, featuring clinician photographs and signatures, are displayed in clinician exam rooms for a 16-week period.
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Usual care with no posted letters.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Posted commitment letter
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescribing for Patients With Acute Respiratory Infections (ARI)
Description
Using data from electronic health records, we will calculate clinician antibiotic prescribing rates for antibiotic-inappropriate ARI diagnoses: acute nasopharyngitis (ICD-9 460.x), acute laryngitis without obstruction (465.8), acute laryngopharyngitis (465.0), acute bronchitis (466.x), acute upper respiratory infections of other multiple sites (465.8), acute upper respiratory infections not otherwise specified (465.9), bronchitis not specified as acute or chronic (490.x), non-streptococcal pharyngitis (462.xx), and influenza with other respiratory manifestations (487.1). To control for temporal trends in antibiotic prescribing and provider-fixed effects, we will fit a logistic mixed effects model that predicts inappropriate antibiotic prescribing as a function of study arm and an indicator for baseline versus intervention period (a difference-in-differences regression).
Time Frame
up to 12 months post intervention
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Medical professionals licensed to provide care and prescribe medications (including antibiotics)
Treating adult patients (18 years of age and older) from 5 Los Angeles community clinics
Exclusion Criteria:
none
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jason N Doctor, Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
University of Southern California
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
QueensCare Family Clinics
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90027
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24474434
Citation
Meeker D, Knight TK, Friedberg MW, Linder JA, Goldstein NJ, Fox CR, Rothfeld A, Diaz G, Doctor JN. Nudging guideline-concordant antibiotic prescribing: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Mar;174(3):425-31. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.14191.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Nudging Guideline-concordant Antibiotic Prescribing Using Public Commitments
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs