search
Back to results

A Phase 4 Study to Assess the Impact of Patient Support Program on Health Related Quality of Life and Adherence in Subjects With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Administered Rebif® With the RebiSmart™ Device (RebiQoL)

Primary Purpose

Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Rebif®
Sponsored by
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Multiple Sclerosis focused on measuring Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting, Rebif, RebiSmart, Patient support program

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female, aged 18 or older
  • A diagnosis of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis according to the revised McDonald Criteria (2010)
  • Treatment with Rebif® 22 or 44 mcg subcutaneously three times a week in accordance to the Summary of product characteristics
  • Rebif® administered by the RebiSmart™ device
  • Provided a signed informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has received any components, except for technical support, of MinSupport Plus prior to study entry
  • Has difficulty reading and/or understanding Swedish
  • Has a mental condition rendering the subject unable to understand the nature, scope and possible consequences of the study, and/or evidence of an uncooperative attitude
  • No access to computer
  • Participation in another clinical study

Sites / Locations

  • Please contact the Merck Communications Service for Recruiting locations
  • Research site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research site
  • Research Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Technical support for the RebiSmart™ device

Subject support program (MinSupport Plus)

Arm Description

Subjects will be administered Rebif® by the RebiSmart™ device at a dose of either 22 or 44 microgram (mcg) subcutaneously (SC) 3 times a week in accordance to the summary of product characteristics (SPC) along with technical support for RebiSmart.

Subjects will be administered Rebif® by the RebiSmart™ device at a dose of either 22 or 44 mcg SC 3 times a week in accordance to the SPC along with subject support program MinSupport Plus which includes technical support for RebiSmart™ device, personal coaching regarding treatment and understanding of the disease, lifestyle guide and web support.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) Psychological Score at Month 12
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) is a validated MS specific questionnaire consisting of 29 questions of which 20 addressed the physical impact component and 9 assessed the psychological impact. A combined score can be generated, or both components can be reported separately. The psychological wellbeing assessment portion of the MSIS-29 was comprised of 9 questions in which subjects rate the impact of MS on their day-to-day life from 1=no impact to 5=extreme impact. The total Psychological Score was calculated using following formula: sum of score for 9 questions - 9/0.36. The total score range ranges from 0-100 where, lower total score indicates less psychologically-related impact while a higher total score indicates greater psychologically-related impact on a subject's functioning.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) Psychological Score at Month 6
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) is a validated MS specific questionnaire consisting of 29 questions of which 20 addressed the physical impact component and 9 assessed the psychological impact. A combined score can be generated, or both components can be reported separately. The psychological wellbeing assessment portion of the MSIS-29 was comprised of 9 questions in which subjects rate the impact of MS on their day-to-day life from 1=no impact to 5=extreme impact. The total Psychological Score was calculated using following formula: sum of score for 9 questions - 9/0.36. The total score range ranges from 0-100 where, lower total score indicates less psychologically-related impact while a higher total score indicates greater psychologically-related impact on a subject's functioning.
Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) Total Score at Month 6 and 12
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) is a validated MS specific questionnaire consisting of 29 questions of which 20 addressed the physical impact component and 9 assessed the psychological impact. A combined score can be generated, or both components can be reported separately. The total score of the MSIS-29 was comprised of all the 29 questions in which subjects rate the impact of MS on their day-to-day life from 1=no impact to 5=extreme impact. The total Score was calculated using following formula: sum of score for 29 questions - 29/1.45. The total score range ranges from 0-100 where, lower total score indicates less psychologically-related impact while a higher total score indicates greater psychologically-related impact on a subject's functioning.
Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire With 5 Questions Alternatives (EQ5D-5L) Summary Score at Month 6 and 12
Quality of life was assessed using the EQ5D-5L score, which is one of the most widely used generic index measures of health-related quality of life. It consists of a 5-item descriptive system that measures 5 dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension comprises 5 levels with corresponding numeric scores ranging from 1 (no problems) through 5 (extreme problems) in which 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3= moderate problems, 4= severe problems, and 5= extreme problems. A unique EQ5D-5L health state was defined by combining the numeric level scores for each of the 5 dimensions and the total score ranges from 5 to 25. An increase in the EQ5D-5L total score indicates worsening.
Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire With 5 Questions Alternatives (EQ5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scale at Month 6 and 12
EQ-5D-5L VAS was used to record a subject's rating for his/her current health-related quality of life state and captured on a vertical VAS (0-100), where 0 = worst imaginable health state and 100 = best imaginable health state.
Percentage of Subjects With Treatment Adherence at Month 6 and 12
According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), treatment adherence is defined as both compliance (taking the medication in the correct dose and according to the schedule prescribed) and persistency (maintenance of the drug regimen over the long-term). Percentage of subjects with <10% missed injections (measured with the software RDS 2.0) during 6 and 12 months were reported.
Change From Baseline in Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) Score at Month 6 and 12
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is a method of evaluating fatigue in multiple sclerosis and is designed to differentiate fatigue from clinical depression, since both share some of the same symptoms. The Fatigue Severity Scale is a 9-item questionnaire developed to assess the level of fatigue due to neurological disease, were each assessed on a 1-7 scale (1= no fatigue and 7= severe fatigue). The total score was calculated as the average of individual 9-items and ranged from 1 to 7 with a higher value indicating greater impairment due to fatigue.
Change From Baseline in Modified Fatigue Impact Scale Score at Month 6 and 12
The Modified Fatigue Impact Scale is a list of 21 statements describing how fatigue may affect a person's functioning. Answers ranging from 0 (Never) to 4 (Almost always). A total score ranged from a possible 0 (no fatigue impact) to 84 (almost always impacted by fatigue). A lower total score indicates less fatigue-related impact while a higher total score indicates greater fatigue-related impact on a subject's functioning.
Change From Baseline in Modified Fatigue Impact Scale Index at Month 6 and 12
The Modified Fatigue Impact Index assesses fatigue- severity, distress, or degree of interference. Modified Fatigue Impact Scale Index was expressed in terms of percentage and ranged from 0% (no fatigue) to 100% (almost always impacted by fatigue).
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score at Month 6 and 12
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used to measure depression and anxiety in patients. The scale was limited to 14 questions, a practical tool for identifying and quantifying the two most common forms psychological disturbances in medical subjects. 7 of the items relate to anxiety and 7 relate to depression. Each item on the questionnaire was scored from 0-3 giving a total score between 0 and 21 for either anxiety or depression where higher score indicates more anxiety/depression.
Number of Subjects With Working Ability at Month 12
Working ability was assessed by measuring the number of subjects for the following categories: 1) Subjects with full sickness/disability pension, 2) Subjects who were employed or had their own business, 3) Subjects who were retired, 4) Subjects who were studying, 5) None of the above.
Percentage of Subjects With Adverse Events (AE) up to Month 12
AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this the study drug. An AE was defined as any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. A serious AE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) include both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs.
Number of Subjects With Response Based on Lifestyle Questionnaire for (MinSupport Plus) at Month 6 and 12
Lifestyle Questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life for subjects based on following parameters: Stress, Alcohol, Cost, Physical Aspect, Sleep, Activity and Smoking. Subjects provided their responses on the basis of three color codes: Green, Orange and Red, where Green refers to - no problem; Orange refers to - some problem and red refers to - definite/debilitating problem.
Number of Subjects With Response Based on Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire at Month 12
The subject satisfaction questionnaire was defined as satisfaction with overall treatment and support from health care providers during the last 12 months. Subjects were asked to rate their satisfaction by choosing either "Very discontented, discontented, contented or Very contented".
Number of Subjects With Response Based on Health Care Personnel Satisfaction Questionnaire at Month 12
The subject satisfaction questionnaire was defined as satisfaction with overall treatment and support from health care providers during the last 12 months. Subjects were asked to rate their satisfaction by choosing either "Very unsatisfied, unsatisfied, satisfied or very satisfied".
Number of Subjects With Lifestyle Goals for MinSupport Plus at Month 12
Subjects defined up to 4 personal lifestyle goals during the first study week. Subjects completed the following questions related to lifestyle goals achieved during this study: 1. Was the goal achieved? (Yes/No) 2. If yes, better than expected or achieved as expected? 3. If better than expected, a lot or a little better than expected? 4. If no, a little or a lot less than expected?

Full Information

First Posted
February 12, 2013
Last Updated
July 21, 2017
Sponsor
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01791244
Brief Title
A Phase 4 Study to Assess the Impact of Patient Support Program on Health Related Quality of Life and Adherence in Subjects With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Administered Rebif® With the RebiSmart™ Device
Acronym
RebiQoL
Official Title
A Phase IV Multicenter Randomized Study to Assess the Impact of a Patient Support Program (MinSupport Plus) on Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Adherence in Patients With Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Administered Rebif® With the RebiSmart Device
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 28, 2013 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 29, 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 29, 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a randomized, comparative, and multicenter study to assess the impact of a patient support program (MinSupport Plus) on health related quality of life (HRQoL) and adherence in subjects with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis administered Rebif® with the RebiSmart™ device.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting
Keywords
Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting, Rebif, RebiSmart, Patient support program

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Investigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
93 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Technical support for the RebiSmart™ device
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects will be administered Rebif® by the RebiSmart™ device at a dose of either 22 or 44 microgram (mcg) subcutaneously (SC) 3 times a week in accordance to the summary of product characteristics (SPC) along with technical support for RebiSmart.
Arm Title
Subject support program (MinSupport Plus)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subjects will be administered Rebif® by the RebiSmart™ device at a dose of either 22 or 44 mcg SC 3 times a week in accordance to the SPC along with subject support program MinSupport Plus which includes technical support for RebiSmart™ device, personal coaching regarding treatment and understanding of the disease, lifestyle guide and web support.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Rebif®
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) Psychological Score at Month 12
Description
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) is a validated MS specific questionnaire consisting of 29 questions of which 20 addressed the physical impact component and 9 assessed the psychological impact. A combined score can be generated, or both components can be reported separately. The psychological wellbeing assessment portion of the MSIS-29 was comprised of 9 questions in which subjects rate the impact of MS on their day-to-day life from 1=no impact to 5=extreme impact. The total Psychological Score was calculated using following formula: sum of score for 9 questions - 9/0.36. The total score range ranges from 0-100 where, lower total score indicates less psychologically-related impact while a higher total score indicates greater psychologically-related impact on a subject's functioning.
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 12
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) Psychological Score at Month 6
Description
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) is a validated MS specific questionnaire consisting of 29 questions of which 20 addressed the physical impact component and 9 assessed the psychological impact. A combined score can be generated, or both components can be reported separately. The psychological wellbeing assessment portion of the MSIS-29 was comprised of 9 questions in which subjects rate the impact of MS on their day-to-day life from 1=no impact to 5=extreme impact. The total Psychological Score was calculated using following formula: sum of score for 9 questions - 9/0.36. The total score range ranges from 0-100 where, lower total score indicates less psychologically-related impact while a higher total score indicates greater psychologically-related impact on a subject's functioning.
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 6
Title
Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) Total Score at Month 6 and 12
Description
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) is a validated MS specific questionnaire consisting of 29 questions of which 20 addressed the physical impact component and 9 assessed the psychological impact. A combined score can be generated, or both components can be reported separately. The total score of the MSIS-29 was comprised of all the 29 questions in which subjects rate the impact of MS on their day-to-day life from 1=no impact to 5=extreme impact. The total Score was calculated using following formula: sum of score for 29 questions - 29/1.45. The total score range ranges from 0-100 where, lower total score indicates less psychologically-related impact while a higher total score indicates greater psychologically-related impact on a subject's functioning.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 6 and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire With 5 Questions Alternatives (EQ5D-5L) Summary Score at Month 6 and 12
Description
Quality of life was assessed using the EQ5D-5L score, which is one of the most widely used generic index measures of health-related quality of life. It consists of a 5-item descriptive system that measures 5 dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension comprises 5 levels with corresponding numeric scores ranging from 1 (no problems) through 5 (extreme problems) in which 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3= moderate problems, 4= severe problems, and 5= extreme problems. A unique EQ5D-5L health state was defined by combining the numeric level scores for each of the 5 dimensions and the total score ranges from 5 to 25. An increase in the EQ5D-5L total score indicates worsening.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 6 and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire With 5 Questions Alternatives (EQ5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scale at Month 6 and 12
Description
EQ-5D-5L VAS was used to record a subject's rating for his/her current health-related quality of life state and captured on a vertical VAS (0-100), where 0 = worst imaginable health state and 100 = best imaginable health state.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 6 and 12
Title
Percentage of Subjects With Treatment Adherence at Month 6 and 12
Description
According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), treatment adherence is defined as both compliance (taking the medication in the correct dose and according to the schedule prescribed) and persistency (maintenance of the drug regimen over the long-term). Percentage of subjects with <10% missed injections (measured with the software RDS 2.0) during 6 and 12 months were reported.
Time Frame
Month 6 and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) Score at Month 6 and 12
Description
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is a method of evaluating fatigue in multiple sclerosis and is designed to differentiate fatigue from clinical depression, since both share some of the same symptoms. The Fatigue Severity Scale is a 9-item questionnaire developed to assess the level of fatigue due to neurological disease, were each assessed on a 1-7 scale (1= no fatigue and 7= severe fatigue). The total score was calculated as the average of individual 9-items and ranged from 1 to 7 with a higher value indicating greater impairment due to fatigue.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 6 and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Modified Fatigue Impact Scale Score at Month 6 and 12
Description
The Modified Fatigue Impact Scale is a list of 21 statements describing how fatigue may affect a person's functioning. Answers ranging from 0 (Never) to 4 (Almost always). A total score ranged from a possible 0 (no fatigue impact) to 84 (almost always impacted by fatigue). A lower total score indicates less fatigue-related impact while a higher total score indicates greater fatigue-related impact on a subject's functioning.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 6 and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Modified Fatigue Impact Scale Index at Month 6 and 12
Description
The Modified Fatigue Impact Index assesses fatigue- severity, distress, or degree of interference. Modified Fatigue Impact Scale Index was expressed in terms of percentage and ranged from 0% (no fatigue) to 100% (almost always impacted by fatigue).
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 6 and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score at Month 6 and 12
Description
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used to measure depression and anxiety in patients. The scale was limited to 14 questions, a practical tool for identifying and quantifying the two most common forms psychological disturbances in medical subjects. 7 of the items relate to anxiety and 7 relate to depression. Each item on the questionnaire was scored from 0-3 giving a total score between 0 and 21 for either anxiety or depression where higher score indicates more anxiety/depression.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 6 and 12
Title
Number of Subjects With Working Ability at Month 12
Description
Working ability was assessed by measuring the number of subjects for the following categories: 1) Subjects with full sickness/disability pension, 2) Subjects who were employed or had their own business, 3) Subjects who were retired, 4) Subjects who were studying, 5) None of the above.
Time Frame
Month 12
Title
Percentage of Subjects With Adverse Events (AE) up to Month 12
Description
AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this the study drug. An AE was defined as any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. A serious AE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) include both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Month 12
Title
Number of Subjects With Response Based on Lifestyle Questionnaire for (MinSupport Plus) at Month 6 and 12
Description
Lifestyle Questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life for subjects based on following parameters: Stress, Alcohol, Cost, Physical Aspect, Sleep, Activity and Smoking. Subjects provided their responses on the basis of three color codes: Green, Orange and Red, where Green refers to - no problem; Orange refers to - some problem and red refers to - definite/debilitating problem.
Time Frame
Month 6 and 12
Title
Number of Subjects With Response Based on Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire at Month 12
Description
The subject satisfaction questionnaire was defined as satisfaction with overall treatment and support from health care providers during the last 12 months. Subjects were asked to rate their satisfaction by choosing either "Very discontented, discontented, contented or Very contented".
Time Frame
Month 12
Title
Number of Subjects With Response Based on Health Care Personnel Satisfaction Questionnaire at Month 12
Description
The subject satisfaction questionnaire was defined as satisfaction with overall treatment and support from health care providers during the last 12 months. Subjects were asked to rate their satisfaction by choosing either "Very unsatisfied, unsatisfied, satisfied or very satisfied".
Time Frame
Month 12
Title
Number of Subjects With Lifestyle Goals for MinSupport Plus at Month 12
Description
Subjects defined up to 4 personal lifestyle goals during the first study week. Subjects completed the following questions related to lifestyle goals achieved during this study: 1. Was the goal achieved? (Yes/No) 2. If yes, better than expected or achieved as expected? 3. If better than expected, a lot or a little better than expected? 4. If no, a little or a lot less than expected?
Time Frame
Month 12

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Male or female, aged 18 or older A diagnosis of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis according to the revised McDonald Criteria (2010) Treatment with Rebif® 22 or 44 mcg subcutaneously three times a week in accordance to the Summary of product characteristics Rebif® administered by the RebiSmart™ device Provided a signed informed consent form Exclusion Criteria: Has received any components, except for technical support, of MinSupport Plus prior to study entry Has difficulty reading and/or understanding Swedish Has a mental condition rendering the subject unable to understand the nature, scope and possible consequences of the study, and/or evidence of an uncooperative attitude No access to computer Participation in another clinical study
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Please contact the Merck Communications Service for Recruiting locations
City
Darmstadt
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research site
City
Angered
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Danderyd
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Eksjö
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Gävle
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Karlstad
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Research Site
City
KS Huddinge
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Linköping
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Malmö/Lund
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Motala
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Skövde
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Trollhättan
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Research site
City
Ängelholm
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Örnsköldsvik
Country
Sweden

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31276502
Citation
Landtblom AM, Guala D, Martin C, Olsson-Hau S, Haghighi S, Jansson L, Fredrikson S. RebiQoL: A randomized trial of telemedicine patient support program for health-related quality of life and adherence in people with MS treated with Rebif. PLoS One. 2019 Jul 5;14(7):e0218453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218453. eCollection 2019.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

A Phase 4 Study to Assess the Impact of Patient Support Program on Health Related Quality of Life and Adherence in Subjects With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Administered Rebif® With the RebiSmart™ Device

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs