search
Back to results

Study Evaluating ABT-199 in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Primary Purpose

Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Venetoclax
Dexamethasone
Sponsored by
AbbVie
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma focused on measuring Relapsed multiple myeloma, Refractory multiple myeloma, Multiple myeloma, Relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance score of 1 or 0. Participants in the Phase 2 portion: ECOG performance score of 2, 1, or 0.
  • Diagnosis of multiple myeloma previously treated with at least one prior line of therapy.

    • Induction therapy followed by stem cell transplant and maintenance therapy will be considered a single line of therapy.
    • For Safety Expansion, participants must have been previously treated with a proteasome inhibitor (e.g., bortezomib) and an immunomodulatory agent (e.g., thalidomide, lenalidomide).
    • For Venetoclax-Dexamethasone Combination, participants must have been been previously treated with a proteasome inhibitor (e.g., bortezomib) and an immunomodulatory agent (e.g., thalidomide, lenalidomide) AND have t(11;14)-positive multiple myeloma per the central lab testing.
    • For Phase 2, participants must have MM positive for the t(11;14) translocation, as determined by an analytically validated fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay per the central laboratory testing (enrollment with local t(11;14)-positive FISH results only will be considered at the discretion of the TA MD). Participants must have evidence of disease progression on or within 60 days of last dose of most recent previous treatment based on IMWG criteria AND must have previously received at least 2 lines of therapy, including an immunomodulatory drug (lenalidomide or pomalidomide), a proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib, carfilzomib or ixazomib), daratumumab, and glucocorticoids.

      • For US participants: Daratumumab combination regimen must be one of the prior lines of therapy (for this study, daratumumab plus corticosteroids will not be considered a combination regimen).
      • For Non-US participants: Either daratumumab monotherapy or combination therapy is acceptable. Daratumumab monotherapy will be limited to approximately 20 percent of the total number of Phase 2 participants.
  • Measurable disease at Screening:

    • Serum monoclonal protein of at least 1.0 g/dL (10g/L) by protein electrophoresis.
    • At least 200 mg of monoclonal protein in the urine on 24-hr electrophoresis.
    • Serum immunoglobulin free light chain of at least 10 mg/dL and abnormal serum immunoglobulin kappa to lambda free light chain ratio.
  • Participants with a history of autologous or allogenic stem cell transplantation must have adequate peripheral blood counts independent of any growth factor support, and have recovered from any transplant related toxicity(s) and be:

    • At least 100 days post-autologous transplant prior to first dose of study drug or
    • At least 6 months post-allogenic transplant prior to first dose of study drug and not have active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), i.e., requiring treatment.
  • Meet the following laboratory parameters, per the reference range, at least once during the screening period:

    • ANC of at least 1000/μL (Participants may use growth factor support to achieve ANC eligibility criteria).
    • AST and ALT not higher than 3 x ULN.
    • Calculated creatinine clearance of at least 30 mL/min using a modified Cockcroft-Gault calculation.
    • Platelet count of at least 30,000 mm³ (independent of transfusion for 2 weeks).
    • Hemoglobin of at least 8.0 g/dL (participants may receive blood transfusion to achieve hemoglobin eligibility criteria).
    • Total bilirubin not higher than 1.5 x ULN (Participants with Gilbert's Syndrome may have bilirubin higher 1.5 x ULN).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exhibits evidence of other clinically significant uncontrolled condition(s), including, but not limited to:

    • Acute infection within 14 days prior to first dose of study drug requiring antibiotic, antifungal, or antiviral therapy.
    • Diagnosis of fever and neutropenia within 1 week prior to first dose of study drug.
  • Cardiovascular disability status of New York Heart Association Class greater than or equal to 3.
  • Significant history of renal, neurologic, psychiatric, endocrinologic, metabolic, immunologic, cardiovascular or hepatic disease, within the last 6 months that, in the opinion of the investigator, would adversely affect his/her participation in the study.
  • History of other active malignancies other than multiple myeloma within the past 3 years prior to study entry, with the following exceptions:

    • Adequately treated in situ carcinoma of the cervix uteri;
    • Basal cell carcinoma of the skin or localized squamous cell carcinoma of the skin;
    • Localized prostate cancer Gleason grade 6 or lower AND with stable prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels off treatment
    • Previous malignancy confined and surgically resected (or treated with other modalities) with curative intent.
  • Known Human Immunodeficiency Viral (HIV) infection.
  • Active hepatitis B or C infection.

Sites / Locations

  • Mayo Clinic - Scottsdale /ID# 75808
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences /ID# 170002
  • Yale University /ID# 203704
  • Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute /ID# 74993
  • Ingalls Memorial Hosp /ID# 205346
  • Tulane Cancer Center Clinic /ID# 204123
  • Tufts Medical Center /ID# 203814
  • University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center Michigan Medicine /ID# 170007
  • Mayo Clinic - Rochester /ID# 74994
  • Hattiesburg Clinic /ID# 201187
  • Washington University-School of Medicine /ID# 76094
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center /ID# 169158
  • The John Theurer Cancer /ID# 200248
  • Duke Cancer Center /ID# 129356
  • University Hospitals - Seidman Cancer Center /ID# 204502
  • Ohio State Cancer Center /ID# 200249
  • Avera Cancer Institute /ID# 204178
  • Baylor University Medical Ctr. /ID# 170056
  • Swedish Cancer Institute - Edmonds /ID# 170006
  • Univ of Wisconsin Hosp/Clinics /ID# 200246
  • Medical College of Wisconsin /ID# 205229
  • UZ Brussel /ID# 170711
  • ZNA Stuivenberg /ID# 170067
  • Duplicate_University Hospital Leuven /ID# 170715
  • CHRU Lille - Hopital Claude Huriez /ID# 74995
  • CHRU Tours - Hopital Bretonneau /ID# 126639
  • CHU de Nantes, Hotel Dieu -HME /ID# 75033
  • Duplicate_CHU Grenoble - Hopital Michallon /ID# 126658
  • Ulleval, OUS /ID# 170707

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm 6

Arm 7

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mg

Phase 1: Venetoclax 600 mg

Phase 1: Venetoclax 900 mg

Phase 1: Venetoclax 1200 mg

Phase 1 Safety Expansion: Venetoclax 1200 mg

Phase 1 Combination: Venetoclax 800 mg/Dexamethasone 20 or 40 mg

Phase 2 Expansion: Venetoclax 800 mg/Dexamethasone 20 or 40 mg

Arm Description

Participants in the dose-escalation cohort received 300 mg of venetoclax daily on Days 1 -21 of each cycle after a 2-week lead-in period, during which venetoclax doses were increased weekly.

Participants in the dose-escalation cohort received 600 mg of venetoclax daily on Days 1 -21 of each cycle after a 2-week lead-in period, during which venetoclax doses were increased weekly.

Participants in the dose-escalation cohort received 900 mg of venetoclax daily on Days 1 -21 of each cycle after a 2-week lead-in period, during which venetoclax doses were increased weekly.

Participants in the dose-escalation cohort received 1200 mg of venetoclax daily on Days 1 -21 of each cycle after a 2-week lead-in period, during which venetoclax doses were increased weekly.

Participants in the safety expansion cohort received 1200 mg of venetoclax daily on Days 1 - 21 of each cycle after a 2-week lead-in period, during which venetoclax doses were increased weekly.

Participants with t(11;14) translocation multiple myeloma received daily venetoclax at a dose of 800 mg (no lead-in period) on Days 1- 21 of each cycle concomitant with weekly dexamethasone at a dose of 40 mg (20 mg for those aged ≥ 75 years).

The Phase 2 cohort further explored the efficacy of venetoclax in combination with dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory participants with t(11;14) translocation multiple myeloma. Participants received daily venetoclax at a dose of 800 mg (no lead-in period) on Days 1- 21 of each cycle concomitant with weekly dexamethasone at a dose of 40 mg (20 mg for those aged ≥ 75 years).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With Adverse Events
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. The investigator assesses the relationship of each event to the use of study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is an important medical event that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the outcomes listed above. Treatment-emergent adverse events/treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TEAEs/TESAEs) are defined as any event that began or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug.
Phase 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Venetoclax
Cmax is the highest concentration that a drug achieves in the blood after administration in a dosing interval.
Phase 1: Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Venetoclax
Tmax is the the time at which the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) is observed.
Phase 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve Over Time From 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) of Venetoclax
AUC is a measure of how long and how much drug is present in the body after dosing.
Phase 2: Overall Response Rate
Overall response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with documented best overall response of Partial Response (PR) or better (PR, Very good partial response [VGPR], Complete response [CR], or Stringent complete response [sCR]) per 2016 standard International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria.
Phase 2: Very Good Partial Response Rate or Better
The percentage of participants with documented best overall response of Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or better (VGPR, Complete response [CR], or Stringent complete response [sCR]) per 2016 standard International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria was computed.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Phase 1: Overall Response Rate
Overall response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with documented best overall response of Partial Response (PR) or better (PR, Very good partial response [VGPR], Complete response [CR], or Stringent complete response [sCR]) per 2011 International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria.
Time to Response (TTR)
TTR is defined as the number of days from the date of first dose of study drug until the date of their first favorable response of Partial Response (PR) or better (PR, Very good partial response [VGPR], Complete response [CR], or Stringent complete response [sCR]) per 2011 International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria (Phase 1) or 2016 IMWG criteria (Phase 2). If a participant did not experience a favorable response, they were to be censored at the date of last adequate assessment. TTR was analyzed by Kaplan- Meier (K-M)\ methodology.
Time to Progression (TTP)
TTP is defined as the number of days from the date of first dose of study drug to the date of first documented disease progression or death due to multiple myeloma, whichever occurs first. TTP was analyzed by Kaplan- Meier (K-M) methodology.
Duration of Response
DOR is defined as the number of days from the date of first response of Partial Response (PR) or better to the date of first documented disease progression or death due to multiple myeloma, whichever occurs first. DOR was analyzed by Kaplan- Meier (K-M) methodology.
Phase 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
PFS is defined as the number of days from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methodology.
Phase 2: Overall Survival (OS)
OS is defined as the number of days from the date of the first dose of study drug to the date of death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, OS was censored at the last known alive date. The distribution of OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.
Phase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst Pain
The BPI-SF is a pain-specific measure developed to assess patient-reported severity (or intensity) of pain (4 items) and the impact of pain on daily functioning (7 items) in patients with cancer pain. The four pain severity items assess pain at its "worst in last 24 hours," "least in last 24 hours," "average," and "now" (current pain). For these items, participants are asked to rate their pain on an 11-point numeric rating scale with anchors of 0 (no pain) and 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). The Worst Pain scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating severe pain. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement.
Phase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
The QLQ-C30 is a 30-item subject self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social, and cognitive), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), a global health status/quality of life scale, and six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). For the Physical Functioning scale, participants rate five items on a four-point scale, with 1 as "not at all" and 4 as "very much." The Physical Functioning Scale scores range from 0 to 100 and were calculated per the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3rd edition), version 3.0. A high scale score represents high/healthy level of functioning. Positive changes from baseline indicate improvement.
Phase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
The QLQ-C30 is a 30-item subject self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social, and cognitive), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), a global health status/quality of life scale, and six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale, participants rate two items on a seven point scale, with 1 as "very poor" and 7 as "excellent." The Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale ranges from 0 to 100 and was calculated per the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3rd edition), version 3.0. A high score for the global health status/QoL represents a high QoL. Positive changes from baseline indicate improvement.
Phase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] Score
PROMIS Cancer Fatigue SF is a seven item questionnaire that assesses the impact and experience of fatigue over the past 7 days. All questions employ the following five response options: 1 = Not at all, 2 = A little bit, 3 = Somewhat, 4 = Quite a bit, and 5 = Very much. The total raw score is the sum of the responses to each question and is converted to a T-score. The T-score re-scales the total raw score to a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. The [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] 7a T-Scores range from 29.4 to 83.2, with higher scores indicating more fatigue. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement.

Full Information

First Posted
October 12, 2012
Last Updated
March 16, 2023
Sponsor
AbbVie
Collaborators
Genentech, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01794520
Brief Title
Study Evaluating ABT-199 in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Official Title
A Phase 1/2 Study Evaluating the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of ABT-199 in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 10, 2012 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 29, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 29, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
AbbVie
Collaborators
Genentech, Inc.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The Phase 1 primary objectives of this study were to assess the safety profile, characterize pharmacokinetics (PK) and determine the dosing schedule, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and recommended Phase 2 dose (RPTD) of ABT-199 (venetoclax) when administered in participants with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. This study also assessed the safety profile and PK of venetoclax in combination with dexamethasone in participants with t(11;14)-positive multiple myeloma. The Phase 2 primary objective was to further evaluate the objective response rate (ORR) and very good partial response or better rate (VGPR+) in participants with t(11;14)-positive multiple myeloma.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Keywords
Relapsed multiple myeloma, Refractory multiple myeloma, Multiple myeloma, Relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 1, Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Sequential Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
117 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants in the dose-escalation cohort received 300 mg of venetoclax daily on Days 1 -21 of each cycle after a 2-week lead-in period, during which venetoclax doses were increased weekly.
Arm Title
Phase 1: Venetoclax 600 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants in the dose-escalation cohort received 600 mg of venetoclax daily on Days 1 -21 of each cycle after a 2-week lead-in period, during which venetoclax doses were increased weekly.
Arm Title
Phase 1: Venetoclax 900 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants in the dose-escalation cohort received 900 mg of venetoclax daily on Days 1 -21 of each cycle after a 2-week lead-in period, during which venetoclax doses were increased weekly.
Arm Title
Phase 1: Venetoclax 1200 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants in the dose-escalation cohort received 1200 mg of venetoclax daily on Days 1 -21 of each cycle after a 2-week lead-in period, during which venetoclax doses were increased weekly.
Arm Title
Phase 1 Safety Expansion: Venetoclax 1200 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants in the safety expansion cohort received 1200 mg of venetoclax daily on Days 1 - 21 of each cycle after a 2-week lead-in period, during which venetoclax doses were increased weekly.
Arm Title
Phase 1 Combination: Venetoclax 800 mg/Dexamethasone 20 or 40 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants with t(11;14) translocation multiple myeloma received daily venetoclax at a dose of 800 mg (no lead-in period) on Days 1- 21 of each cycle concomitant with weekly dexamethasone at a dose of 40 mg (20 mg for those aged ≥ 75 years).
Arm Title
Phase 2 Expansion: Venetoclax 800 mg/Dexamethasone 20 or 40 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The Phase 2 cohort further explored the efficacy of venetoclax in combination with dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory participants with t(11;14) translocation multiple myeloma. Participants received daily venetoclax at a dose of 800 mg (no lead-in period) on Days 1- 21 of each cycle concomitant with weekly dexamethasone at a dose of 40 mg (20 mg for those aged ≥ 75 years).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Venetoclax
Other Intervention Name(s)
ABT-199, VENCLEXTA®
Intervention Description
Each dose of venetoclax was to be taken with approximately 240 mL of water. On days that pre-dose pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling was required, dosing was to occur in the morning at the clinic at approximately 0900 (± 1 hour) to facilitate PK sampling. Dose Escalation cohort participants were to take venetoclax within 30 minutes after the completion of a standard low-fat breakfast with approximately 240 mL of water on Cycle 2 Day 1. On all other dosing days, participants were instructed to take venetoclax orally QD within 30 minutes after the completion of a low-fat breakfast. Tablets were to be swallowed whole and must not have been broken, chewed, or crushed.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Dexamethasone
Intervention Description
Tablets were administered by mouth per the dexamethasone prescribing information.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Description
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. The investigator assesses the relationship of each event to the use of study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is an important medical event that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the outcomes listed above. Treatment-emergent adverse events/treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TEAEs/TESAEs) are defined as any event that began or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug.
Time Frame
From first dose of study drug until 30 days following last dose of study drug (up to 2482 days)
Title
Phase 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Venetoclax
Description
Cmax is the highest concentration that a drug achieves in the blood after administration in a dosing interval.
Time Frame
Cycle 2, Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose
Title
Phase 1: Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Venetoclax
Description
Tmax is the the time at which the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) is observed.
Time Frame
Cycle 2, Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose
Title
Phase 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve Over Time From 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) of Venetoclax
Description
AUC is a measure of how long and how much drug is present in the body after dosing.
Time Frame
Cycle 2, Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose (dose escalation cohort); (1200 mg dose): Cycle 2, Day 1 at predose (safety expansion cohort, 1200 mg dose)
Title
Phase 2: Overall Response Rate
Description
Overall response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with documented best overall response of Partial Response (PR) or better (PR, Very good partial response [VGPR], Complete response [CR], or Stringent complete response [sCR]) per 2016 standard International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria.
Time Frame
Response was assessed at Cycle 2, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; estimated median time on follow-up was 31.7 months
Title
Phase 2: Very Good Partial Response Rate or Better
Description
The percentage of participants with documented best overall response of Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or better (VGPR, Complete response [CR], or Stringent complete response [sCR]) per 2016 standard International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria was computed.
Time Frame
Response was assessed at Cycle 2, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; estimated median time on follow-up was 31.7 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Phase 1: Overall Response Rate
Description
Overall response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with documented best overall response of Partial Response (PR) or better (PR, Very good partial response [VGPR], Complete response [CR], or Stringent complete response [sCR]) per 2011 International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria.
Time Frame
Response was assessed at Cycle 2, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; estimated median time on follow-up was 8.1 months
Title
Time to Response (TTR)
Description
TTR is defined as the number of days from the date of first dose of study drug until the date of their first favorable response of Partial Response (PR) or better (PR, Very good partial response [VGPR], Complete response [CR], or Stringent complete response [sCR]) per 2011 International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria (Phase 1) or 2016 IMWG criteria (Phase 2). If a participant did not experience a favorable response, they were to be censored at the date of last adequate assessment. TTR was analyzed by Kaplan- Meier (K-M)\ methodology.
Time Frame
Response was assessed at Cycle 2, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; Estimated median time on follow-up was 8.1 months for Phase 1 and 31.7 months for Phase 2
Title
Time to Progression (TTP)
Description
TTP is defined as the number of days from the date of first dose of study drug to the date of first documented disease progression or death due to multiple myeloma, whichever occurs first. TTP was analyzed by Kaplan- Meier (K-M) methodology.
Time Frame
Estimated median duration of follow-up was 8.1 months for Phase 1 and 31.7 months for Phase 2
Title
Duration of Response
Description
DOR is defined as the number of days from the date of first response of Partial Response (PR) or better to the date of first documented disease progression or death due to multiple myeloma, whichever occurs first. DOR was analyzed by Kaplan- Meier (K-M) methodology.
Time Frame
Assessed at Cycle 2, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; estimated median duration of follow-up was 8.1 months for Phase 1 and 31.7 months for Phase 2
Title
Phase 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Description
PFS is defined as the number of days from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methodology.
Time Frame
Estimated median duration of follow-up was 31.7 months
Title
Phase 2: Overall Survival (OS)
Description
OS is defined as the number of days from the date of the first dose of study drug to the date of death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, OS was censored at the last known alive date. The distribution of OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.
Time Frame
Estimated median duration of follow-up was 31.7 months
Title
Phase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst Pain
Description
The BPI-SF is a pain-specific measure developed to assess patient-reported severity (or intensity) of pain (4 items) and the impact of pain on daily functioning (7 items) in patients with cancer pain. The four pain severity items assess pain at its "worst in last 24 hours," "least in last 24 hours," "average," and "now" (current pain). For these items, participants are asked to rate their pain on an 11-point numeric rating scale with anchors of 0 (no pain) and 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). The Worst Pain scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating severe pain. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline; Cycle 3, Day 1; Cycle 5, Day 1; Cycle 7, Day 1; Cycle 9, Day 1; Cycle 11, Day 1; Cycle 13, Day 1; Cycle 15, Day 1; Cycle 17, Day 1; Cycle 19, Day 1; Cycle 21, Day 1; Cycle 23, Day 1; Cycle 25, Day 1; Final visit
Title
Phase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Description
The QLQ-C30 is a 30-item subject self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social, and cognitive), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), a global health status/quality of life scale, and six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). For the Physical Functioning scale, participants rate five items on a four-point scale, with 1 as "not at all" and 4 as "very much." The Physical Functioning Scale scores range from 0 to 100 and were calculated per the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3rd edition), version 3.0. A high scale score represents high/healthy level of functioning. Positive changes from baseline indicate improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline; Cycle 3, Day 1; Cycle 5, Day 1; Cycle 7, Day 1; Cycle 9, Day 1; Cycle 11, Day 1; Cycle 13, Day 1; Cycle 15, Day 1; Cycle 17, Day 1; Cycle 19, Day 1; Cycle 21, Day 1; Cycle 23, Day 1; Cycle 25, Day 1; Final visit
Title
Phase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Description
The QLQ-C30 is a 30-item subject self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social, and cognitive), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), a global health status/quality of life scale, and six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale, participants rate two items on a seven point scale, with 1 as "very poor" and 7 as "excellent." The Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale ranges from 0 to 100 and was calculated per the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3rd edition), version 3.0. A high score for the global health status/QoL represents a high QoL. Positive changes from baseline indicate improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline; Cycle 3, Day 1; Cycle 5, Day 1; Cycle 7, Day 1; Cycle 9, Day 1; Cycle 11, Day 1; Cycle 13, Day 1; Cycle 15, Day 1; Cycle 17, Day 1; Cycle 19, Day 1; Cycle 21, Day 1; Cycle 23, Day 1; Cycle 25, Day 1; Final visit
Title
Phase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] Score
Description
PROMIS Cancer Fatigue SF is a seven item questionnaire that assesses the impact and experience of fatigue over the past 7 days. All questions employ the following five response options: 1 = Not at all, 2 = A little bit, 3 = Somewhat, 4 = Quite a bit, and 5 = Very much. The total raw score is the sum of the responses to each question and is converted to a T-score. The T-score re-scales the total raw score to a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. The [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] 7a T-Scores range from 29.4 to 83.2, with higher scores indicating more fatigue. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline; Cycle 3, Day 1; Cycle 5, Day 1; Cycle 7, Day 1; Cycle 9, Day 1; Cycle 11, Day 1; Cycle 13, Day 1; Cycle 15, Day 1; Cycle 17, Day 1; Cycle 19, Day 1; Cycle 21, Day 1; Cycle 23, Day 1; Cycle 25, Day 1; Final visit

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance score of 1 or 0. Participants in the Phase 2 portion: ECOG performance score of 2, 1, or 0. Diagnosis of multiple myeloma (MM) previously treated with at least one prior line of therapy. Induction therapy followed by stem cell transplant and maintenance therapy will be considered a single line of therapy. For Safety Expansion, participants must have been previously treated with a proteasome inhibitor (e.g., bortezomib) and an immunomodulatory agent (e.g., thalidomide, lenalidomide). For Venetoclax-Dexamethasone Combination, participants must have been previously treated with a proteasome inhibitor (e.g., bortezomib) and an immunomodulatory agent (e.g., thalidomide, lenalidomide) AND have t(11;14)-positive multiple myeloma per the central lab testing. For Phase 2, participants must have MM positive for the t(11;14) translocation, as determined by an analytically validated fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay per the central laboratory testing (enrollment with local t(11;14)-positive FISH results only will be considered at the discretion of the Therapeutic Area MD). Participants must have evidence of disease progression on or within 60 days of last dose of most recent previous treatment based on International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria AND must have previously received at least 2 lines of therapy, including an immunomodulatory drug (lenalidomide or pomalidomide), a proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib, carfilzomib or ixazomib), daratumumab, and glucocorticoids. For US participants: Daratumumab combination regimen must be one of the prior lines of therapy (for this study, daratumumab plus corticosteroids will not be considered a combination regimen). For Non-US participants: Either daratumumab monotherapy or combination therapy is acceptable. Daratumumab monotherapy will be limited to approximately 20 percent of the total number of Phase 2 participants. Measurable disease at Screening: Serum monoclonal protein of at least 1.0 g/dL (10g/L) by protein electrophoresis. At least 200 mg of monoclonal protein in the urine on 24-hr electrophoresis. Serum immunoglobulin free light chain of at least 10 mg/dL and abnormal serum immunoglobulin kappa to lambda free light chain ratio. Participants with a history of autologous or allogenic stem cell transplantation must have adequate peripheral blood counts independent of any growth factor support, and have recovered from any transplant related toxicity(s) and be: At least 100 days post-autologous transplant prior to first dose of study drug or At least 6 months post-allogenic transplant prior to first dose of study drug and not have active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), i.e., requiring treatment. Meet the following laboratory parameters, per the reference range, at least once during the screening period: Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) of at least 1000/μL (Participants may use growth factor support to achieve ANC eligibility criteria). Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) not higher than 3 x Upper Limit of Normal Range (ULN). Calculated creatinine clearance of at least 30 mL/min using a modified Cockcroft-Gault calculation. Platelet count of at least 30,000 mm³ (independent of transfusion for 2 weeks). Hemoglobin of at least 8.0 g/dL (participants may receive blood transfusion to achieve hemoglobin eligibility criteria). Total bilirubin not higher than 1.5 x ULN (Participants with Gilbert's Syndrome may have bilirubin higher than 1.5 x ULN). Exclusion Criteria: Exhibits evidence of other clinically significant uncontrolled condition(s), including, but not limited to: Acute infection within 14 days prior to first dose of study drug requiring antibiotic, antifungal, or antiviral therapy. Diagnosis of fever and neutropenia within 1 week prior to first dose of study drug. Cardiovascular disability status of New York Heart Association Class ≥ 3. Significant history of renal, neurologic, psychiatric, endocrinologic, metabolic, immunologic, cardiovascular or hepatic disease, within the last 6 months that, in the opinion of the investigator, would adversely affect his/her participation in the study. History of other active malignancies other than multiple myeloma within the past 3 years prior to study entry, with the following exceptions: Adequately treated in situ carcinoma of the cervix uteri; Basal cell carcinoma of the skin or localized squamous cell carcinoma of the skin; Localized prostate cancer Gleason grade 6 or lower AND with stable prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels off treatment Previous malignancy confined and surgically resected (or treated with other modalities) with curative intent. Known Human Immunodeficiency Viral (HIV) infection. Active hepatitis B or C infection.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
ABBVIE INC.
Organizational Affiliation
AbbVie
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic - Scottsdale /ID# 75808
City
Scottsdale
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85259-5452
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences /ID# 170002
City
Little Rock
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72205
Country
United States
Facility Name
Yale University /ID# 203704
City
New Haven
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06510
Country
United States
Facility Name
Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute /ID# 74993
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30322
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ingalls Memorial Hosp /ID# 205346
City
Harvey
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60426
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tulane Cancer Center Clinic /ID# 204123
City
New Orleans
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70112
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tufts Medical Center /ID# 203814
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02111-1552
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center Michigan Medicine /ID# 170007
City
Ann Arbor
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48109
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic - Rochester /ID# 74994
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905-0001
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hattiesburg Clinic /ID# 201187
City
Hattiesburg
State/Province
Mississippi
ZIP/Postal Code
39401
Country
United States
Facility Name
Washington University-School of Medicine /ID# 76094
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Nebraska Medical Center /ID# 169158
City
Omaha
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68198-6840
Country
United States
Facility Name
The John Theurer Cancer /ID# 200248
City
Hackensack
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07601
Country
United States
Facility Name
Duke Cancer Center /ID# 129356
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27710-3000
Country
United States
Facility Name
University Hospitals - Seidman Cancer Center /ID# 204502
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44106-1716
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ohio State Cancer Center /ID# 200249
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43210
Country
United States
Facility Name
Avera Cancer Institute /ID# 204178
City
Sioux Falls
State/Province
South Dakota
ZIP/Postal Code
57105
Country
United States
Facility Name
Baylor University Medical Ctr. /ID# 170056
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75246
Country
United States
Facility Name
Swedish Cancer Institute - Edmonds /ID# 170006
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Univ of Wisconsin Hosp/Clinics /ID# 200246
City
Madison
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53792-0001
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medical College of Wisconsin /ID# 205229
City
Milwaukee
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53226-3522
Country
United States
Facility Name
UZ Brussel /ID# 170711
City
Jette
State/Province
Bruxelles-Capitale
ZIP/Postal Code
1090
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
ZNA Stuivenberg /ID# 170067
City
Antwerp
ZIP/Postal Code
2060
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Duplicate_University Hospital Leuven /ID# 170715
City
Leuven
ZIP/Postal Code
3000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
CHRU Lille - Hopital Claude Huriez /ID# 74995
City
Lille
State/Province
Hauts-de-France
ZIP/Postal Code
59037
Country
France
Facility Name
CHRU Tours - Hopital Bretonneau /ID# 126639
City
Tours CEDEX 9
State/Province
Indre-et-Loire
ZIP/Postal Code
37044
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU de Nantes, Hotel Dieu -HME /ID# 75033
City
Nantes
State/Province
Pays-de-la-Loire
ZIP/Postal Code
44000
Country
France
Facility Name
Duplicate_CHU Grenoble - Hopital Michallon /ID# 126658
City
Grenoble
ZIP/Postal Code
38043
Country
France
Facility Name
Ulleval, OUS /ID# 170707
City
Oslo
ZIP/Postal Code
0450
Country
Norway

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
AbbVie is committed to responsible data sharing regarding the clinical trials we sponsor. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information (e.g., protocols and clinical study reports), as long as the trials are not part of an ongoing or planned regulatory submission. This includes requests for clinical trial data for unlicensed products and indications.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
For details on when studies are available for sharing visit https://vivli.org/ourmember/abbvie/
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Access to this clinical trial data can be requested by any qualified researchers who engage in rigorous independent scientific research, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and statistical analysis plan and execution of a data sharing statement. Data requests can be submitted at any time after approval in the US and/or EU and a primary manuscript is accepted for publication. For more information on the process, or to submit a request, visit the following link https://www.abbvieclinicaltrials.com/hcp/data-sharing/
IPD Sharing URL
https://vivli.org/ourmember/abbvie/
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29018077
Citation
Kumar S, Kaufman JL, Gasparetto C, Mikhael J, Vij R, Pegourie B, Benboubker L, Facon T, Amiot M, Moreau P, Punnoose EA, Alzate S, Dunbar M, Xu T, Agarwal SK, Enschede SH, Leverson JD, Ross JA, Maciag PC, Verdugo M, Touzeau C. Efficacy of venetoclax as targeted therapy for relapsed/refractory t(11;14) multiple myeloma. Blood. 2017 Nov 30;130(22):2401-2409. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-06-788786. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
https://www.rxabbvie.com/
Description
This clinical study may be evaluating a usage that is not currently FDA approved. Please see US Prescribing Information for approved uses.

Learn more about this trial

Study Evaluating ABT-199 in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs