Evaluation of Performance and Usability of N6 in the Paediatric Population
Primary Purpose
Transplants and Implants, Hearing Loss
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
N6
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Transplants and Implants
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 5-14 years, currently using N5
- Minimum speech perception ability in noise of 30% at +10 decibels (dB) signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).
- Minimum of 2 years cochlear implant (CI) experience, including at least 6 months experience with their current processor
- Excellent verbal reporters
- Excellent record of attending clinical appointments.
- Attend a regular school,
- English 1st language.
- Excellent record of compliance with habilitation tasks.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Cognitive impairment, or other significant impairment that would impact on their ability to undertake task requirements
- Inability to attend study appointments.
Sites / Locations
- The Shepherd Centre
- Hear and Say CentreRecruiting
- Melbourne Cochlear Implant ClinicRecruiting
- The Hearing HouseRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
N6
N5
Arm Description
The N6 system comprises an investigational sound processor, remote assistant and fitting software
The current commercially-available cochlear implant system Performance of N5 will be compared to performance with N6 using a within-subject design.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Group usability performance data for N6 versus N5
The investigational sound processor, remote assistant and fitting software will be compared to the existing implant system on measures of speech perception and usability in a take-home study.
Secondary Outcome Measures
speech recognition scores in quiet and noise between the two processors
The CUNY sentences and CNC word lists will be administered in quiet and noise.
Useability questionnaire on the different sound processing features
An in house questionnaire has been developed where the parent is asked to rank various features of the device, and its usability on a 5-point Likert Scale
Subjective feedback on performance as well as patient preference between the 2 processors
The PEACH, TEACH and SELF (Ching & Hill, 2007) will be used to collect this information from the parent, teacher and child. These questionnaires have been used in many previous studies.
In addition, any verbal feedback provided by recipients will be noted on CRFs.
Evaluate the usability of the two systems in a group of children, their carers and their teachers
The information from the above questionnaires will be used to collectively compare the usability of the child's current processor and the N6 processor.
Clinical recommendations for fitting paediatric recipients with the new processor
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01800929
First Posted
August 27, 2012
Last Updated
February 28, 2013
Sponsor
Cochlear, Asia Pacific
Collaborators
The HEARing Co-operative Research Centre, Melbourne, Melbourne Cochlear Implant Clinic, Melbourne, The Shepherd Centre, Sydney, Hear and Say Centre, The Hearing House, Auckland
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01800929
Brief Title
Evaluation of Performance and Usability of N6 in the Paediatric Population
Official Title
Evaluation of Performance and Usability of N6 in the Paediatric Population
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
November 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 2013 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 2013 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Cochlear, Asia Pacific
Collaborators
The HEARing Co-operative Research Centre, Melbourne, Melbourne Cochlear Implant Clinic, Melbourne, The Shepherd Centre, Sydney, Hear and Say Centre, The Hearing House, Auckland
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance and usability of the N6 system in children with the N5 system.
Detailed Description
This study will evaluate the user benefits of the N6 system in the paediatric population currently equipped with N5. The performance and usability of both systems will be evaluated and compared. The performance of the N6 is expected to be at least equivalent to the N5.
Outcome measures:
City University of New York (CUNY) Sentence Test in quiet and noise
Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) words in quiet
in-house designed Usability questionnaires of the N6 system (information to be used internally)
PEACH, TEACH and SELF questionnaires - developed by Ching & Hill (2007). PEACH - The Parents' Evaluation of Aural/oral performance of Children TEACH - The Teachers' Evaluation of Aural/oral performance of Children for teachers SELF - The Child's Self evaluation of aural/oral performance.
Speech perception tests will be administered at baseline, then again three times, two weeks apart with the N6 processor - i.e. week 0, week 2, week 4 & week 6. Total time: 2 months.
Questionnaires will also be given at the same time points, to get baseline information, as well as N6 information
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Transplants and Implants, Hearing Loss
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
30 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
N6
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The N6 system comprises an investigational sound processor, remote assistant and fitting software
Arm Title
N5
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The current commercially-available cochlear implant system Performance of N5 will be compared to performance with N6 using a within-subject design.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
N6
Intervention Description
Children with N5 will be upgraded to the N6 for a period of up to 2 months to evaluate.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Group usability performance data for N6 versus N5
Description
The investigational sound processor, remote assistant and fitting software will be compared to the existing implant system on measures of speech perception and usability in a take-home study.
Time Frame
Nov 2012-June 2013
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
speech recognition scores in quiet and noise between the two processors
Description
The CUNY sentences and CNC word lists will be administered in quiet and noise.
Time Frame
Nov 2012-June 2013
Title
Useability questionnaire on the different sound processing features
Description
An in house questionnaire has been developed where the parent is asked to rank various features of the device, and its usability on a 5-point Likert Scale
Time Frame
Nov 2012-June 2013
Title
Subjective feedback on performance as well as patient preference between the 2 processors
Description
The PEACH, TEACH and SELF (Ching & Hill, 2007) will be used to collect this information from the parent, teacher and child. These questionnaires have been used in many previous studies.
In addition, any verbal feedback provided by recipients will be noted on CRFs.
Time Frame
Nov 2012-June 2013
Title
Evaluate the usability of the two systems in a group of children, their carers and their teachers
Description
The information from the above questionnaires will be used to collectively compare the usability of the child's current processor and the N6 processor.
Time Frame
Nov 2012-June 2013
Title
Clinical recommendations for fitting paediatric recipients with the new processor
Time Frame
Nov 2012-June 2013
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
5 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
14 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Age 5-14 years, currently using N5
Minimum speech perception ability in noise of 30% at +10 decibels (dB) signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).
Minimum of 2 years cochlear implant (CI) experience, including at least 6 months experience with their current processor
Excellent verbal reporters
Excellent record of attending clinical appointments.
Attend a regular school,
English 1st language.
Excellent record of compliance with habilitation tasks.
Exclusion Criteria:
Cognitive impairment, or other significant impairment that would impact on their ability to undertake task requirements
Inability to attend study appointments.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Robert Cowan, PhD
Phone
+61294286555
Email
r.cowan@unimelb.edu.au
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Valerie Looi, PhD
Phone
+61296115896
Email
vlooi@cochlear.com
Facility Information:
Facility Name
The Shepherd Centre
City
Sydney
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2008
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Active, not recruiting
Facility Name
Hear and Say Centre
City
Brisbane
State/Province
Queensland
ZIP/Postal Code
4066
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jane McGovern, M AUd St
Phone
+61738702221
Email
jane@hearandsay.com.au
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gabriella Constantinescu, PhD
Phone
+61738702221
Email
gabriella@hearandsaycentre.com.au
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rachel Finbow, M Aud
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jane McGovern, M Aud St
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Trudie Dowell, M Aud
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Beth Atkinson
Facility Name
Melbourne Cochlear Implant Clinic
City
Melbourne
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3002
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michelle Moran, M Aud
Phone
+61399298624
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alex Rousset, M Aud
Phone
+61399298624
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michelle Moran, M Aud
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alex Rousset, M Aud
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jaime Leigh, M Aud
Facility Name
The Hearing House
City
Auckland
Country
New Zealand
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Leigh Martelli, M Aud
Phone
+6495792333
Email
leigh@hearinghouse.co.nz
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Janet Digby
Phone
+6495792333
Email
janet@levare.co.nz
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Leigh Martelli, M Aud
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clair Spence, M Aud
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Evaluation of Performance and Usability of N6 in the Paediatric Population
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs