search
Back to results

Functional Impact of GLP-1 for Heart Failure Treatment (FIGHT) (FIGHT)

Primary Purpose

Acute Heart Failure

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Liraglutide
Placebo
Sponsored by
Duke University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Acute Heart Failure

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years
  2. AHFS as defined by the presence of at least 1 symptom (dyspnea, orthopnea, or edema) AND 1 sign (rales on auscultation, peripheral edema, ascites, pulmonary vascular congestion on chest radiography)
  3. AHFS is the primary cause of hospitalization
  4. Prior clinical diagnosis of HF
  5. Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction(LVEF) ≤ 40% during the preceding 3 months (if no echo within the preceding 3 months, an LVEF ≤ 30% during the preceding three years is acceptable)
  6. On evidence-based medication for HF (including beta-blocker and ACE-inhibitor/ARB) or previously deemed intolerant
  7. Use of at least 80 mg or furosemide total daily dose (or equivalent) prior to admission for AHFS (a lower dose of a loop diuretic combined with a thiazide will count as an "equivalent")
  8. Willingness to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. AHFS due to acute myocarditis or acute Myocardial Infarction
  2. Ongoing hemodynamically significant arrhythmias contributing to HF decompensation
  3. Inotrope, intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or other mechanical circulatory support use at the time of consent. Prior use will not exclude a patient.
  4. Current or planned left ventricular assist device therapy in next 180 days
  5. United Network for Organ Sharing status 1A or 1B
  6. B-type natriuretic peptide(BNP)< 250 or NT-proBNP<1,000 (Not required per protocol but if available and too low would be an exclusion; within 48 hours of consent)
  7. Hemoglobin (Hgb) < 8.0 g/dl
  8. Glomerular filtration rate(GFR) < 20 ml/min/1.73 m2 within 48 hours of consent
  9. Systolic blood pressure < 80 mmHg at consent
  10. Resting Heart Rate > 110 at consent
  11. Acute coronary syndrome within 4 weeks as defined by electrocardiographic (ECG) changes and biomarkers of myocardial necrosis (e.g. troponin) in an appropriate clinical setting (chest discomfort or anginal equivalent)
  12. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting or new biventricular pacing within past 4 weeks
  13. Primary hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
  14. Infiltrative cardiomyopathy
  15. Constrictive pericarditis or tamponade
  16. Complex congenital heart disease
  17. Non-cardiac pulmonary edema
  18. More than moderate aortic or mitral stenosis
  19. Intrinsic (prolapse, rheumatic) valve disease with severe mitral, aortic or tricuspid regurgitation
  20. Sepsis, active infection (excluding cystitis) or other comorbidity driving the HF decompensation
  21. Acute or chronic severe liver disease as evidenced by any of the following: encephalopathy, variceal bleeding, International Normalized Ration (INR) > 1.7 in the absence of anticoagulation treatment
  22. Terminal illness (other than HF) with expected survival of less than 1 year
  23. Previous adverse reaction to the study drug
  24. Receipt of any investigational product in the previous 30 days.
  25. Enrollment or planned enrollment in another randomized therapeutic clinical trial in next 6 months.
  26. Inability to comply with planned study procedures
  27. Pregnancy or breastfeeding mothers
  28. Women of reproductive age not on adequate contraception
  29. History of acute or chronic pancreatitis
  30. History of symptomatic gastroparesis
  31. Familial or personal history of medullary thyroid cancer or multiple endocrine neoplasia type-2 (MEN2)
  32. Prior weight-loss surgery (i.e., Roux-en-Y gastric bypass) or other gastric surgery associated with increased endogenous GLP-1 production
  33. Prior or ongoing treatment with GLP-1 receptor agonists
  34. Ongoing treatment with dipeptidyl peptide-IV inhibitors (1 week washout required)
  35. Ongoing treatment with thiazolidinedione
  36. Oxygen-dependent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  37. Diabetic patients with history of 2 or more severe hypoglycemia, Diabetic Ketoacidosis(DKA) or hyperglycemic, hyperosmotic nonketotic coma in the preceding 12 months.
  38. Diagnosis of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

40. If diabetic, inadequate glycemic control with glucose level > 300 mg/dL within 24 hours of randomization

Sites / Locations

  • Christiana Care Health Services
  • Emory University School of Medicine
  • Northwestern University
  • Johns Hopkins Hospital
  • Tufts Medical Center
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • Boston VA Healtcare System
  • Mayo Clinic
  • Washington University
  • Saint Louis University Hospital
  • Duke University
  • Southeast Regional Medical Center
  • University Hospitals- Case Medical Center
  • Metro Health System
  • Cleveland Clinic
  • Lancaster Heart and Stroke Foundation
  • University of Pennsylvaina
  • Jefferson Medical College
  • Temple University Hospital
  • Michael Debakey VA Medical Center
  • Intermountain Medical Center
  • University of Utah School of Medicine
  • Utah VA Medical Center
  • The University of Vermont- Fletcher Allen Health Care

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Liraglutide

Placebo

Arm Description

Increasing dose from 0.6mg, 1.2mg to 1.8mg SQ daily.

Placebo dose increasing from 0.6mg, 1.2mg to 1.8 mg SQ daily.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Global Ranking of Predefined Events
A rank score based on time to death, time to adjudicated heart failure hospitalization, and time-averaged proportional change in NTproBNP through d180. For patients that died, the patient with the shortest time from randomization to death is assigned rank 1, the second shortest time is assigned rank 2, etc. The patient with the longest time from randomization to death is assigned rank X. For patients that did not die but had a heart failure hospitalization, the patient with the shortest time from randomization to re-admission is assigned rank X+1 and the patient with the longest time from randomization to heart failure hospitalization is assigned rank Y. For patients that did not die or have a heart failure hospitalization, increases in time-averaged proportional change in NTproBNP indicate a worse result and the largest increase is assigned rank Y+1. The patient with the largest decrease is assigned rank N, where N is the sample size.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Volume Index
Change in Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Volume Index from baseline to 180 days.
Change in Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume Index
Change in left ventricular end-systolic volume index from baseline to day 180.
Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
Change in left ventricular ejection fraction from baseline to day 180
Change in Medial Filling Pressure
Change in medial filling pressure baseline to day 180.
Change in Lateral Filling Pressure
Change in lateral filling pressure baseline to day 180.
Change in 6 Minute Walk Distance
Change in 6 minute walk distance baseline to day 30
Change in 6 Minute Walk Distance
Change in 6 minute walk distance baseline to 90 days.
Change in 6 Minute Walk Distance
Change in 6 minute walk distance baseline to 180 days.
Change in Clinical Summary Score Using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
Change in clinical summary score using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) baseline to 30 days. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life.In the KCCQ, an overall summary score can be derived from the physical function, symptom (frequency and severity), social function and quality of life domains. For each domain, the validity, reproducibility, responsiveness and interpretability have been independently established. Each question is answered by the subject on a 6 point scale (Extremely limited, quite a bit limited, moderately limited, slightly limited, not at all limited, Limited for other reasons or did not do this activity).Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
Change in Clinical Summary Score Using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
Change in clinical summary score using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) baseline to 90 days.The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life.In the KCCQ, an overall summary score can be derived from the physical function, symptom (frequency and severity), social function and quality of life domains. For each domain, the validity, reproducibility, responsiveness and interpretability have been independently established. Each question is answered by the subject on a 6 point scale (Extremely limited, quite a bit limited, moderately limited, slightly limited, not at all limited, Limited for other reasons or did not do this activity).Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
Change in Clinical Summary Score Using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
Change in clinical summary score using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) from baseline to day 180.The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life.In the KCCQ, an overall summary score can be derived from the physical function, symptom (frequency and severity), social function and quality of life domains. For each domain, the validity, reproducibility, responsiveness and interpretability have been independently established. Each question is answered by the subject on a 6 point scale (Extremely limited, quite a bit limited, moderately limited, slightly limited, not at all limited, Limited for other reasons or did not do this activity).Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) change in overall summary score baseline to 30 days.The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life.In the KCCQ, an overall summary score can be derived from the physical function, symptom (frequency and severity), social function and quality of life domains. For each domain, the validity, reproducibility, responsiveness and interpretability have been independently established. Each question is answered by the subject on a 6 point scale (Extremely limited, quite a bit limited, moderately limited, slightly limited, not at all limited, Limited for other reasons or did not do this activity).Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) change in overall summary score baseline to 90 days.The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life.In the KCCQ, an overall summary score can be derived from the physical function, symptom (frequency and severity), social function and quality of life domains. For each domain, the validity, reproducibility, responsiveness and interpretability have been independently established. Each question is answered by the subject on a 6 point scale (Extremely limited, quite a bit limited, moderately limited, slightly limited, not at all limited, Limited for other reasons or did not do this activity).Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score.
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) change in overall summary score baseline to 180 days.The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life.In the KCCQ, an overall summary score can be derived from the physical function, symptom (frequency and severity), social function and quality of life domains. For each domain, the validity, reproducibility, responsiveness and interpretability have been independently established. Each question is answered by the subject on a 6 point scale (Extremely limited, quite a bit limited, moderately limited, slightly limited, not at all limited, Limited for other reasons or did not do this activity).Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
Individual Component of the Primary Endpoint- Mortality
Individual component of the primary endpoint of mortality at 180 days after randomization
Individual Component of the Primary Endpoint- Heart Failure Hospitalization
Individual component of the primary endpoint- Heart Failure hospitalization from randomization to 180 days
Individual Component of the Primary Endpoint- Time-averaged Proportional Change in NT-proBNP
Individual component of the primary endpoint- time-averaged proportional change in NT-proBNP from baseline to 180 days
Global Ranking of Predefined Events
A rank score based on time to death, time to adjudicated heart failure hospitalization, time to emergency department visit and time-averaged proportional change in NTproBNP through d180. See Outcome Measure 1 for a general description of the outcome derivation.

Full Information

First Posted
February 7, 2013
Last Updated
February 14, 2017
Sponsor
Duke University
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01800968
Brief Title
Functional Impact of GLP-1 for Heart Failure Treatment (FIGHT)
Acronym
FIGHT
Official Title
Functional Impact of GLP-1 for Heart Failure Treatment
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Duke University
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The primary objective is to test the hypothesis that, compared with placebo, therapy with Subcutaneous (SQ) GLP-1 agonist in the post-Acute Heart Failure Syndrome (AHFS) discharge period will be associated with greater clinical stability at six months as assessed by a composite clinical endpoint.
Detailed Description
Hospitalization for AHFS identifies individuals at increased risk of death and re-hospitalization following discharge. This increased risk justifies intervention with novel therapy during the vulnerable post-discharge period to enhance clinical stability and prevent early HF mortality and readmissions. As heart failure (HF) progresses, impairments in metabolism render the heart substrate constrained, limiting cardiac metabolism. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is a naturally occurring incretin peptide that enhances cellular glucose uptake by stimulating insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity in target tissues. Preclinical and early-phase clinical data support GLP-1 as an effective therapy for advanced HF while use of GLP-1 receptor agonists in large numbers of patients with diabetes reveal a good safety profile and reductions in adverse cardiac outcomes.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Acute Heart Failure

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
300 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Liraglutide
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Increasing dose from 0.6mg, 1.2mg to 1.8mg SQ daily.
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo dose increasing from 0.6mg, 1.2mg to 1.8 mg SQ daily.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Liraglutide
Other Intervention Name(s)
Victoza
Intervention Description
Active Drug
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Global Ranking of Predefined Events
Description
A rank score based on time to death, time to adjudicated heart failure hospitalization, and time-averaged proportional change in NTproBNP through d180. For patients that died, the patient with the shortest time from randomization to death is assigned rank 1, the second shortest time is assigned rank 2, etc. The patient with the longest time from randomization to death is assigned rank X. For patients that did not die but had a heart failure hospitalization, the patient with the shortest time from randomization to re-admission is assigned rank X+1 and the patient with the longest time from randomization to heart failure hospitalization is assigned rank Y. For patients that did not die or have a heart failure hospitalization, increases in time-averaged proportional change in NTproBNP indicate a worse result and the largest increase is assigned rank Y+1. The patient with the largest decrease is assigned rank N, where N is the sample size.
Time Frame
Randomization to 180 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Volume Index
Description
Change in Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Volume Index from baseline to 180 days.
Time Frame
Baseline to 180 days
Title
Change in Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume Index
Description
Change in left ventricular end-systolic volume index from baseline to day 180.
Time Frame
Baseline to 180 days
Title
Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
Description
Change in left ventricular ejection fraction from baseline to day 180
Time Frame
Baseline to 180 days
Title
Change in Medial Filling Pressure
Description
Change in medial filling pressure baseline to day 180.
Time Frame
Baseline to 180 days
Title
Change in Lateral Filling Pressure
Description
Change in lateral filling pressure baseline to day 180.
Time Frame
Baseline to 180 days
Title
Change in 6 Minute Walk Distance
Description
Change in 6 minute walk distance baseline to day 30
Time Frame
Baseline to day 30
Title
Change in 6 Minute Walk Distance
Description
Change in 6 minute walk distance baseline to 90 days.
Time Frame
Baseline to 90 days
Title
Change in 6 Minute Walk Distance
Description
Change in 6 minute walk distance baseline to 180 days.
Time Frame
Baseline to 180 days
Title
Change in Clinical Summary Score Using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
Description
Change in clinical summary score using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) baseline to 30 days. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life.In the KCCQ, an overall summary score can be derived from the physical function, symptom (frequency and severity), social function and quality of life domains. For each domain, the validity, reproducibility, responsiveness and interpretability have been independently established. Each question is answered by the subject on a 6 point scale (Extremely limited, quite a bit limited, moderately limited, slightly limited, not at all limited, Limited for other reasons or did not do this activity).Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
Time Frame
Baseline to 30 days
Title
Change in Clinical Summary Score Using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
Description
Change in clinical summary score using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) baseline to 90 days.The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life.In the KCCQ, an overall summary score can be derived from the physical function, symptom (frequency and severity), social function and quality of life domains. For each domain, the validity, reproducibility, responsiveness and interpretability have been independently established. Each question is answered by the subject on a 6 point scale (Extremely limited, quite a bit limited, moderately limited, slightly limited, not at all limited, Limited for other reasons or did not do this activity).Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
Time Frame
Baseline to 90 days
Title
Change in Clinical Summary Score Using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
Description
Change in clinical summary score using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) from baseline to day 180.The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life.In the KCCQ, an overall summary score can be derived from the physical function, symptom (frequency and severity), social function and quality of life domains. For each domain, the validity, reproducibility, responsiveness and interpretability have been independently established. Each question is answered by the subject on a 6 point scale (Extremely limited, quite a bit limited, moderately limited, slightly limited, not at all limited, Limited for other reasons or did not do this activity).Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
Time Frame
Baseline to day 180
Title
Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score
Description
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) change in overall summary score baseline to 30 days.The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life.In the KCCQ, an overall summary score can be derived from the physical function, symptom (frequency and severity), social function and quality of life domains. For each domain, the validity, reproducibility, responsiveness and interpretability have been independently established. Each question is answered by the subject on a 6 point scale (Extremely limited, quite a bit limited, moderately limited, slightly limited, not at all limited, Limited for other reasons or did not do this activity).Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
Time Frame
Baseline to 30 days
Title
Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score
Description
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) change in overall summary score baseline to 90 days.The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life.In the KCCQ, an overall summary score can be derived from the physical function, symptom (frequency and severity), social function and quality of life domains. For each domain, the validity, reproducibility, responsiveness and interpretability have been independently established. Each question is answered by the subject on a 6 point scale (Extremely limited, quite a bit limited, moderately limited, slightly limited, not at all limited, Limited for other reasons or did not do this activity).Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
Time Frame
Baseline to 90 days
Title
Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score.
Description
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) change in overall summary score baseline to 180 days.The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life.In the KCCQ, an overall summary score can be derived from the physical function, symptom (frequency and severity), social function and quality of life domains. For each domain, the validity, reproducibility, responsiveness and interpretability have been independently established. Each question is answered by the subject on a 6 point scale (Extremely limited, quite a bit limited, moderately limited, slightly limited, not at all limited, Limited for other reasons or did not do this activity).Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
Time Frame
Baseline to 180 days
Title
Individual Component of the Primary Endpoint- Mortality
Description
Individual component of the primary endpoint of mortality at 180 days after randomization
Time Frame
Randomization to 180 days
Title
Individual Component of the Primary Endpoint- Heart Failure Hospitalization
Description
Individual component of the primary endpoint- Heart Failure hospitalization from randomization to 180 days
Time Frame
Randomization to 180 days
Title
Individual Component of the Primary Endpoint- Time-averaged Proportional Change in NT-proBNP
Description
Individual component of the primary endpoint- time-averaged proportional change in NT-proBNP from baseline to 180 days
Time Frame
Baseline to 180 days
Title
Global Ranking of Predefined Events
Description
A rank score based on time to death, time to adjudicated heart failure hospitalization, time to emergency department visit and time-averaged proportional change in NTproBNP through d180. See Outcome Measure 1 for a general description of the outcome derivation.
Time Frame
Baseline to 180 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥ 18 years AHFS as defined by the presence of at least 1 symptom (dyspnea, orthopnea, or edema) AND 1 sign (rales on auscultation, peripheral edema, ascites, pulmonary vascular congestion on chest radiography) AHFS is the primary cause of hospitalization Prior clinical diagnosis of HF Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction(LVEF) ≤ 40% during the preceding 3 months (if no echo within the preceding 3 months, an LVEF ≤ 30% during the preceding three years is acceptable) On evidence-based medication for HF (including beta-blocker and ACE-inhibitor/ARB) or previously deemed intolerant Use of at least 80 mg or furosemide total daily dose (or equivalent) prior to admission for AHFS (a lower dose of a loop diuretic combined with a thiazide will count as an "equivalent") Willingness to provide informed consent Exclusion Criteria: AHFS due to acute myocarditis or acute Myocardial Infarction Ongoing hemodynamically significant arrhythmias contributing to HF decompensation Inotrope, intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or other mechanical circulatory support use at the time of consent. Prior use will not exclude a patient. Current or planned left ventricular assist device therapy in next 180 days United Network for Organ Sharing status 1A or 1B B-type natriuretic peptide(BNP)< 250 or NT-proBNP<1,000 (Not required per protocol but if available and too low would be an exclusion; within 48 hours of consent) Hemoglobin (Hgb) < 8.0 g/dl Glomerular filtration rate(GFR) < 20 ml/min/1.73 m2 within 48 hours of consent Systolic blood pressure < 80 mmHg at consent Resting Heart Rate > 110 at consent Acute coronary syndrome within 4 weeks as defined by electrocardiographic (ECG) changes and biomarkers of myocardial necrosis (e.g. troponin) in an appropriate clinical setting (chest discomfort or anginal equivalent) Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting or new biventricular pacing within past 4 weeks Primary hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Infiltrative cardiomyopathy Constrictive pericarditis or tamponade Complex congenital heart disease Non-cardiac pulmonary edema More than moderate aortic or mitral stenosis Intrinsic (prolapse, rheumatic) valve disease with severe mitral, aortic or tricuspid regurgitation Sepsis, active infection (excluding cystitis) or other comorbidity driving the HF decompensation Acute or chronic severe liver disease as evidenced by any of the following: encephalopathy, variceal bleeding, International Normalized Ration (INR) > 1.7 in the absence of anticoagulation treatment Terminal illness (other than HF) with expected survival of less than 1 year Previous adverse reaction to the study drug Receipt of any investigational product in the previous 30 days. Enrollment or planned enrollment in another randomized therapeutic clinical trial in next 6 months. Inability to comply with planned study procedures Pregnancy or breastfeeding mothers Women of reproductive age not on adequate contraception History of acute or chronic pancreatitis History of symptomatic gastroparesis Familial or personal history of medullary thyroid cancer or multiple endocrine neoplasia type-2 (MEN2) Prior weight-loss surgery (i.e., Roux-en-Y gastric bypass) or other gastric surgery associated with increased endogenous GLP-1 production Prior or ongoing treatment with GLP-1 receptor agonists Ongoing treatment with dipeptidyl peptide-IV inhibitors (1 week washout required) Ongoing treatment with thiazolidinedione Oxygen-dependent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Diabetic patients with history of 2 or more severe hypoglycemia, Diabetic Ketoacidosis(DKA) or hyperglycemic, hyperosmotic nonketotic coma in the preceding 12 months. Diagnosis of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus 40. If diabetic, inadequate glycemic control with glucose level > 300 mg/dL within 24 hours of randomization
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Adrian Hernandez, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Duke University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Eugene Bruanwald, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Harvard University
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Christiana Care Health Services
City
Newark
State/Province
Delaware
ZIP/Postal Code
19718
Country
United States
Facility Name
Emory University School of Medicine
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30322
Country
United States
Facility Name
Northwestern University
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States
Facility Name
Johns Hopkins Hospital
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21287
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tufts Medical Center
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02111
Country
United States
Facility Name
Massachusetts General Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Brigham and Women's Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02115
Country
United States
Facility Name
Boston VA Healtcare System
City
West Roxbury
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02132
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905
Country
United States
Facility Name
Washington University
City
St. Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Facility Name
Saint Louis University Hospital
City
St. Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63117
Country
United States
Facility Name
Duke University
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27705
Country
United States
Facility Name
Southeast Regional Medical Center
City
Lumberton
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28538
Country
United States
Facility Name
University Hospitals- Case Medical Center
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44106
Country
United States
Facility Name
Metro Health System
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44109
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195
Country
United States
Facility Name
Lancaster Heart and Stroke Foundation
City
Lancaster
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
17603
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pennsylvaina
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Jefferson Medical College
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19107
Country
United States
Facility Name
Temple University Hospital
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19140
Country
United States
Facility Name
Michael Debakey VA Medical Center
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Intermountain Medical Center
City
Murray
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84157
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Utah School of Medicine
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84132
Country
United States
Facility Name
Utah VA Medical Center
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84132
Country
United States
Facility Name
The University of Vermont- Fletcher Allen Health Care
City
Burlington
State/Province
Vermont
ZIP/Postal Code
05401
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35654972
Citation
Lerman JB, Giamberardino SN, Hernandez AF, Felker GM, Shah SH, McGarrah RW. Plasma metabolites associated with functional and clinical outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction with and without type 2 diabetes. Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 2;12(1):9183. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12973-0.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32362166
Citation
Redouane B, Greene SJ, Fudim M, Vaduganathan M, Ambrosy AP, Sun JL, DeVore AD, McNulty SE, Mentz RJ, Hernandez AF, Felker GM, Cooper LB, Borlaug BA, Velazquez EJ, Margulies KB, Sharma A. Effects of Liraglutide on Worsening Renal Function Among Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Insights From the FIGHT Trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2020 May;13(5):e006758. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006758. Epub 2020 May 4.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30120812
Citation
Sharma A, Ambrosy AP, DeVore AD, Margulies KB, McNulty SE, Mentz RJ, Hernandez AF, Michael Felker G, Cooper LB, Lala A, Vader J, Groake JD, Borlaug BA, Velazquez EJ. Liraglutide and weight loss among patients with advanced heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction: insights from the FIGHT trial. ESC Heart Fail. 2018 Dec;5(6):1035-1043. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12334. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
27483064
Citation
Margulies KB, Hernandez AF, Redfield MM, Givertz MM, Oliveira GH, Cole R, Mann DL, Whellan DJ, Kiernan MS, Felker GM, McNulty SE, Anstrom KJ, Shah MR, Braunwald E, Cappola TP; NHLBI Heart Failure Clinical Research Network. Effects of Liraglutide on Clinical Stability Among Patients With Advanced Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Aug 2;316(5):500-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.10260.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Functional Impact of GLP-1 for Heart Failure Treatment (FIGHT)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs