search
Back to results

Role of Intrauterine Cornual Block in Combination With Direct Cervical Block in Outpatient Endometrial Ablation (ICOB)

Primary Purpose

Endometrial Diseases

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Local Anaesthetic
Sponsored by
Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Endometrial Diseases focused on measuring Ablation, Outpatient

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 50 Years (Adult)FemaleAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All women between the ages of 18 - 50 years presenting to the gynaecology outpatient clinic scheduled for an outpatient hysteroscopic intrauterine therapeutic intervention such as endometrial ablation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women with contraindications to hysteroscopic procedures such as atypical endometrial hyperplasia or endometrial cancer, undiagnosed abnormal vaginal bleeding, current lower pelvic infection or uterine abnormalities

    • Women who are allergic to local anaesthesia
    • Not technically possible to perform a hysteroscopy e.g. women with distorted uterine cavity due to large fibroids
    • Women considered vulnerable (e.g. current mental illness, emotionally labile, or learning difficulties)
    • Women who decline to be randomised and request the additional anaesthetic or decline it will form a separate group to be studied and will be administered the VAS similar to the trial group. This group will be analysed separately to determine whether they are significantly different to those patients who consent to being part of the trial.

Sites / Locations

  • Birmingham Women's Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Local anaesthetic

Saline

Arm Description

2mls consisting of 1ml of 3% mepivacaine (short / medium acting) and 1ml of 0.5% bupivacaine (long acting)

2mls of Normal Saline solution in a 5ml syringe

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Visual Analogue scale evaluating pain
To determine the effectiveness of intrauterine cornual block by evaluating pain directly attributable to outpatient hysteroscopic endometrial ablation assessed by using an ungraduated 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) administered immediately after the procedure prior to shifting patient to the recovery unit.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Visual Analogue scale evaluating pain
To determine the effectiveness of intrauterine cornual block by evaluating pain using VAS at 1 hour after the procedure and prior to discharge from the hospital. To assess the total requirements for rescue analgesia in the first 24-hour post-operative period between the two groups.

Full Information

First Posted
February 24, 2013
Last Updated
June 7, 2019
Sponsor
Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust
Collaborators
University of Birmingham
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01808898
Brief Title
Role of Intrauterine Cornual Block in Combination With Direct Cervical Block in Outpatient Endometrial Ablation
Acronym
ICOB
Official Title
Randomized Double-blind Placebo Controlled Trial to Assess the Role of Intrauterine Cornual Block (ICOB) in Combination With Direct Cervical Block in Outpatient Endometrial Ablation
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust
Collaborators
University of Birmingham

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The usual intervention to control the pain during an outpatient endometrial ablation has been to use local anaesthesia (LA) injection just in the neck of the womb (cervix). However, this alone may not be sufficient to control the pain completely. Therefore, we want to find out whether an injection of LA given deep into the muscle of the womb (myometrium), in addition to that in the cervix, has a better effect on controlling the pain during the procedure. All women attending gynaecology outpatient clinics, who have consented for an outpatient hysteroscopic procedure, will be invited to take part in the study. The study will be carried out in the outpatient hysteroscopy clinic at Birmingham Women's Hospital. As part of standard pain control method during an outpatient endometrial ablation, all women will receive an injection of LA in the cervix of the uterus to 'freeze it'. During hysteroscopy a randomly selected treatment group will receive an injection into deep muscle containing only normal saline (control group) whereas the experiment group will receive fast / long acting local anaesthesia (cornual block). Women will be asked to rate the degree of pain by placing a mark on an ungraduated 10 cm horizontal line. These scales will be given before the procedure, during LA injection, immediately after, one hour and at the time of discharge from hospital. The results will help future patients undergoing a similar procedure to have much better pain relief and allow many more to have the procedure without the side effects of a general anaesthetic and its risks. In addition to having less pain, it may reduce the number of painkillers needed as well as any stay in hospital. In future this may also allow a greater variety of procedures to be done in an outpatient setting.
Detailed Description
Outpatient local anaesthesic (LA) hysteroscopic intrauterine therapeutic interventions such as endometrial ablation have gained wider acceptance in the last decade. However, pain experienced during these procedures can be a disincentive and is the commonest reason for the use of escalating levels of analgesia post procedure, which results in prolongation of hospital stay and recovery. Various methods of LA have been studied including intrauterine topical lignocaine or cervical block using topical lignocaine, paracervical block or intracervical block. However, a single site block individually may not be sufficient to control the pain completely due to inability of the one site block to affect the sensitivity of the whole uterus, as the uterine fundus is effectively still unanaesthetised. This may be due to the uterus receiving complex innervations from different nerve routes such as the uterovaginal plexus, the Frankenhauser nerve plexuses, parasympathetic ganglia and the thoracic nerve. Therefore, it seems logical to use a direct cervical block to block the sensation through uterovaginal plexus and use an additional deep myometrial block adjacent to each cornua to directly block the thoracic nerve supply. To date, only one small observational study has looked at the effect of such a combined block in relieving pain during outpatient hysteroscopic procedures. Therefore, we propose to undertake a double blind randomised controlled trial to address this question by comparing effectiveness of a standard direct cervical block and intrauterine cornual block (ICOB) versus a direct cervical block and a normal saline intrauterine cornual injection (control).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Endometrial Diseases
Keywords
Ablation, Outpatient

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Factorial Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
93 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Local anaesthetic
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
2mls consisting of 1ml of 3% mepivacaine (short / medium acting) and 1ml of 0.5% bupivacaine (long acting)
Arm Title
Saline
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
2mls of Normal Saline solution in a 5ml syringe
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Local Anaesthetic
Other Intervention Name(s)
Mepivacaine and bupivacaine
Intervention Description
On the day of the procedure and before the patients are treated, a designated clinician will draw up the local anaesthetic (2mls consisting of 1ml of 3% mepivacaine (short / medium acting) and 1ml of 0.5% bupivacaine (long acting)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Visual Analogue scale evaluating pain
Description
To determine the effectiveness of intrauterine cornual block by evaluating pain directly attributable to outpatient hysteroscopic endometrial ablation assessed by using an ungraduated 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) administered immediately after the procedure prior to shifting patient to the recovery unit.
Time Frame
administered immediately after the procedure
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Visual Analogue scale evaluating pain
Description
To determine the effectiveness of intrauterine cornual block by evaluating pain using VAS at 1 hour after the procedure and prior to discharge from the hospital. To assess the total requirements for rescue analgesia in the first 24-hour post-operative period between the two groups.
Time Frame
1 hour after procedure and at discharge from hospital

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: All women between the ages of 18 - 50 years presenting to the gynaecology outpatient clinic scheduled for an outpatient hysteroscopic intrauterine therapeutic intervention such as endometrial ablation. Exclusion Criteria: Women with contraindications to hysteroscopic procedures such as atypical endometrial hyperplasia or endometrial cancer, undiagnosed abnormal vaginal bleeding, current lower pelvic infection or uterine abnormalities Women who are allergic to local anaesthesia Not technically possible to perform a hysteroscopy e.g. women with distorted uterine cavity due to large fibroids Women considered vulnerable (e.g. current mental illness, emotionally labile, or learning difficulties) Women who decline to be randomised and request the additional anaesthetic or decline it will form a separate group to be studied and will be administered the VAS similar to the trial group. This group will be analysed separately to determine whether they are significantly different to those patients who consent to being part of the trial.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Janesh K Gupta, MSc MD FRCOG
Organizational Affiliation
Birmingham University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Birmingham Women's Hospital
City
Birmingham
ZIP/Postal Code
B15 2TG
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26546298
Citation
Kumar V, Tryposkiadis K, Gupta JK. Hysteroscopic local anesthetic intrauterine cornual block in office endometrial ablation: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2016 Feb;105(2):474-80.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.019. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Role of Intrauterine Cornual Block in Combination With Direct Cervical Block in Outpatient Endometrial Ablation

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs