search
Back to results

Patient Targeted Upper Extremity Rehabilitation After Stroke (TARG)

Primary Purpose

Stroke

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Task Practice Physical Rehabilitation Therapy
Sponsored by
VA Office of Research and Development
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Stroke focused on measuring rehabilitation, occupational therapy, upper extremity

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 89 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

Individuals are eligible for this study if they have:

  • experienced a stroke at least 3 months prior that has resulted in unilateral hemiparesis.
  • exhibit voluntarily paretic arm shoulder flexion 30 degrees with simultaneous elbow extension 20 degrees.
  • impairment with overhead reach and wrist circumduction and fine motor dexterity.
  • passive range of motion in affected shoulder, elbow and wrist within 20 degrees of normal values.

Exclusion Criteria:

Individuals are not eligible for this study if they have:

  • a lesion in the brainstem or cerebellum.
  • another neurological disease that may impair motor skills (e.g., Parkinson's Disease).
  • pain in the affected upper extremity that would limit participation in the study intervention.
  • difficulty understanding and following 3-step directions.
  • difficulty sitting independently without postural support.
  • an orthopedic condition or impaired corrected vision that alters the kinematics of reaching.
  • are unable to travel to and remain in Charleston SC for the duration of the 4-week study.

Sites / Locations

  • Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Targeted Task Practice

Non-Targeted Task Practice

Arm Description

Targeted task practice is defined as a therapy program aimed at patient-specific upper extremity motor impairment levels and systematically progressed to assure an ongoing "just right" match between task-difficulty and patient-ability. Participants attended occupational therapy 3 times per week for 4 weeks. Each therapy session was 2 hours in length.

Non-targeted task practice is a standard of care treatment consisting of task practice with no guidance from the measurement framework to systematically address specific upper extremity motor impairment levels or progress rehabilitation therapy. Participants attended occupational therapy 3 times per week for 4 weeks. Each therapy session was 2 hours in length.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) is a stroke rehabilitation assessment of arm/hand movement impairment. It is traditionally scored by assigning 30 items assessing voluntary arm/hand movements and 3 items assessing reflexes an ordinal rating (0=unable, 1=partial, 2=near normal), then summing the ratings to obtain a general statement of ability. Instead of this traditional scoring method, the investigators will eliminate the reflex items, thus reporting the aggregate score possible from 0/60 to 60/60 points. Higher scores indicate greater levels of arm movement ability.
Wolf Motor Function Test
The Wolf Motor Function Test is an assessment of arm movement function. Subjects are timed (seconds) as they complete 15 functional movements with the paretic arm. The average time required to complete an item is reported in seconds so that lower scores (quicker completion times) indicate greater functional movement skills. Post-intervention averages were compared to baseline averages so a reduction in timed averages indicates improved movement function.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Surface Electromyographic (sEMG) Analysis of Functional Arm Muscle Activations
sEMG analysis is an objective method to study muscle coordination during functional arm movements. Subjects will be fitted with sensors on the skin placed over 8 arm/shoulder muscles on both arms. The sensors will detect the muscle activity of these muscles during functional reaching movements. sEMG data will be recorded with a 16-channel wireless Motion Labs EMG system and processed with custom ORBIS software.

Full Information

First Posted
March 11, 2013
Last Updated
August 5, 2019
Sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Collaborators
Medical University of South Carolina
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01819506
Brief Title
Patient Targeted Upper Extremity Rehabilitation After Stroke
Acronym
TARG
Official Title
Patient-Targeted Upper Extremity Rehabilitation After Stroke
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 1, 2013 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 31, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 31, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Collaborators
Medical University of South Carolina

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Each year in the US, approximately 795,000 people have a stroke, and the overwhelming majority of those who survive are unable to resume meaningful daily activities because of impaired movement in one arm/hand. This study will investigate the effects of a challenging 4-week physical rehabilitation therapy program that is targeted at specific movement impairments and systematically progressed to assure an ongoing "just right" level of rigor. The investigators anticipate that therapy targeted to address specific movement impairments will improve recovery of arm/hand movement in people who have had a stroke.
Detailed Description
The overwhelming majority of individuals who survive stroke have persistent upper extremity (UE) motor deficits which interfere with re-engagement in meaningful activities. While advances from neuroscience are spurring development of new rehabilitation strategies, the development of novel measurement methods has not kept pace. Currently, there is no comprehensive measurement framework to objectively quantify impairment, match a rehabilitation therapy program to a patient's impairment level, and measure specific therapy effects. Therefore there has not been a rehabilitation trial where a measurement framework is the basis for designing the treatment as well as defining the outcome. The investigators redesigned the Fugl-Meyer UE Assessment (FMA-UE) using item response theory Rasch analysis and developed a first of its kind measurement framework that locates a patient along a continuum of impairment and directs a personalized therapy program tailored to patients' specific impairments and ability levels. The purpose of this proposed research is to empirically test this framework. The objective of this project is to empirically test the FMA-UE measurement framework. This study hypothesizes that therapeutic task practice at the just-right challenge of difficulty will maximize post-stroke motor skill reacquisition. It is expected that "targeted task-practice", will increase UE motor ability because task goal difficulty will be matched and systematically progressed according to patients' initial and evolving levels of ability. This is a single-blinded study with parallel arm design, stratified sampling and blocked randomization. 120 individuals with post-stroke UE hemiparesis will be enrolled; 40 participants per 3 UE impairment levels as defined by the investigators' measurement framework. Participants will engage in 12 sessions (3x/wk for 4 weeks, 2 hrs/session) of reach-to-grasp task-practice. Within each impairment level, subjects will be randomized to a treatment group; 20 to targeted task-practice and 20 to non-targeted task-practice. Targeted task-practice is personalized to patient-specific UE motor deficits with initial targets (goals) defined according to baseline measures and targets continually progressed after every 3 therapy sessions so that the goals match the patient's evolving level of ability. Non-targeted task practice is defined as a standard of care task-practice intervention intended to increase UE use but not alter specific impairments. Data analyses will include (1) ANOVA to test the effects of targeted vs. non-targeted therapy on UE motor ability, (2) multiple regression to model the relationship between therapy and movement adaptions occurring pre- to post-rehabilitation, and (3) growth mixture modeling to define responders and non-responders. This project is significant because there is a pressing need for a comprehensive measurement framework to guide novel interventions designed to improve post-stroke UE motor function and define their effects.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke
Keywords
rehabilitation, occupational therapy, upper extremity

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
103 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Targeted Task Practice
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Targeted task practice is defined as a therapy program aimed at patient-specific upper extremity motor impairment levels and systematically progressed to assure an ongoing "just right" match between task-difficulty and patient-ability. Participants attended occupational therapy 3 times per week for 4 weeks. Each therapy session was 2 hours in length.
Arm Title
Non-Targeted Task Practice
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Non-targeted task practice is a standard of care treatment consisting of task practice with no guidance from the measurement framework to systematically address specific upper extremity motor impairment levels or progress rehabilitation therapy. Participants attended occupational therapy 3 times per week for 4 weeks. Each therapy session was 2 hours in length.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Task Practice Physical Rehabilitation Therapy
Other Intervention Name(s)
Task Practice
Intervention Description
Similar to stroke rehabilitation occupational therapy.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity
Description
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) is a stroke rehabilitation assessment of arm/hand movement impairment. It is traditionally scored by assigning 30 items assessing voluntary arm/hand movements and 3 items assessing reflexes an ordinal rating (0=unable, 1=partial, 2=near normal), then summing the ratings to obtain a general statement of ability. Instead of this traditional scoring method, the investigators will eliminate the reflex items, thus reporting the aggregate score possible from 0/60 to 60/60 points. Higher scores indicate greater levels of arm movement ability.
Time Frame
participants will be followed for the duration of the 4-week rehabilitation treatment, an expected average of 4 weeks.
Title
Wolf Motor Function Test
Description
The Wolf Motor Function Test is an assessment of arm movement function. Subjects are timed (seconds) as they complete 15 functional movements with the paretic arm. The average time required to complete an item is reported in seconds so that lower scores (quicker completion times) indicate greater functional movement skills. Post-intervention averages were compared to baseline averages so a reduction in timed averages indicates improved movement function.
Time Frame
participants will be followed for the duration of the 4-week rehabilitation treatment, an expected average of 4 weeks.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Surface Electromyographic (sEMG) Analysis of Functional Arm Muscle Activations
Description
sEMG analysis is an objective method to study muscle coordination during functional arm movements. Subjects will be fitted with sensors on the skin placed over 8 arm/shoulder muscles on both arms. The sensors will detect the muscle activity of these muscles during functional reaching movements. sEMG data will be recorded with a 16-channel wireless Motion Labs EMG system and processed with custom ORBIS software.
Time Frame
participants will be followed for the duration of the 4-week rehabilitation treatment, an expected average of 4 weeks.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
89 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Individuals are eligible for this study if they have: experienced a stroke at least 3 months prior that has resulted in unilateral hemiparesis. exhibit voluntarily paretic arm shoulder flexion 30 degrees with simultaneous elbow extension 20 degrees. impairment with overhead reach and wrist circumduction and fine motor dexterity. passive range of motion in affected shoulder, elbow and wrist within 20 degrees of normal values. Exclusion Criteria: Individuals are not eligible for this study if they have: a lesion in the brainstem or cerebellum. another neurological disease that may impair motor skills (e.g., Parkinson's Disease). pain in the affected upper extremity that would limit participation in the study intervention. difficulty understanding and following 3-step directions. difficulty sitting independently without postural support. an orthopedic condition or impaired corrected vision that alters the kinematics of reaching. are unable to travel to and remain in Charleston SC for the duration of the 4-week study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michelle L. Woodbury, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC
City
Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29401-5799
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17532892
Citation
Woodbury ML, Velozo CA, Richards LG, Duncan PW, Studenski S, Lai SM. Dimensionality and construct validity of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the upper extremity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Jun;88(6):715-23. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.02.036.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22234665
Citation
Velozo CA, Woodbury ML. Translating measurement findings into rehabilitation practice: an example using Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity with patients following stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(10):1211-22. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2010.10.0203.
Results Reference
background
Links:
URL
https://education.musc.edu/colleges/health-professions/research/crrnc
Description
Click here for more information about stroke rehabilitation research at the Medical University of South Carolina

Learn more about this trial

Patient Targeted Upper Extremity Rehabilitation After Stroke

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs