search
Back to results

Structural Fat Grafting for Craniofacial Trauma: Repeat Fat Grafting Injection-5 Subject Cohort (BTIPlusUp)

Primary Purpose

Facial Injuries, Adipose Tissue

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Repeat Fat grafting
Sponsored by
University of Pittsburgh
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Facial Injuries focused on measuring Craniomaxillofacial (CMF) Battle-injured (BI), Facial Trauma, Fat Grafts, Autogenous Fat Transfers (AFT), Wounded warriors

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged 18 years or older and able to provide informed consent
  2. Have suffered injury resulting in craniofacial volume defects which could be treated with a graft volume of between 5 and 150 cc of lipoaspirate
  3. Be at least 3 months post-injury or post-surgery (from trauma procedures) so that acute edema is resolved
  4. Volume defects are covered by intact skin and do not communicate with oral cavity or sinuses
  5. The three dimensional geometry of the volume defects would allow for treatment with lipoaspirate injection that in a manner that at least two distinct treated areas could be discerned on gross examination and radiographically (e.g. treated regions are on opposite sides of the face, on lower face versus upper face, or separated by a bony landmark such as zygoma. This would include the ability to treat an uninjured contralateral region with lipaspirate in order to obtain symmetry.
  6. Willing and able to comply with follow up examinations, including radiographic studies
  7. Have completed participation in IRB# PRO09060101.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age less than 18 years
  2. Inability to provide informed consent
  3. Craniofacial defects intended for treatment have open wounds or communicate with oral cavity or sinus (note: presence of such a defect in the setting of another defect(s) that meets treatment criteria will not exclude the patient from participating).
  4. Active infection anywhere in the body
  5. Diagnosed with cancer within the last 12 months and /or presently receiving chemotherapy or radiation treatment
  6. Known coagulopathy
  7. Systemic disease that would render the fat harvest and injection procedure, along with associated anesthesia, unsafe to the patient.
  8. Pregnancy
  9. Subjects with Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder. (Subjects who are found to be stable on medication and receive psychiatric clearance could be eligible for study participation per the Physician's discretion.)

Sites / Locations

  • Unversity of Pittsburgh

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Repeat Facial fat grafting

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Facial Volume Score
the facial volume and appearance grading scale evaluates each aesthetic region in the face based on both physical examination and 3D photography by the clinician. scale ranges from 1-3 where a score of 1 indicates an obvious contour defect; 2 shows a noticeable improvement in contour but not sufficient to impart a normal appearance; 3 represents a normal appearance and/or close approximation with a normal uninjured contralateral structure.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Serial Computed Tomography Imaging
serial computed tomography images were collected to evaluate the volume of the defect

Full Information

First Posted
March 19, 2013
Last Updated
June 9, 2017
Sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
Collaborators
United States Department of Defense
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01822301
Brief Title
Structural Fat Grafting for Craniofacial Trauma: Repeat Fat Grafting Injection-5 Subject Cohort
Acronym
BTIPlusUp
Official Title
Structural Fat Grafting for Craniofacial Trauma: Repeat Fat Grafting Injection-5 Subject Cohort
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
Collaborators
United States Department of Defense

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Fat grafting represents a technique with great potential to improve outcomes in minimally invasive facial reconstruction. Fat grafting has already been demonstrated as a safe and minimally invasive technique over decades of widespread practice in plastic surgery. In our current study of fat grafting for facial deformities (IRB# PRO09060101), we have treated 9 subjects without adverse event and all have had a significant improvement. Since all methods of treatment and evaluation are the same in this study, we will be able to use the data in our prior study as additional control data. We hypothesize that repeating the fat grafting in subjects with previous facial fat grafts will enable successful restoration of tissue volume and craniofacial form. Additionally, we hypothesize that the results will be durable and subject quality of life improved. Five (5) subjects (who were previously enrolled into IRB# PRO09060101) will be enrolled to this single center University of Pittsburgh site research study.
Detailed Description
Facial trauma injuries, especially those sustained in military combat and severe automobile crashes, are characterized by destruction of bone and soft tissue anatomy. While the bony skeleton can often be reconstructed, the overlying soft tissue is difficult to restore. Importantly, it is the structure of the soft tissue that imparts the normal human form, and adequate reconstruction of soft tissue defects allows trauma victims to reintegrate into society. Accepted procedures for soft tissue reconstruction of the face involve tissue flap reconstruction procedures and autologous fat grafting. Tissue flap operations are extensive, often including microvascular surgery, and do not precisely correct the deformities. Fat grafting is a less invasive technique that allows for more precise shaping of the reconstructed tissues. However, autologous fat grafts may undergo resorption that can affect the appearance of the reconstruction over time. The degree of change in appearance after fat grafting has not been well studied for facial trauma patients. We hypothesize that subjects who have successfully completed participation in the study (PRO09060101) and experienced graft resorbtion will have improved outcomes with an additional fat graft treatment. We anticipate that additional fat graft treatment will fully restore the facial features and overcome fat loss from the initial fat graft treatment. Additionally, we hypothesize that the cellular properties of the fat precursor cells (preadipocytes) may correlate with fat graft retention

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Facial Injuries, Adipose Tissue
Keywords
Craniomaxillofacial (CMF) Battle-injured (BI), Facial Trauma, Fat Grafts, Autogenous Fat Transfers (AFT), Wounded warriors

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
5 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Repeat Facial fat grafting
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Repeat Fat grafting
Intervention Description
Fat grafting is a minimally invasive clinical procedure that has been widely used by plastic surgeons within reconstructive surgery for many years. Fat grafting is considered a standard of care procedure in plastic surgery. In brief, fat tissue to be used for grafting is harvested (usually from abdomen or thighs) with a small liposuction cannula in the operating room. The fat tissue is then sterilely centrifuged and allowed to decant before separating the fluid and oil layers from the fat tissue fraction. The aspirated fat is then loaded into 1cc syringes and injected into the facial deformity using specialized injection cannulas. In this study, we will treat 5 subjects from protocol (IRB # PRO09060101) with an additional fat graft treatment to assess whether this will increase fat graft retention over time. Additionally, data from our current study assessing volume retention after fat grafting for facial deformities (IRB # PRO09060101) with be used for comparison.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Facial Volume Score
Description
the facial volume and appearance grading scale evaluates each aesthetic region in the face based on both physical examination and 3D photography by the clinician. scale ranges from 1-3 where a score of 1 indicates an obvious contour defect; 2 shows a noticeable improvement in contour but not sufficient to impart a normal appearance; 3 represents a normal appearance and/or close approximation with a normal uninjured contralateral structure.
Time Frame
assessed at baseline (pre-op), days 7-21 post-op, 3 months post-op, and 9 months post-op
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Serial Computed Tomography Imaging
Description
serial computed tomography images were collected to evaluate the volume of the defect
Time Frame
assessed at 7-21 days, 3 months and 9 months post op.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Aged 18 years or older and able to provide informed consent Have suffered injury resulting in craniofacial volume defects which could be treated with a graft volume of between 5 and 150 cc of lipoaspirate Be at least 3 months post-injury or post-surgery (from trauma procedures) so that acute edema is resolved Volume defects are covered by intact skin and do not communicate with oral cavity or sinuses The three dimensional geometry of the volume defects would allow for treatment with lipoaspirate injection that in a manner that at least two distinct treated areas could be discerned on gross examination and radiographically (e.g. treated regions are on opposite sides of the face, on lower face versus upper face, or separated by a bony landmark such as zygoma. This would include the ability to treat an uninjured contralateral region with lipaspirate in order to obtain symmetry. Willing and able to comply with follow up examinations, including radiographic studies Have completed participation in IRB# PRO09060101. Exclusion Criteria: Age less than 18 years Inability to provide informed consent Craniofacial defects intended for treatment have open wounds or communicate with oral cavity or sinus (note: presence of such a defect in the setting of another defect(s) that meets treatment criteria will not exclude the patient from participating). Active infection anywhere in the body Diagnosed with cancer within the last 12 months and /or presently receiving chemotherapy or radiation treatment Known coagulopathy Systemic disease that would render the fat harvest and injection procedure, along with associated anesthesia, unsafe to the patient. Pregnancy Subjects with Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder. (Subjects who are found to be stable on medication and receive psychiatric clearance could be eligible for study participation per the Physician's discretion.)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joseph P Rubin, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Pittsburgh
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Unversity of Pittsburgh
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15213
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
It is the Principal Investigator's intention to make stored samples and subject de-identified information available to secondary investigators after all research study testing has been completed. These stored samples and associated subject information will not include subject identifiers.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
16936551
Citation
Moseley TA, Zhu M, Hedrick MH. Adipose-derived stem and progenitor cells as fillers in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Sep;118(3 Suppl):121S-128S. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000234609.74811.2e.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17653684
Citation
Cardenas JC, Carvajal J. Refinement of rhinoplasty with lipoinjection. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007 Sep-Oct;31(5):501-5. doi: 10.1007/s00266-006-0136-2. Epub 2007 Jul 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17522480
Citation
Hu S, Zhang H, Feng Y, Yang Y, Han X, Han X, Zhong Y, Shi J. Introduction of an easy technique for purification and injection of autogenous free fat parcels in correcting of facial contour deformities. Ann Plast Surg. 2007 Jun;58(6):602-7. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000248110.59452.49.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17255689
Citation
Kaufman MR, Bradley JP, Dickinson B, Heller JB, Wasson K, O'Hara C, Huang C, Gabbay J, Ghadjar K, Miller TA. Autologous fat transfer national consensus survey: trends in techniques for harvest, preparation, and application, and perception of short- and long-term results. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Jan;119(1):323-331. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000244903.51440.8c.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18036412
Citation
Sardesai MG, Moore CC. Quantitative and qualitative dermal change with microfat grafting of facial scars. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Dec;137(6):868-72. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.08.008.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16936550
Citation
Coleman SR. Structural fat grafting: more than a permanent filler. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Sep;118(3 Suppl):108S-120S. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000234610.81672.e7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17157518
Citation
Domergue S, Psomas C, Yachouh J, Lesnik A, Reynes J, Goudot P, Jammet P. Fat microinfiltration autografting for facial restructuring in HIV patients. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2006 Dec;34(8):484-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2006.07.857. Epub 2006 Dec 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16393612
Citation
Narins RS, Tope WD, Pope K, Ross EV. Overtreatment effects associated with a radiofrequency tissue-tightening device: rare, preventable, and correctable with subcision and autologous fat transfer. Dermatol Surg. 2006 Jan;32(1):115-24. doi: 10.1111/1524-4725.2006.32019. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16982984
Citation
Pontius AT, Williams EF 3rd. The evolution of midface rejuvenation: combining the midface-lift and fat transfer. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2006 Sep-Oct;8(5):300-5. doi: 10.1001/archfaci.8.5.300.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16230558
Citation
Burnouf M, Buffet M, Schwarzinger M, Roman P, Bui P, Prevot M, Deleuze J, Morini JP, Franck N, Gorin I, Dupin N. Evaluation of Coleman lipostructure for treatment of facial lipoatrophy in patients with human immunodeficiency virus and parameters associated with the efficiency of this technique. Arch Dermatol. 2005 Oct;141(10):1220-4. doi: 10.1001/archderm.141.10.1220.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19338805
Citation
Ellenbogen R, Motykie G, Youn A, Svehlak S, Yamini D. Facial reshaping using less invasive methods. Aesthet Surg J. 2005 Mar-Apr;25(2):144-52. doi: 10.1016/j.asj.2005.02.001.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16218175
Citation
Guaraldi G, Orlando G, De Fazio D, De Lorenzi I, Rottino A, De Santis G, Pedone A, Spaggiari A, Baccarani A, Borghi V, Esposito R. Comparison of three different interventions for the correction of HIV-associated facial lipoatrophy: a prospective study. Antivir Ther. 2005;10(6):753-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15985788
Citation
Kanchwala SK, Holloway L, Bucky LP. Reliable soft tissue augmentation: a clinical comparison of injectable soft-tissue fillers for facial-volume augmentation. Ann Plast Surg. 2005 Jul;55(1):30-5; discussion 35. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000168292.69753.73.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15759091
Citation
Kuran I, Tumerdem B. A new simple method used to prepare fat for injection. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2005 Jan-Feb;29(1):18-22; discussion 23. doi: 10.1007/s00266-004-0059-8. Epub 2005 Mar 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19336203
Citation
Ellenbogen R, Youn A, Yamini D, Svehlak S. The volumetric face lift. Aesthet Surg J. 2004 Nov-Dec;24(6):514-22. doi: 10.1016/j.asj.2004.08.006.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15577385
Citation
Karabulut AB, Tumerdem B. Obtaining predictable results in malar augmentation with preimplant fat injection. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Dec;114(7):1974-5. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000143917.52057.2a. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15277830
Citation
Serra-Renom JM, Fontdevila J. Treatment of facial fat atrophy related to treatment with protease inhibitors by autologous fat injection in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Aug;114(2):551-5; discussion 556-7. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000128427.54445.63.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17163916
Citation
Dasiou-Plakida D. Fat injections for facial rejuvenation: 17 years experience in 1720 patients. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2003 Jul;2(3-4):119-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-2130.2004.00060.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11405760
Citation
Sadick NS, Hudgins LC. Fatty acid analysis of transplanted adipose tissue. Arch Dermatol. 2001 Jun;137(6):723-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11134987
Citation
Berman M. Rejuvenation of the upper eyelid complex with autologous fat transplantation. Dermatol Surg. 2000 Dec;26(12):1113-6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10670595
Citation
Cortese A, Savastano G, Felicetta L. Free fat transplantation for facial tissue augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000 Feb;58(2):164-9; discussion 169-70. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(00)90331-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11083572
Citation
Erol OO. Facial autologous soft-tissue contouring by adjunction of tissue cocktail injection (micrograft and minigraft mixture of dermis, fascia, and fat). Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000 Nov;106(6):1375-87; discussion 1388-9. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200011000-00026.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10632174
Citation
Reiche-Fischel O, Wolford LM, Pitta M. Facial contour reconstruction using an autologous free fat graft: a case report with 18-year follow-up. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000 Jan;58(1):103-6. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(00)80026-9. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9655427
Citation
Guerrerosantos J. Simultaneous rhytidoplasty and lipoinjection: a comprehensive aesthetic surgical strategy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Jul;102(1):191-9. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199807000-00032.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8774241
Citation
Robinson E, Rumsey N, Partridge J. An evaluation of the impact of social interaction skills training for facially disfigured people. Br J Plast Surg. 1996 Jul;49(5):281-9. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1226(96)90156-3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18089144
Citation
Sarwer DB, Crerand CE. Body image and cosmetic medical treatments. Body Image. 2004 Jan;1(1):99-111. doi: 10.1016/S1740-1445(03)00003-2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1609874
Citation
Perry S, Difede J, Musngi G, Frances AJ, Jacobsberg L. Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder after burn injury. Am J Psychiatry. 1992 Jul;149(7):931-5. doi: 10.1176/ajp.149.7.931.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19289942
Citation
Valente SM. Visual disfigurement and depression. Plast Surg Nurs. 2009 Jan-Mar;29(1):10-6; quiz 17-8. doi: 10.1097/01.PSN.0000347718.75285.23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15838211
Citation
Levine E, Degutis L, Pruzinsky T, Shin J, Persing JA. Quality of life and facial trauma: psychological and body image effects. Ann Plast Surg. 2005 May;54(5):502-10. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000155282.48465.94.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17572578
Citation
Guyuron B, Majzoub RK. Facial augmentation with core fat graft: a preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Jul;120(1):295-302. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000264399.40701.71.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9314314
Citation
Bisson JI, Shepherd JP, Dhutia M. Psychological sequelae of facial trauma. J Trauma. 1997 Sep;43(3):496-500. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199709000-00018.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10342476
Citation
Balakrishnan C, Hashim M, Gao D. The effect of partial-thickness facial burns on social functioning. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1999 May-Jun;20(3):224-5. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199905000-00012.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2239515
Citation
Macgregor FC. Facial disfigurement: problems and management of social interaction and implications for mental health. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1990 Fall;14(4):249-57. doi: 10.1007/BF01578358.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11434225
Citation
Thompson A, Kent G. Adjusting to disfigurement: processes involved in dealing with being visibly different. Clin Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;21(5):663-82. doi: 10.1016/s0272-7358(00)00056-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16998408
Citation
Wallis H, Renneberg B, Ripper S, Germann G, Wind G, Jester A. Emotional distress and psychosocial resources in patients recovering from severe burn injury. J Burn Care Res. 2006 Sep-Oct;27(5):734-41. doi: 10.1097/01.BCR.0000238094.33426.0D.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18347892
Citation
Yee A, Adjei N, Do J, Ford M, Finkelstein J. Do patient expectations of spinal surgery relate to functional outcome? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 May;466(5):1154-61. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0194-7. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10267258
Citation
Nguyen TD, Attkisson CC, Stegner BL. Assessment of patient satisfaction: development and refinement of a service evaluation questionnaire. Eval Program Plann. 1983;6(3-4):299-313. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(83)90010-1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
962494
Citation
Weissman MM, Bothwell S. Assessment of social adjustment by patient self-report. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1976 Sep;33(9):1111-5. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770090101010.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
5810590
Citation
Watson D, Friend R. Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1969 Aug;33(4):448-57. doi: 10.1037/h0027806. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10568646
Citation
Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. JAMA. 1999 Nov 10;282(18):1737-44. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.18.1737.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Weathers FW, Litz BT, Herman DS, Huska JA, Keane TM. The PTSD Checklist: Reliability, validity and diagnostic utility. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies; 1993, San Antonio, TX.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. NY: Basic Books
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16250744
Citation
Carver CS. You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: consider the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med. 1997;4(1):92-100. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2926629
Citation
Carver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK. Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Feb;56(2):267-83. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.56.2.267.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
6837532
Citation
Procidano ME, Heller K. Measures of perceived social support from friends and from family: three validation studies. Am J Community Psychol. 1983 Feb;11(1):1-24. doi: 10.1007/BF00898416.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1593914
Citation
Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller S. SF-36 Physical and mental heatlh summary scales: A users manual. 2nd ed. Boston: New England Medical Center, 1994
Results Reference
background
Citation
Lawrence J, Heinberg LJ, Roca A, Munster AM, Fauerbach JA. Development and validation of the Satisfaction with Appearance Scale: assessing body image among burn-injured patients. Psychological Assessment 1998; 10: 64-70.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Structural Fat Grafting for Craniofacial Trauma: Repeat Fat Grafting Injection-5 Subject Cohort

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs