search
Back to results

Comparing the Effectiveness of Combined Hyperthermia and External Beam Radiation (EBRT) Versus EBRT Alone in Treating Patients With Painful Bone Metastases

Primary Purpose

All Type of Cancers With Bony Metastasis

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Taiwan
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Hyperthermia
External-beam radiotherapy
Sponsored by
Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for All Type of Cancers With Bony Metastasis focused on measuring External-beam radiotherapy, Hyperthermia

Eligibility Criteria

21 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically or clinically confirmed solid tumor metastasis with index lesion involving or abutting bone. *Index lesion means an irradiated field covered lesions contoured from CT-Simulation which may generally less than 20cm, include 4-5 vertebra bodies, sacrum plus adjacent iliac lesions or a segment of femerol bone. Each patient can only have one index lesion for this study.
  • Index lesion with bone destruction either osteolytic or osteoblastic in nature as assessed on CT or MRI imaging
  • If the nature of the metastatic disease has been previously documented, the index lesion to be treated does not require further documentation (i.e., biopsy)
  • ≥ One primary painful metastatic site. The most painful site that need treatment first will be elected as index lesion site for evaluation of response. Additional less painful metastatic sites may be present. Patients who elect to have another course of RT treatment on different metastatic sites after the initial treatment are allowed.
  • Worst pain in the last 24 hours must be ≥ 4 on a 0-10 numeric scale.
  • Index lesion causing clinical or radiographic evidence of partial spinal cord or cauda equina compression/effacement is allowed.
  • Have developed pain or have persistent pain while on a stable chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, target therapy or bisphosphonate therapy regimen is allowed. There will be no change of chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, or bisphosphonate therapy for 4 weeks before and after radiotherapy
  • ECOG performance status 0-3
  • Life expectancy ≥ 3 months
  • Patients with impending fracture of weight bearing bone or patients with symptoms of spinal cord compression should have surgical opinion before the start of radiotherapy. Patient should not be able to be enrolled in this study if surgery is scheduled.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Index lesion involves the skull
  • Index lesion has evidence of a pathologic fracture, impending fracture need immediate surgery are not eligible. Those patients had received decompression surgery are not eligible.
  • Has undergone prior radiotherapy at the index lesion
  • Those who chemotherapy or systemic treatment will be changed during study period.
  • Patients had history of metal implant inside or outside irradiation field are not eligible .
  • Patients had history of pacemaker insertion due to arrhythmia are not eligible.

Sites / Locations

  • Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial HospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

External-beam radiotherapy combine hyperthermia

External-beam radiotherapy alone

Arm Description

Hyperthermia 42℃ ± 0.5℃ for 40min, 2 times/week within 2hr after irradiation. Radiation protocol are 3Gy 5 times a week for a total of 30Gy/10fx/2 weeks

External-beam radiotherapy alone comprising 30Gy/10 fractions, 5 times a week, administered with 2 weeks.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Complete response rate
Complete response rate defined with Brief Pain Inventory score of zero plus no concomitant increase analgesic intake within 3 months after radiotherapy.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Adverse events
Incidence of treatment-related adverse events from hyperthermia and RT.
Tumor response
To determine the difference of radiological tumor response in measurable indicated lesions on week 12.
Pain relief
To determine the difference in response of pain relief by Brief Pain Inventory score. To determine time and duration to pain relief on indicated lesion.
Quality-of-life
To compare the impact on quality-of-life using EORTC-C30 questionares.

Full Information

First Posted
April 24, 2013
Last Updated
October 11, 2016
Sponsor
Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01842048
Brief Title
Comparing the Effectiveness of Combined Hyperthermia and External Beam Radiation (EBRT) Versus EBRT Alone in Treating Patients With Painful Bone Metastases
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
July 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 2019 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 2019 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The main goals of deep hyperthermia combined with external beam radiation (EBRT) on bone metastases are the response on pain relief, duration of response and time to achieve complete pain relief.
Detailed Description
The goal of this study is to conduct comparative data on the efficacy of low temperature (40-43℃ range) deep hyperthermia adding on external beam radiation for treatment of metastatic bone tumors. There are 3 reasons of conducting this clinical trial. Firstly, radiotherapy is most effective modality for bony metastases treatment, but only limited radiation dose can be delivered to metastatic bony metastatic sites with relatively short response duration observed clinically. Since it is a palliative treatment for pain relief, some patients develop recurrent pain at the same lesions a few months later. Most patients must accept their hopeless conditions and accept toward the end of their lives due to difficulty of reirradiation. There is urgently need for more effective treatment. Secondly, most combination of hyperthermia and radiation trials were relatively high dose of radiation, with the basic idea of hyperthermic radiosensitization, the combination of hyperthermia and radiotherapy on bone metastasis is warrant. Clinical trials experiences on relatively less deep tumors such as breast, head and neck cancers, extremity sarcoma or melanoma may not be applied on deep seated tumors. Bony metastases are usually deep seated lesions with hard cortex bone surrounded. The real benefit of hyperthermia can be highlighted on bony metastases. Thirdly, metastatic bony microenvironment are critical for the providing of bone marrow-derived immune suppressor cells circulating to systemic tumor microenvironment, mild thermal therapy to metastatic bony microenvironment may have dual immunomodulatory effects: direct enhancement of immune cell activity through thermally sensitive molecular pathways associated with immune cell function/activation, and, indirect enhancement of immunosurveillance through a reduction in hypoxia-induced immune suppressor cells around metastatic foci via improved tumor vascular perfusion. An unexpected survival benefit may demonstrated from this study. Patients are stratified according to solitary or multiple sites, primary cancer type (Breast or prostate vs others), and severity of pain (i.e., worst pain score in the last 24-hour period) (4-6 vs 7-10). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. Treatment protocol A was designed to compare the response of matched tumors in the same patient treated by radiation alone or by radiation combined with hyperthermia when the patient had multiple tumors. Two tumors of comparable size were treated with either protocol A or B, and the responses were compared. The tumor size was computed as the product of maximum length times maximum width.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
All Type of Cancers With Bony Metastasis
Keywords
External-beam radiotherapy, Hyperthermia

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
152 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
External-beam radiotherapy combine hyperthermia
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Hyperthermia 42℃ ± 0.5℃ for 40min, 2 times/week within 2hr after irradiation. Radiation protocol are 3Gy 5 times a week for a total of 30Gy/10fx/2 weeks
Arm Title
External-beam radiotherapy alone
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
External-beam radiotherapy alone comprising 30Gy/10 fractions, 5 times a week, administered with 2 weeks.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Hyperthermia
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
External-beam radiotherapy
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Complete response rate
Description
Complete response rate defined with Brief Pain Inventory score of zero plus no concomitant increase analgesic intake within 3 months after radiotherapy.
Time Frame
24 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Adverse events
Description
Incidence of treatment-related adverse events from hyperthermia and RT.
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Tumor response
Description
To determine the difference of radiological tumor response in measurable indicated lesions on week 12.
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Pain relief
Description
To determine the difference in response of pain relief by Brief Pain Inventory score. To determine time and duration to pain relief on indicated lesion.
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Quality-of-life
Description
To compare the impact on quality-of-life using EORTC-C30 questionares.
Time Frame
24 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Histologically or clinically confirmed solid tumor metastasis with index lesion involving or abutting bone. *Index lesion means an irradiated field covered lesions contoured from CT-Simulation which may generally less than 20cm, include 4-5 vertebra bodies, sacrum plus adjacent iliac lesions or a segment of femerol bone. Each patient can only have one index lesion for this study. Index lesion with bone destruction either osteolytic or osteoblastic in nature as assessed on CT or MRI imaging If the nature of the metastatic disease has been previously documented, the index lesion to be treated does not require further documentation (i.e., biopsy) ≥ One primary painful metastatic site. The most painful site that need treatment first will be elected as index lesion site for evaluation of response. Additional less painful metastatic sites may be present. Patients who elect to have another course of RT treatment on different metastatic sites after the initial treatment are allowed. Worst pain in the last 24 hours must be ≥ 4 on a 0-10 numeric scale. Index lesion causing clinical or radiographic evidence of partial spinal cord or cauda equina compression/effacement is allowed. Have developed pain or have persistent pain while on a stable chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, target therapy or bisphosphonate therapy regimen is allowed. There will be no change of chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, or bisphosphonate therapy for 4 weeks before and after radiotherapy ECOG performance status 0-3 Life expectancy ≥ 3 months Patients with impending fracture of weight bearing bone or patients with symptoms of spinal cord compression should have surgical opinion before the start of radiotherapy. Patient should not be able to be enrolled in this study if surgery is scheduled. Exclusion Criteria: Index lesion involves the skull Index lesion has evidence of a pathologic fracture, impending fracture need immediate surgery are not eligible. Those patients had received decompression surgery are not eligible. Has undergone prior radiotherapy at the index lesion Those who chemotherapy or systemic treatment will be changed during study period. Patients had history of metal implant inside or outside irradiation field are not eligible . Patients had history of pacemaker insertion due to arrhythmia are not eligible.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Kwan-Hwa Chi, M.D.
Phone
886-2-28332211
Ext
2273
Email
M006565@ms.skh.org.tw
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Yu-Shan Wang, Ph.D
Phone
886-2-28332211
Ext
2614
Email
T006659@ms.skh.org.tw
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital
City
Taipei
ZIP/Postal Code
11101
Country
Taiwan
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Su-Chen Huang, M.S.
Phone
886-2-28332211
Ext
2612
Email
A007267@ms.skh.org.tw
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kwan-Hwa Chi Chi, M.D.

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Comparing the Effectiveness of Combined Hyperthermia and External Beam Radiation (EBRT) Versus EBRT Alone in Treating Patients With Painful Bone Metastases

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs