search
Back to results

NHFOV Versus NCPAP to Prevent Exubation Failure

Primary Purpose

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Status
Suspended
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
CPAP
NHFOV
Sponsored by
University of Manitoba
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Respiratory Distress Syndrome focused on measuring RDS

Eligibility Criteria

15 Minutes - 7 Days (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Newborn less than 28 weeks gestation at birth
  • Intubated and ventilated in the first 24 hours of life
  • Extubated in the first week of life
  • Parental consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of parental consent
  • Major congenital malformation
  • Severe perinatal asphyxia
  • Airway abnormalities
  • Pneumothorax

Sites / Locations

  • St. Boniface General Hospital
  • Health Sciences Center, NICU

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Nasal CPAP

NHFOV

Arm Description

Nasal CPAP using Infant flow

Nasal High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation using Dräger Babylog® VN500 ventilator machine

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Extubation failure
Newborns in both groups will be re-intubated within the study period if they have respiratory failure defined as arterial or capillary gas with pH < 7.20 or PCO2 > 60, oxygen requirement ≥ 35%, or recurrent or severe apnea (12 documented apneas within 24 hours or single apnea requiring positive pressure ventilation).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Changes in capillary pCO2 after extubation
capillary pCO2 values will be measured after extubation. Timing and frequency of blood gas sampling will be determined by clinical staff caring for infant and will not be specified by study protocol.
pneumothorax
incidence of pneumothorax during use of either nasal CPAP or high frequency nasal ventilation will be documented.
intraventricular hemorrage (IVH)
Infants will be screened for IVH per routine clinical care. Incidence of total IVH and severe IVH will be compared between treatments.
feeding tolerance
The time to achieve full enteral feeding (135 ml/kg/d) will be compared for both treatments

Full Information

First Posted
April 17, 2013
Last Updated
August 3, 2015
Sponsor
University of Manitoba
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01852916
Brief Title
NHFOV Versus NCPAP to Prevent Exubation Failure
Official Title
Nasal High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation (NHFOV) Versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP) Ventilation: a Pilot Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Suspended
Why Stopped
Poor recruitment rate
Study Start Date
September 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2015 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2015 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Manitoba

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to assess whether nasal high frequency ventilation (NHFV) is superior to nasal continuous positive pressure (nCPAP) to prevent tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation in preterm infants less than 28 weeks gestation following first attempt at extubation and removal from mechanical ventilation
Detailed Description
Extremely preterm infants frequently need to be placed back on invasive mechanical ventilation following initial attempts to remove them from this mode of respiratory support. Continued mechanical ventilation is thought to be the primary driver in the development of chronic lung disease and a major component in adverse developmental outcome of these infants. Infants fail their first trial of removal from ventilation because of apnea and respiratory failure. Animal studies and early clinical experience suggest that it is possible to effectively provide ventilation via high frequency nasal ventilation. In the animal models this mode of ventilation appears to provide for better lung development and less injury. Nasal CPAP has been shown to improve the success rate of extubation from mechanical ventilation by preventing post extubation atelectasis with resultant improvements in gas exchange. However in many of the most premature infants, poorly developed control of respiratory drive is a major problem and despite treatment with caffeine, mechanical ventilation is needed. High frequency nasal ventilation may support ventilation enough during apneic periods to mitigate the need for traditional mechanical ventilation. Use of non-invasive modes may result in a decrease in the incidence and or severity of chronic lung problems and developmental disability of this group of infants. Extremely premature infants (GA <28 weeks) less than 7 days old will be randomized to either NHFV or nCPAP following the first attempt at extubation and removal from mechanical ventilation. All infants will have received at least a loading dose of caffeine citrate (10 mg/kg of caffeine base equivalent prior to extubation. Initial nCPAP level will be determined by clinical staff but will be at least equal to the level of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) used during mechanical ventilation. A similar level of pressure will be used as initial mean airway pressure (MAP) in infants receiving HFNV. The primary outcome will be need for reintubation during the first 7 days after extubation attempt due to preset criteria. Crossover to the other modality will not be allowed during this period. Infants may remain on HFNF beyond the 7 day primary endpoint if deemed necessary by the clinical staff. Weaning of HFNV to nCPAP will be allowed during the 7 day primary study period and reinstitution of HFNF will be allowed for those initially randomized to that mode of respiratory support. The magnitude of the effect size cannot be determined as there are no studies to base a sample size calculation on. A pragmatic sample size of 20 infants was selected (10 in each arm) to allow estimation of any potential effect size. Further study(ies) will need to be performed to show conclusively efficacy (or lack) of NHFV to prevent post-extubation respiratory failure or its use in preventing chronic lung disease or improving developmental outcomes.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Keywords
RDS

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
20 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Nasal CPAP
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Nasal CPAP using Infant flow
Arm Title
NHFOV
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Nasal High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation using Dräger Babylog® VN500 ventilator machine
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
CPAP
Intervention Description
Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation using Infant Flow CPAP machine
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
NHFOV
Intervention Description
Nasal High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Extubation failure
Description
Newborns in both groups will be re-intubated within the study period if they have respiratory failure defined as arterial or capillary gas with pH < 7.20 or PCO2 > 60, oxygen requirement ≥ 35%, or recurrent or severe apnea (12 documented apneas within 24 hours or single apnea requiring positive pressure ventilation).
Time Frame
within 7 days post-extubation
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Changes in capillary pCO2 after extubation
Description
capillary pCO2 values will be measured after extubation. Timing and frequency of blood gas sampling will be determined by clinical staff caring for infant and will not be specified by study protocol.
Time Frame
Within 7 days post-extubation
Title
pneumothorax
Description
incidence of pneumothorax during use of either nasal CPAP or high frequency nasal ventilation will be documented.
Time Frame
duration of use of positive pressure or reintubation which ever is shorter
Title
intraventricular hemorrage (IVH)
Description
Infants will be screened for IVH per routine clinical care. Incidence of total IVH and severe IVH will be compared between treatments.
Time Frame
first 2 weeks of life
Title
feeding tolerance
Description
The time to achieve full enteral feeding (135 ml/kg/d) will be compared for both treatments
Time Frame
3 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
15 Minutes
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
7 Days
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Newborn less than 28 weeks gestation at birth Intubated and ventilated in the first 24 hours of life Extubated in the first week of life Parental consent Exclusion Criteria: Lack of parental consent Major congenital malformation Severe perinatal asphyxia Airway abnormalities Pneumothorax
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ronald J Baier, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
HSC Neonatology
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
St. Boniface General Hospital
City
Winnipeg
State/Province
Manitoba
ZIP/Postal Code
R2H 2A6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Health Sciences Center, NICU
City
Winnipeg
State/Province
Manitoba
ZIP/Postal Code
R3A 1S1
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

NHFOV Versus NCPAP to Prevent Exubation Failure

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs