Exparel vs. Standard Bupivicaine for Abdominoplasty
Primary Purpose
Pain, Postoperative
Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Liposomal Injection Bupivacaine (Exparel)
Standard bupivicaine
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Pain, Postoperative focused on measuring Pain, Postoperative, Analgesia, Anesthesia, local, Abdominoplasty
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- adult men and women
- scheduled for abdominoplasty
Exclusion Criteria:
- pregnant women
- patients with allergy to amide-type local anesthetics
Sites / Locations
- Emory University Hospital Midtown
- Emory University Hospital
- Emory Aesthetic Center at Paces
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Liposomal injection bupivicaine (Exparel)
Standard bupivicaine
Arm Description
Patients will have the maximum approved dose of Exparel, 266 mg, diluted in 20 mL normal saline, infiltrated into the rectus fascia and subcutaneous tissues at the time of abdominoplasty.
Patients will receive the maximum safe allowance of 0.25% bupivacaine, or 1.5 mg/kg (eg. 150 mg or 60 mL for a 100 kg patient) infiltrated into the rectus fascia and subcutaneous tissues at the time of abdominoplasty.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Pain Score, Visual Analogue Pain Scores
Continuous Visual Analogue Scale 0 - 10 (0=no pain, 10=worst imaginable pain. Patients will complete a log of pain levels experienced each morning and evening for 3 days. Score is 0-10 on a visual analog scale.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01853176
Brief Title
Exparel vs. Standard Bupivicaine for Abdominoplasty
Official Title
Is Liposomal Injection Bupivacaine (Exparel) Superior to Standard Bupivacaine for Abdominoplasty? A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
October 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
required documentation too onerous
Study Start Date
May 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2014 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Emory University
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Background & study question:
Strategies for post-operative pain control that make use of various different types of medicines are advantageous both for patient comfort and for minimizing the use of opioid pain medicines and their associated side effects, which include drowsiness, nausea, and vomiting. A key element of these strategies is wound injection with local anesthetic (numbing medicine) at the time of surgery. Local numbing procedures are used routinely in patients undergoing abdominoplasty (tummy tuck), most often with lidocaine or bupivacaine, which can last several hours. Multiple studies have shown that locally injected pain medicines achieve better pain control, less opioid use, and faster return to normal activities, such that the use of one of these local anesthetic medicines is the current standard of care.
Exparel is an extended-release formulation of bupivacaine that can produce local pain relief for up to 72 hours. Studies have shown it to provide better post-operative pain control and decreased use of opioid medications when compared to patients who did not receive any local numbing agents. Exparel has been used successfully in a variety of surgical settings, including open colon surgery, laparoscopic gall bladder removal, abdominoplasty, and breast augmentation. Its effectiveness has by and large been established in comparison to no local anesthetic. In this study, we seek to investigate the benefit of Exparel compared to standard bupivacaine infiltration in patients undergoing abdominoplasty.
Study design:
Patients scheduled for abdominoplasty with the lead investigator will be offered inclusion in this study. Consenting patients will be randomly assigned to standard bupivacaine or Exparel by coin toss after their clinic visit. On the day of surgery, the only difference between patients assigned to one arm or the other is the local anesthetic used. The surgery itself and plan for general anesthesia will be similar. Both groups will have the same pain medicines available after surgery.
Patients will be given a form on which to record twice-daily pain ratings and opioid narcotic needs for 3 days after surgery. For patients admitted after surgery, oral and IV narcotic use will be collected from their inpatient medical record.
The primary outcome of interest is daily and cumulative pain scores through 3 days. A secondary endpoint is daily and total opioid use over 3 days. Additional measures include the time to first post-operative use of opioid medication and incidence of any adverse side effects.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pain, Postoperative
Keywords
Pain, Postoperative, Analgesia, Anesthesia, local, Abdominoplasty
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
4 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Liposomal injection bupivicaine (Exparel)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients will have the maximum approved dose of Exparel, 266 mg, diluted in 20 mL normal saline, infiltrated into the rectus fascia and subcutaneous tissues at the time of abdominoplasty.
Arm Title
Standard bupivicaine
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients will receive the maximum safe allowance of 0.25% bupivacaine, or 1.5 mg/kg (eg. 150 mg or 60 mL for a 100 kg patient) infiltrated into the rectus fascia and subcutaneous tissues at the time of abdominoplasty.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Liposomal Injection Bupivacaine (Exparel)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Exparel, bupivicaine liposome injectable suspension
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Standard bupivicaine
Other Intervention Name(s)
bupivicaine, Marcaine
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain Score, Visual Analogue Pain Scores
Description
Continuous Visual Analogue Scale 0 - 10 (0=no pain, 10=worst imaginable pain. Patients will complete a log of pain levels experienced each morning and evening for 3 days. Score is 0-10 on a visual analog scale.
Time Frame
3 days
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
adult men and women
scheduled for abdominoplasty
Exclusion Criteria:
pregnant women
patients with allergy to amide-type local anesthetics
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Albert Losken, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Emory University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Emory University Hospital Midtown
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30308
Country
United States
Facility Name
Emory University Hospital
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30322
Country
United States
Facility Name
Emory Aesthetic Center at Paces
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30327
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22067185
Citation
Gorfine SR, Onel E, Patou G, Krivokapic ZV. Bupivacaine extended-release liposome injection for prolonged postsurgical analgesia in patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Dec;54(12):1552-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318232d4c1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22546131
Citation
Haas E, Onel E, Miller H, Ragupathi M, White PF. A double-blind, randomized, active-controlled study for post-hemorrhoidectomy pain management with liposome bupivacaine, a novel local analgesic formulation. Am Surg. 2012 May;78(5):574-81. doi: 10.1177/000313481207800540.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22900785
Citation
Dasta J, Ramamoorthy S, Patou G, Sinatra R. Bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension compared with bupivacaine HCl for the reduction of opioid burden in the postsurgical setting. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Oct;28(10):1609-15. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.721760. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21136251
Citation
Chavez-Abraham V, Barr JS, Zwiebel PC. The efficacy of a lidocaine-infused pain pump for postoperative analgesia following elective augmentation mammaplasty or abdominoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011 Aug;35(4):463-9. doi: 10.1007/s00266-010-9633-4. Epub 2010 Dec 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21042130
Citation
Feng LJ. Painless abdominoplasty: the efficacy of combined intercostal and pararectus blocks in reducing postoperative pain and recovery time. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Nov;126(5):1723-1732. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ef8fe5.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Exparel vs. Standard Bupivicaine for Abdominoplasty
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs