search
Back to results

Evaluation of Nucleus 6 Sound Coding Algorithms

Primary Purpose

Hearing Loss

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Nucleus 6 sound processor
Sponsored by
Cochlear
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hearing Loss focused on measuring background noise, speech performance, wind noise

Eligibility Criteria

8 Years - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Eight years of age or older
  2. CI24RE, CI500 or CI422 series Nucleus cochlear implant types (commercially approved)
  3. At least 3 months experience with the cochlear implant
  4. Post-linguistic onset of bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, with no congenital component to the hearing loss
  5. Native speaker of English, the language used to assess speech perception performance
  6. Willingness to participate in and to comply with all requirements of the protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject, regarding the possible benefits, risks, and limitations that are inherent to the prosthetic device 2. Unwillingness or inability of the candidate to comply with all investigational requirements 3. Additional handicaps that would prevent or restrict participation in the audiological evaluations

-

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    Nucleus 6

    Arm Description

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Percentage of Words Correct on AzBio Sentences in Noise S0N90
    Individuals were tested with AzBio Sentences in Noise using a speech front (0 degrees) and noise presented to the implant ear (90 degrees) using the following features: enhanced Automatic Gain Control (eAGC), Signal to Noise Ratio - Noise Canceller (SNR-NC), Wind Noise Reduction (WNR) and Automatic Scene Analyzer (SCAN).

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Full Information

    First Posted
    May 13, 2013
    Last Updated
    November 4, 2020
    Sponsor
    Cochlear
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT01854879
    Brief Title
    Evaluation of Nucleus 6 Sound Coding Algorithms
    Official Title
    Evaluation of Nucleus 6 Sound Coding Algorithms
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    November 2020
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    March 2013 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    May 2013 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    May 2013 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    Cochlear

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The purpose of the study was to evaluate the features of the Nucleus 6 Sound Processor (CP900 series) on existing Nucleus recipients who currently use the previous generation sound processor, the Cochlear Nucleus CP810 (also commonly known as the Nucleus 5), with a Cochlear Nucleus CI24RE, CI512 or CI422 cochlear implant. The features evaluated included an enhanced Automatic Gain Control (eAGC), the option to provide acoustic amplification in combination with traditional electric stimulation through an acoustic component, and three input processing algorithms: Signal to Noise Ratio - Noise Canceller (SNR-NC), Wind Noise Reduction (WNR) and Automatic Scene Analyzer (SCAN). As is customary for a single-subject research design, study results will be analyzed for each subject individually. For evaluations where testing took place under two conditions (i.e. Endpoint 2, 3, 4, and 5) a non-inferiority hypothesis test based on the paired comparisons of the % of words correct will be performed. For each subject, the paired difference (P1 minus P2) will be calculated and the mean difference will be tested statistically against a non-inferiority null hypothesis of 10%. Successful rejection of the null hypothesis allows for a conclusion that the performance under the test condition 2 (based on the Nucleus 6 sound processor) will be non-inferior to the test condition 1 (based on the Nucleus 5 sound processor). Ho: P1 - P2 ≥ 10% Ha: P1 - P2 < 10% We hypothesize acceptance of the null hypothesis for the Nucleus 6 features. Testing will be based on a paired t-test with a one-sided 0.05 alpha level. The value of 10% was selected as the non-inferiority margin as one that can be tested with reasonable power and was clinically meaningful.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Hearing Loss
    Keywords
    background noise, speech performance, wind noise

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Single Group Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    N/A
    Enrollment
    97 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Nucleus 6
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Nucleus 6 sound processor
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Percentage of Words Correct on AzBio Sentences in Noise S0N90
    Description
    Individuals were tested with AzBio Sentences in Noise using a speech front (0 degrees) and noise presented to the implant ear (90 degrees) using the following features: enhanced Automatic Gain Control (eAGC), Signal to Noise Ratio - Noise Canceller (SNR-NC), Wind Noise Reduction (WNR) and Automatic Scene Analyzer (SCAN).
    Time Frame
    Each assessment was completed acutely which equated to approximately 2 hours of testing

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    8 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Eight years of age or older CI24RE, CI500 or CI422 series Nucleus cochlear implant types (commercially approved) At least 3 months experience with the cochlear implant Post-linguistic onset of bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, with no congenital component to the hearing loss Native speaker of English, the language used to assess speech perception performance Willingness to participate in and to comply with all requirements of the protocol Exclusion Criteria: 1. Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject, regarding the possible benefits, risks, and limitations that are inherent to the prosthetic device 2. Unwillingness or inability of the candidate to comply with all investigational requirements 3. Additional handicaps that would prevent or restrict participation in the audiological evaluations -

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Learn more about this trial

    Evaluation of Nucleus 6 Sound Coding Algorithms

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs