search
Back to results

Dignity Talk: Helping Palliative Care Patients and Families Have Important Conversations (DTalk)

Primary Purpose

Palliative Care, Family, End of Life Care

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Dignity Talk
The Dignity Talk Communication Topics
Sponsored by
University of Manitoba
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Palliative Care focused on measuring Palliative Care, Family, adaptation, psychological

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

For Patient:

Patients being cared for:

  • in a palliative care unit or whose care is focused on palliation as determined by clinical staff
  • or patients who have have a confirmed diagnosis of amyotropic lateral sclerosis, and have symptoms in a domain that interferes with their social or occupation functioning: a) mobility, b) dysphasia, c) dyspnea, or d) speech or patients who have are have been on dialysis > 3 months and are > 60 years of age - or residents of Personal Care Home all of whom are:
  • 18 years of age or older
  • able to provide informed oral and written consent
  • cognitive capacity (based on clinical consensus)

For Family Member or Close Friend:

  • Family member or close friend who the patient identifies they would be comfortable talking with using the Dignity Talk question framework
  • Family member who is 18 years of age or older
  • Family member who is able to provide oral and written consent
  • Family member who has cognitive capacity to participate in meaningful conversation (based on research staff decision)

For Healthcare Provider:

  • Employed one of the participating sites
  • in a discipline directly involved in clinical care (physician, nursing, social work, spiritual care, allied healthcare, etc.)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not meeting the above inclusion criteria

Sites / Locations

  • Victoria Hospice
  • St. Boniface Hospital
  • Riverview Health Centre
  • Concordia Hospital
  • Deer Lodge Centre
  • Grace Hospital
  • Health Sciences Centre
  • Manitoba Renal Program
  • Seven Oaks Hospital
  • Victoria Hospital
  • Winnipeg Regional Health Authority
  • WRHA Personal Care Homes
  • Dr. Bob Kemp Hospice

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Dignity Talk dyad completers

Dignity Talk non-completers

Arm Description

Those dyads where both patient and family member co-participant complete the protocol using the Dignity Talk Communication Topics

Those dyads where patient and family member co-participant either do not complete the protocol or do not use the Dignity Talk Communication Topics (November 2016 - the investigators have not as yet enrolled any participants who have not completed the study without using the Dignity Talk Topics. However some participants have withdrawn from the study without completing.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Family communication connectedness Index

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

Full Information

First Posted
February 11, 2013
Last Updated
December 12, 2017
Sponsor
University of Manitoba
Collaborators
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01883375
Brief Title
Dignity Talk: Helping Palliative Care Patients and Families Have Important Conversations
Acronym
DTalk
Official Title
Dignity Talk: a Novel Palliative Care Intervention for Patients and Their Families
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 30, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 31, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Manitoba
Collaborators
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Dying patients and their families face many challenges near the end-of-life. Not only do patients often experience physical distress, but they also have feelings of loss of dignity, isolation, and uncertainty. Family members also face many challenges. They bear witness to the suffering of loved ones, and they face uncertainty, loss, and at times a mounting sense of helplessness. The purpose of this study is to introduce and evaluate a new intervention called Dignity Talk, meant to enhance end-of-life experience for both patients and their families. Dignity Talk is based on a set of questions by which terminally ill patients and their family members can engage in meaningful conversations with each other. It is intended to lessen feelings of loss and helplessness and enhance feelings of connectedness by facilitating conversations that tap into a sense of meaning and purpose, sharing of memories, wishes, hopes, and giving guidance to those who will soon be left behind. In Phase 1, 20 patients and family members will help finalize the method and Dignity Talk question framework (is it easy to understand, do the investigators have the right questions, and is the wording sensitive). In Phase 2 of the study the investigators will ask 100 patient-family pairs for feedback about Dignity Talk: what influence it had on their palliative care experience, whether it works well, and whether this intervention should become a regular part of palliative care. The investigators will also ask for feedback from health-care providers in both phases. We are requesting approval for an amendment to the healthcare provider feedback focus group questions. Will add those documents when they are approved. Four to six months after the death of their loved one, the investigators will contact the family member to ask their thoughts about Dignity Talk, how it shaped their experience of their grief and bereavement. The investigators expect that the study will show that Dignity Talk can be an effective, highly accessible palliative care intervention, which will enhance the end-of-life experience for palliative patients and the families who support them.
Detailed Description
See above summary

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Palliative Care, Family, End of Life Care
Keywords
Palliative Care, Family, adaptation, psychological

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
56 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Dignity Talk dyad completers
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Those dyads where both patient and family member co-participant complete the protocol using the Dignity Talk Communication Topics
Arm Title
Dignity Talk non-completers
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Those dyads where patient and family member co-participant either do not complete the protocol or do not use the Dignity Talk Communication Topics (November 2016 - the investigators have not as yet enrolled any participants who have not completed the study without using the Dignity Talk Topics. However some participants have withdrawn from the study without completing.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Dignity Talk
Intervention Description
Patient and family member participants will be given the Dignity Talk framework questions and asked to use them in conversation with each other. Research nurse will return at day 4-6 to confirm both participants have covered all items they wish to discuss. 4-6 months after the death of patient, family members will be contacted in order to collect data pertaining to their bereavement experiences and distress. Will also be asked to complete evaluative feedback on Dignity Talk.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
The Dignity Talk Communication Topics
Intervention Description
There have not been any non-completers - this arm not being used currently
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Family communication connectedness Index
Time Frame
31 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Time Frame
31 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: For Patient: Patients being cared for: in a palliative care unit or whose care is focused on palliation as determined by clinical staff or patients who have have a confirmed diagnosis of amyotropic lateral sclerosis, and have symptoms in a domain that interferes with their social or occupation functioning: a) mobility, b) dysphasia, c) dyspnea, or d) speech or patients who have are have been on dialysis > 3 months and are > 60 years of age - or residents of Personal Care Home all of whom are: 18 years of age or older able to provide informed oral and written consent cognitive capacity (based on clinical consensus) For Family Member or Close Friend: Family member or close friend who the patient identifies they would be comfortable talking with using the Dignity Talk question framework Family member who is 18 years of age or older Family member who is able to provide oral and written consent Family member who has cognitive capacity to participate in meaningful conversation (based on research staff decision) For Healthcare Provider: Employed one of the participating sites in a discipline directly involved in clinical care (physician, nursing, social work, spiritual care, allied healthcare, etc.) Exclusion Criteria: not meeting the above inclusion criteria
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Victoria Hospice
City
Victoria
State/Province
British Columbia
Country
Canada
Facility Name
St. Boniface Hospital
City
Winnipeg
State/Province
Manitoba
ZIP/Postal Code
R3E 0V9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Riverview Health Centre
City
Winnipeg
State/Province
Manitoba
ZIP/Postal Code
R3L 2P4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Concordia Hospital
City
Winnipeg
State/Province
Manitoba
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Deer Lodge Centre
City
Winnipeg
State/Province
Manitoba
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Grace Hospital
City
Winnipeg
State/Province
Manitoba
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Health Sciences Centre
City
Winnipeg
State/Province
Manitoba
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Manitoba Renal Program
City
Winnipeg
State/Province
Manitoba
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Seven Oaks Hospital
City
Winnipeg
State/Province
Manitoba
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Victoria Hospital
City
Winnipeg
State/Province
Manitoba
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Winnipeg Regional Health Authority
City
Winnipeg
State/Province
Manitoba
Country
Canada
Facility Name
WRHA Personal Care Homes
City
Winnipeg
State/Province
Manitoba
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Dr. Bob Kemp Hospice
City
Hamilton
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L9B 1B1
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29130367
Citation
Guo Q, Chochinov HM, McClement S, Thompson G, Hack T. Development and evaluation of the Dignity Talk question framework for palliative patients and their families: A mixed-methods study. Palliat Med. 2018 Jan;32(1):195-205. doi: 10.1177/0269216317734696. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Dignity Talk: Helping Palliative Care Patients and Families Have Important Conversations

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs