search
Back to results

Genetic Risk and Health Coaching for Type 2 Diabetes and Coronary Heart Disease

Primary Purpose

Coronary Heart Disease, Susceptibility to, 5, Prediabetic State

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Health coaching
Genetic risk counseling
Standard risk assessment
Sponsored by
Duke University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Coronary Heart Disease, Susceptibility to, 5 focused on measuring heart disease, type 2 diabetes, genetic testing, health coaching, risk assessment

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 to 65 years
  • Willingness and ability to provide informed consent
  • Have an active email address and internet access
  • Physical exam in the last 12 months with the following documented evaluations in EMR (Electronic Medical record):

    1. Blood pressure
    2. Height and weight
    3. Fasting blood glucose or Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c)
    4. Lipid panel (TC, LDL, HDL, TRIG) with at least one of them outside of the normal ranges defined as:

    i.BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (BMI = weight [kg] / ht [m]2)

ii.FPG > 100 AND ≤ 125 mg/dL

iii.HbA1c > 5.7% ≤ 6.4%

iv.SBP ≥ 130 mmHg

v.TC ≥ 200 mg/dL

vi.TRIG ≥ 150 mg/dL

vii.LDL ≥ 129 mg/dL

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Projected deployment in the upcoming 6 months
  • Diagnosed type 2 diabetes
  • Diagnosed coronary heart disease (CHD) -(Myocardial Infarction, or documented CHD)
  • Inability to ambulate or participate in physical activity
  • Serious chronic disease related complications or conditions that could significantly affect study outcomes [currently treated cancer, renal failure, cardiovascular accident (CVA) with residual effects on functioning
  • Current participation in another research study
  • Spouse, partner or other household member already participating in this study protocol

Sites / Locations

  • David Grant Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Standard Risk Assessment (SRA)

SRA plus Health Coaching (HC)

SRA plus Genetic Risk Counseling (GRC)

SRA+HC+GRC

Arm Description

Subjects will receive a standard risk assessment only for coronary heart disease (CHD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Standard risk factors are reviewed by a provider at a risk counseling visit with the subject.

In addition to the standard risk assessment for CHD and T2D subjects will receive health coaching intervention for 6 months

In addition to the SRA subjects will receive genetic risk counseling at the risk counseling visit with a clinic provider. Genetic test results for CHD (rs10757274) and T2D (rs7903146, rs1801282, rs5219) risk variants will be incorporated into the risk profile reviewed with subjects.

In addition to the standard risk assessment for CHD and T2D subjects will receive genetic risk counseling and health coaching intervention for 6 months.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Dietary Intake as Measured by Percent Energy From Fat
Dietary intake as measured by percent energy from fat, adjusted for baseline
Dietary Intake as Measured by Daily Grams of Fiber
Dietary intake as measured by daily grams of fiber, adjusted for baseline
Physical Activity, as Measured by the Stanford Brief Activity Survey (SBAS)
The Stanford Brief Activity Survey is a 2-item survey that assesses two categories of physical activity - work and leisure. There are five options for degree of activity to choose from in each of the two areas of activity. Activity categories (inactive, light-intensity activity, moderate-intensity activity, hard-intensity activity, and very hard-intensity) are represented in a table of different patterns. Degree of work activity is represented on the vertical axis and degree of leisure activity is represented on the horizontal axis. The overall activity level category is determined by where the two responses intersect.
Smoking Status
Medication Adherence as Measured by Morisky Adherence Survey MMAS8
Scores of the MMAS-8 range from 0 to 8. A score below 6 indicates low adherence, a score between 6 < 8 medium adherence and a score of 8 high adherence.
Weight
Weight in kg
Waist Circumference
Waist circumference in cm
Systolic Blood Pressure
Systolic blood pressure in mmHg
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Diastolic blood pressure in mmHg
High-density Lipoprotein (HDL)
High-density lipoprotein (HDL) in mg/dL
Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL)
Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) in mg/dL
Triglycerides
Triglycerides in mg/dL

Secondary Outcome Measures

Fasting Blood Glucose
Adjusted for baseline
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Total Cholesterol
Adjusted for baseline
AF Composite Fitness Scores
Last annual fitness exam result, collected as pass or fail
Framingham Risk Score (FRS)
Diabetes Risk Score
Perceived Risk for Coronary Heart Disease (CHD)
Investigator developed questions assessing level of personal perceived risk, fear, anger, worry regarding CHD risk. The consequences subscale ranges from 6-30. Higher scores on the consequences represent strongly held beliefs about negative consequences of the illness. The personal control subscale ranges from 6-30 and the treatment control subscale ranges from 2-10. Higher scores on the personal control and treatment control represent positive beliefs about the controllability of the illness. The emotional representations scores range from 6-30. Higher score indicates higher levels of worry or anxiety about risk of illness.
Perceived Risk for Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Investigator developed questions assessing level of personal perceived risk, fear, anger, worry regarding T2D risk. The consequences subscale ranges from 6-30. Higher scores on the consequences represent strongly held beliefs about negative consequences of the illness. The personal control subscale ranges from 6-30 and the treatment control subscale ranges from 2-10. Higher scores on the personal control and treatment control represent positive beliefs about the controllability of the illness. The emotional representations scores range from 6-30. Higher score indicates higher levels of worry or anxiety about risk of illness.
Patient Activation Score
Patient activation is the degree to which patients accept an active role in their healthcare, and have the knowledge, skills and confidence to take care of their health. When scored as a continuous variable, the range is from 0 to 100, with higher numbers indicating greater levels of patient activation.
Stages of Change
These evidence-based questions are validated and based upon the Transtheoretical Model and assess an individual's readiness to make behavioral change in 5 health behavior domains (dietary intake, exercise, weight loss, smoking cessation, and medication adherence).
Depression, as Measured by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
The Beck Depression Inventory is a 21-item measure that assesses self-reported symptoms of depression. It has been heavily used in research linking depression to heart disease. Scores range from 0-63, with 0 = minimal depression and 63 = severe depression.
Unmanaged Stress as Measured by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
The PSS is a 10 item survey assessing feelings and thoughts of stress. Scores range from 0-40 with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress.
Social Isolation
Single item to assess for availability of support person, where No=no support person.

Full Information

First Posted
June 19, 2013
Last Updated
March 24, 2018
Sponsor
Duke University
Collaborators
David Grant U.S. Air Force Medical Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01884545
Brief Title
Genetic Risk and Health Coaching for Type 2 Diabetes and Coronary Heart Disease
Official Title
Genetic Risk and Health Coaching for Type 2 Diabetes and Coronary Heart Disease
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 1, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 1, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Duke University
Collaborators
David Grant U.S. Air Force Medical Center

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to examine whether the use of genetic test information and/or health coaching in patient risk counseling for heart disease and diabetes affect health behaviors and health outcomes in active-duty Air Force (ADAF), beneficiaries or dependents and Air Force retiree patients. Total of 400 subjects will be enrolled. They will be randomly(like flipping a coin)assigned to 4 groups: 1)Standard risk assessment (SRA)only; 2)SRA plus genetic risk information (SRA+G); 3)SRA plus health coaching (SRA+HC); or 4)SRA, genetic risk information, and health coaching (SRA+G+HC). Subjects randomized to the two genetic arms will have blood collected for testing of investigational coronary heart disease (CHD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk markers. Participants in the two groups that include health coaching will be assigned to a trained certified health coach for a period of 6 months. The duration of the study is 12 months with 3 in person visits (baseline, 6 months and 12 months) and completion of surveys at 6 weeks and 3 month time points.
Detailed Description
This study will examine the impact of providing genetic CHD and T2D risk information, with or without a supportive behavioral intervention, on promoting risk-reducing behaviors and improving clinical outcomes. In short, using a 4-group (2X2) randomized controlled trial (RCT) design, this study will determine whether incorporating multiple-marker genetic testing into risk counseling for CHD and T2D, coupled with a health coaching intervention will lead to greater changes in physical fitness, health behaviors, risk status and clinical outcomes in active-duty Air Force (ADAF), beneficiaries or dependents and AF retiree patients (N=400). The study will address the following task objectives: Determine the main and interactive effects of multiple-marker genetic risk information incorporated into standard CHD and T2D risk counseling (Standard Risk Assessment, or SRA) and an established, structured telephonic health coaching intervention on health behavior change (diet, exercise habits, smoking cessation) over 12 months, with a focus on ADAF patients, as well as their beneficiaries and retirees. Determine the main and interactive effects of genetic risk information incorporated into standard CHD and T2D risk counseling and a telephonic health coaching intervention on clinical outcomes (fasting blood glucose, blood pressure, BMI, LDL, triglycerides, total cholesterol, AF composite fitness scores) over 12 months in this AF cohort. Given the lack of RCTs on the effects of differing genetic test results, such as false reassurance and genetic determinism, we will also pursue a third, exploratory task objective: Examine the differential effects of level of CHD and T2D genetic risk (# of risk alleles) on behavior change (diet, exercise habits, smoking cessation) and AF fitness scores at 12 months post baseline. Baseline data collection: After screening and informed consent, height and weight, SBP, waist circumference, current lab results (FPG, total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL, HbA1c, and HDL) and current PHA (physical health assessment) data with fitness scores ( for active duty personnel only) will be obtained from the medical records. Subjects randomized to the two genetic arms will have blood collected for testing of investigational CHD and T2D risk markers. Randomization will take place to one of the following: SRA only; SRA plus genetic risk information (SRA+G); SRA plus health coaching (SRA+HC); or SRA, genetic risk information, and health coaching (SRA+G+HC). Risk Counseling Visit: Within four weeks after the baseline visit all participants will receive risk counseling with trained provider(s) at each clinic site. Health coaching intervention: Participants in the two groups that include health coaching will be assigned to a trained health coach for a period of 6 months (n=200). IHC (Integrative Health Coaching) sessions will be provided by telephone using a structure that has evolved in multiple trials and clinical programs at Duke Integrative Medicine. Six week, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups: At 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after the baseline visit, participants will be asked to complete selected surveys online. 6month and 12 month study visits: 12 months from the baseline visit, active duty participants will complete their annual PHA, required annual AF fitness testing; and all participants will complete study visits at 6 and 12 months for weight, waist circumference, BP, fasting glucose or HbA1c and lipid panels to be re-assessed. Surveys will be completed at or prior to the final 12 month visit as well.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Coronary Heart Disease, Susceptibility to, 5, Prediabetic State
Keywords
heart disease, type 2 diabetes, genetic testing, health coaching, risk assessment

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Factorial Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
220 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Standard Risk Assessment (SRA)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects will receive a standard risk assessment only for coronary heart disease (CHD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Standard risk factors are reviewed by a provider at a risk counseling visit with the subject.
Arm Title
SRA plus Health Coaching (HC)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
In addition to the standard risk assessment for CHD and T2D subjects will receive health coaching intervention for 6 months
Arm Title
SRA plus Genetic Risk Counseling (GRC)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
In addition to the SRA subjects will receive genetic risk counseling at the risk counseling visit with a clinic provider. Genetic test results for CHD (rs10757274) and T2D (rs7903146, rs1801282, rs5219) risk variants will be incorporated into the risk profile reviewed with subjects.
Arm Title
SRA+HC+GRC
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
In addition to the standard risk assessment for CHD and T2D subjects will receive genetic risk counseling and health coaching intervention for 6 months.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Health coaching
Intervention Description
Telephonic health coaching sessions with a trained certified health coach for a period of 6 months (total of 10 biweekly calls).
Intervention Type
Genetic
Intervention Name(s)
Genetic risk counseling
Intervention Description
In addition to the SRA subjects will receive genetic risk counseling at the risk counseling visit with a clinic provider. Genetic test results for CHD (rs10757274) and T2D (rs7903146, rs1801282, rs5219) risk variants will be incorporated into the risk profile reviewed with subjects.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Standard risk assessment
Intervention Description
Standard risk assessment for coronary heart disease (CHD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Standard risk factors are reviewed by a provider at a risk counseling visit with the subject.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Dietary Intake as Measured by Percent Energy From Fat
Description
Dietary intake as measured by percent energy from fat, adjusted for baseline
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Dietary Intake as Measured by Daily Grams of Fiber
Description
Dietary intake as measured by daily grams of fiber, adjusted for baseline
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Physical Activity, as Measured by the Stanford Brief Activity Survey (SBAS)
Description
The Stanford Brief Activity Survey is a 2-item survey that assesses two categories of physical activity - work and leisure. There are five options for degree of activity to choose from in each of the two areas of activity. Activity categories (inactive, light-intensity activity, moderate-intensity activity, hard-intensity activity, and very hard-intensity) are represented in a table of different patterns. Degree of work activity is represented on the vertical axis and degree of leisure activity is represented on the horizontal axis. The overall activity level category is determined by where the two responses intersect.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Smoking Status
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Medication Adherence as Measured by Morisky Adherence Survey MMAS8
Description
Scores of the MMAS-8 range from 0 to 8. A score below 6 indicates low adherence, a score between 6 < 8 medium adherence and a score of 8 high adherence.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Weight
Description
Weight in kg
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Waist Circumference
Description
Waist circumference in cm
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Systolic Blood Pressure
Description
Systolic blood pressure in mmHg
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Description
Diastolic blood pressure in mmHg
Time Frame
12 months
Title
High-density Lipoprotein (HDL)
Description
High-density lipoprotein (HDL) in mg/dL
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL)
Description
Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) in mg/dL
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Triglycerides
Description
Triglycerides in mg/dL
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Fasting Blood Glucose
Description
Adjusted for baseline
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Total Cholesterol
Description
Adjusted for baseline
Time Frame
12 months
Title
AF Composite Fitness Scores
Description
Last annual fitness exam result, collected as pass or fail
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Framingham Risk Score (FRS)
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Diabetes Risk Score
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Perceived Risk for Coronary Heart Disease (CHD)
Description
Investigator developed questions assessing level of personal perceived risk, fear, anger, worry regarding CHD risk. The consequences subscale ranges from 6-30. Higher scores on the consequences represent strongly held beliefs about negative consequences of the illness. The personal control subscale ranges from 6-30 and the treatment control subscale ranges from 2-10. Higher scores on the personal control and treatment control represent positive beliefs about the controllability of the illness. The emotional representations scores range from 6-30. Higher score indicates higher levels of worry or anxiety about risk of illness.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Perceived Risk for Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Description
Investigator developed questions assessing level of personal perceived risk, fear, anger, worry regarding T2D risk. The consequences subscale ranges from 6-30. Higher scores on the consequences represent strongly held beliefs about negative consequences of the illness. The personal control subscale ranges from 6-30 and the treatment control subscale ranges from 2-10. Higher scores on the personal control and treatment control represent positive beliefs about the controllability of the illness. The emotional representations scores range from 6-30. Higher score indicates higher levels of worry or anxiety about risk of illness.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Patient Activation Score
Description
Patient activation is the degree to which patients accept an active role in their healthcare, and have the knowledge, skills and confidence to take care of their health. When scored as a continuous variable, the range is from 0 to 100, with higher numbers indicating greater levels of patient activation.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Stages of Change
Description
These evidence-based questions are validated and based upon the Transtheoretical Model and assess an individual's readiness to make behavioral change in 5 health behavior domains (dietary intake, exercise, weight loss, smoking cessation, and medication adherence).
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Depression, as Measured by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Description
The Beck Depression Inventory is a 21-item measure that assesses self-reported symptoms of depression. It has been heavily used in research linking depression to heart disease. Scores range from 0-63, with 0 = minimal depression and 63 = severe depression.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Unmanaged Stress as Measured by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
Description
The PSS is a 10 item survey assessing feelings and thoughts of stress. Scores range from 0-40 with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Social Isolation
Description
Single item to assess for availability of support person, where No=no support person.
Time Frame
6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age 18 to 65 years Willingness and ability to provide informed consent Have an active email address and internet access Physical exam in the last 12 months with the following documented evaluations in EMR (Electronic Medical record): Blood pressure Height and weight Fasting blood glucose or Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) Lipid panel (TC, LDL, HDL, TRIG) with at least one of them outside of the normal ranges defined as: i.BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (BMI = weight [kg] / ht [m]2) ii.FPG > 100 AND ≤ 125 mg/dL iii.HbA1c > 5.7% ≤ 6.4% iv.SBP ≥ 130 mmHg v.TC ≥ 200 mg/dL vi.TRIG ≥ 150 mg/dL vii.LDL ≥ 129 mg/dL Exclusion Criteria: Projected deployment in the upcoming 6 months Diagnosed type 2 diabetes Diagnosed coronary heart disease (CHD) -(Myocardial Infarction, or documented CHD) Inability to ambulate or participate in physical activity Serious chronic disease related complications or conditions that could significantly affect study outcomes [currently treated cancer, renal failure, cardiovascular accident (CVA) with residual effects on functioning Current participation in another research study Spouse, partner or other household member already participating in this study protocol
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Allison Vorderstrasse, DNSc
Organizational Affiliation
Duke University, School of Nursing
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ruth Wolever, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Duke University, Duke Intergrative Medicina
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
David Grant Medical Center
City
Fairfield
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94535
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
20159873
Citation
Palomaki GE, Melillo S, Bradley LA. Association between 9p21 genomic markers and heart disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2010 Feb 17;303(7):648-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.118.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21142536
Citation
McCarthy MI. Genomics, type 2 diabetes, and obesity. N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 9;363(24):2339-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0906948. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16855264
Citation
Florez JC, Jablonski KA, Bayley N, Pollin TI, de Bakker PI, Shuldiner AR, Knowler WC, Nathan DM, Altshuler D; Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. TCF7L2 polymorphisms and progression to diabetes in the Diabetes Prevention Program. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jul 20;355(3):241-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062418.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20142567
Citation
Sheridan SL, Viera AJ, Krantz MJ, Ice CL, Steinman LE, Peters KE, Kopin LA, Lungelow D; Cardiovascular Health Intervention Research and Translation Network Work Group on Global Coronary Heart Disease Risk. The effect of giving global coronary risk information to adults: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2010 Feb 8;170(3):230-9. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.516.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20031596
Citation
Brautbar A, Ballantyne CM, Lawson K, Nambi V, Chambless L, Folsom AR, Willerson JT, Boerwinkle E. Impact of adding a single allele in the 9p21 locus to traditional risk factors on reclassification of coronary heart disease risk and implications for lipid-modifying therapy in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2009 Jun;2(3):279-85. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.108.817338. Epub 2009 Apr 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24416670
Citation
Vorderstrasse AA, Ginsburg GS, Kraus WE, Maldonado MC, Wolever RQ. Health coaching and genomics-potential avenues to elicit behavior change in those at risk for chronic disease: protocol for personalized medicine effectiveness study in air force primary care. Glob Adv Health Med. 2013 May;2(3):26-38. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2013.035.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
35417442
Citation
Yang Q, Zhao A, Lee C, Wang X, Vorderstrasse A, Wolever RQ. Latent Profile/Class Analysis Identifying Differentiated Intervention Effects. Nurs Res. 2022 Sep-Oct 01;71(5):394-403. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000597. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Genetic Risk and Health Coaching for Type 2 Diabetes and Coronary Heart Disease

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs