search
Back to results

Intervention for Postpartum Infections Following Caesarean Section (APIPICS)

Primary Purpose

Surgical Wound Infection, Infection; Cesarean Section, Cesarean Section; Dehiscence

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Denmark
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
Standard wound dressing
Sponsored by
Odense University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Surgical Wound Infection focused on measuring Randomized Controlled Trial, Economical Evaluation, Caesarean Section, Cesarean Section, Postoperative Wound Treatment, Surgical Site Infections, Wound Infections, Infectious Morbidity, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 year
  • Women, who can read and understand Danish

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serious illness requiring medical treatment, such as cancer
  • Stillborn child
  • If the fascia is ruptured

Sites / Locations

  • Odense University Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Other

Arm Label

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

A standard wound dressing

Arm Description

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) is an alternative method of conservative wound management, which uses negative pressure to promote wound healing in both chronic and acute wounds. The rationale for using NPWT is that it mechanically stimulates the formation of new tissue and removes wound fluid and infectious material

The standard wound dressing is a hydrofiber or alginate dressing, used for open wound

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The frequency of re-rupture in each study group

Secondary Outcome Measures

Length of hospitalization
Readmission to hospital due to wound complications after the re-operation
Number of participants with a decreased health-related quality of life score as a measure of satisfaction and tolerability
A health-related quality of life measure, recorded in Quality Adjusted Life Years at the two interventions. The health-related quality of life score is measured on the 4 day after the re-operation and at the 6 and 12 months follow-up.
The cosmetic outcome as a measure of satisfaction
The scar will be evaluated by a plastic surgeon at a clinical examination 6 and 12 months after the re-operation. After study completion pictures of the scars will be evaluated by two blinded plastic surgeons, using two predefined scar scales.

Full Information

First Posted
June 27, 2013
Last Updated
October 14, 2016
Sponsor
Odense University Hospital
Collaborators
Region of Southern Denmark, University of Southern Denmark, Hvidovre University Hospital, Smith & Nephew, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01891006
Brief Title
Intervention for Postpartum Infections Following Caesarean Section
Acronym
APIPICS
Official Title
Intervention for Postpartum Infections Following Caesarean Section - a Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
November 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Odense University Hospital
Collaborators
Region of Southern Denmark, University of Southern Denmark, Hvidovre University Hospital, Smith & Nephew, Inc.

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to examine whether Negative Pressure Wound Therapy is an effective wound treatment compared to conventional wound treatment in the period of time from reoperation to re-suturing in women having surgical wound rupture after Caesarean Section.
Detailed Description
This study is a non-blinded randomized controlled trial and a concurrent Health Economic. The study examines the effect on wound healing using NPWT compared with conventional wound treatment in women, who experience spontaneous dehiscence or where a surgeon deliberately opens the wound after Caesarean Section (CS). Women, who have given informed consent, will be randomized to either intervention or control group via a computer-generated randomization program. It is not possible to blind either participants or therapists. The analysis will be carried out on an intention to treat basis. Women with post-CS wound infection will be hospitalized and the wound will be reopened and cleaned under general anaesthesia. In the intervention group women will be treated with NPWT. The change of wound dressing on the second day takes place in the obstetrical or plastic surgery ward. On the fourth day, the NPWT material will be removed and the wound evaluated before re-suturing. In the control group the wound will be treated with a hydrofiber or alginate dressing. Changes of wound dressing will take place on the second and fourth days as in the intervention group. In both groups, when the wound is evaluated on the second and fourth day, it will be described and measured (depth, width, length). After four days of treatment, the wound will be re-sutured in both groups. It is expected that some wounds are not suitable for re-suturing on the fourth day. If a woman does not want to participate, she will receive the conventional treatment, which corresponds to the treatment in the control group. Women, who do not wish to participate, will be asked for permission to use their data in the analysis.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Surgical Wound Infection, Infection; Cesarean Section, Cesarean Section; Dehiscence, Complications; Cesarean Section, Complications; Cesarean Section, Wound, Dehiscence, Wound; Rupture, Surgery, Cesarean Section
Keywords
Randomized Controlled Trial, Economical Evaluation, Caesarean Section, Cesarean Section, Postoperative Wound Treatment, Surgical Site Infections, Wound Infections, Infectious Morbidity, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
26 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) is an alternative method of conservative wound management, which uses negative pressure to promote wound healing in both chronic and acute wounds. The rationale for using NPWT is that it mechanically stimulates the formation of new tissue and removes wound fluid and infectious material
Arm Title
A standard wound dressing
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
The standard wound dressing is a hydrofiber or alginate dressing, used for open wound
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
Other Intervention Name(s)
RENASYS-G from Smith&Nephew
Intervention Description
The Negative Pressure Wound Therapy are changed on the 2. day and removed on the 4. day after the re-operation.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Standard wound dressing
Intervention Description
The standard wound dressing is a a hydrofiber or alginate dressing used for open wounds
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The frequency of re-rupture in each study group
Time Frame
Within the first 30 days after surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Length of hospitalization
Time Frame
Within the first 30 days after Caesarean Section
Title
Readmission to hospital due to wound complications after the re-operation
Time Frame
Within the first 30 days after Caesarean Section
Title
Number of participants with a decreased health-related quality of life score as a measure of satisfaction and tolerability
Description
A health-related quality of life measure, recorded in Quality Adjusted Life Years at the two interventions. The health-related quality of life score is measured on the 4 day after the re-operation and at the 6 and 12 months follow-up.
Time Frame
Within the first 30 days after Caesarean Section
Title
The cosmetic outcome as a measure of satisfaction
Description
The scar will be evaluated by a plastic surgeon at a clinical examination 6 and 12 months after the re-operation. After study completion pictures of the scars will be evaluated by two blinded plastic surgeons, using two predefined scar scales.
Time Frame
A 6 and 12 months follow-up

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥ 18 year Women, who can read and understand Danish Exclusion Criteria: Serious illness requiring medical treatment, such as cancer Stillborn child If the fascia is ruptured
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nana Hyldig, PhD Student
Organizational Affiliation
Odense University Hospital, department of Plastic Surgery, University of Southern Denmark, Faculty of Health Sciences, institute of Clinical Research, research unit, department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Odense University Hospital
City
Odense
ZIP/Postal Code
5000
Country
Denmark

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Intervention for Postpartum Infections Following Caesarean Section

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs