search
Back to results

PET/CT or PET/MRI in Measuring Tumors in Patients Undergoing Clinical Imaging or With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer

Primary Purpose

Breast Cancer, Unspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol Specific

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
positron emission tomography/computed tomography
PET/MRI
Position Device
Sponsored by
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Breast Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • [Cohorts 1 and 2] Female patients who are referred by their physician to have a clinical PET/CT
  • [Cohort 3] Patients referred for clinical breast dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI for recently diagnosed breast cancer
  • Normal kidney function for subjects that will receive magnetic resonance (MR) contrast agent as part of their clinical imaging
  • For subjects for whom MR contrast agent is to be administered, University Hospitals (UH) policy 8.17.26 will be applied

    • The following guidelines will be followed when a patient or patient representative responds "yes" to questions on the MRI history sheet 'Are you on dialysis, history of kidney failure, end stage renal disease, chronic liver disease, or are you a peri-liver transplant patient':

      • The patient must have a serum creatinine value available within three (3) weeks prior to the injection of gadolinium
      • Calculate an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on serum creatinine; if the eGFR is less than 30 the attending radiologist must discuss the risks and benefits of administering gadolinium with the referring physician and patient; the collective judgment of the patient, radiologist and referring physician must be in agreement to proceed with the injection of gadolinium
      • Calculated eGFR in range of 31-59 requires the judgment of the attending radiologist whether to discuss gadolinium administration with referring physician and patient or whether to directly use or hold the contrast agent
      • If an eGFR is greater than 60, gadolinium may be administered without further physician or patient discussion
      • Gadolinium administration is limited to single dose at 0.1mmol/kg; Omniscan should not be used
      • Technologist will document radiologist decision to administer gadolinium on the MRI history sheet; radiologist will document decision and consultation with the referring physician and patient in the MRI report
      • PERITONEAL DIALYSIS PATIENTS:

        • No gadolinium will be administered unless the patient has been scheduled for hemodialysis within 24 hours following the injection of gadolinium; technologist will determine eGFR and follow above guidelines; dialysis will be scheduled by the referring physician
      • HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS:

        • No gadolinium will be administered unless the patient has been scheduled for hemodialysis within 24 hours following the injection of gadolinium; no determination of eGFR is necessary; radiologist will assume eGFR less than 30 and follow above guidelines; dialysis will be scheduled by the referring physician
  • Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who do not meet all of the above inclusion criteria
  • Subjects unwilling or unable to sign the informed consent form
  • Subjects who are cognitively impaired and thus unable to give informed consent
  • Subjects unable to undergo MR scanning due to exclusion via University Hospitals Case Medical Center (UHCMC) MR restrictions (e.g. certain implanted metallic or electronic devices)
  • Subjects who are pregnant
  • Subjects that are too large to fit comfortably into the PET/MR on the breast coil; for cohort 1 only we will accept a maximum of 10 subjects that are too large for the PET/MRI to acquire a prone PET/CT but without the paired PET/MR

Sites / Locations

  • Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Cohort 1: Standard positioning device

Cohort 2: New positioning device

Cohort 3: Current positioning device until new is available

Arm Description

Patients undergo clinical FDG-PET/CT followed by prone breast PET/CT and/or prone breast PET/MRI with or without DTPA.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Attenuation Correction for PET/MRI, Assessed Using Standard Uptake Values (SUVs) (Cohorts I & II)
Uptake and attenuation correction of PET/MRI and PET/CT will be examined by comparing SUVs of the two methods. The proportions of subjects with SUV of the PET/MR within 5%, 10%, and 20% of the SUV from PET/CT will be estimated with exact 95% confidence intervals.
Attenuation Correction for PET/CT, Assessed Using SUVs (Cohorts I & II)
Uptake and attenuation correction of PET/MRI and PET/CT will be examined by comparing SUVs of the two methods. The proportions of subjects with SUV of the PET/MR within 5%, 10%, and 20% of the SUV from PET/CT will be estimated with exact 95% confidence intervals.
Comparison of Specificity Rates of Fused FDG-PET/MRI (Cohort III)
McNemar's test or a generalized estimating equations logistic regression model with patient as the cluster used to compare specificity rates of the new technology versus current technology (MRI alone), restricting analysis to true negative lesions. Utilizing 3 different combinations of scan parameters to determine which combination has the highest specificity. Single parameter: DCE-MRI is the gold standard to which the two parameter and three parameter rows are compared. Combinations include: Single parameter: DCE-MRI Two Parameter A: DCE-MRI and DWI ADC Two Parameter B: DCE-MRI and FDG-PET Three Parameter: DCE-MRI, DWI ADC, FDG-PET
Sensitivity of PET/CT and PET/MRI (Cohort III)
McNemar's test or a generalized estimating equations logistic regression model with patient as the cluster used to compare sensitivity rates of the new technology versus current technology (MRI alone), restricting analysis to true negative lesions. Utilizing 3 different combinations of scan parameters to determine which combination has the highest sensitivity. Combinations include: Single parameter: DCE-MRI Two Parameter A: DCE-MRI and DWI ADC Two Parameter B: DCE-MRI and FDG-PET Three Parameter: DCE-MRI, DWI ADC, FDG-PET

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
July 1, 2013
Last Updated
February 24, 2020
Sponsor
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01892540
Brief Title
PET/CT or PET/MRI in Measuring Tumors in Patients Undergoing Clinical Imaging or With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer
Official Title
Positron Mammographic Imaging (PMI)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This clinical trial studies positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) or PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in measuring tumors in patients undergoing clinical imaging or with newly diagnosed breast cancer. New diagnostic procedures, such as PET/CT or PET/MRI, may be more effective than MRI alone in measuring tumors in patients undergoing clinical imaging or with newly diagnosed breast cancer.
Detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To improve visualization of tumors by developing better image reconstruction and correction methods. II. To revise the positioning devices and, if necessary, scanner table to fit a wider size range of women. OUTLINE: Patients undergo clinical fludeoxyglucose F-18 (FDG)-PET/CT followed by prone breast PET/CT and/or prone breast PET/MRI with or without gadopentetate dimeglumine (DTPA).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Breast Cancer, Unspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol Specific

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
43 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Cohort 1: Standard positioning device
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients undergo clinical FDG-PET/CT followed by prone breast PET/CT and/or prone breast PET/MRI with or without DTPA.
Arm Title
Cohort 2: New positioning device
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Cohort 3: Current positioning device until new is available
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Diagnostic Test
Intervention Name(s)
positron emission tomography/computed tomography
Intervention Description
Undergo PET/CT
Intervention Type
Diagnostic Test
Intervention Name(s)
PET/MRI
Intervention Description
Undergo PET/MRI positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging hybrid imaging
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Position Device
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Attenuation Correction for PET/MRI, Assessed Using Standard Uptake Values (SUVs) (Cohorts I & II)
Description
Uptake and attenuation correction of PET/MRI and PET/CT will be examined by comparing SUVs of the two methods. The proportions of subjects with SUV of the PET/MR within 5%, 10%, and 20% of the SUV from PET/CT will be estimated with exact 95% confidence intervals.
Time Frame
1 yr from study start
Title
Attenuation Correction for PET/CT, Assessed Using SUVs (Cohorts I & II)
Description
Uptake and attenuation correction of PET/MRI and PET/CT will be examined by comparing SUVs of the two methods. The proportions of subjects with SUV of the PET/MR within 5%, 10%, and 20% of the SUV from PET/CT will be estimated with exact 95% confidence intervals.
Time Frame
1 yr from study start
Title
Comparison of Specificity Rates of Fused FDG-PET/MRI (Cohort III)
Description
McNemar's test or a generalized estimating equations logistic regression model with patient as the cluster used to compare specificity rates of the new technology versus current technology (MRI alone), restricting analysis to true negative lesions. Utilizing 3 different combinations of scan parameters to determine which combination has the highest specificity. Single parameter: DCE-MRI is the gold standard to which the two parameter and three parameter rows are compared. Combinations include: Single parameter: DCE-MRI Two Parameter A: DCE-MRI and DWI ADC Two Parameter B: DCE-MRI and FDG-PET Three Parameter: DCE-MRI, DWI ADC, FDG-PET
Time Frame
1 yr from study start
Title
Sensitivity of PET/CT and PET/MRI (Cohort III)
Description
McNemar's test or a generalized estimating equations logistic regression model with patient as the cluster used to compare sensitivity rates of the new technology versus current technology (MRI alone), restricting analysis to true negative lesions. Utilizing 3 different combinations of scan parameters to determine which combination has the highest sensitivity. Combinations include: Single parameter: DCE-MRI Two Parameter A: DCE-MRI and DWI ADC Two Parameter B: DCE-MRI and FDG-PET Three Parameter: DCE-MRI, DWI ADC, FDG-PET
Time Frame
1 yr from study start

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: [Cohorts 1 and 2] Female patients who are referred by their physician to have a clinical PET/CT [Cohort 3] Patients referred for clinical breast dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI for recently diagnosed breast cancer Normal kidney function for subjects that will receive magnetic resonance (MR) contrast agent as part of their clinical imaging For subjects for whom MR contrast agent is to be administered, University Hospitals (UH) policy 8.17.26 will be applied The following guidelines will be followed when a patient or patient representative responds "yes" to questions on the MRI history sheet 'Are you on dialysis, history of kidney failure, end stage renal disease, chronic liver disease, or are you a peri-liver transplant patient': The patient must have a serum creatinine value available within three (3) weeks prior to the injection of gadolinium Calculate an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on serum creatinine; if the eGFR is less than 30 the attending radiologist must discuss the risks and benefits of administering gadolinium with the referring physician and patient; the collective judgment of the patient, radiologist and referring physician must be in agreement to proceed with the injection of gadolinium Calculated eGFR in range of 31-59 requires the judgment of the attending radiologist whether to discuss gadolinium administration with referring physician and patient or whether to directly use or hold the contrast agent If an eGFR is greater than 60, gadolinium may be administered without further physician or patient discussion Gadolinium administration is limited to single dose at 0.1mmol/kg; Omniscan should not be used Technologist will document radiologist decision to administer gadolinium on the MRI history sheet; radiologist will document decision and consultation with the referring physician and patient in the MRI report PERITONEAL DIALYSIS PATIENTS: No gadolinium will be administered unless the patient has been scheduled for hemodialysis within 24 hours following the injection of gadolinium; technologist will determine eGFR and follow above guidelines; dialysis will be scheduled by the referring physician HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS: No gadolinium will be administered unless the patient has been scheduled for hemodialysis within 24 hours following the injection of gadolinium; no determination of eGFR is necessary; radiologist will assume eGFR less than 30 and follow above guidelines; dialysis will be scheduled by the referring physician Ability to provide informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Subjects who do not meet all of the above inclusion criteria Subjects unwilling or unable to sign the informed consent form Subjects who are cognitively impaired and thus unable to give informed consent Subjects unable to undergo MR scanning due to exclusion via University Hospitals Case Medical Center (UHCMC) MR restrictions (e.g. certain implanted metallic or electronic devices) Subjects who are pregnant Subjects that are too large to fit comfortably into the PET/MR on the breast coil; for cohort 1 only we will accept a maximum of 10 subjects that are too large for the PET/MRI to acquire a prone PET/CT but without the paired PET/MR
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Donna Plecha, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44106-5065
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

PET/CT or PET/MRI in Measuring Tumors in Patients Undergoing Clinical Imaging or With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs