search
Back to results

Brain Aging and Treatment Response in Geriatric Depression

Primary Purpose

Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), Depression

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Escitalopram
Memantine
Placebo
Sponsored by
University of California, Los Angeles
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) focused on measuring Major Depression, Geriatric Major Depression, Executive Cognitive Dysfunction, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Older Adults, Geriatric, Executive Cognitive Impairment, Quality of Life, Disability, Comorbidity, Medical Burden, Safety, Candidate Genes

Eligibility Criteria

60 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Meets the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) criteria for major depressive disorder (recurrent and nonrecurrent course will be identified)
  • Score of 16 or higher on the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HDRS) at study entry
  • Score of 24 or higher on the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE)
  • Age 60 years old or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of psychiatric illness or a substance abuse disorder other than unipolar depression, diagnosed prior to the onset of the first depressive episode
  • Presence of psychotic symptoms
  • Severe or acute medical illness (e.g., major surgery, metastatic cancer, stroke, heart attack) 6 months prior to study entry
  • Acute suicidal or violent behavior or history of suicide attempt within the year prior to study entry
  • Presence of delirium, neurodegenerative dementia, Parkinson's disease, or any other central nervous system (CNS) diseases
  • Toxic or metabolic abnormalities on laboratory examination
  • Medications taken or medical illnesses present that could account for depression
  • Active heart failure categorized as Class III or greater according to New York Heart Association criteria
  • Heart attack or crescendo angina within the 3 months prior to study entry
  • Symptomatic cardiac arrhythmias or symptomatic, hemodynamically significant mitral or aortic valvular disease
  • Resting heart rate less than 50 beats per minute and a corrected QT (QTc) interval greater than 0.45 seconds
  • Second or third degree atrioventricular block
  • Systolic blood pressure greater than 180 mmHg or less than 90 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure greater than 105 mmHg or less than 50 mmHg at study entry
  • Treated with depot neuroleptic therapy within 6 months prior to study entry
  • Treated with any neuroleptic, antidepressant, anxiolytic medication (other than lorazepam), or over-the-counter CNS-active medications used for treatment of depression (e.g, St. John's Wort, kava-kava, melatonin) within 2 weeks (4 weeks for fluoxetine or monoamine-oxidase inhibitors [MAOIs]) prior to the first administration of study medication
  • Known allergy to escitalopram or memantine or history of ineffective treatment with escitalopram or memantine for current depressive episode
  • Requires concomitant therapy with any prescription or over-the-counter medications that have potentially dangerous interactions with either escitalopram or memantine
  • Requires electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) or received ECT within 3 months prior to study entry
  • Initiated psychotherapy within 3 months prior to study entry or will be initiating or terminating psychotherapy during the study

Sites / Locations

  • UCLA Semel Institute - Neuropsychiatric Institute (NPI)

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Escitalopram and Memantine

Escitalopram and placebo

Arm Description

Participants will take a combination of Escitalopram and Memantine for 12 months

Participants will take a combination of Escitalopram and placebo for 12 months

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Clinician administered scale measures severity of depressive symptoms. This measure includes 24 items. Response options vary item to item and include the following ranges: [0-2], [0-3], and [0-4]. A score of 0 suggests absence of symptoms and/or difficulties and higher scores represent more severe difficulties. Possible overall score range [0-74], higher scores representing more severe difficulties.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale
Clinician administered item scale measures severity of depressive symptoms. The 10 items are measured on a 7-point scale ranging from 0 to 6; creating a total range of 0-60. A score of 0 suggests absence of symptoms and higher scores represent greater severity of depression.Severity gradations for the MADRS have been proposed (9-17 = mild, 18-34 = moderate, and ≥ 35 = severe). Treatment remission is defined as an endpoint total score ≤ 10.
Change in Cognitive Domain Scores
Neuropsychological battery of tests which included the following domains: learning, delayed recall, and executive functioning. Raw scores were transformed to z-scores for each test score of interest for each participant, and then averaged. These z-scores were averaged within each neuropsychological domain to produce composite scores and then averaged over all tests to calculate a global performance score. Higher scores are indicative of better performance.

Full Information

First Posted
May 31, 2013
Last Updated
October 11, 2019
Sponsor
University of California, Los Angeles
Collaborators
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01902004
Brief Title
Brain Aging and Treatment Response in Geriatric Depression
Official Title
Treatment of Geriatric Depression With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Double-blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of Namenda (Memantine) Augmentation of Lexapro (Escitalopram) in Depressed Patients at Least 60 Years of Age
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2013 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 23, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 23, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of California, Los Angeles
Collaborators
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The proposed project will evaluate the role of neuroimaging biomarkers of brain aging (i.e., neurodegenerative and vascular brain changes) and mild cognitive impairment in the patterns of treatment response to memantine combined with escitalopram compared to escitalopram and placebo.
Detailed Description
This study is designed to conduct a double-blind placebo-controlled trial of Namenda (Memantine) as an augmentation to Lexapro (Escitalopram) in depressed older adults 60 years of age and older. Throughout the course of the study, the investigators anticipate screening about 400 subjects to recruit 134 participants in the first four years. This study will require that the subjects complete up to 20 (twenty) visits in 12 (twelve) months to the study site during their participation. The purpose of this study is to determine whether Namenda (memantine) when taken in combination with Lexapro (escitalopram), may improve the quality of treatment response by making it faster and more complete, and also by improving thinking and memory in comparison to Lexapro taken with a placebo. Enrolled subjects will be provided with 10-20 mg of escitalopram for 12 months, and concurrently randomly assigned to either memantine or placebo groups. The investigators will also examine the safety and tolerability (how well the treatment works and the side effects) of a combination of Namenda and Lexapro as compared to placebo and Lexapro in subjects with major depressive disorder and mild cognitive impairment who are at least 60 years of age. Memantine is likely to accelerate and enhance antidepressant response to escitalopram and improve cognitive performance. Subjects with amnestic mild cognitive impairment or biomarkers of brain aging at baseline are likely to have preferential response to the combination of memantine and escitalopram compared to escitalopram and placebo, thus identifying a more personalized treatment approach in the high-risk subgroups for poor clinical outcomes.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), Depression
Keywords
Major Depression, Geriatric Major Depression, Executive Cognitive Dysfunction, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Older Adults, Geriatric, Executive Cognitive Impairment, Quality of Life, Disability, Comorbidity, Medical Burden, Safety, Candidate Genes

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
115 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Escitalopram and Memantine
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants will take a combination of Escitalopram and Memantine for 12 months
Arm Title
Escitalopram and placebo
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants will take a combination of Escitalopram and placebo for 12 months
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Escitalopram
Other Intervention Name(s)
Lexapro
Intervention Description
All subjects will receive 10 to 20mg of escitalopram open-label throughout the trial. Participants will begin taking one 10mg capsule once per day, and this dosage may be increased or decreased depending on the participant's response to the medication. Participants will continue on their assigned dosage of escitalopram until treatment completion.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Memantine
Other Intervention Name(s)
Namenda
Intervention Description
Memantine dosage will be 5 to 20mg a day. Participants will initially take one 5mg capsule once a day, which will be gradually increased to a maximum of 10mg capsules twice per day.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Other Intervention Name(s)
inactive substance
Intervention Description
Placebo pills will be taken in combination with the active Namenda (Memantine) pills. Participants will initially take 1 capsule per day, which will be increased to a maximum of 1 capsule twice per day.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Description
Clinician administered scale measures severity of depressive symptoms. This measure includes 24 items. Response options vary item to item and include the following ranges: [0-2], [0-3], and [0-4]. A score of 0 suggests absence of symptoms and/or difficulties and higher scores represent more severe difficulties. Possible overall score range [0-74], higher scores representing more severe difficulties.
Time Frame
Measured at 3 months; 6 months and 12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale
Description
Clinician administered item scale measures severity of depressive symptoms. The 10 items are measured on a 7-point scale ranging from 0 to 6; creating a total range of 0-60. A score of 0 suggests absence of symptoms and higher scores represent greater severity of depression.Severity gradations for the MADRS have been proposed (9-17 = mild, 18-34 = moderate, and ≥ 35 = severe). Treatment remission is defined as an endpoint total score ≤ 10.
Time Frame
Measured at 3 months; 6 months and 12 months
Title
Change in Cognitive Domain Scores
Description
Neuropsychological battery of tests which included the following domains: learning, delayed recall, and executive functioning. Raw scores were transformed to z-scores for each test score of interest for each participant, and then averaged. These z-scores were averaged within each neuropsychological domain to produce composite scores and then averaged over all tests to calculate a global performance score. Higher scores are indicative of better performance.
Time Frame
Measured at 6 months and 12 months
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Description
The UKU (Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser) Side Effect Rating Scale organizes symptoms into 4 categories (i.e., Psychic, Neurologic, Autonomic, Other) containing 8-19 symptoms each. Each symptom receives a score for degree and causal relationship. Degree is scored between 0-3 with higher scores being more severe. Causal relationship is scored as improbable, possible, or probable.
Time Frame
Measured at 3, 6 months and 12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Meets the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) criteria for major depressive disorder (recurrent and nonrecurrent course will be identified) Score of 16 or higher on the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HDRS) at study entry Score of 24 or higher on the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) Age 60 years old or older Exclusion Criteria: History of psychiatric illness or a substance abuse disorder other than unipolar depression, diagnosed prior to the onset of the first depressive episode Presence of psychotic symptoms Severe or acute medical illness (e.g., major surgery, metastatic cancer, stroke, heart attack) 6 months prior to study entry Acute suicidal or violent behavior or history of suicide attempt within the year prior to study entry Presence of delirium, neurodegenerative dementia, Parkinson's disease, or any other central nervous system (CNS) diseases Toxic or metabolic abnormalities on laboratory examination Medications taken or medical illnesses present that could account for depression Active heart failure categorized as Class III or greater according to New York Heart Association criteria Heart attack or crescendo angina within the 3 months prior to study entry Symptomatic cardiac arrhythmias or symptomatic, hemodynamically significant mitral or aortic valvular disease Resting heart rate less than 50 beats per minute and a corrected QT (QTc) interval greater than 0.45 seconds Second or third degree atrioventricular block Systolic blood pressure greater than 180 mmHg or less than 90 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure greater than 105 mmHg or less than 50 mmHg at study entry Treated with depot neuroleptic therapy within 6 months prior to study entry Treated with any neuroleptic, antidepressant, anxiolytic medication (other than lorazepam), or over-the-counter CNS-active medications used for treatment of depression (e.g, St. John's Wort, kava-kava, melatonin) within 2 weeks (4 weeks for fluoxetine or monoamine-oxidase inhibitors [MAOIs]) prior to the first administration of study medication Known allergy to escitalopram or memantine or history of ineffective treatment with escitalopram or memantine for current depressive episode Requires concomitant therapy with any prescription or over-the-counter medications that have potentially dangerous interactions with either escitalopram or memantine Requires electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) or received ECT within 3 months prior to study entry Initiated psychotherapy within 3 months prior to study entry or will be initiating or terminating psychotherapy during the study
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Helen Lavretsky, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
University of California, Los Angeles
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
UCLA Semel Institute - Neuropsychiatric Institute (NPI)
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90095
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35233974
Citation
Kilpatrick LA, Krause-Sorio B, Siddarth P, Narr KL, Lavretsky H. Default mode network connectivity and treatment response in geriatric depression. Brain Behav. 2022 Apr;12(4):e2475. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2475. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32663977
Citation
Krause-Sorio B, Siddarth P, Kilpatrick L, Laird KT, Milillo MM, Ercoli L, Narr KL, Lavretsky H. Combined treatment with escitalopram and memantine increases gray matter volume and cortical thickness compared to escitalopram and placebo in a pilot study of geriatric depression. J Affect Disord. 2020 Sep 1;274:464-470. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.092. Epub 2020 May 24.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32382137
Citation
Grzenda A, Siddarth P, Laird KT, Yeargin J, Lavretsky H. Transcriptomic signatures of treatment response to the combination of escitalopram and memantine or placebo in late-life depression. Mol Psychiatry. 2021 Sep;26(9):5171-5179. doi: 10.1038/s41380-020-0752-2. Epub 2020 May 7.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31519517
Citation
Lavretsky H, Laird KT, Krause-Sorio B, Heimberg BF, Yeargin J, Grzenda A, Wu P, Thana-Udom K, Ercoli LM, Siddarth P. A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of Combined Escitalopram and Memantine for Older Adults With Major Depression and Subjective Memory Complaints. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;28(2):178-190. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2019.08.011. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Brain Aging and Treatment Response in Geriatric Depression

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs