search
Back to results

A Trial Comparing Combination Treatment (Solifenacin Plus Mirabegron) With One Treatment Alone (Solifenacin) (BESIDE)

Primary Purpose

Urinary Bladder Diseases, Urinary Bladder Overactive, Urologic Diseases

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
mirabegron 25 mg
mirabegron 50 mg
solifenacin 5 mg
solifenacin 10 mg
mirabegron 25 mg matching placebo
mirabegron 50 mg matching placebo
solifenacin 5 mg matching placebo
solifenacin 10 mg matching placebo
Sponsored by
Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Urinary Bladder Diseases focused on measuring Vesitrim, Betanis, Urgency, Frequency, Mirabegron, YM178, Betmiga, Vesicare, Micturition, YM905, Solifenacin, Urinary incontinence, Overactive Bladder (OAB), Myrbetriq, Vesikur, Urgency incontinence

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Main Inclusion at Screening:

    1. Subject has symptoms of OAB (urinary frequency and urgency with urgency incontinence) for >= 3 months prior to the screening visit
    2. Subject is willing and able to complete the micturition diary and questionnaires correctly, including collection and measurement of urine output for 3 days prior to each visit;
    3. Subject has symptoms of "wet" OAB (urinary frequency and urgency with incontinence or mixed incontinence with predominant urgency incontinence), and reports an average of at least 2 incontinence episodes per day.
  • Main Inclusion at Run-in (Visit 2):

    1. Subject experiences on average at least 1 episode of urgency (grade 3 or 4) with or without incontinence per 24-hour period during the 3-day micturition diary period.
    2. Subject experiences on average at least 2 incontinence episodes per 24-hour period during the 3-day micturition diary period.
    3. Subject experiences on average at least 8 micturitions (excluding incontinence episodes) per 24-hour period during the 3-day micturition diary period.
  • Main Inclusion at Randomization (Visit 3):

    1. Subject experiences at least 1 incontinence episode during the 3-day micturition diary period and wishes to increase their treatment for OAB symptoms.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Main Exclusion at Screening:

    1. Subject in the opinion of the investigator has clinically significant Bladder Outlet Obstruction (BOO).
    2. Subject has significant Post-void residual (PVR) volume (PVR > 150 ml).
    3. Subject has significant stress incontinence or mixed stress/urgency incontinence where stress is the predominant factor as determined by the investigator
    4. Subject has an indwelling catheter or practices intermittent self catheterization.
    5. Subject has evidence of a UTI.
    6. Subject has chronic inflammation such as interstitial cystitis, bladder stones, previous pelvic radiation therapy, or previous or current malignant disease of the pelvic organs
    7. Subject has moderate to severe hepatic impairment
    8. Subject has severe renal impairment or End Stage Renal disease
    9. Subject has a clinically significant abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG)
    10. Subject has a concurrent malignancy or history of cancer (except noninvasive skin cancer) within the last 5 years prior to screening.
    11. Subject has a QTcF interval > 450 ms for males or > 470 ms for females or is at risk of QT prolongation (e.g., family history of long QT syndrome, hypokalaemia).
    12. Subject has received intravesical treatment in the past 12 months with e.g., botulinum toxin, resiniferatoxin, capsaicin.
    13. Subject has severe uncontrolled hypertension, which is defined as a sitting average systolic blood pressure ≥ 180 mmHg and/or average diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mmHg.
  • Main Exclusion at Randomization (visit 3):

    1. Subject has achieved 100% continence from Visit 2 to Visit 3 (no incontinence episodes are recorded in the 3 day diary administered for 3 days prior to Visit 3).
    2. Subject does not desire an increase in study medication.
    3. Subject has an average total daily urine volume > 3000ml as recorded in the micturition diary.
    4. Subject has severe uncontrolled hypertension, which is defined as a sitting average systolic blood pressure ≥ 180 mmHg and/or average diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mmHg.
    5. Subject has a clinically significant abnormal ECG

Sites / Locations

  • Genova Clinical Research
  • Associated Pharmaceutical Research Center, Inc.
  • The American Institute of Research
  • Bayview Research Group
  • Meridien Research
  • Innovative Research of West FL
  • Best Quality Research Inc.
  • Palmetto Professional Research
  • Urology Center of Central Florida
  • Meridien Research
  • Stedman Clinical Trials
  • Private Practice
  • Meridian Clinical Research, LLC
  • Herman Clinical Research
  • North Idaho Urology
  • First Urology, PSC
  • Deaconess Gateway Health Center
  • MedStar Health Research Institute
  • Bay State Clinical Trials, Inc.
  • Beyer Research
  • Quality Clinical Research
  • Albuquerque Clinical Trials, Inc.
  • Brooklyn Urology Research Group
  • Advanced Urology Centers of New York
  • Premier Medical Group of the Hudson Valley PC
  • Premier Medical Group of the Hudson Valley PC
  • PMG Research of Raleigh, dba PMG Research of Cary
  • Alliance Urology Specialists
  • Wake Research Associates LLC
  • PMG Research of Winston-Salem, LLC
  • The Urology Group
  • Providence Health Partners
  • The Clinical Trial Center
  • Health Concepts
  • Jean Brown Research
  • Alexandria Clinical Research
  • Site: 37402
  • Site: 37403
  • Site: 37405
  • Site: 61006
  • Site: 61001
  • Site: 61016
  • Site: 43008
  • Site: 43001
  • Site: 43006
  • Site: 43007
  • Site: 43002
  • Site: 43004
  • Site: 43005
  • Site: 43010
  • Site: 43011
  • Site: 43012
  • Site: 43003
  • Site: 32007
  • Site: 32013
  • Site: 32009
  • Site: 32003
  • Site: 32005
  • Site: 32015
  • Site: 32008
  • Site: 32014
  • Site: 15001
  • Site: 15009
  • Site: 15006
  • Site: 15015
  • Site: 15014
  • Site: 15007
  • Site: 15019
  • Site: 15012
  • Site: 15013
  • Site: 15018
  • Site: 15016
  • Site: 15047
  • Site: 42015
  • Site: 42020
  • Site: 42018
  • Site: 42004
  • Site: 42021
  • Site: 42016
  • Site: 42008
  • Site: 42017
  • Site: 42007
  • Site: 42022
  • Site: 45008
  • Site: 45003
  • Site: 45009
  • Site: 45011
  • Site: 35804
  • Site: 35805
  • Site: 33018
  • Site: 33017
  • Site: 99502
  • Site: 49008
  • Site: 49022
  • Site: 49021
  • Site: 49011
  • Site: 49004
  • Site: 49018
  • Site: 49009
  • Site: 49017
  • Site: 49003
  • Site: 49020
  • Site: 49014
  • Site: 30001
  • Site: 30005
  • Site: 30002
  • Site: 36003
  • Site: 36011
  • Site: 36002
  • Site: 36008
  • Site: 36009
  • Site: 35303
  • Site: 35301
  • Site: 35309
  • Site: 35310
  • Site: 35306
  • Site: 35313
  • Site: 35304
  • Site: 35305
  • Site: 97201
  • Site: 97202
  • Site: 97207
  • Site: 97203
  • Site: 97205
  • Site: 97206
  • Site: 39007
  • Site: 39002
  • Site: 39010
  • Site: 39006
  • Site: 39013
  • Site: 39009
  • Site: 96101
  • Site: 31008
  • Site: 47005
  • Site: 47002
  • Site: 47003
  • Site: 48002
  • Site: 48006
  • Site: 48010
  • Site: 48005
  • Site: 48001
  • Site: 48008
  • Site: 35104
  • Site: 35105
  • Site: 35102
  • Site: 35103
  • Site: 35101
  • Site: 35106
  • Site: 40016
  • Site: 40018
  • Site: 40012
  • Site: 40019
  • Site: 40003
  • Site: 40017
  • Site: 40020
  • Site: 70003
  • Site: 70004
  • Site: 70005
  • Site: 70008
  • Site: 70010
  • Site: 70011
  • Site: 70012
  • Site: 70024
  • Site: 70013
  • Site: 70002
  • Site: 70006
  • Site: 70007
  • Site: 70009
  • Site: 70025
  • Site: 42110
  • Site: 42114
  • Site: 42113
  • Site: 42111
  • Site: 42112
  • Site: 42108
  • Site: 42109
  • Site: 38601
  • Site: 38606
  • Site: 38607
  • Site: 38610
  • Site: 34012
  • Site: 34016
  • Site: 34001
  • Site: 34004
  • Site: 34015
  • Site: 34023
  • Site: 34021
  • Site: 34018
  • Site: 34013
  • Site: 34007
  • Site: 34020
  • Site: 34014
  • Site: 46004
  • Site: 46013
  • Site: 46014
  • Site: 46001
  • Site: 46012
  • Site: 46015
  • Site: 41008
  • Site: 41001
  • Site: 90005
  • Site: 90008
  • Site: 90002
  • Site: 90003
  • Site: 90007
  • Site: 90004
  • Site: 90006
  • Site: 44007
  • Site: 44012
  • Site: 44015
  • Site: 44019
  • Site: 44009
  • Site: 44016
  • Site: 44017
  • Site: 44018
  • Site: 44010
  • Site: 44008
  • Site: 44013
  • Site: 44011

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Combination (solifenacin + mirabegron)

Solifenacin 5 mg

Solifenacin 10 mg

Arm Description

Participants received solifenacin 5 mg, mirabegron 25 mg and solifenacin 10 mg matching placebo once daily for the first 4 weeks of double-blind period. For the last 8 weeks of the double-blind treatment period, the 25 mg mirabegron tablet was replaced by a 50 mg mirabegron tablet. Placebo was given for the 2 week single-blind safety follow-up period.

Participants received solifenacin 5 mg, mirabegron 25 mg matching placebo and solifenacin 10 mg matching placebo once daily. For the last 8 weeks of the double-blind treatment period, the 25 mg mirabegron matching placebo tablet was replaced by a 50 mg mirabegron matching placebo tablet (to maintain the blind). Placebo was given for the 2 week single-blind safety follow-up period

Participants received solifenacin 5 mg matching placebo, mirabegron 25 mg matching placebo and solifenacin 10 mg once daily. For the last 8 weeks of the double-blind treatment period, the 25 mg mirabegron matching placebo tablet was replaced by a 50 mg mirabegron matching placebo tablet (to maintain the blind). Placebo was given for the 2 week single-blind safety follow-up period.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (EoT) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
The mean number of incontinence episodes (complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine) per day was derived from number of incontinence episodes recorded on valid diary days during the 3-day micturition diary period divided by the number of valid diary days during the 3-day micturition diary period. The analysis population consisted of the Full Analysis Set (FAS) which comprised of all the Randomized Analysis Set's (RAS) participants who met the following criteria: took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug after randomization, reported at least 1 micturition in the baseline diary & at least 1 micturition postbaseline & reported at least 1 incontinence episode in the baseline diary. For participants who withdrew before EoT (week 12) and have no measurement available for that diary period, the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) value during the double-blind study period was used as EoT value to derive the primary variable.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 & 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
The mean number of incontinence episodes (complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine) per day was derived from number of incontinence episodes recorded on valid diary days during the 3-day micturition diary period divided by the number of valid diary days during the 3-day micturition diary period.
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
The average number of micturitions (voluntary urinations (excluding incontinence only episodes)) per 24 hours was derived from number of micturitions recorded on valid diary days during the 3-day micturition diary period divided by the number of valid diary days during the 3-day micturition diary period (excluding incontinence only episodes).
Number of Incontinence Episodes Reported During the 3-Day Diary
The number of incontinence episodes (complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine) per day was derived from total number of incontinence episodes on valid diary days recorded during the 3-day micturition diary period.
Change From Baseline in Mean Volume Voided (MVV) Per Micturition
MVV per micturition was defined as MVV (mL) per micturition during last 3 days of the 3-day micturition diary period. MVV per micturition was calculated as the sum of each volume voided for each record with volume voided > 0 on valid diary days divided by the total number of records with a volume voided > 0 on valid diary days during the 3-day micturition diary period.
Change From Baseline to EoT in Corrected Micturition Frequency (CMF)
CMF was defined as the mean number of micturitions per 24 hours that participants would have at EoT if their fluid intake had remained unchanged since baseline. This was calculated by the MVV per Micturition at baseline multiplied by the mean number of micturitions per 24 hours at baseline divided by the MVV per micturition at EoT.
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence (UI) Episodes Per 24 Hours
UI was defined as the complaint of involuntary urine leakage accompanied by or immediately preceded by urgency. UI was measured using the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale (PPIUS), a patient reported outcome validated 5-point categorical scale rating the degree of associated urinary urgency severity (0=No urgency, I felt no need to empty my bladder, but did so for other reasons. 1=Mild, I could postpone voiding as long as necessary, without fear of wetting myself. 2= Moderate, I could postpone voiding for a short while, without fear of wetting myself. 3=Severe, I could not postpone voiding, but had to rush to the toilet in order not to wet myself. 4=Urgency incontinence, I leaked before arriving to the toilet). One urgency incontinence episode was counted for each record of the diary in which the following occurred: incontinence episode or 'both' was recorded & severity of urinary urgency recorded was 3 or 4.
Number of UI Episodes Reported During the 3-Day Diary
Number of UI episodes was calculated using the number of UI episodes recorded on valid diary days during the 3-day micturition diary period. NOTE: Only urgency incontinence episodes recorded on a valid diary day were counted.
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 and/or 4) Per 24 Hours
An urgency episode was defined as the complaint of a sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer. The mean number of urgency episodes (severity of 3 or 4) per 24 hours was defined as the average number of times a participant recorded an urgency episode (severity of 3 or 4) with or without incontinence per day during the 3-day micturition diary period. Measured using the PPIUS scale. This was calculated using the sum of each record with an urgency episode (severity of 3 or 4) recorded on a valid diary day divided by the number of valid diary days during the 3-day micturition diary period.
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Pads Per 24 Hours
The mean number of pads per 24 hours was defined as the average number of times a participant recorded a new pad used per day during the 3-day micturition diary period. This was calculated using the number of new pads used during valid diary days during the 3-day micturition diary period divided by the number of valid diary days during the 3-day micturition diary period.
Number of Pads Used During the 3-Day Diary
The number of pads used was defined as the number of times a participant recorded a new pad used during the 3-day micturition diary period. This was calculated using the sum of each record with new pad checked. Only records with new pad checked on a valid diary day were counted.
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes
Mean number of nocturia episodes was defined as the number of times a participant urinated (excluding incontinence only episodes) while sleeping during the 3-day diary period, divided by the number of valid diary days during the diary period. Night time episode of incontinence only was not considered a nocturia episode. Nocturia episodes were counted for each micturition record which occurred between the date/time of going to bed with intention to sleep and the date/time of getting up with intention to stay awake on a valid diary day & which was accompanied by a sleep interruption. Nocturia only determined for those who were not night-shift workers.
Number of Nocturia Episodes Reported Over 3-Day Diary
The number of nocturia episodes was defined as the number of times a participant urinated (excluding incontinence only episodes) during sleeping time during the 3-day micturition diary period. This was calculated using the sum of each nocturia episode recorded on valid diary days during the 3-day micturition diary period.
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to EoT in Euroqol European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Subscale Score: Mobility
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status. It has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels: level 1=no problem or none; level 2=slight problems; level 3=moderate problems; level 4=severe problems; level 5=unable to perform activity.
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Subscale Score: Self-care
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status. It has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels: level 1=no problem or none; level 2=slight problems; level 3=moderate problems; level 4=severe problems; level 5=unable to perform activity.
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Subscale Score: Usual Activities
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status. It has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels: level 1=no problem or none; level 2=slight problems; level 3=moderate problems; level 4=severe problems; level 5=unable to perform activity.
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Subscale Score: Pain/Discomfort
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status. It has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels: level 1=no problem or none; level 2=slight problems; level 3=moderate problems; level 4=severe problems; level 5=unable to perform activity.
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Subscale Score: Anxiety/Depression
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status. It has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels: level 1=no problem or none; level 2=slight problems; level 3=moderate problems; level 4=severe problems; level 5=unable to perform activity.
Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Symptom (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score
The OAB-q was a self-reported questionnaire comprising 33-items each rated on a 6-point Likert scale. The questionnaire consisted of an 8-item symptom bother scale and 25 health-related QoL (HRQL) items comprising 4 HRQL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction). Symptom Bother score ranges from 0 (least severity) to 100 (worst severity).
Change From Baseline in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score
The OAB-q was a self-reported questionnaire comprising 33-items each rated on a 6-point Likert scale. The questionnaire consisted of an 8-item symptom bother scale and 25 health-related QoL (HRQL) items comprising 4 HRQL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction). HRQL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social) and total score range from 0 (worst quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life).
Change From Baseline in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: Coping
The OAB-q was a self-reported questionnaire comprising 33-items each rated on a 6-point Likert scale. The questionnaire consisted of an 8-item symptom bother scale and 25 health-related QoL (HRQL) items comprising 4 HRQL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction). HRQL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social) and total score range from 0 (worst quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life).
Change From Baseline in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: Concern
The OAB-q was a self-reported questionnaire comprising 33-items each rated on a 6-point Likert scale. The questionnaire consisted of an 8-item symptom bother scale and 25 health-related QoL (HRQL) items comprising 4 HRQL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction). HRQL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social) and total score range from 0 (worst quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life).
Change From Baseline in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: Sleep
The OAB-q was a self-reported questionnaire comprising 33-items each rated on a 6-point Likert scale. The questionnaire consisted of an 8-item symptom bother scale and 25 health-related QoL (HRQL) items comprising 4 HRQL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction). HRQL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social) and total score range from 0 (worst quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life).
Change From Baseline in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: Social Interaction
The OAB-q was a self-reported questionnaire comprising 33-items each rated on a 6-point Likert scale. The questionnaire consisted of an 8-item symptom bother scale and 25 health-related QoL (HRQL) items comprising 4 HRQL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction). HRQL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social) and total score range from 0 (worst quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life).
Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction - Visual Analogue Scale (TS-VAS) Score
The TS-VAS rated participant satisfaction with treatment on a scale from 0 (No, not at all) to 10 (Yes, completely).
Change From Baseline in Patient Perception Bladder Control (PPBC) Score
The PPBC was a validated, global assessment tool using a 6-point Likert scale on which participants rated their subjective impression of their current bladder condition. PPBC score: 1-no problem, 2- some very minor problems, 3-some minor problems, 4-moderate problems, 5-severe problems, 6-many severe problems.
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient and Clinician Global Impression of Change Scales (PGIC and CGIC)
The PGIC was a 2-part questionnaire, assessing both the change in the participant's overall condition (Patient Impression in General Health (PIBS)) and change in bladder condition since the start of the study (Patient Impression in General Health (PIGH)) (from very much worse to very much improved). The CGIC was a single questionnaire assessing the participant's change in bladder condition since the beginning of the study (Clinician Impression in Bladder Symptoms (CIBS)).
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Decrease From Baseline in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Incontinence was defined as any involuntary leakage of urine.
Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Postbaseline
Incontinence was defined as any involuntary leakage of urine.
Percentage of Participants With a Mean of at Least 8 Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Baseline and Less Than 8 Micturitions Per 24 Hours Postbaseline
Micturitions were defined as voluntary urinations (excluding incontinence only episodes).
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 10-Point Improvement From Baseline in OAB-q Symptom Bother Score
The OAB-q was a self-reported questionnaire comprising 33-items each rated on a 6-point Likert scale. The questionnaire consisted of an 8-item symptom bother scale and 25 health-related QoL (HRQL) items comprising 4 HRQL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction). Symptom Bother score ranges from 0 (least severity) to 100 (worst severity).
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 10-Point Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score
HRQL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social) and total score range from 0 (worst quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life).
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC
The PPBC was a validated, global assessment tool using a 6-point Likert scale on which participants rated their subjective impression of their current bladder condition.
Percentage of Participants With Major (at Least 2-Point) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC
The PPBC was a validated, global assessment tool using a 6-point Likert scale on which participants rated their subjective impression of their current bladder condition.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug or has undergone study procedures & which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) referred to an adverse event which started or worsened in the period from first double-blind medication intake until 30 days after the last double-blind medication intake.
Change From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Volume
PVR Volume was assessed by bladder scan.

Full Information

First Posted
July 24, 2013
Last Updated
July 18, 2018
Sponsor
Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01908829
Brief Title
A Trial Comparing Combination Treatment (Solifenacin Plus Mirabegron) With One Treatment Alone (Solifenacin)
Acronym
BESIDE
Official Title
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Centre Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Adding Mirabegron to Solifenacin in Incontinent OAB Subjects Who Have Received Solifenacin for 4 Weeks and Warrant Additional Relief for Their OAB Symptoms
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 10, 2013 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 24, 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 25, 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to see if adding a new type of medication recently approved to treat overactive bladder (mirabegron) to an antimuscarinic treatment (solifenacin) would be more effective in controlling incontinence than when using the antimuscarinic treatment alone.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Urinary Bladder Diseases, Urinary Bladder Overactive, Urologic Diseases
Keywords
Vesitrim, Betanis, Urgency, Frequency, Mirabegron, YM178, Betmiga, Vesicare, Micturition, YM905, Solifenacin, Urinary incontinence, Overactive Bladder (OAB), Myrbetriq, Vesikur, Urgency incontinence

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
2174 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Combination (solifenacin + mirabegron)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg, mirabegron 25 mg and solifenacin 10 mg matching placebo once daily for the first 4 weeks of double-blind period. For the last 8 weeks of the double-blind treatment period, the 25 mg mirabegron tablet was replaced by a 50 mg mirabegron tablet. Placebo was given for the 2 week single-blind safety follow-up period.
Arm Title
Solifenacin 5 mg
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg, mirabegron 25 mg matching placebo and solifenacin 10 mg matching placebo once daily. For the last 8 weeks of the double-blind treatment period, the 25 mg mirabegron matching placebo tablet was replaced by a 50 mg mirabegron matching placebo tablet (to maintain the blind). Placebo was given for the 2 week single-blind safety follow-up period
Arm Title
Solifenacin 10 mg
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg matching placebo, mirabegron 25 mg matching placebo and solifenacin 10 mg once daily. For the last 8 weeks of the double-blind treatment period, the 25 mg mirabegron matching placebo tablet was replaced by a 50 mg mirabegron matching placebo tablet (to maintain the blind). Placebo was given for the 2 week single-blind safety follow-up period.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
mirabegron 25 mg
Other Intervention Name(s)
Betmiga, Myrbetriq, YM178, Betanis
Intervention Description
Mirabegron was supplied as the marketed formulation in the 25 mg OCAS (Oral Controlled Absorption System) modified release tablets. Medication was taken orally with a glass of water, with or without food.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
mirabegron 50 mg
Other Intervention Name(s)
YM905, Vesitrim, Vesikur, Vesicare
Intervention Description
Mirabegron was supplied as the marketed formulation in the 50 mg OCAS (Oral Controlled Absorption System) modified release tablets. Medication was taken orally with a glass of water, with or without food.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
solifenacin 5 mg
Other Intervention Name(s)
Vesicare, Vesitrim, YM905, Vesikur
Intervention Description
Solifenacin was provided as the marketed formulation in the 5 mg strength. Medication was taken orally with a glass of water, with or without food.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
solifenacin 10 mg
Other Intervention Name(s)
Vesicare, Vesitrim, YM905, Vesikur
Intervention Description
Solifenacin was provided as the marketed formulation in the 10 mg strength. Medication was taken orally with a glass of water, with or without food.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
mirabegron 25 mg matching placebo
Intervention Description
Matching placebo of mirabegron OCAS 25 mg tablets was supplied. Medication was taken orally with a glass of water, with or without food.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
mirabegron 50 mg matching placebo
Intervention Description
Matching placebo of mirabegron OCAS 50 mg tablets was supplied. Medication was taken orally with a glass of water, with or without food.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
solifenacin 5 mg matching placebo
Intervention Description
Matching placebo of solifenacin succinate 5 mg tablets was supplied. Medication was taken orally with a glass of water, with or without food.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
solifenacin 10 mg matching placebo
Intervention Description
Matching placebo of solifenacin succinate 10 mg tablets was supplied. Medication was taken orally with a glass of water, with or without food.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (EoT) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Description
The mean number of incontinence episodes (complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine) per day was derived from number of incontinence episodes recorded on valid diary days during the 3-day micturition diary period divided by the number of valid diary days during the 3-day micturition diary period. The analysis population consisted of the Full Analysis Set (FAS) which comprised of all the Randomized Analysis Set's (RAS) participants who met the following criteria: took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug after randomization, reported at least 1 micturition in the baseline diary & at least 1 micturition postbaseline & reported at least 1 incontinence episode in the baseline diary. For participants who withdrew before EoT (week 12) and have no measurement available for that diary period, the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) value during the double-blind study period was used as EoT value to derive the primary variable.
Time Frame
Baseline and end of treatment (up to 12 weeks)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 & 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Description
The mean number of incontinence episodes (complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine) per day was derived from number of incontinence episodes recorded on valid diary days during the 3-day micturition diary period divided by the number of valid diary days during the 3-day micturition diary period.
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 4, 8 & 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Description
The average number of micturitions (voluntary urinations (excluding incontinence only episodes)) per 24 hours was derived from number of micturitions recorded on valid diary days during the 3-day micturition diary period divided by the number of valid diary days during the 3-day micturition diary period (excluding incontinence only episodes).
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 4, 8 & 12
Title
Number of Incontinence Episodes Reported During the 3-Day Diary
Description
The number of incontinence episodes (complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine) per day was derived from total number of incontinence episodes on valid diary days recorded during the 3-day micturition diary period.
Time Frame
Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Mean Volume Voided (MVV) Per Micturition
Description
MVV per micturition was defined as MVV (mL) per micturition during last 3 days of the 3-day micturition diary period. MVV per micturition was calculated as the sum of each volume voided for each record with volume voided > 0 on valid diary days divided by the total number of records with a volume voided > 0 on valid diary days during the 3-day micturition diary period.
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 4, 8 & 12
Title
Change From Baseline to EoT in Corrected Micturition Frequency (CMF)
Description
CMF was defined as the mean number of micturitions per 24 hours that participants would have at EoT if their fluid intake had remained unchanged since baseline. This was calculated by the MVV per Micturition at baseline multiplied by the mean number of micturitions per 24 hours at baseline divided by the MVV per micturition at EoT.
Time Frame
Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Title
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence (UI) Episodes Per 24 Hours
Description
UI was defined as the complaint of involuntary urine leakage accompanied by or immediately preceded by urgency. UI was measured using the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale (PPIUS), a patient reported outcome validated 5-point categorical scale rating the degree of associated urinary urgency severity (0=No urgency, I felt no need to empty my bladder, but did so for other reasons. 1=Mild, I could postpone voiding as long as necessary, without fear of wetting myself. 2= Moderate, I could postpone voiding for a short while, without fear of wetting myself. 3=Severe, I could not postpone voiding, but had to rush to the toilet in order not to wet myself. 4=Urgency incontinence, I leaked before arriving to the toilet). One urgency incontinence episode was counted for each record of the diary in which the following occurred: incontinence episode or 'both' was recorded & severity of urinary urgency recorded was 3 or 4.
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 4, 8 & 12
Title
Number of UI Episodes Reported During the 3-Day Diary
Description
Number of UI episodes was calculated using the number of UI episodes recorded on valid diary days during the 3-day micturition diary period. NOTE: Only urgency incontinence episodes recorded on a valid diary day were counted.
Time Frame
Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 and/or 4) Per 24 Hours
Description
An urgency episode was defined as the complaint of a sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer. The mean number of urgency episodes (severity of 3 or 4) per 24 hours was defined as the average number of times a participant recorded an urgency episode (severity of 3 or 4) with or without incontinence per day during the 3-day micturition diary period. Measured using the PPIUS scale. This was calculated using the sum of each record with an urgency episode (severity of 3 or 4) recorded on a valid diary day divided by the number of valid diary days during the 3-day micturition diary period.
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 4, 8 & 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Pads Per 24 Hours
Description
The mean number of pads per 24 hours was defined as the average number of times a participant recorded a new pad used per day during the 3-day micturition diary period. This was calculated using the number of new pads used during valid diary days during the 3-day micturition diary period divided by the number of valid diary days during the 3-day micturition diary period.
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 4, 8 & 12
Title
Number of Pads Used During the 3-Day Diary
Description
The number of pads used was defined as the number of times a participant recorded a new pad used during the 3-day micturition diary period. This was calculated using the sum of each record with new pad checked. Only records with new pad checked on a valid diary day were counted.
Time Frame
Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes
Description
Mean number of nocturia episodes was defined as the number of times a participant urinated (excluding incontinence only episodes) while sleeping during the 3-day diary period, divided by the number of valid diary days during the diary period. Night time episode of incontinence only was not considered a nocturia episode. Nocturia episodes were counted for each micturition record which occurred between the date/time of going to bed with intention to sleep and the date/time of getting up with intention to stay awake on a valid diary day & which was accompanied by a sleep interruption. Nocturia only determined for those who were not night-shift workers.
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 4, 8 & 12
Title
Number of Nocturia Episodes Reported Over 3-Day Diary
Description
The number of nocturia episodes was defined as the number of times a participant urinated (excluding incontinence only episodes) during sleeping time during the 3-day micturition diary period. This was calculated using the sum of each nocturia episode recorded on valid diary days during the 3-day micturition diary period.
Time Frame
Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Title
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to EoT in Euroqol European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Subscale Score: Mobility
Description
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status. It has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels: level 1=no problem or none; level 2=slight problems; level 3=moderate problems; level 4=severe problems; level 5=unable to perform activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Title
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Subscale Score: Self-care
Description
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status. It has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels: level 1=no problem or none; level 2=slight problems; level 3=moderate problems; level 4=severe problems; level 5=unable to perform activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Title
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Subscale Score: Usual Activities
Description
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status. It has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels: level 1=no problem or none; level 2=slight problems; level 3=moderate problems; level 4=severe problems; level 5=unable to perform activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Title
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Subscale Score: Pain/Discomfort
Description
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status. It has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels: level 1=no problem or none; level 2=slight problems; level 3=moderate problems; level 4=severe problems; level 5=unable to perform activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Title
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Subscale Score: Anxiety/Depression
Description
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status. It has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels: level 1=no problem or none; level 2=slight problems; level 3=moderate problems; level 4=severe problems; level 5=unable to perform activity.
Time Frame
Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Title
Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Symptom (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score
Description
The OAB-q was a self-reported questionnaire comprising 33-items each rated on a 6-point Likert scale. The questionnaire consisted of an 8-item symptom bother scale and 25 health-related QoL (HRQL) items comprising 4 HRQL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction). Symptom Bother score ranges from 0 (least severity) to 100 (worst severity).
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 4, 8 & 12
Title
Change From Baseline in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score
Description
The OAB-q was a self-reported questionnaire comprising 33-items each rated on a 6-point Likert scale. The questionnaire consisted of an 8-item symptom bother scale and 25 health-related QoL (HRQL) items comprising 4 HRQL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction). HRQL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social) and total score range from 0 (worst quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life).
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 4, 8 & 12
Title
Change From Baseline in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: Coping
Description
The OAB-q was a self-reported questionnaire comprising 33-items each rated on a 6-point Likert scale. The questionnaire consisted of an 8-item symptom bother scale and 25 health-related QoL (HRQL) items comprising 4 HRQL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction). HRQL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social) and total score range from 0 (worst quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life).
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 4, 8 & 12
Title
Change From Baseline in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: Concern
Description
The OAB-q was a self-reported questionnaire comprising 33-items each rated on a 6-point Likert scale. The questionnaire consisted of an 8-item symptom bother scale and 25 health-related QoL (HRQL) items comprising 4 HRQL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction). HRQL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social) and total score range from 0 (worst quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life).
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 4, 8 & 12
Title
Change From Baseline in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: Sleep
Description
The OAB-q was a self-reported questionnaire comprising 33-items each rated on a 6-point Likert scale. The questionnaire consisted of an 8-item symptom bother scale and 25 health-related QoL (HRQL) items comprising 4 HRQL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction). HRQL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social) and total score range from 0 (worst quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life).
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 4, 8 & 12
Title
Change From Baseline in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: Social Interaction
Description
The OAB-q was a self-reported questionnaire comprising 33-items each rated on a 6-point Likert scale. The questionnaire consisted of an 8-item symptom bother scale and 25 health-related QoL (HRQL) items comprising 4 HRQL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction). HRQL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social) and total score range from 0 (worst quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life).
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 4, 8 & 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction - Visual Analogue Scale (TS-VAS) Score
Description
The TS-VAS rated participant satisfaction with treatment on a scale from 0 (No, not at all) to 10 (Yes, completely).
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 4, 8 & 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Patient Perception Bladder Control (PPBC) Score
Description
The PPBC was a validated, global assessment tool using a 6-point Likert scale on which participants rated their subjective impression of their current bladder condition. PPBC score: 1-no problem, 2- some very minor problems, 3-some minor problems, 4-moderate problems, 5-severe problems, 6-many severe problems.
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 4, 8 & 12
Title
Number of Participants in Each Category of Patient and Clinician Global Impression of Change Scales (PGIC and CGIC)
Description
The PGIC was a 2-part questionnaire, assessing both the change in the participant's overall condition (Patient Impression in General Health (PIBS)) and change in bladder condition since the start of the study (Patient Impression in General Health (PIGH)) (from very much worse to very much improved). The CGIC was a single questionnaire assessing the participant's change in bladder condition since the beginning of the study (Clinician Impression in Bladder Symptoms (CIBS)).
Time Frame
End of treatment (up to 12 weeks)
Title
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Decrease From Baseline in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Description
Incontinence was defined as any involuntary leakage of urine.
Time Frame
Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Title
Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Postbaseline
Description
Incontinence was defined as any involuntary leakage of urine.
Time Frame
Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Title
Percentage of Participants With a Mean of at Least 8 Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Baseline and Less Than 8 Micturitions Per 24 Hours Postbaseline
Description
Micturitions were defined as voluntary urinations (excluding incontinence only episodes).
Time Frame
Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Title
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 10-Point Improvement From Baseline in OAB-q Symptom Bother Score
Description
The OAB-q was a self-reported questionnaire comprising 33-items each rated on a 6-point Likert scale. The questionnaire consisted of an 8-item symptom bother scale and 25 health-related QoL (HRQL) items comprising 4 HRQL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction). Symptom Bother score ranges from 0 (least severity) to 100 (worst severity).
Time Frame
Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Title
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 10-Point Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score
Description
HRQL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social) and total score range from 0 (worst quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life).
Time Frame
Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Title
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC
Description
The PPBC was a validated, global assessment tool using a 6-point Likert scale on which participants rated their subjective impression of their current bladder condition.
Time Frame
Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Title
Percentage of Participants With Major (at Least 2-Point) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC
Description
The PPBC was a validated, global assessment tool using a 6-point Likert scale on which participants rated their subjective impression of their current bladder condition.
Time Frame
Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Title
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Description
AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug or has undergone study procedures & which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) referred to an adverse event which started or worsened in the period from first double-blind medication intake until 30 days after the last double-blind medication intake.
Time Frame
From first dose of double blind treatment until 30 days after last dose (up to 16 weeks)
Title
Change From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Volume
Description
PVR Volume was assessed by bladder scan.
Time Frame
Baseline and weeks 4, 8 & 12

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Main Inclusion at Screening: Subject has symptoms of OAB (urinary frequency and urgency with urgency incontinence) for >= 3 months prior to the screening visit Subject is willing and able to complete the micturition diary and questionnaires correctly, including collection and measurement of urine output for 3 days prior to each visit; Subject has symptoms of "wet" OAB (urinary frequency and urgency with incontinence or mixed incontinence with predominant urgency incontinence), and reports an average of at least 2 incontinence episodes per day. Main Inclusion at Run-in (Visit 2): Subject experiences on average at least 1 episode of urgency (grade 3 or 4) with or without incontinence per 24-hour period during the 3-day micturition diary period. Subject experiences on average at least 2 incontinence episodes per 24-hour period during the 3-day micturition diary period. Subject experiences on average at least 8 micturitions (excluding incontinence episodes) per 24-hour period during the 3-day micturition diary period. Main Inclusion at Randomization (Visit 3): Subject experiences at least 1 incontinence episode during the 3-day micturition diary period and wishes to increase their treatment for OAB symptoms. Exclusion Criteria: Main Exclusion at Screening: Subject in the opinion of the investigator has clinically significant Bladder Outlet Obstruction (BOO). Subject has significant Post-void residual (PVR) volume (PVR > 150 ml). Subject has significant stress incontinence or mixed stress/urgency incontinence where stress is the predominant factor as determined by the investigator Subject has an indwelling catheter or practices intermittent self catheterization. Subject has evidence of a UTI. Subject has chronic inflammation such as interstitial cystitis, bladder stones, previous pelvic radiation therapy, or previous or current malignant disease of the pelvic organs Subject has moderate to severe hepatic impairment Subject has severe renal impairment or End Stage Renal disease Subject has a clinically significant abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Subject has a concurrent malignancy or history of cancer (except noninvasive skin cancer) within the last 5 years prior to screening. Subject has a QTcF interval > 450 ms for males or > 470 ms for females or is at risk of QT prolongation (e.g., family history of long QT syndrome, hypokalaemia). Subject has received intravesical treatment in the past 12 months with e.g., botulinum toxin, resiniferatoxin, capsaicin. Subject has severe uncontrolled hypertension, which is defined as a sitting average systolic blood pressure ≥ 180 mmHg and/or average diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mmHg. Main Exclusion at Randomization (visit 3): Subject has achieved 100% continence from Visit 2 to Visit 3 (no incontinence episodes are recorded in the 3 day diary administered for 3 days prior to Visit 3). Subject does not desire an increase in study medication. Subject has an average total daily urine volume > 3000ml as recorded in the micturition diary. Subject has severe uncontrolled hypertension, which is defined as a sitting average systolic blood pressure ≥ 180 mmHg and/or average diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mmHg. Subject has a clinically significant abnormal ECG
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clinical Study Manager
Organizational Affiliation
Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Genova Clinical Research
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85704
Country
United States
Facility Name
Associated Pharmaceutical Research Center, Inc.
City
Buena Park
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90620
Country
United States
Facility Name
The American Institute of Research
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90017
Country
United States
Facility Name
Bayview Research Group
City
Valley Village
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91607
Country
United States
Facility Name
Meridien Research
City
Brooksville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33016
Country
United States
Facility Name
Innovative Research of West FL
City
Clearwater
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33756
Country
United States
Facility Name
Best Quality Research Inc.
City
Hialeah
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33016
Country
United States
Facility Name
Palmetto Professional Research
City
Hialeah
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33016
Country
United States
Facility Name
Urology Center of Central Florida
City
Kissimmee
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34741
Country
United States
Facility Name
Meridien Research
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33606
Country
United States
Facility Name
Stedman Clinical Trials
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33613
Country
United States
Facility Name
Private Practice
City
West Palm Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33407
Country
United States
Facility Name
Meridian Clinical Research, LLC
City
Savannah
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
31406
Country
United States
Facility Name
Herman Clinical Research
City
Suwanee
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30024
Country
United States
Facility Name
North Idaho Urology
City
Coeur d'Alene
State/Province
Idaho
ZIP/Postal Code
83814
Country
United States
Facility Name
First Urology, PSC
City
Jeffersonville
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
47130
Country
United States
Facility Name
Deaconess Gateway Health Center
City
Newburgh
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
47630
Country
United States
Facility Name
MedStar Health Research Institute
City
Hyattsville
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
20782
Country
United States
Facility Name
Bay State Clinical Trials, Inc.
City
Watertown
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02472
Country
United States
Facility Name
Beyer Research
City
Kalamazoo
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
49009
Country
United States
Facility Name
Quality Clinical Research
City
Omaha
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Albuquerque Clinical Trials, Inc.
City
Albuquerque
State/Province
New Mexico
ZIP/Postal Code
87102
Country
United States
Facility Name
Brooklyn Urology Research Group
City
Brooklyn
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11215
Country
United States
Facility Name
Advanced Urology Centers of New York
City
Garden City
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11530
Country
United States
Facility Name
Premier Medical Group of the Hudson Valley PC
City
Kingston
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
12401
Country
United States
Facility Name
Premier Medical Group of the Hudson Valley PC
City
Poughkeepsie
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
12601
Country
United States
Facility Name
PMG Research of Raleigh, dba PMG Research of Cary
City
Cary
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27518
Country
United States
Facility Name
Alliance Urology Specialists
City
Greensboro
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27403
Country
United States
Facility Name
Wake Research Associates LLC
City
Raleigh
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27612
Country
United States
Facility Name
PMG Research of Winston-Salem, LLC
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27103
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Urology Group
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45212
Country
United States
Facility Name
Providence Health Partners
City
Dayton
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45439
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Clinical Trial Center
City
Jenkintown
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19046
Country
United States
Facility Name
Health Concepts
City
Rapid City
State/Province
South Dakota
ZIP/Postal Code
57702
Country
United States
Facility Name
Jean Brown Research
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84124
Country
United States
Facility Name
Alexandria Clinical Research
City
Alexandria
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22304
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site: 37402
City
Yerevan
Country
Armenia
Facility Name
Site: 37403
City
Yerevan
Country
Armenia
Facility Name
Site: 37405
City
Yerevan
Country
Armenia
Facility Name
Site: 61006
City
Adelaide
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Site: 61001
City
Kogarah, Sydney
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Site: 61016
City
Victoria
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Site: 43008
City
Graz
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Site: 43001
City
Innsbruck
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Site: 43006
City
Innsbruck
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Site: 43007
City
Linz
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Site: 43002
City
Vienna
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Site: 43004
City
Vienna
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Site: 43005
City
Vienna
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Site: 43010
City
Vienna
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Site: 43011
City
Vienna
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Site: 43012
City
Vienna
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Site: 43003
City
Wels
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Site: 32007
City
Anderlecht
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Site: 32013
City
Deurne
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Site: 32009
City
Edegem
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Site: 32003
City
Gent
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Site: 32005
City
Gent
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Site: 32015
City
Kortrijk
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Site: 32008
City
Liege
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Site: 32014
City
Roeselare
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Site: 15001
City
Barrie
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site: 15009
City
Bathurst
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site: 15006
City
Brampton
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site: 15015
City
Granby
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site: 15014
City
Kelowna
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site: 15007
City
Kitchener
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site: 15019
City
Sherbrooke
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site: 15012
City
Toronto
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site: 15013
City
Toronto
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site: 15018
City
Victoriaville
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site: 15016
City
Victoria
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site: 15047
City
Victoria
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site: 42015
City
Brno
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Site: 42020
City
Melnik
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Site: 42018
City
Nachod
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Site: 42004
City
Plzen
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Site: 42021
City
Plzen
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Site: 42016
City
Prague 1
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Site: 42008
City
Prague
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Site: 42017
City
Praha 2
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Site: 42007
City
Praha 4
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Site: 42022
City
Praha 4
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Site: 45008
City
Aarhus N
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Site: 45003
City
Frederiksberg
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Site: 45009
City
Herlev
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Site: 45011
City
Odense C
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Site: 35804
City
Helsinki (hus)
Country
Finland
Facility Name
Site: 35805
City
Tampere
Country
Finland
Facility Name
Site: 33018
City
Bordeaux Cedex
Country
France
Facility Name
Site: 33017
City
Marseille
Country
France
Facility Name
Site: 99502
City
T'bilisi
Country
Georgia
Facility Name
Site: 49008
City
Bad Ems
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site: 49022
City
Berlin
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site: 49021
City
Hagenow
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site: 49011
City
Halle (Saale)
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site: 49004
City
Hamburg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site: 49018
City
Henningsdorf
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site: 49009
City
Hettstedt
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site: 49017
City
Koblenz
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site: 49003
City
Lutherstadt Eisleben
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site: 49020
City
Reutlingen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site: 49014
City
Sangerhausen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site: 30001
City
Athens
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Site: 30005
City
Heraklion, Crete
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Site: 30002
City
Patras
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Site: 36003
City
Csongrad
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Site: 36011
City
Hajduszoboszlo
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Site: 36002
City
Nyiregyhaza
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Site: 36008
City
Salgotarjan
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Site: 36009
City
Szekszard
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Site: 35303
City
Cork
Country
Ireland
Facility Name
Site: 35301
City
Dublin
Country
Ireland
Facility Name
Site: 35309
City
Dublin
Country
Ireland
Facility Name
Site: 35310
City
Dublin
Country
Ireland
Facility Name
Site: 35306
City
Limerick
Country
Ireland
Facility Name
Site: 35313
City
Mullingar
Country
Ireland
Facility Name
Site: 35304
City
Tralee
Country
Ireland
Facility Name
Site: 35305
City
Waterford
Country
Ireland
Facility Name
Site: 97201
City
Haifa
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Site: 97202
City
Jerusalem
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Site: 97207
City
Kfar Saba
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Site: 97203
City
Petach Tikva
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Site: 97205
City
Petach Tikva
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Site: 97206
City
Tel Hashomer
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Site: 39007
City
Avellino
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Site: 39002
City
Cantanzaro
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Site: 39010
City
Firenze
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Site: 39006
City
Perugia
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Site: 39013
City
Treviglio (BG)
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Site: 39009
City
Varese
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Site: 96101
City
Beirut
Country
Lebanon
Facility Name
Site: 31008
City
Amsterdam
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Site: 47005
City
Bekkestua
Country
Norway
Facility Name
Site: 47002
City
Tonsberg
Country
Norway
Facility Name
Site: 47003
City
Trondheim
Country
Norway
Facility Name
Site: 48002
City
Kolbuszowa Dolna
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Site: 48006
City
Krakow
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Site: 48010
City
Lublin
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Site: 48005
City
Piaseczno
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Site: 48001
City
Warszawa
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Site: 48008
City
Warszawa
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Site: 35104
City
Lisbon
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Site: 35105
City
Lisbon
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Site: 35102
City
Matosinhos
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Site: 35103
City
Porto
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Site: 35101
City
Setubal
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Site: 35106
City
Tomar
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Site: 40016
City
Bucharest
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Site: 40018
City
Bucharest
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Site: 40012
City
Craiova
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Site: 40019
City
Craiova
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Site: 40003
City
Judetul Ilfov
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Site: 40017
City
Oradea
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Site: 40020
City
Timisoara
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Site: 70003
City
Moscow
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Site: 70004
City
Moscow
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Site: 70005
City
Moscow
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Site: 70008
City
Moscow
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Site: 70010
City
Moscow
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Site: 70011
City
Moscow
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Site: 70012
City
Moscow
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Site: 70024
City
Moscow
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Site: 70013
City
Rostove-on-Don
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Site: 70002
City
Saint Petersburg
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Site: 70006
City
Saint Petersburg
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Site: 70007
City
Saint Petersburg
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Site: 70009
City
Saint Petersburg
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Site: 70025
City
Saratov
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Site: 42110
City
Bratislava
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Site: 42114
City
Kosice
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Site: 42113
City
Michalovce
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Site: 42111
City
Nove Zamky
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Site: 42112
City
Piestany
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Site: 42108
City
Poprad
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Site: 42109
City
Zilina
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Site: 38601
City
Ljubljana
Country
Slovenia
Facility Name
Site: 38606
City
Maribor
Country
Slovenia
Facility Name
Site: 38607
City
Maribor
Country
Slovenia
Facility Name
Site: 38610
City
Ptuj
Country
Slovenia
Facility Name
Site: 34012
City
Barcelona
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Site: 34016
City
Bilbao
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Site: 34001
City
Getafe (Madrid)
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Site: 34004
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Site: 34015
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Site: 34023
City
Mendaro
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Site: 34021
City
Miranda de Ebro
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Site: 34018
City
San Sebastian de los Reyes
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Site: 34013
City
San Sebastian
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Site: 34007
City
Sevilla
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Site: 34020
City
Sevilla
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Site: 34014
City
Vigo
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Site: 46004
City
Halmstad
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Site: 46013
City
Lund
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Site: 46014
City
Norrtalje
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Site: 46001
City
Stockholm
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Site: 46012
City
Stockholm
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Site: 46015
City
Umea
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Site: 41008
City
Baden
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
Site: 41001
City
Frauenfeld
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
Site: 90005
City
Ankara
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Site: 90008
City
Ankara
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Site: 90002
City
Izmir
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Site: 90003
City
Izmir
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Site: 90007
City
Kocaeli
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Site: 90004
City
Manisa
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Site: 90006
City
Sivas
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Site: 44007
City
Bristol
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Site: 44012
City
Cambridge
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Site: 44015
City
Cheltenham
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Site: 44019
City
Coventry
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Site: 44009
City
Garston
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Site: 44016
City
Kings Lynn
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Site: 44017
City
London
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Site: 44018
City
Northampton
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Site: 44010
City
Nottingham
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Site: 44008
City
Plymouth
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Site: 44013
City
Taunton
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Site: 44011
City
West Yorkshire
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Access to anonymized individual participant level data collected during the trial, in addition to study-related supporting documentation, is planned for trials conducted with approved product indications and formulations, as well as compounds terminated during development. Conditions and exceptions are described under the Sponsor Specific Details for Astellas on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Access to participant level data is offered to researchers after publication of the primary manuscript (if applicable) and is available as long as Astellas has legal authority to provide the data.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Researchers must submit a proposal to conduct a scientifically relevant analysis of the study data. The research proposal is reviewed by an Independent Research Panel. If the proposal is approved, access to the study data is provided in a secure data sharing environment after receipt of a signed Data Sharing Agreement.
IPD Sharing URL
https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com/
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28916436
Citation
Gibson W, MacDiarmid S, Huang M, Siddiqui E, Stolzel M, Choudhury N, Drake MJ. Treating Overactive Bladder in Older Patients with a Combination of Mirabegron and Solifenacin: A Prespecified Analysis from the BESIDE Study. Eur Urol Focus. 2017 Dec;3(6):629-638. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26965560
Citation
Drake MJ, Chapple C, Esen AA, Athanasiou S, Cambronero J, Mitcheson D, Herschorn S, Saleem T, Huang M, Siddiqui E, Stolzel M, Herholdt C, MacDiarmid S; BESIDE study investigators. Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron Add-on Therapy to Solifenacin in Incontinent Overactive Bladder Patients with an Inadequate Response to Initial 4-Week Solifenacin Monotherapy: A Randomised Double-blind Multicentre Phase 3B Study (BESIDE). Eur Urol. 2016 Jul;70(1):136-145. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.030. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
https://astellasclinicalstudyresults.com/study.aspx?ID=247
Description
Link to results on Astellas Clinical Study Results website

Learn more about this trial

A Trial Comparing Combination Treatment (Solifenacin Plus Mirabegron) With One Treatment Alone (Solifenacin)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs