search
Back to results

Medical and Economic Evaluation of a Magnetic Anal Sphincter for Patients With Severe Anal Incontinence (MOS STIC)

Primary Purpose

Fecal Incontinence, Anal Incontinence

Status
Suspended
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
magnetic anal sphincter
sacral nerve stimulation
Sponsored by
Nantes University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Fecal Incontinence focused on measuring Fecal Incontinence., Anal Incontinence., Functional Bowel Disorders., SNS., Artificial Sphincters., Magnetic Anal Sphincter.

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patient (male or female) of 18 to 75 years of age
  • Affected by severe anal incontinence (SAI)*.
  • Documented failure of conservative treatment (reeducation and medical treatment)
  • With functional anal sphincter**
  • Agrees to take part in the study and has signed the informed consent form
  • Agrees to undergo post-operative surveillance for a period of one (1) year
  • Covered by National Insurance

    • Defined as follows: at least one involuntary passing of stool per week measured by collecting data on incontinence accidents on a 3-week stool record chart, with the continence problem developing over more than 6 months. **Defined as follows: external sphincter intact (without injury or after sphincter repair) or external sphincter altered, with an injury of a size that does not justify sphincter repair.

Internal sphincter injuries not taken into account (by professional consensus).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anorectal or pelvic malformations
  • Local conditions incompatible with the proposed sizes of the MAS (extreme obesity, thickness of the tissue in the anorectal area)
  • Sequelae of rectal resections - presence of cancer of the rectum or anus
  • Rectal prolapse and/or major pelvic floor disorders
  • Major chronic disorder of the intestinal motility, irritable bowel syndrome, repeated faecalomas, megarectum
  • Extensive sphincter degeneration
  • Consequences of radiation-induced rectitis and chronic inflammatory diseases of the bowel (Crohn's disease)
  • Neurological disorders or systemic diseases (multiple sclerosis, scleroderma, paraplegia)
  • Festering sores of the perineal and/or anorectal regions
  • Known or suspected risks of allergy to titanium
  • Active pelvic infection
  • Contraindications to SNS:

    • Cardiac stimulator or defibrillator implant
    • Malformation of the sacrum
    • Patient exposed to Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    • Skin diseases exposing the patient to the risk of infection (at the investigator's discretion)
    • Patient scheduled for diathermy or ablation by radiofrequency
  • Pregnant women
  • Adults under guardianship
  • Patients involved in a mobility project in the year following the operation
  • Patient already subjected to one or other of the therapeutic approaches (MAS or SNS) Please note: coagulation problems (including anti-aggregant or anti-coagulant treatments) are not a contraindication if these problems can be corrected during the perioperative period.

Sites / Locations

  • Nantes University Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

NMS

SAM

Arm Description

Implantation under general of local anesthesia of sacral nerve stimulation system (Interstim Therapy)

Implantation under general anesthesia of magnetic anal sphincter (Fenix)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Average number of fecal incontinence episodes
Average number of fecal incontinence episodes per week over a period of 3 weeks, 6 months after the implantation of a magnetic anal sphincter (FenixTM magnetic anal sphincter group) or of the Spinelli electrode during the PNE test (sacral nerve stimulation group), on the basis of a standardised stool diary

Secondary Outcome Measures

Overall cost for the health care system
Overall cost for the health care system including implantation and follow-up - Duration and cost of hospital admissions,- Cost of covering any complications arising
Respective complications of the two therapeutic approaches
Number and nature of the complications over 12 months, according to the Clavien-Dindo classification
Functional results at 6 and 12 months, compared with baseline
Stool record chart, faecal incontinence score (Wexner), recourse to antidiarrhoeal treatment, the taking of analgesics, constipation score (ODS), recourse to a treatment for constipation
Quality of life and overall satisfaction
Quality of life and overall satisfaction of the patient at 6 and 12 months, compared with baseline:Quality of life score specific to faecal incontinence (FIQL), General quality of life scores (SF 36 and EQ-5D)
Anorectal manometry data
Sphincter pressure at rest, voluntary contractions, rectal maximum tolerable volume.

Full Information

First Posted
August 8, 2013
Last Updated
June 23, 2017
Sponsor
Nantes University Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01920607
Brief Title
Medical and Economic Evaluation of a Magnetic Anal Sphincter for Patients With Severe Anal Incontinence
Acronym
MOS STIC
Official Title
Medical and Economic Evaluation of a Magnetic Anal Sphincter for Patients With Severe Anal Incontinence
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Suspended
Why Stopped
recruitment difficulties
Study Start Date
November 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2017 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Nantes University Hospital

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare 2 surgical treatments of severe fecal incontinence (defined as more than a major leak per week). The hypothesis of this "non-inferiority" trial is that magnetic anal sphincter is clinically as effective as SNS, but more cost-effective in managing fecal incontinence
Detailed Description
Severe anal incontinence, defined as the uncontrolled passing of stool at least once a week, is a problem that has a serious impact on the quality of life. In the event of failure of conservative treatments, surgery can help improve continence problems in a significant number of cases. Sacral nerve stimulation is currently the standard surgical treatment for severe anal incontinence when sphincter repair (sphincteroplasty) is not recommended. A new method of treatment based on sphincter reinforcement through the implanting of a band of magnetic beads*, has proved to be reliable and efficient on a small series of cases, particularly after the failure of sacral nerve stimulation. The aim of our trial, which compares the "magnetic anal sphincter* and sacral nerve stimulation" in a homogeneous population of patients affected by severe anal incontinence is to define the position of this new approach in the treatment algorithm of this functional disorder, determining its clinical and medical/economic advantages compared to those of the current standard treatment. * FenixTM (Torax Medical)

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Fecal Incontinence, Anal Incontinence
Keywords
Fecal Incontinence., Anal Incontinence., Functional Bowel Disorders., SNS., Artificial Sphincters., Magnetic Anal Sphincter.

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
71 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
NMS
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Implantation under general of local anesthesia of sacral nerve stimulation system (Interstim Therapy)
Arm Title
SAM
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Implantation under general anesthesia of magnetic anal sphincter (Fenix)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
magnetic anal sphincter
Other Intervention Name(s)
Fenix
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
sacral nerve stimulation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Interstim
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Average number of fecal incontinence episodes
Description
Average number of fecal incontinence episodes per week over a period of 3 weeks, 6 months after the implantation of a magnetic anal sphincter (FenixTM magnetic anal sphincter group) or of the Spinelli electrode during the PNE test (sacral nerve stimulation group), on the basis of a standardised stool diary
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall cost for the health care system
Description
Overall cost for the health care system including implantation and follow-up - Duration and cost of hospital admissions,- Cost of covering any complications arising
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Respective complications of the two therapeutic approaches
Description
Number and nature of the complications over 12 months, according to the Clavien-Dindo classification
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Functional results at 6 and 12 months, compared with baseline
Description
Stool record chart, faecal incontinence score (Wexner), recourse to antidiarrhoeal treatment, the taking of analgesics, constipation score (ODS), recourse to a treatment for constipation
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 & 12 months
Title
Quality of life and overall satisfaction
Description
Quality of life and overall satisfaction of the patient at 6 and 12 months, compared with baseline:Quality of life score specific to faecal incontinence (FIQL), General quality of life scores (SF 36 and EQ-5D)
Time Frame
Baselnie, 6 & 12 months
Title
Anorectal manometry data
Description
Sphincter pressure at rest, voluntary contractions, rectal maximum tolerable volume.
Time Frame
Baseline & 6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Adult patient (male or female) of 18 to 75 years of age Affected by severe anal incontinence (SAI)*. Documented failure of conservative treatment (reeducation and medical treatment) With functional anal sphincter** Agrees to take part in the study and has signed the informed consent form Agrees to undergo post-operative surveillance for a period of one (1) year Covered by National Insurance Defined as follows: at least one involuntary passing of stool per week measured by collecting data on incontinence accidents on a 3-week stool record chart, with the continence problem developing over more than 6 months. **Defined as follows: external sphincter intact (without injury or after sphincter repair) or external sphincter altered, with an injury of a size that does not justify sphincter repair. Internal sphincter injuries not taken into account (by professional consensus). Exclusion Criteria: Anorectal or pelvic malformations Local conditions incompatible with the proposed sizes of the MAS (extreme obesity, thickness of the tissue in the anorectal area) Sequelae of rectal resections - presence of cancer of the rectum or anus Rectal prolapse and/or major pelvic floor disorders Major chronic disorder of the intestinal motility, irritable bowel syndrome, repeated faecalomas, megarectum Extensive sphincter degeneration Consequences of radiation-induced rectitis and chronic inflammatory diseases of the bowel (Crohn's disease) Neurological disorders or systemic diseases (multiple sclerosis, scleroderma, paraplegia) Festering sores of the perineal and/or anorectal regions Known or suspected risks of allergy to titanium Active pelvic infection Contraindications to SNS: Cardiac stimulator or defibrillator implant Malformation of the sacrum Patient exposed to Magnetic Resonance Imaging Skin diseases exposing the patient to the risk of infection (at the investigator's discretion) Patient scheduled for diathermy or ablation by radiofrequency Pregnant women Adults under guardianship Patients involved in a mobility project in the year following the operation Patient already subjected to one or other of the therapeutic approaches (MAS or SNS) Please note: coagulation problems (including anti-aggregant or anti-coagulant treatments) are not a contraindication if these problems can be corrected during the perioperative period.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Nantes University Hospital
City
Nantes
ZIP/Postal Code
4000
Country
France

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22339789
Citation
Wong MT, Meurette G, Wyart V, Lehur PA. Does the magnetic anal sphincter device compare favourably with sacral nerve stimulation in the management of faecal incontinence? Colorectal Dis. 2012 Jun;14(6):e323-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02995.x.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Medical and Economic Evaluation of a Magnetic Anal Sphincter for Patients With Severe Anal Incontinence

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs