Medical and Economic Evaluation of a Magnetic Anal Sphincter for Patients With Severe Anal Incontinence (MOS STIC)
Primary Purpose
Fecal Incontinence, Anal Incontinence
Status
Suspended
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
magnetic anal sphincter
sacral nerve stimulation
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Fecal Incontinence focused on measuring Fecal Incontinence., Anal Incontinence., Functional Bowel Disorders., SNS., Artificial Sphincters., Magnetic Anal Sphincter.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patient (male or female) of 18 to 75 years of age
- Affected by severe anal incontinence (SAI)*.
- Documented failure of conservative treatment (reeducation and medical treatment)
- With functional anal sphincter**
- Agrees to take part in the study and has signed the informed consent form
- Agrees to undergo post-operative surveillance for a period of one (1) year
Covered by National Insurance
- Defined as follows: at least one involuntary passing of stool per week measured by collecting data on incontinence accidents on a 3-week stool record chart, with the continence problem developing over more than 6 months. **Defined as follows: external sphincter intact (without injury or after sphincter repair) or external sphincter altered, with an injury of a size that does not justify sphincter repair.
Internal sphincter injuries not taken into account (by professional consensus).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Anorectal or pelvic malformations
- Local conditions incompatible with the proposed sizes of the MAS (extreme obesity, thickness of the tissue in the anorectal area)
- Sequelae of rectal resections - presence of cancer of the rectum or anus
- Rectal prolapse and/or major pelvic floor disorders
- Major chronic disorder of the intestinal motility, irritable bowel syndrome, repeated faecalomas, megarectum
- Extensive sphincter degeneration
- Consequences of radiation-induced rectitis and chronic inflammatory diseases of the bowel (Crohn's disease)
- Neurological disorders or systemic diseases (multiple sclerosis, scleroderma, paraplegia)
- Festering sores of the perineal and/or anorectal regions
- Known or suspected risks of allergy to titanium
- Active pelvic infection
Contraindications to SNS:
- Cardiac stimulator or defibrillator implant
- Malformation of the sacrum
- Patient exposed to Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Skin diseases exposing the patient to the risk of infection (at the investigator's discretion)
- Patient scheduled for diathermy or ablation by radiofrequency
- Pregnant women
- Adults under guardianship
- Patients involved in a mobility project in the year following the operation
- Patient already subjected to one or other of the therapeutic approaches (MAS or SNS) Please note: coagulation problems (including anti-aggregant or anti-coagulant treatments) are not a contraindication if these problems can be corrected during the perioperative period.
Sites / Locations
- Nantes University Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
NMS
SAM
Arm Description
Implantation under general of local anesthesia of sacral nerve stimulation system (Interstim Therapy)
Implantation under general anesthesia of magnetic anal sphincter (Fenix)
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Average number of fecal incontinence episodes
Average number of fecal incontinence episodes per week over a period of 3 weeks, 6 months after the implantation of a magnetic anal sphincter (FenixTM magnetic anal sphincter group) or of the Spinelli electrode during the PNE test (sacral nerve stimulation group), on the basis of a standardised stool diary
Secondary Outcome Measures
Overall cost for the health care system
Overall cost for the health care system including implantation and follow-up - Duration and cost of hospital admissions,- Cost of covering any complications arising
Respective complications of the two therapeutic approaches
Number and nature of the complications over 12 months, according to the Clavien-Dindo classification
Functional results at 6 and 12 months, compared with baseline
Stool record chart, faecal incontinence score (Wexner), recourse to antidiarrhoeal treatment, the taking of analgesics, constipation score (ODS), recourse to a treatment for constipation
Quality of life and overall satisfaction
Quality of life and overall satisfaction of the patient at 6 and 12 months, compared with baseline:Quality of life score specific to faecal incontinence (FIQL), General quality of life scores (SF 36 and EQ-5D)
Anorectal manometry data
Sphincter pressure at rest, voluntary contractions, rectal maximum tolerable volume.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01920607
First Posted
August 8, 2013
Last Updated
June 23, 2017
Sponsor
Nantes University Hospital
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01920607
Brief Title
Medical and Economic Evaluation of a Magnetic Anal Sphincter for Patients With Severe Anal Incontinence
Acronym
MOS STIC
Official Title
Medical and Economic Evaluation of a Magnetic Anal Sphincter for Patients With Severe Anal Incontinence
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Suspended
Why Stopped
recruitment difficulties
Study Start Date
November 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2017 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Nantes University Hospital
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare 2 surgical treatments of severe fecal incontinence (defined as more than a major leak per week). The hypothesis of this "non-inferiority" trial is that magnetic anal sphincter is clinically as effective as SNS, but more cost-effective in managing fecal incontinence
Detailed Description
Severe anal incontinence, defined as the uncontrolled passing of stool at least once a week, is a problem that has a serious impact on the quality of life. In the event of failure of conservative treatments, surgery can help improve continence problems in a significant number of cases.
Sacral nerve stimulation is currently the standard surgical treatment for severe anal incontinence when sphincter repair (sphincteroplasty) is not recommended.
A new method of treatment based on sphincter reinforcement through the implanting of a band of magnetic beads*, has proved to be reliable and efficient on a small series of cases, particularly after the failure of sacral nerve stimulation.
The aim of our trial, which compares the "magnetic anal sphincter* and sacral nerve stimulation" in a homogeneous population of patients affected by severe anal incontinence is to define the position of this new approach in the treatment algorithm of this functional disorder, determining its clinical and medical/economic advantages compared to those of the current standard treatment.
* FenixTM (Torax Medical)
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Fecal Incontinence, Anal Incontinence
Keywords
Fecal Incontinence., Anal Incontinence., Functional Bowel Disorders., SNS., Artificial Sphincters., Magnetic Anal Sphincter.
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
71 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
NMS
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Implantation under general of local anesthesia of sacral nerve stimulation system (Interstim Therapy)
Arm Title
SAM
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Implantation under general anesthesia of magnetic anal sphincter (Fenix)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
magnetic anal sphincter
Other Intervention Name(s)
Fenix
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
sacral nerve stimulation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Interstim
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Average number of fecal incontinence episodes
Description
Average number of fecal incontinence episodes per week over a period of 3 weeks, 6 months after the implantation of a magnetic anal sphincter (FenixTM magnetic anal sphincter group) or of the Spinelli electrode during the PNE test (sacral nerve stimulation group), on the basis of a standardised stool diary
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall cost for the health care system
Description
Overall cost for the health care system including implantation and follow-up - Duration and cost of hospital admissions,- Cost of covering any complications arising
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Respective complications of the two therapeutic approaches
Description
Number and nature of the complications over 12 months, according to the Clavien-Dindo classification
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Functional results at 6 and 12 months, compared with baseline
Description
Stool record chart, faecal incontinence score (Wexner), recourse to antidiarrhoeal treatment, the taking of analgesics, constipation score (ODS), recourse to a treatment for constipation
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 & 12 months
Title
Quality of life and overall satisfaction
Description
Quality of life and overall satisfaction of the patient at 6 and 12 months, compared with baseline:Quality of life score specific to faecal incontinence (FIQL), General quality of life scores (SF 36 and EQ-5D)
Time Frame
Baselnie, 6 & 12 months
Title
Anorectal manometry data
Description
Sphincter pressure at rest, voluntary contractions, rectal maximum tolerable volume.
Time Frame
Baseline & 6 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Adult patient (male or female) of 18 to 75 years of age
Affected by severe anal incontinence (SAI)*.
Documented failure of conservative treatment (reeducation and medical treatment)
With functional anal sphincter**
Agrees to take part in the study and has signed the informed consent form
Agrees to undergo post-operative surveillance for a period of one (1) year
Covered by National Insurance
Defined as follows: at least one involuntary passing of stool per week measured by collecting data on incontinence accidents on a 3-week stool record chart, with the continence problem developing over more than 6 months. **Defined as follows: external sphincter intact (without injury or after sphincter repair) or external sphincter altered, with an injury of a size that does not justify sphincter repair.
Internal sphincter injuries not taken into account (by professional consensus).
Exclusion Criteria:
Anorectal or pelvic malformations
Local conditions incompatible with the proposed sizes of the MAS (extreme obesity, thickness of the tissue in the anorectal area)
Sequelae of rectal resections - presence of cancer of the rectum or anus
Rectal prolapse and/or major pelvic floor disorders
Major chronic disorder of the intestinal motility, irritable bowel syndrome, repeated faecalomas, megarectum
Extensive sphincter degeneration
Consequences of radiation-induced rectitis and chronic inflammatory diseases of the bowel (Crohn's disease)
Neurological disorders or systemic diseases (multiple sclerosis, scleroderma, paraplegia)
Festering sores of the perineal and/or anorectal regions
Known or suspected risks of allergy to titanium
Active pelvic infection
Contraindications to SNS:
Cardiac stimulator or defibrillator implant
Malformation of the sacrum
Patient exposed to Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Skin diseases exposing the patient to the risk of infection (at the investigator's discretion)
Patient scheduled for diathermy or ablation by radiofrequency
Pregnant women
Adults under guardianship
Patients involved in a mobility project in the year following the operation
Patient already subjected to one or other of the therapeutic approaches (MAS or SNS) Please note: coagulation problems (including anti-aggregant or anti-coagulant treatments) are not a contraindication if these problems can be corrected during the perioperative period.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Nantes University Hospital
City
Nantes
ZIP/Postal Code
4000
Country
France
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22339789
Citation
Wong MT, Meurette G, Wyart V, Lehur PA. Does the magnetic anal sphincter device compare favourably with sacral nerve stimulation in the management of faecal incontinence? Colorectal Dis. 2012 Jun;14(6):e323-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02995.x.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Medical and Economic Evaluation of a Magnetic Anal Sphincter for Patients With Severe Anal Incontinence
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs