Evaluation of Pain and Inflammation After Injection of Lucentis vs Eylea for Treatment of Wet Macular Degeneration
Primary Purpose
Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Ranibizumab 0.5mg
Aflibercept 2.0mg
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Able to provide informed consent and comply with study assessments for the full duration of the study
- Age >/= 65 years
- New onset Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration or (See No.4)
- Previously treated Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Lucentis or Eylea intravitreal injections
- Visual Acuity of 20/400 or better
- No history of Post injection pain or inflammation with prior treatments -
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of Endophthalmitis in either eye
- Uncontrolled or symptomatic Dry Eye Syndrome
- History of Anterior or Posterior Uveitis
- History of Post injection pain or inflammation with prior treatments
- Recent thromboembolic event(<3 months)
- Pregnancy(positive pregnancy test) or Lactation/Premenopausal women not using adequate contraception -
Sites / Locations
- Sierra Eye Associates
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Ranibizumab 0.5mg Intravitreal injection
Aflibercept 2.0mg Intravitreal injection
Arm Description
Intravitreal injection of Ranibizumab 0.5mg once
Intravitreal Aflibercept 2.0mg once
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Evidence of Anterior Chamber Inflammation
Evidence of anterior chamber inflammation at visit #1 and #2 using Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN)
Secondary Outcome Measures
Patients With Post Injection Pain Score of One or Higher on Pain Scale
Pain score rated on an 11 point numerical rating from 0-10 ( 0 = no pain, and 10 = worst possible pain) administered to each patient verbally at visit #1 and visit #2. The data below shows number of patients with pain score 1 or greater in each group.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01926977
First Posted
August 19, 2013
Last Updated
February 3, 2016
Sponsor
Arshad Khanani
Collaborators
Genentech, Inc.
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01926977
Brief Title
Evaluation of Pain and Inflammation After Injection of Lucentis vs Eylea for Treatment of Wet Macular Degeneration
Official Title
Evaluation of Post Injection Inflammation and Pain After Ranibizumab vs Aflibercept Intravitreal Injections
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2014 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Arshad Khanani
Collaborators
Genentech, Inc.
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study is designed to compare the post injection inflammation and pain seen after intravitreal injections of Ranibizumab vs Aflibercept.
Detailed Description
This is an open-label, Phase I-II study of post injection pain and inflammation after intravitreally administered Ranibizumab and Aflibercept in 100 subjects with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration. We will enroll both treatment experienced ( patients who were treated with Lucentis or Eylea, but not Avastin in the past) and treatment naive patients ( new onset Neovascular AMD with no history of intravitreal injections).
The treatment experienced patients will be treated with the intravitreal medication other than what they were receiving in the past, for example, patients treated with Lucentis will switch to Eylea for study purposes and vice versa.
Consented, enrolled subjects will receive open-label intravitreal injection of either 0.5mg Ranibizumab or 2mg Aflibercept. A standard intravitreal injection protocol will be followed. Patients will be reevaluated between 24-48 hours and 5-7 days post injections. A non-injecting physician will evaluate the patients for anterior chamber inflammation; this physician will be blinded about the specific treatment. Anterior chamber inflammation is described as any cell or flare in the anterior chamber. These will be evaluated using Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) working group classifications.
Pain score will be evaluated using a Numerical Rating Scale. Each patient will have a standard script verbally read to them at their visit, and asked to rate their pain based on this scale.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 1, Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
100 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Ranibizumab 0.5mg Intravitreal injection
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Intravitreal injection of Ranibizumab 0.5mg once
Arm Title
Aflibercept 2.0mg Intravitreal injection
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Intravitreal Aflibercept 2.0mg once
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ranibizumab 0.5mg
Other Intervention Name(s)
Lucentis
Intervention Description
Patient will receive intravitreal injection of Ranibizumab 0.5mg.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Aflibercept 2.0mg
Other Intervention Name(s)
Eylea
Intervention Description
Patients will receive intravitreal injection of Aflibercept 2.0mg.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Evidence of Anterior Chamber Inflammation
Description
Evidence of anterior chamber inflammation at visit #1 and #2 using Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN)
Time Frame
24 to 48 hours (visit #1) and 5 to 7 days (visit #2)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Patients With Post Injection Pain Score of One or Higher on Pain Scale
Description
Pain score rated on an 11 point numerical rating from 0-10 ( 0 = no pain, and 10 = worst possible pain) administered to each patient verbally at visit #1 and visit #2. The data below shows number of patients with pain score 1 or greater in each group.
Time Frame
24 to 48 hours (visit #1) and 5 to 7 days (visit #2)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Able to provide informed consent and comply with study assessments for the full duration of the study
Age >/= 65 years
New onset Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration or (See No.4)
Previously treated Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Lucentis or Eylea intravitreal injections
Visual Acuity of 20/400 or better
No history of Post injection pain or inflammation with prior treatments -
Exclusion Criteria:
History of Endophthalmitis in either eye
Uncontrolled or symptomatic Dry Eye Syndrome
History of Anterior or Posterior Uveitis
History of Post injection pain or inflammation with prior treatments
Recent thromboembolic event(<3 months)
Pregnancy(positive pregnancy test) or Lactation/Premenopausal women not using adequate contraception -
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Arshad M Khanani, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Sierra Eye Associates
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Sierra Eye Associates
City
Reno
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89502
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Evaluation of Pain and Inflammation After Injection of Lucentis vs Eylea for Treatment of Wet Macular Degeneration
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs