search
Back to results

A Study to Evaluate Efficacy of Tocilizumab Administered as Monotherapy or in Combination With Methotrexate and/or Other Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Participants

Primary Purpose

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Tocilizumab
DMARDs
Sponsored by
Hoffmann-La Roche
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of active RA according to the revised (1987) ACR criteria or EULAR/ACR (2010) criteria
  • Moderate to severe RA (CDAI at least [>/=] 10 and DAS28 >/=3.2) at screening
  • Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors-inadequate responder (TNF-IR), methotrexate-inadequate responder (MTX-IR), and/or DMARDs-inadequate responder (DMARDs-IR)
  • Oral corticosteroids (less than or equal to [</=] 10 mg per day prednisone or equivalent) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; up to the maximum recommended dose) are permitted if on a stable dose regimen for >/=4 weeks prior to baseline
  • Permitted non-biologic DMARDs are allowed if at a stable dose for >/=4 weeks prior to baseline
  • Receiving treatment on an outpatient basis, not including tocilizumab
  • Females of childbearing potential and males with female partners of childbearing potential must agree to use a reliable means of contraception for at least 3 months following the last dose of tocilizumab

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 8 weeks prior to screening or planned major surgery within 12 months following baseline
  • Rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA; secondary Sjögren's syndrome with RA is permitted
  • Functional Class IV as defined by the ACR Classification of Functional Status in RA
  • Diagnosis of juvenile idiopathic arthritis or juvenile RA and/or RA before the age of 16
  • Prior history of or current inflammatory joint disease other than RA
  • Exposure to tocilizumab (either intravenous [IV] or SC) at any time prior to baseline
  • Treatment with any investigational agent within 4 weeks (or 5 half-lives of the investigational drug, whichever is longer) of screening
  • Previous treatment with any cell-depleting therapies
  • Intra-articular or parenteral corticosteroids within 4 weeks prior to baseline
  • History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to human, humanized, or murine monoclonal antibodies
  • Evidence of serious uncontrolled concomitant cardiovascular, nervous system, pulmonary, renal, hepatic, endocrine (including uncontrolled diabetes mellitus), or gastrointestinal disease
  • Known active current or history of recurrent bacterial, viral, fungal, mycobacterial, or other infections
  • Any major episode of infection requiring hospitalization or treatment with IV antibiotics within 4 weeks of screening or oral antibiotics within 2 weeks of screening
  • Active tuberculosis (TB) requiring treatment within the previous 3 years
  • Positive for hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis C antibody
  • Primary or secondary immunodeficiency (history of or currently active)
  • Evidence of active malignant disease, malignancies diagnosed within the previous 10 years (except for basal and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or carcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri that has been excised and cured), or breast cancer diagnosed within the previous 20 years
  • Pregnant or breast feeding women
  • Neuropathies or other conditions that might interfere with pain evaluation

Sites / Locations

  • Uni Degli Studi Di L Aquila; Cattedra Di Reumatologia - Dept. Di Medicina Interna E San
  • P. O. Spirito Santo - Asl Pescara; U.O. Complessa Di Reumatologia
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Bianchi Melacrino Morelli; Unità Operativa di Reumatologia
  • Az. Ospedaliera S. Giuseppe Moscati; Dip. Med. Gen. Struttura Semplice Reumatologia
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Rummo; Divisione Di Reumatologia
  • Azienda Ospedaliera A. Cardarelli; Medicina III - Divisione di Reumatologia
  • Policlinico Universitario-II Università di Napoli; Reumatologia
  • Osp Riuniti S.Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona; Rep. Medicina Interna
  • Irccs Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri-Istituto Scientifico Di Telese;U.O. Riabilitazione Reumatologica
  • A.O.U Policlinico S. Orsola Malpighi di Bologna U.O di Medicina Interna Borghi - Pad.2
  • A.O. Universitaria Policlinico Di Modena; Reumatologia
  • Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova; Reumatologia
  • Policlinico Univ. Uni Degli Sudi Di Udine; Clinica Di Reumatologia
  • Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico Di Trigoria; Medicina Clinica E Reumatologia
  • Policlinico Tor Vergata; Divisione Di Reumatologia
  • Ospedale S.Pietro Fatebenefratelli; Divisione di Reumatologia
  • Ospedale La Colletta; Reparto Di Reumatologia
  • Università Degli Studi Di Genova - Dimi; Reumatologia
  • Ospedale San Paolo; Divisione di Reumatologia
  • Asst Papa Giovanni XXIII; Dh Reumatologia
  • Ospedale Civile "La Memoria" Di Gavardo;Immunoematologia Trasfusionale-Allergologia E Reumatologia
  • Ospedale Di Magenta Fornaroli; U.O. Di Reumatologia
  • Asst Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumato-Logico Gaetano Pini/Cto; Divisione Di Reumatologia
  • Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico; Unità Operativa Complessa di Allergologia e Immunologia Clinica
  • ASST FATEBENEFRATELLI SACCO; Reumatologia (Sacco)
  • Asst Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda; Reumatologia
  • ASST DI MONZA; Reumatologia (Medicina I)
  • Irccs Policlinico San Matteo; Reumatologia Adulti
  • ASST DI VIMERCATE; Medicina Generale
  • Ospedale Regionale Torrette; SOD Clinica Medica del Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specialisti
  • Ospedale Murri - Universita Politecnica Delle Marche; Clinica Reumatologica Ii
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Maggiore Della Carita; Day Hospital Immunologia
  • Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Battista; Reparto Reumatologia
  • Ordine Mauriziano Ospedale Umberto I; Centro Di Reumatologia
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico; Servizio Reumatologia
  • ASL Lecce- Presidio Ospedaliero di Casarano-Servizio di Reumatologia ed Osteoporosi
  • Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia; Dipartimento Medicina Interna Reumatologia
  • Ospedali Riuniti Di Foggia; Struttura Di Reumatologia
  • A.O. Universitaria Policlinico Monserrato Di Cagliari; Reumatologia I
  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Sassari; UOC Reumatologia
  • Ospedale Vittorio Emanuele Ii; U.O. Reumatologia Clinica Medica Condorelli
  • Azienda Osped. Univ. Policlinico G. Martino; Centro Prevenzione E Cura Osteoporosi
  • Arnas Ospedale Civico; Medicina Interna II
  • Ospedale Careggi Villa Monnatessa ; Sezione Di Reumatologia
  • Az. Osp. Pisana Ospedale S. Chiara; U.O. Di Reumatologia
  • Osp S. Maria Misericordia Dip. Medicina Clinica Sperimentale Cattedra Reumatologia
  • Ospedale Regionale Umberto Parini; Reparto Endocrinologia e Diabetologia - Amb. Reumatologia
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Borgo Trento; Dipartimento di Medicina Sezione di Reumatologia
  • Policlinico G.B. Rossi; Divisione Immunologia Clinica Sperimentale Medicina B

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Tocilizumab

Arm Description

Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 milligrams (mg) will be administered as subcutaneous (SC) injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants can continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it becomes commercially available in Italy.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Week 24
The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) based on a 28-joint assessment, patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGDA) and physician global assessment of disease activity (PGDA) assessed on 0-10 centimeters (cm) visual analogue scale (VAS). Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score less than or equal to (</=) 2.8 indicates disease remission, greater than (>) 2.8 to 10 indicates low disease activity, >10 to 22 indicates moderate disease activity, and >22 indicates high disease activity.
Change From Baseline in CDAI at Week 20
The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score </=2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10 indicates low disease activity, >10 to 22 indicates moderate disease activity, and >22 indicates high disease activity.
Change From Baseline in CDAI at Week 16
The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score </=2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10 indicates low disease activity, >10 to 22 indicates moderate disease activity, and >22 indicates high disease activity.
Change From Baseline in CDAI at Week 12
The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score </=2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10 indicates low disease activity, >10 to 22 indicates moderate disease activity, and >22 indicates high disease activity.
Change From Baseline in CDAI at Week 8
The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score </=2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10 indicates low disease activity, >10 to 22 indicates moderate disease activity, and >22 indicates high disease activity.
Change From Baseline in CDAI at Week 4
The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score </=2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10 indicates low disease activity, >10 to 22 indicates moderate disease activity, and >22 indicates high disease activity.
Change From Baseline in CDAI at Week 2
The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score </=2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10 indicates low disease activity, >10 to 22 indicates moderate disease activity, and >22 indicates high disease activity.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission According to CDAI up to Week 52
The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score </=2.8 during any two consecutive visits, not including the baseline visit indicates disease remission.
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) at Weeks 2, 24, and 52
DAS28-ESR is calculated from the TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in millimeters per hour (mm/hour) and PtGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores indicate greater affectation due to disease activity. DAS28-ESR total score= 0-9.4. DAS28-ESR </=3.2 indicates low disease activity, DAS28-ESR >3.2 to 5.1 indicates moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-ESR </=3.2 indicates remission.
Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 24, and 52
SDAI is a numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS and C-reactive protein (CRP) in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). Higher scores indicate greater affectation due to disease activity. SDAI total score = 0-86. SDAI </=3.3 indicates disease remission, >3.4 to 11 indicates low disease activity, >11 to 26 indicates moderate disease activity, and >26 indicates high disease activity.
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20), 50% (ACR50), and 70% (ACR70) Response
The ACR 20, 50, and 70 responses: greater than or equal to (>/=) 20 percent (%), 50%, and 70% improvement in TJC and SJC (28 assessed joints), and 20%, 50%, 70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria, respectively: 1) PGDA, 2) PtGDA, 3) participant's assessment of pain, 4) participant's assessment of functional disability via a health assessment questionnaire, and 5) CRP or ESR at each visit.
Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28
The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 </=3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 >3.2 to </=5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to </=1.2 with DAS28 </=5.1; non-responders: change from baseline </=0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and </=1.2 with DAS28 >5.1.
Change From Baseline in Total TJC at Weeks 2, 24, and 52
TJC was defined as the total number of painful joints based on 68-joint assessment (TJC-68) and 28-joint assessment (TJC-28).
Change From Baseline in Total SJC at Weeks 2, 24, and 52
SJC was defined as the total number of swollen joints based on 66-joint assessment (SJC-66) and 28-joint assessment (SJC-28).
Association Between Disease Activity Parameters: DAS28-ESR and CDAI, Assessed Using Correlation Coefficient
DAS28-ESR is calculated from the TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, the ESR in mm/hour and PtGDA. DAS28-ESR total score= 0-9.4. Higher scores indicate greater affectation due to disease activity. The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. CDAI total score = 0-76. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. Correlation coefficient for relationship between DAS28-ESR and CDAI at different time points is reported. Correlation coefficient value range= -1 to 1. Higher positive value indicates greater positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater negative relationship.
Association Between Disease Activity Parameters: DAS28-ESR and SDAI, Assessed Using Correlation Coefficient
DAS28-ESR is calculated from the TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, the ESR in mm/hour and PtGDA. DAS28-ESR total score= 0-9.4. Higher scores indicate greater affectation due to disease activity. SDAI is a numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS and CRP in mg/dL. SDAI total score= 0-86. Higher scores indicate greater affectation due to disease activity. Correlation coefficient for relationship between DAS28-ESR and SDAI at different time points is reported. Correlation coefficient value range= -1 to 1. Higher positive value indicates greater positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater negative relationship.
Association Between Disease Activity Parameters: CDAI and SDAI, Assessed Using Correlation Coefficient
The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. CDAI total score = 0-76. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. SDAI is a numerical sum of 5 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS and CRP in mg/dL. SDAI total score= 0-86. Higher scores indicate greater affectation due to disease activity. Correlation coefficient for relationship between CDAI and SDAI at different time points is reported. Correlation coefficient value range= -1 to 1. Higher positive value indicates greater positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater negative relationship.
Association Between Disease Activity Parameter (DAS28-ESR) and Treatment Response Parameters (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70), Assessed Using Regression Coefficient
DAS28-ESR is calculated from the TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, the ESR in mm/hour and PtGDA. DAS28-ESR total score= 0-9.4. The ACR 20, 50, and 70 responses: >/=20%, 50%, and 70% improvement in TJC and SJC, and 20%, 50%, 70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria, respectively: 1) PGDA, 2) PtGDA, 3) participant's assessment of pain, 4) participant's assessment of functional disability via a health assessment questionnaire, and 5) CRP at each visit. Regression coefficients for relationship between DAS28-ESR and ACR responses (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70) at different time points are reported. Regression coefficient value range= not defined (any negative or positive value is possible). Higher positive value indicates greater extent of positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater extent of negative relationship.
Association Between Disease Activity Parameter (DAS28-ESR) and Treatment Response Parameter (EULAR), Assessed Using Regression Coefficient
DAS28-ESR is calculated from the TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, the ESR in mm/hour and PtGDA. DAS28-ESR total score= 0-9.4. EULAR response criteria (based on DAS28 score): Good responders (change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 </=3.2); Moderate responders (change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 >3.2 to </=5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to </=1.2 with DAS28 </=5.1); Non-responders (change from baseline </=0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and </=1.2 with DAS28 >5.1). Regression coefficient for relationship between DAS28-ESR and EULAR Good response at different time points is reported. Regression coefficient value range= not defined (any negative or positive value is possible). Higher positive value indicates greater extent of positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater extent of negative relationship.
Association Between Disease Activity Parameter (CDAI) and Treatment Response Parameters (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70), Assessed Using Regression Coefficient
The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. CDAI total score = 0-76. The ACR 20, 50, and 70 responses: >/=20%, 50%, and 70% improvement in TJC and SJC, and 20%, 50%, 70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria, respectively: 1) PGDA, 2) PtGDA, 3) participant's assessment of pain, 4) participant's assessment of functional disability via a health assessment questionnaire, and 5) CRP at each visit. Regression coefficients for relationship between CDAI and ACR responses (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70) at different time points are reported. Regression coefficient value range= not defined (any negative or positive value is possible). Higher positive value indicates greater extent of positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater extent of negative relationship.
Association Between Disease Activity Parameter (CDAI) and Treatment Response Parameter (EULAR), Assessed Using Regression Coefficient
The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. CDAI total score = 0-76. EULAR response criteria (based on DAS28 score): Good responders (change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 </=3.2); Moderate responders (change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 >3.2 to </=5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to </=1.2 with DAS28 </=5.1); Non-responders (change from baseline </=0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and </=1.2 with DAS28 >5.1). Regression coefficient for relationship between CDAI and EULAR Good response at different time points is reported. Regression coefficient value range= not defined (any negative or positive value is possible). Higher positive value indicates greater extent of positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater extent of negative relationship.
Association Between Disease Activity Parameter (SDAI) and Treatment Response Parameters (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70), Assessed Using Regression Coefficient
SDAI is a numerical sum of 5 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS and CRP in mg/dL. SDAI total score= 0-86. The ACR 20, 50, and 70 responses: >/=20%, 50%, and 70% improvement in TJC and SJC, and 20%, 50%, 70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria, respectively: 1) PGDA, 2) PtGDA, 3) participant's assessment of pain, 4) participant's assessment of functional disability via a health assessment questionnaire, and 5) CRP at each visit. Regression coefficients for relationship between SDAI and ACR responses (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70) at different time points are reported. Regression coefficient value range= not defined (any negative or positive value is possible). Higher positive value indicates greater extent of positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater extent of negative relationship.
Association Between Disease Activity Parameter (SDAI) and Treatment Response Parameter (EULAR), Assessed Using Regression Coefficient
The SDAI is a numerical sum of 5 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS and CRP in mg/dL. SDAI total score= 0-86. EULAR response criteria (based on DAS28 score): Good responders (change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 </=3.2); Moderate responders (change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 >3.2 to </=5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to </=1.2 with DAS28 </=5.1); Non-responders (change from baseline </=0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and </=1.2 with DAS28 >5.1). Regression coefficient for relationship between SDAI and EULAR Good response at different time points is reported. Regression coefficient value range= not defined (any negative or positive value is possible). Higher positive value indicates greater extent of positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater extent of negative relationship.
Percentage of DMARDs Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation Events by Reasons
Percentage of DMARDs dose reduction and/or discontinuation (Red/Dis) events is reported by different reasons.
Percentage of Non-DMARDs Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation Events by Reasons
Percentage of Non-DMARDs dose reduction and/or discontinuation (Red/Dis) events is reported by different reasons.
Change From Baseline in PtGDA VAS Score at Weeks 2, 24, and 52
Participants answered the following question: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today." Participants responded by using a 0 - 100 millimeter (mm) VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = very poorly.
Change From Baseline in PGDA VAS Score at Weeks 2, 24, and 52
The physician assessed participant's current disease activity on a 0-100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = no disease activity and 100 mm = maximum disease activity.
Participant Pain VAS Score at Weeks 2, 24, and 52
Participants assessed their pain using a 0-100 mm VAS. Intensity of pain range (over past week): 0 mm = no pain to 100 mm = worst possible pain.
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 24, and 52
HAQ-DI is a participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.
Missed Working Days Assessed Using Short Form-Health and Labor Questionnaire (SF-HLQ) Score at Weeks 24 and 52
The SF-HLQ assessed productivity losses related to health problems in individuals with paid or unpaid work and consisted of three modules (absenteeism from paid work, production losses without absenteeism from paid work and hindrance in the performance of paid and unpaid work). Any missed working days or number of worked days with reduced efficiency during the last month were reported.
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Total Score at Weeks 2, 24, and 52
FACIT total score is sum of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) score and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F; additional concerns) score. FACT-G is a core questionnaire that evaluates quality of life (QoL) in cancer population. FACT-G consists of 27 questions grouped in 4 domains of general health-related QoL: physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, and functional well-being; each item ranges from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). FACT-G score ranges between 0-108. FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire that evaluates self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities. Each item ranges from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The sum of all responses result in the FACIT total score with a total possible range of 0 (better score) to 160 (worse score). Negative change from baseline represents a better QoL.
Change From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at Weeks 24 and 52
PSQI is a questionnaire with 18 questions to assess sleep quality. The 18 questions are distributed to 7 elements (subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction). A participant indicates how frequently each item was experienced on a scale from 0 to 3. The global score is the sum score of all 7 elements and ranges from 0-21 with higher values indicating worse sleep quality. A score of >/=5 indicates poor sleepers.
Treatment Compliance, as Assessed Using Participant Diary Cards and Return Records
Treatment Compliance was calculated as (total actual doses taken for the period) / (total planned or prescribed dose for the period) x 100.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) of Special Interest
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAEs are AEs occurring between the first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after the last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. Following AEs were considered as AEs of special interest: anaphylactic reaction, hypersensitivity, stress cardiomyopathy, Gilbert's syndrome, gastrointestinal perforation, injection site erythema, injection site hypersensitivity, injection site irritation, injection site pruritus, arthritis bacterial, cellulitis, klebsiella infection, oral candidiasis, pneumonia, skin infection, vulvovaginal candidiasis, alanine aminotransferase increased, hepatic enzyme increased, brain neoplasm malignant, and urticaria.
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATA) to Tocilizumab
Percentage of participants with positive results for ATA against tocilizumab at different time points is reported.
Mean Tocilizumab Concentration
Mean Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Concentration

Full Information

First Posted
September 2, 2013
Last Updated
June 12, 2017
Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01941940
Brief Title
A Study to Evaluate Efficacy of Tocilizumab Administered as Monotherapy or in Combination With Methotrexate and/or Other Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Participants
Official Title
A National, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase IIIb Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Weekly Tocilizumab Subcutaneous, Administered as Monotherapy or in Combination With Methotrexate and/or Other DMARDs in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 5, 2013 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 9, 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 5, 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This open-label, single arm, Phase 3b study will evaluate the efficacy of tocilizumab (RoActemra), administered as monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate and/or other DMARDs, in participants with moderate to severe active RA.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rheumatoid Arthritis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
227 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Tocilizumab
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 milligrams (mg) will be administered as subcutaneous (SC) injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants can continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it becomes commercially available in Italy.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tocilizumab
Other Intervention Name(s)
RoActemra
Intervention Description
Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg as SC injection will be administered once every week.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
DMARDs
Intervention Description
Non-biologic DMARDs according to standard of care, at a stable dose that was initiated at least 4 weeks prior to baseline.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Week 24
Description
The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) based on a 28-joint assessment, patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGDA) and physician global assessment of disease activity (PGDA) assessed on 0-10 centimeters (cm) visual analogue scale (VAS). Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score less than or equal to (</=) 2.8 indicates disease remission, greater than (>) 2.8 to 10 indicates low disease activity, >10 to 22 indicates moderate disease activity, and >22 indicates high disease activity.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in CDAI at Week 20
Description
The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score </=2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10 indicates low disease activity, >10 to 22 indicates moderate disease activity, and >22 indicates high disease activity.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 20
Title
Change From Baseline in CDAI at Week 16
Description
The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score </=2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10 indicates low disease activity, >10 to 22 indicates moderate disease activity, and >22 indicates high disease activity.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in CDAI at Week 12
Description
The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score </=2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10 indicates low disease activity, >10 to 22 indicates moderate disease activity, and >22 indicates high disease activity.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in CDAI at Week 8
Description
The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score </=2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10 indicates low disease activity, >10 to 22 indicates moderate disease activity, and >22 indicates high disease activity.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 8
Title
Change From Baseline in CDAI at Week 4
Description
The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score </=2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10 indicates low disease activity, >10 to 22 indicates moderate disease activity, and >22 indicates high disease activity.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4
Title
Change From Baseline in CDAI at Week 2
Description
The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score </=2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10 indicates low disease activity, >10 to 22 indicates moderate disease activity, and >22 indicates high disease activity.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission According to CDAI up to Week 52
Description
The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score </=2.8 during any two consecutive visits, not including the baseline visit indicates disease remission.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Week 52 (Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 38, and 52)
Title
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) at Weeks 2, 24, and 52
Description
DAS28-ESR is calculated from the TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in millimeters per hour (mm/hour) and PtGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores indicate greater affectation due to disease activity. DAS28-ESR total score= 0-9.4. DAS28-ESR </=3.2 indicates low disease activity, DAS28-ESR >3.2 to 5.1 indicates moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-ESR </=3.2 indicates remission.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 24, and 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 24, and 52
Description
SDAI is a numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS and C-reactive protein (CRP) in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). Higher scores indicate greater affectation due to disease activity. SDAI total score = 0-86. SDAI </=3.3 indicates disease remission, >3.4 to 11 indicates low disease activity, >11 to 26 indicates moderate disease activity, and >26 indicates high disease activity.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 24, and 52
Title
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20), 50% (ACR50), and 70% (ACR70) Response
Description
The ACR 20, 50, and 70 responses: greater than or equal to (>/=) 20 percent (%), 50%, and 70% improvement in TJC and SJC (28 assessed joints), and 20%, 50%, 70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria, respectively: 1) PGDA, 2) PtGDA, 3) participant's assessment of pain, 4) participant's assessment of functional disability via a health assessment questionnaire, and 5) CRP or ESR at each visit.
Time Frame
Weeks 2, 24, and 52
Title
Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28
Description
The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 </=3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 >3.2 to </=5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to </=1.2 with DAS28 </=5.1; non-responders: change from baseline </=0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and </=1.2 with DAS28 >5.1.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 24, and 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Total TJC at Weeks 2, 24, and 52
Description
TJC was defined as the total number of painful joints based on 68-joint assessment (TJC-68) and 28-joint assessment (TJC-28).
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 24, and 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Total SJC at Weeks 2, 24, and 52
Description
SJC was defined as the total number of swollen joints based on 66-joint assessment (SJC-66) and 28-joint assessment (SJC-28).
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 24, and 52
Title
Association Between Disease Activity Parameters: DAS28-ESR and CDAI, Assessed Using Correlation Coefficient
Description
DAS28-ESR is calculated from the TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, the ESR in mm/hour and PtGDA. DAS28-ESR total score= 0-9.4. Higher scores indicate greater affectation due to disease activity. The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. CDAI total score = 0-76. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. Correlation coefficient for relationship between DAS28-ESR and CDAI at different time points is reported. Correlation coefficient value range= -1 to 1. Higher positive value indicates greater positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater negative relationship.
Time Frame
Weeks 2, 24, 52
Title
Association Between Disease Activity Parameters: DAS28-ESR and SDAI, Assessed Using Correlation Coefficient
Description
DAS28-ESR is calculated from the TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, the ESR in mm/hour and PtGDA. DAS28-ESR total score= 0-9.4. Higher scores indicate greater affectation due to disease activity. SDAI is a numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS and CRP in mg/dL. SDAI total score= 0-86. Higher scores indicate greater affectation due to disease activity. Correlation coefficient for relationship between DAS28-ESR and SDAI at different time points is reported. Correlation coefficient value range= -1 to 1. Higher positive value indicates greater positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater negative relationship.
Time Frame
Weeks 2, 24, 52
Title
Association Between Disease Activity Parameters: CDAI and SDAI, Assessed Using Correlation Coefficient
Description
The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. CDAI total score = 0-76. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. SDAI is a numerical sum of 5 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS and CRP in mg/dL. SDAI total score= 0-86. Higher scores indicate greater affectation due to disease activity. Correlation coefficient for relationship between CDAI and SDAI at different time points is reported. Correlation coefficient value range= -1 to 1. Higher positive value indicates greater positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater negative relationship.
Time Frame
Weeks 2, 24, 52
Title
Association Between Disease Activity Parameter (DAS28-ESR) and Treatment Response Parameters (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70), Assessed Using Regression Coefficient
Description
DAS28-ESR is calculated from the TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, the ESR in mm/hour and PtGDA. DAS28-ESR total score= 0-9.4. The ACR 20, 50, and 70 responses: >/=20%, 50%, and 70% improvement in TJC and SJC, and 20%, 50%, 70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria, respectively: 1) PGDA, 2) PtGDA, 3) participant's assessment of pain, 4) participant's assessment of functional disability via a health assessment questionnaire, and 5) CRP at each visit. Regression coefficients for relationship between DAS28-ESR and ACR responses (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70) at different time points are reported. Regression coefficient value range= not defined (any negative or positive value is possible). Higher positive value indicates greater extent of positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater extent of negative relationship.
Time Frame
Weeks 2, 24, 52
Title
Association Between Disease Activity Parameter (DAS28-ESR) and Treatment Response Parameter (EULAR), Assessed Using Regression Coefficient
Description
DAS28-ESR is calculated from the TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, the ESR in mm/hour and PtGDA. DAS28-ESR total score= 0-9.4. EULAR response criteria (based on DAS28 score): Good responders (change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 </=3.2); Moderate responders (change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 >3.2 to </=5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to </=1.2 with DAS28 </=5.1); Non-responders (change from baseline </=0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and </=1.2 with DAS28 >5.1). Regression coefficient for relationship between DAS28-ESR and EULAR Good response at different time points is reported. Regression coefficient value range= not defined (any negative or positive value is possible). Higher positive value indicates greater extent of positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater extent of negative relationship.
Time Frame
Weeks 2, 24, 52
Title
Association Between Disease Activity Parameter (CDAI) and Treatment Response Parameters (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70), Assessed Using Regression Coefficient
Description
The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. CDAI total score = 0-76. The ACR 20, 50, and 70 responses: >/=20%, 50%, and 70% improvement in TJC and SJC, and 20%, 50%, 70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria, respectively: 1) PGDA, 2) PtGDA, 3) participant's assessment of pain, 4) participant's assessment of functional disability via a health assessment questionnaire, and 5) CRP at each visit. Regression coefficients for relationship between CDAI and ACR responses (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70) at different time points are reported. Regression coefficient value range= not defined (any negative or positive value is possible). Higher positive value indicates greater extent of positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater extent of negative relationship.
Time Frame
Weeks 2, 24, 52
Title
Association Between Disease Activity Parameter (CDAI) and Treatment Response Parameter (EULAR), Assessed Using Regression Coefficient
Description
The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. CDAI total score = 0-76. EULAR response criteria (based on DAS28 score): Good responders (change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 </=3.2); Moderate responders (change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 >3.2 to </=5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to </=1.2 with DAS28 </=5.1); Non-responders (change from baseline </=0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and </=1.2 with DAS28 >5.1). Regression coefficient for relationship between CDAI and EULAR Good response at different time points is reported. Regression coefficient value range= not defined (any negative or positive value is possible). Higher positive value indicates greater extent of positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater extent of negative relationship.
Time Frame
Weeks 2, 24, 52
Title
Association Between Disease Activity Parameter (SDAI) and Treatment Response Parameters (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70), Assessed Using Regression Coefficient
Description
SDAI is a numerical sum of 5 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS and CRP in mg/dL. SDAI total score= 0-86. The ACR 20, 50, and 70 responses: >/=20%, 50%, and 70% improvement in TJC and SJC, and 20%, 50%, 70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria, respectively: 1) PGDA, 2) PtGDA, 3) participant's assessment of pain, 4) participant's assessment of functional disability via a health assessment questionnaire, and 5) CRP at each visit. Regression coefficients for relationship between SDAI and ACR responses (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70) at different time points are reported. Regression coefficient value range= not defined (any negative or positive value is possible). Higher positive value indicates greater extent of positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater extent of negative relationship.
Time Frame
Weeks 2, 24, 52
Title
Association Between Disease Activity Parameter (SDAI) and Treatment Response Parameter (EULAR), Assessed Using Regression Coefficient
Description
The SDAI is a numerical sum of 5 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS and CRP in mg/dL. SDAI total score= 0-86. EULAR response criteria (based on DAS28 score): Good responders (change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 </=3.2); Moderate responders (change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 >3.2 to </=5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to </=1.2 with DAS28 </=5.1); Non-responders (change from baseline </=0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and </=1.2 with DAS28 >5.1). Regression coefficient for relationship between SDAI and EULAR Good response at different time points is reported. Regression coefficient value range= not defined (any negative or positive value is possible). Higher positive value indicates greater extent of positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater extent of negative relationship.
Time Frame
Weeks 2, 24, 52
Title
Percentage of DMARDs Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation Events by Reasons
Description
Percentage of DMARDs dose reduction and/or discontinuation (Red/Dis) events is reported by different reasons.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Week 52
Title
Percentage of Non-DMARDs Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation Events by Reasons
Description
Percentage of Non-DMARDs dose reduction and/or discontinuation (Red/Dis) events is reported by different reasons.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in PtGDA VAS Score at Weeks 2, 24, and 52
Description
Participants answered the following question: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today." Participants responded by using a 0 - 100 millimeter (mm) VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = very poorly.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 24, and 52
Title
Change From Baseline in PGDA VAS Score at Weeks 2, 24, and 52
Description
The physician assessed participant's current disease activity on a 0-100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = no disease activity and 100 mm = maximum disease activity.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 24, and 52
Title
Participant Pain VAS Score at Weeks 2, 24, and 52
Description
Participants assessed their pain using a 0-100 mm VAS. Intensity of pain range (over past week): 0 mm = no pain to 100 mm = worst possible pain.
Time Frame
Weeks 2, 24, and 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 24, and 52
Description
HAQ-DI is a participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 24, and 52
Title
Missed Working Days Assessed Using Short Form-Health and Labor Questionnaire (SF-HLQ) Score at Weeks 24 and 52
Description
The SF-HLQ assessed productivity losses related to health problems in individuals with paid or unpaid work and consisted of three modules (absenteeism from paid work, production losses without absenteeism from paid work and hindrance in the performance of paid and unpaid work). Any missed working days or number of worked days with reduced efficiency during the last month were reported.
Time Frame
Weeks 24 and 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Total Score at Weeks 2, 24, and 52
Description
FACIT total score is sum of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) score and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F; additional concerns) score. FACT-G is a core questionnaire that evaluates quality of life (QoL) in cancer population. FACT-G consists of 27 questions grouped in 4 domains of general health-related QoL: physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, and functional well-being; each item ranges from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). FACT-G score ranges between 0-108. FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire that evaluates self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities. Each item ranges from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The sum of all responses result in the FACIT total score with a total possible range of 0 (better score) to 160 (worse score). Negative change from baseline represents a better QoL.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 24, and 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at Weeks 24 and 52
Description
PSQI is a questionnaire with 18 questions to assess sleep quality. The 18 questions are distributed to 7 elements (subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction). A participant indicates how frequently each item was experienced on a scale from 0 to 3. The global score is the sum score of all 7 elements and ranges from 0-21 with higher values indicating worse sleep quality. A score of >/=5 indicates poor sleepers.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52
Title
Treatment Compliance, as Assessed Using Participant Diary Cards and Return Records
Description
Treatment Compliance was calculated as (total actual doses taken for the period) / (total planned or prescribed dose for the period) x 100.
Time Frame
Weeks 24 and 52
Title
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) of Special Interest
Description
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAEs are AEs occurring between the first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after the last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. Following AEs were considered as AEs of special interest: anaphylactic reaction, hypersensitivity, stress cardiomyopathy, Gilbert's syndrome, gastrointestinal perforation, injection site erythema, injection site hypersensitivity, injection site irritation, injection site pruritus, arthritis bacterial, cellulitis, klebsiella infection, oral candidiasis, pneumonia, skin infection, vulvovaginal candidiasis, alanine aminotransferase increased, hepatic enzyme increased, brain neoplasm malignant, and urticaria.
Time Frame
Baseline up to 95 weeks
Title
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATA) to Tocilizumab
Description
Percentage of participants with positive results for ATA against tocilizumab at different time points is reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 38, 52, at 8 weeks after last dose (up to Week 60), at early withdrawal (up to Week 52), at Follow-up Visits 1 (Week 64), 2 (Week 76), and 3 (Week 88)
Title
Mean Tocilizumab Concentration
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 38, 52, at early withdrawal (up to Week 52), at Follow-up Visit 2 (Week 76)
Title
Mean Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Concentration
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 38, 52, at early withdrawal (up to Week 52), at Follow-up Visit 2 (Week 76)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Diagnosis of active RA according to the revised (1987) ACR criteria or EULAR/ACR (2010) criteria Moderate to severe RA (CDAI at least [>/=] 10 and DAS28 >/=3.2) at screening Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors-inadequate responder (TNF-IR), methotrexate-inadequate responder (MTX-IR), and/or DMARDs-inadequate responder (DMARDs-IR) Oral corticosteroids (less than or equal to [</=] 10 mg per day prednisone or equivalent) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; up to the maximum recommended dose) are permitted if on a stable dose regimen for >/=4 weeks prior to baseline Permitted non-biologic DMARDs are allowed if at a stable dose for >/=4 weeks prior to baseline Receiving treatment on an outpatient basis, not including tocilizumab Females of childbearing potential and males with female partners of childbearing potential must agree to use a reliable means of contraception for at least 3 months following the last dose of tocilizumab Exclusion Criteria: Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 8 weeks prior to screening or planned major surgery within 12 months following baseline Rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA; secondary Sjögren's syndrome with RA is permitted Functional Class IV as defined by the ACR Classification of Functional Status in RA Diagnosis of juvenile idiopathic arthritis or juvenile RA and/or RA before the age of 16 Prior history of or current inflammatory joint disease other than RA Exposure to tocilizumab (either intravenous [IV] or SC) at any time prior to baseline Treatment with any investigational agent within 4 weeks (or 5 half-lives of the investigational drug, whichever is longer) of screening Previous treatment with any cell-depleting therapies Intra-articular or parenteral corticosteroids within 4 weeks prior to baseline History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to human, humanized, or murine monoclonal antibodies Evidence of serious uncontrolled concomitant cardiovascular, nervous system, pulmonary, renal, hepatic, endocrine (including uncontrolled diabetes mellitus), or gastrointestinal disease Known active current or history of recurrent bacterial, viral, fungal, mycobacterial, or other infections Any major episode of infection requiring hospitalization or treatment with IV antibiotics within 4 weeks of screening or oral antibiotics within 2 weeks of screening Active tuberculosis (TB) requiring treatment within the previous 3 years Positive for hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis C antibody Primary or secondary immunodeficiency (history of or currently active) Evidence of active malignant disease, malignancies diagnosed within the previous 10 years (except for basal and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or carcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri that has been excised and cured), or breast cancer diagnosed within the previous 20 years Pregnant or breast feeding women Neuropathies or other conditions that might interfere with pain evaluation
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
Hoffmann-La Roche
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Uni Degli Studi Di L Aquila; Cattedra Di Reumatologia - Dept. Di Medicina Interna E San
City
Coppito
State/Province
Abruzzo
ZIP/Postal Code
67100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
P. O. Spirito Santo - Asl Pescara; U.O. Complessa Di Reumatologia
City
Pescara
State/Province
Abruzzo
ZIP/Postal Code
65100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliera Bianchi Melacrino Morelli; Unità Operativa di Reumatologia
City
Reggio Calabria
State/Province
Calabria
ZIP/Postal Code
89133
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Az. Ospedaliera S. Giuseppe Moscati; Dip. Med. Gen. Struttura Semplice Reumatologia
City
Avellino
State/Province
Campania
ZIP/Postal Code
83100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliera Rummo; Divisione Di Reumatologia
City
Benevento
State/Province
Campania
ZIP/Postal Code
82100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliera A. Cardarelli; Medicina III - Divisione di Reumatologia
City
Napoli
State/Province
Campania
ZIP/Postal Code
80131
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Policlinico Universitario-II Università di Napoli; Reumatologia
City
Napoli
State/Province
Campania
ZIP/Postal Code
80131
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Osp Riuniti S.Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona; Rep. Medicina Interna
City
Salerno
State/Province
Campania
ZIP/Postal Code
84131
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Irccs Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri-Istituto Scientifico Di Telese;U.O. Riabilitazione Reumatologica
City
Telese Terme
State/Province
Campania
ZIP/Postal Code
82037
Country
Italy
Facility Name
A.O.U Policlinico S. Orsola Malpighi di Bologna U.O di Medicina Interna Borghi - Pad.2
City
Bologna
State/Province
Emilia-Romagna
ZIP/Postal Code
40138
Country
Italy
Facility Name
A.O. Universitaria Policlinico Di Modena; Reumatologia
City
Modena
State/Province
Emilia-Romagna
ZIP/Postal Code
41100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova; Reumatologia
City
Reggio Emilia
State/Province
Emilia-Romagna
ZIP/Postal Code
42100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Policlinico Univ. Uni Degli Sudi Di Udine; Clinica Di Reumatologia
City
Udine
State/Province
Friuli-Venezia Giulia
ZIP/Postal Code
33100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico Di Trigoria; Medicina Clinica E Reumatologia
City
Roma
State/Province
Lazio
ZIP/Postal Code
00128
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Policlinico Tor Vergata; Divisione Di Reumatologia
City
Roma
State/Province
Lazio
ZIP/Postal Code
00133
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Ospedale S.Pietro Fatebenefratelli; Divisione di Reumatologia
City
Roma
State/Province
Lazio
ZIP/Postal Code
00189
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Ospedale La Colletta; Reparto Di Reumatologia
City
Arenzano
State/Province
Liguria
ZIP/Postal Code
16011
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Università Degli Studi Di Genova - Dimi; Reumatologia
City
Genova
State/Province
Liguria
ZIP/Postal Code
16132
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Ospedale San Paolo; Divisione di Reumatologia
City
Savona
State/Province
Liguria
ZIP/Postal Code
17100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Asst Papa Giovanni XXIII; Dh Reumatologia
City
Bergamo
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
24127
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Ospedale Civile "La Memoria" Di Gavardo;Immunoematologia Trasfusionale-Allergologia E Reumatologia
City
Gavardo
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
25085
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Ospedale Di Magenta Fornaroli; U.O. Di Reumatologia
City
Magenta
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
20013
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Asst Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumato-Logico Gaetano Pini/Cto; Divisione Di Reumatologia
City
Milano
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
20122
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico; Unità Operativa Complessa di Allergologia e Immunologia Clinica
City
Milano
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
20122
Country
Italy
Facility Name
ASST FATEBENEFRATELLI SACCO; Reumatologia (Sacco)
City
Milano
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
20157
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Asst Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda; Reumatologia
City
Milano
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
20162
Country
Italy
Facility Name
ASST DI MONZA; Reumatologia (Medicina I)
City
Monza
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
20052
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Irccs Policlinico San Matteo; Reumatologia Adulti
City
Pavia
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
27100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
ASST DI VIMERCATE; Medicina Generale
City
Vimercate
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
20059
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Ospedale Regionale Torrette; SOD Clinica Medica del Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specialisti
City
Ancona
State/Province
Marche
ZIP/Postal Code
60020
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Ospedale Murri - Universita Politecnica Delle Marche; Clinica Reumatologica Ii
City
Jesi
State/Province
Marche
ZIP/Postal Code
60035
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliera Maggiore Della Carita; Day Hospital Immunologia
City
Novara
State/Province
Piemonte
ZIP/Postal Code
28100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Battista; Reparto Reumatologia
City
Torino
State/Province
Piemonte
ZIP/Postal Code
10126
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Ordine Mauriziano Ospedale Umberto I; Centro Di Reumatologia
City
Torino
State/Province
Piemonte
ZIP/Postal Code
10128
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico; Servizio Reumatologia
City
Bari
State/Province
Puglia
ZIP/Postal Code
70124
Country
Italy
Facility Name
ASL Lecce- Presidio Ospedaliero di Casarano-Servizio di Reumatologia ed Osteoporosi
City
Casarano (LE)
State/Province
Puglia
ZIP/Postal Code
73042
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia; Dipartimento Medicina Interna Reumatologia
City
Foggia
State/Province
Puglia
ZIP/Postal Code
71100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Ospedali Riuniti Di Foggia; Struttura Di Reumatologia
City
Foggia
State/Province
Puglia
ZIP/Postal Code
71100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
A.O. Universitaria Policlinico Monserrato Di Cagliari; Reumatologia I
City
Cagliari
State/Province
Sardegna
ZIP/Postal Code
09042
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Sassari; UOC Reumatologia
City
Sassari
State/Province
Sardegna
ZIP/Postal Code
07100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Ospedale Vittorio Emanuele Ii; U.O. Reumatologia Clinica Medica Condorelli
City
Catania
State/Province
Sicilia
ZIP/Postal Code
95124
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda Osped. Univ. Policlinico G. Martino; Centro Prevenzione E Cura Osteoporosi
City
Messina
State/Province
Sicilia
ZIP/Postal Code
98100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Arnas Ospedale Civico; Medicina Interna II
City
Palermo
State/Province
Sicilia
ZIP/Postal Code
90127
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Ospedale Careggi Villa Monnatessa ; Sezione Di Reumatologia
City
Firenze
State/Province
Toscana
ZIP/Postal Code
50139
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Az. Osp. Pisana Ospedale S. Chiara; U.O. Di Reumatologia
City
Pisa
State/Province
Toscana
ZIP/Postal Code
56100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Osp S. Maria Misericordia Dip. Medicina Clinica Sperimentale Cattedra Reumatologia
City
Perugia
State/Province
Umbria
ZIP/Postal Code
06122
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Ospedale Regionale Umberto Parini; Reparto Endocrinologia e Diabetologia - Amb. Reumatologia
City
Aosta
State/Province
Valle D'Aosta
ZIP/Postal Code
11100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Borgo Trento; Dipartimento di Medicina Sezione di Reumatologia
City
Verona
State/Province
Veneto
ZIP/Postal Code
37126
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Policlinico G.B. Rossi; Divisione Immunologia Clinica Sperimentale Medicina B
City
Verona
State/Province
Veneto
ZIP/Postal Code
37134
Country
Italy

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
30649524
Citation
Choy E, Caporali R, Xavier R, Fautrel B, Sanmarti R, Bao M, Devenport J, Petho-Schramm A. Effects of concomitant glucocorticoids in TOZURA, a common-framework study programme of subcutaneous tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Jun 1;58(6):1056-1064. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key393.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29244149
Citation
Choy E, Caporali R, Xavier R, Fautrel B, Sanmarti R, Bao M, Bernasconi C, Petho-Schramm A. Subcutaneous tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis: findings from the common-framework phase 4 study programme TOZURA conducted in 22 countries. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Mar 1;57(3):499-507. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex443. Erratum In: Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Jun 1;57(6):1129.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

A Study to Evaluate Efficacy of Tocilizumab Administered as Monotherapy or in Combination With Methotrexate and/or Other Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Participants

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs