Back to results

Denosumab in Combination With Chemotherapy as First-line Treatment of Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Primary Purpose

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Status

Completed

Phase

Phase 2

Locations

International

Study Type

Interventional

Intervention

Denosumab

Zoledronic acid

Placebo to Denosumab

Standard Chemotherapy

Placebo to Zoledronic Acid

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 100 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

Histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IV non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), according to 7th Tumor/Node/Metastasis (TNM) classification (cytological specimens obtained by bronchial washing or brushing, or fine-needle aspiration are acceptable)
Subject has available and has provided consent to release to the sponsor (or designee) a tumor block with confirmed tumor content (or approximately 20 unstained charged slides [a minimum of 7 slides is mandatory]) and the corresponding pathology report
Planned to receive 4 to 6 cycles of pemetrexed or gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin
• For subjects to receive pemetrexed, planned to receive vitamin B12 and folate per pemetrexed approved labeling
Radiographically evaluable (measurable or non-measurable) disease (according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria
Other inclusion criteria may apply

Exclusion Criteria:

Known presence of documented sensitizing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activating mutation or echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (EML4-ALK) translocation (screening following local standards, but strongly encouraged in non-squamous histology)
Known brain metastases (systematic screening of patients not mandatory)
Any prior systemic therapy (before randomization) for the treatment of NSCLC (including chemoradiation), except if for non-metastatic disease and was completed at least 6 months prior to randomization
Planned to receive bevacizumab
Significant dental/oral disease, including prior history or current evidence of osteonecrosis/ osteomyelitis of the jaw, or with the following:
- Active dental or jaw condition which requires oral surgery
- Non-healed dental/oral surgery
- Planned invasive dental procedures for the course of the study.

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Placebo Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Placebo

Denosumab

Arm Description

Participants received placebo matching to denosumab by subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks plus one loading dose on study day 8 in addition to platinum-based standard chemotherapy. Participants with bone metastases also received 4 mg zoledronic acid administered as an IV infusion Q4W or Q3W.

Participants received 120 mg denosumab by subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks plus one loading dose on study day 8 in addition to platinum-based standard chemotherapy. Participants with bone metastases also received placebo to zoledronic acid administered as an IV infusion Q4W or Q3W.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was calculated as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. Participants last known to be alive were censored at the last contact date.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Correlation of Tumor Tissue RANK Expression With Overall Survival

To assess whether the treatment effect on overall survival was correlated with receptor activator of nuclear factor (NF)-κB (RANK) protein expression in tumor cells, RANK expression in archival tumor samples was measured using immunohistochemistry. The intensity of stain in the cytoplasm, membrane, and total was categorized as 0 (negative), 1+ (weak), 2+ (moderate) or 3+ (strong); All intensity is the sum of levels +1, +2 and +3. In addition, an H-score was calculated using the following formula: H-score=(percentage of cells of weak×1)+(percentage of cells of moderate×2)+(percentage of cells of strong×3). The maximum H-score was 300, corresponding to 100% of cells with strong intensity. The correlation between RANK expression level and OS was evaluated using a Cox proportional hazard models that included RANK expression level stratified by the randomization stratification factors in the corresponding treatment group.

Correlation of Tumor Tissue RANK Ligand Expression With Overall Survival

To assess whether the treatment effect on overall survival was correlated with RANK ligand (RANKL) protein expression in tumor cells, RANKL expression in archival tumor samples was measured using immunohistochemistry. The intensity of stain in the cytoplasm was categorized as 0 (negative), 1+ (weak), 2+ (moderate) or 3+ (strong); All intensity is the sum of levels +1, +2 and +3. In addition, an H-score was calculated using the following formula: H-score=(percentage of cells of weak×1)+(percentage of cells of moderate×2)+(percentage of cells of strong×3). The maximum H-score was 300, corresponding to 100% of cells with strong intensity. The correlation between RANKL expression level and OS was evaluated using a Cox proportional hazard models that included RANKL expression level stratified by the randomization stratification factors in the corresponding treatment group.

Objective Response Rate

Objective response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on modified RECIST 1.1 achieved over the study duration. CR: Disappearance of all target and non target lesions, normalization of tumor marker levels and no new lesions. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the size of target lesions with no progression of non-target lesions and no new lesions, or, disappearance of target lesions with persistence of one or more non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker levels above normal limits and no new lesions. Participants who underwent surgical resection while on study were not evaluated for response after the surgery. Participants who did not meet the criteria for an objective response by the analysis cutoff date were considered non-responders.

Correlation of Tumor Tissue RANK Expression With Objective Response Rate

To assess whether the treatment effect on objective response rate (ORR) based on RECIST 1.1 was correlated with RANK protein expression in tumor cells, RANK expression in archival tumor samples was measured using immunohistochemistry. The intensity of stain in the cytoplasm, membrane, and total was categorized as 0 (negative), 1+ (weak), 2+ (moderate) or 3+ (strong); All intensity is the sum of levels +1, +2 and +3. In addition, an H-score was calculated using the following formula: H-score=(percentage of cells of weak×1)+(percentage of cells of moderate×2)+(percentage of cells of strong×3). The maximum H-score was 300, corresponding to 100% of cells with strong intensity. The correlation between RANK expression level and ORR was evaluated within each treatment group using a logistical regression model that included RANK expression value as an independent variable and stratified by the randomization stratification factors. The odds ratio and 95% confidence interval are reported.

Correlation of Tumor Tissue RANKL Expression With Objective Response Rate

To assess whether the treatment effect on objective response rate (ORR) based on RECIST 1.1 was correlated with RANKL protein expression in tumor cells, RANKL expression in archival tumor samples was measured using immunohistochemistry. The intensity of stain in the cytoplasm was categorized as 0 (negative), 1+ (weak), 2+ (moderate) or 3+ (strong); All intensity is the sum of levels +1, +2 and +3. In addition, an H-score was calculated using the following formula: H-score=(percentage of cells of weak×1)+(percentage of cells of moderate×2)+(percentage of cells of strong×3). The maximum H-score was 300, corresponding to 100% of cells with strong intensity. The correlation between RANKL expression level and ORR was evaluated within each treatment group using a logistical regression model that included RANKL expression value as an independent variable and stratified by the randomization stratification factors. The odds ratio and 95% confidence interval are reported.

Clinical Benefit Rate

Clinical benefit rate was defined as the percentage of participants with an objective response (CR or PR) or stable disease (SD) or better for at least 16 weeks achieved over the study duration. If a participant underwent surgical resection while on study, the participant was not evaluated for response after the surgery. Participants who did not meet the criteria for clinical benefit by the analysis cutoff date were considered as non-responders.

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to the first observed disease progression per modified RECIST 1.1 criteria or death from any cause. Participants last known to be alive who did not experience disease progression were censored at their last imaging assessment date, last contact date if they were in the survival follow up phase, end of the study date, or the primary analysis cut-off date, whichever was first. If a participant underwent surgical resection while on study, the participant was censored at the last evaluable imaging assessment prior to the surgery.

Serum Denosumab Trough Levels in Participants Who Received Q3W Dosing

Serum samples were analyzed for denosumab using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) following a validated procedure. The lower limit of quantification for the assay was 20 ng/mL.

Serum Denosumab Trough Levels in Participants Who Received Q4W Dosing

Serum samples were analyzed for denosumab using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) following a validated procedure. The lower limit of quantification for the assay was 20 ng/mL.

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment. A serious adverse event is defined as an AE that meets at least 1 of the following criteria fatal life threatening requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity congenital anomaly/birth defect other medically important serious event Treatment-related AEs include only TEAEs for which the investigator indicated there was a reasonable possibility they may have been caused by study drug. Fatal adverse events include only deaths reported on the Adverse Event Case Report Form.

Full Information

NCT ID

NCT01951586

First Posted

September 24, 2013

Last Updated

October 4, 2021

Sponsor

Amgen

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number

NCT01951586

Brief Title

Denosumab in Combination With Chemotherapy as First-line Treatment of Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Official Title

A Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Phase 2 Trial of Denosumab in Combination With Chemotherapy as First-line Treatment of Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Study Type

Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date

October 2021

Overall Recruitment Status

Completed

Study Start Date

December 31, 2013 (Actual)

Primary Completion Date

July 29, 2016 (Actual)

Study Completion Date

November 28, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title

Sponsor

Name of the Sponsor

Amgen

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product

Data Monitoring Committee

5. Study Description

Brief Summary

This randomized phase 2 trial is studying the effect of adding denosumab to standard chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced lung cancer.

Detailed Description

This is a global randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study in patients with Stage IV untreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with or without bone metastasis. Eligible participants are to receive 4 to 6 cycles of a standard of care platinum-doublet chemotherapy regimen. Participants will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive denosumab or matching placebo with the first investigational product dose coinciding with participant's first cycle of chemotherapy and continuing until the primary analysis, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, death, or lost to follow-up. Participants who discontinued the investigational product early (ie, before primary analysis) were followed for disease status and survival. The primary analysis took place when 149 events of death had been reported. All participants were followed for 2 years after the last dose of blinded investigational product.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose

Treatment

Study Phase

Phase 2

Interventional Study Model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

ParticipantInvestigator

Allocation

Randomized

Enrollment

226 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title

Placebo

Arm Type

Placebo Comparator

Arm Description

Arm Title

Denosumab

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Description

Intervention Type

Drug

Intervention Name(s)

Denosumab

Other Intervention Name(s)

XGEVA

Intervention Description

Administered by subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks (Q4W) plus one loading dose on study day 8; could be administered as often as every 3 weeks (Q3W) to participants receiving Q3W chemotherapy.

Intervention Type

Drug

Intervention Name(s)

Zoledronic acid

Other Intervention Name(s)

Zometa

Intervention Description

Administered by intravenous infusion in participants with bone metastasis upon investigative site request for IV bone-targeted therapy.

Intervention Type

Drug

Intervention Name(s)

Placebo to Denosumab

Intervention Description

Administered by subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks (Q4W) plus one loading dose on study day 8; could be administered as often as every 3 weeks (Q3W) to participants receiving Q3W chemotherapy.

Intervention Type

Drug

Intervention Name(s)

Standard Chemotherapy

Intervention Description

Standard of care chemotherapy consisting of pemetrexed or gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin administered according to local practice.

Intervention Type

Drug

Intervention Name(s)

Placebo to Zoledronic Acid

Intervention Description

Administered by intravenous infusion in participants with bone metastasis upon investigative site request for IV bone-targeted therapy.

Primary Outcome Measure Information:

Title

Overall Survival (OS)

Description

Overall survival was calculated as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. Participants last known to be alive were censored at the last contact date.

Time Frame

From randomization until the end of study; median time on study was 9.64 months.

Secondary Outcome Measure Information:

Title

Correlation of Tumor Tissue RANK Expression With Overall Survival

Description

Time Frame