search
Back to results

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Erenumab (AMG 334) in Migraine Prevention

Primary Purpose

Migraine

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Erenumab
Placebo
Erenumab PFS
Erenumab AI/Pen
Sponsored by
Amgen
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Migraine focused on measuring migraine, headache, prevention, prophylaxis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 60 Years (Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • History of migraine for more than12 months prior to screening
  • Migraine frequency: ≥ 4 and ≤ 14 migraine days per month in each of the 3 months prior to screening and during baseline phase
  • Headache frequency: < 15 headache days per month (with > 50% of the headache days being migraine days) in each of the 3 months prior to screening and during baseline phase
  • Demonstrated at least 80% compliance with the eDiary during baseline phase

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Older than 50 years of age at migraine onset
  • History of cluster headache or basilar or hemiplegic migraine headache
  • Unable to differentiate migraine from other headaches
  • No therapeutic response with > 2 of the following eight medication categories for prophylactic treatment of migraine after an adequate therapeutic trial. Medication categories are:

    • Category 1: Divalproex sodium, sodium valproate
    • Category 2: Topiramate
    • Category 3: Beta blockers (for example: atenolol, bisoprolol, metoprolol, nadolol, nebivolol, pindolol, propranolol, timolol)
    • Category 4: Tricyclic antidepressants (for example: amitriptyline, nortriptyline, protriptyline)
    • Category 5: Venlafaxine, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, milnacipran
    • Category 6: Flunarizine, verapamil
    • Category 7: Lisinopril, candesartan
    • Category 8: Butterbur, feverfew, magnesium (≥ 600 mg/day), riboflavin (≥ 100 mg/day)
  • Overuse of acute migraine medications in any month during the 3 months prior to screening or during screening

Sites / Locations

  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm 6

Arm Type

Placebo Comparator

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Placebo

Erenumab 7 mg QM

Erenumab 21 mg QM

Erenumab 70 mg QM

CHU Substudy: Erenumab 140 mg PFS

CHU Substudy: Erenumab 140 mg AI/Pen

Arm Description

Participants received placebo on day 1 and at weeks 4 and 8 by subcutaneous injection during the double-blind treatment phase. In the open-label treatment phase participants received 70 mg erenumab QM from week 12 to week 264 (last dose). After Protocol Amendment 3, participants still on study had their dose increased to 140 mg QM.

Participants received erenumab 7 mg on day 1 and at weeks 4 and 8 by subcutaneous injection during the double-blind treatment phase. In the open-label treatment phase participants received 70 mg erenumab QM from week 12 to week 264 (last dose). After Protocol Amendment 3, participants still on study had their dose increased to 140 mg QM.

Participants received erenumab 21 mg on day 1 and at weeks 4 and 8 by subcutaneous injection during the double-blind treatment phase. In the open-label treatment phase participants received 70 mg erenumab QM from week 12 to week 264 (last dose). After Protocol Amendment 3, participants still on study had their dose increased to 140 mg QM.

Participants received erenumab 70 mg on day 1 and at weeks 4 and 8 by subcutaneous injection during the double-blind treatment phase. In the open-label treatment phase participants received 70 mg erenumab QM from week 12 to week 264 (last dose). After Protocol Amendment 3, participants still on study had their dose increased to 140 mg QM.

Participants in the open-label treatment phase in the United States randomized to self-administer 140 mg erenumab via two 70 mg injections using a prefilled syringe (PFS) on CHU substudy day 1 (under study site supervision), and at home on day 29 (week 4) and day 57 (week 8).

Participants in the open-label treatment phase in the United States randomized to self-administer 140 mg erenumab via two 70 mg injections using an autoinjector/pen (AI)/pen) on CHU substudy day 1 (under study site supervision), and at home on day 29 (week 4) and day 57 (week 8).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in Monthly Migraine Days at Week 12
A migraine day was any calendar day in which the participant experienced a qualified migraine headache (onset, continuation, or recurrence of the migraine headache). A qualified migraine headache was defined as a migraine with or without aura. The change from baseline in monthly migraine days was calculated as the number of migraine days during the last 4 weeks of the 12-week double-blind treatment phase - the number of migraine days during the 4-week baseline phase.
CHU Substudy: Number of Participants Who Self-administered a Full Dose, Partial Dose, or No Dose of Erenumab
To assess participants ability to administer a full dose of erenumab in home-use at day 29 (week 4) and day 57 (week 8), site staff called participants and asked whether the participant administered a full, partial, or no dose of erenumab. A full dose means that the entire volume of both prefilled syringes or autoinjector/pens were injected. Discontinued prior to dosing day indicates participants who had discontinued the investigational product and did not attempt to self-administer on day 29 or 57.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in Monthly Migraine Days at Week 12
A migraine day was any calendar day in which the participant experienced a qualified migraine headache (onset, continuation, or recurrence of the migraine headache). A qualified migraine headache was defined either as a migraine without aura or a migraine with aura. Monthly migraine days were calculated as the number of migraine days in the 4-week baseline phase and during the last 4 weeks of double-blind treatment. At least a 50% reduction from baseline in monthly migraine days was determined if the change in monthly migraine days from the 4-week baseline phase to the last 4 weeks of the 12-week double-blind treatment phase * 100 / baseline monthly migraine days was less than or equal to -50%.
Change From Baseline in Monthly Migraine Attacks at Week 12
A migraine attack is an episode of any qualified migraine headache or migraine specific medication intakes for aura only. A migraine attack that was interrupted by sleep or that temporarily remits and then recurs within 48 hours or an attack treated successfully with medication but that relapses within 48 hours was considered to be one attack. The change from baseline in monthly migraine attacks was calculated as the number of migraine attacks during the last 4 weeks of the 12-week double-blind treatment phase - the number of migraine attacks during the 4-week baseline phase.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events in the Double-blind Treatment Phase
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial subject, including worsening of a pre-existing medical condition and laboratory value changes that require treatment or adjustment in current therapy. AEs were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03: Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting daily activities Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Death related to AE A serious adverse event is an AE that meets at least 1 of the following criteria: fatal life threatening requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity congenital anomaly/birth defect other medically important serious event
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events in the Open-label Treatment Phase
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial subject, including worsening of a pre-existing medical condition and laboratory value changes that require treatment or adjustment in current therapy. AEs were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03: Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting daily activities Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Death related to AE A serious adverse event is an AE that meets at least 1 of the following criteria: fatal life threatening requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity congenital anomaly/birth defect other medically important serious event
CHU Substudy: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events During the CHU Substudy
AEs were graded using the CTCAE version 4.03: Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting daily activities Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Death related to AE A serious adverse event is an AE that meets at least 1 of the following criteria: fatal life threatening requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity congenital anomaly/birth defect other medically important serious event An adverse device effect is any AE related to the use of a medical device, including AEs resulting from insufficient or inadequate instructions for use, any malfunction of the device, or use error or from intentional misuse of the device.
Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-erenumab Antibodies During the Double-blind Treatment Phase
Two validated assays were used to detect the presence of anti-erenumab antibodies. First, an electrochemiluminescent bridging immunoassay was used to detect binding antibodies (screening assay) and confirm antibodies (confirmatory assay) capable of binding erenumab. Second, a cell-based bioassay was used to test positive binding antibody samples for neutralizing activity against erenumab. Participants who developed anti-erenumab antibodies are participants who were negative or had no result at baseline but positive at any time postbaseline during the DBTP. If a sample was positive for binding antibodies and demonstrated neutralizing activity at the same time point, the participant was defined as positive for neutralizing antibodies.
Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-erenumab Antibodies During the Open-label Treatment Phase
Two validated assays were used to detect the presence of anti-erenumab antibodies. First, an electrochemiluminescent bridging immunoassay was used to detect binding antibodies (screening assay) and confirm antibodies (confirmatory assay) capable of binding erenumab. Second, a cell-based bioassay was used to test positive binding antibody samples for neutralizing activity against erenumab. Participants who developed anti-erenumab antibodies are participants who were negative prior to the first OLTP dose but positive at any time during the OLTP, or participants with no data prior to first dose in OLTP with any post-baseline positive results. If a sample was positive for binding antibodies and demonstrated neutralizing activity at the same time point, the participant was defined as positive for neutralizing antibodies.

Full Information

First Posted
August 30, 2013
Last Updated
October 3, 2022
Sponsor
Amgen
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01952574
Brief Title
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Erenumab (AMG 334) in Migraine Prevention
Official Title
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of AMG 334 in Migraine Prevention
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 6, 2013 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 25, 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 12, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Amgen

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
A study to evaluate the effect of erenumab compared to placebo on the change from baseline in monthly migraine days in participants with episodic migraine.
Detailed Description
The study is composed of an initial screening phase (up to 3 weeks), a 4-week baseline phase, a 12-week double-blind treatment phase (DBTP), an open-label treatment phase (OLTP) for up to 256 weeks, and an 8-week safety follow-up (12 weeks after the last dose of investigational product [IP]). In the DBTP participants were to be randomized in a 3:2:2:2 ratio to placebo, erenumab 7 mg, erenumab 21 mg, or erenumab 70 mg. During the open-label treatment phase, participants were to receive erenumab 70 mg QM from week 12 to week 264. After implementation of Protocol Amendment 3 (07 April 2016), participants remaining in the OLTP increased their dose to erenumab 140 mg QM up to week 264. The safety follow-up increased from an 8-week safety follow-up to a 12-week safety follow-up (16 weeks after the last dose of investigational product). During the OLTP participants enrolled at sites in the United States could enroll in an optional clinical home use (CHU) substudy, per a country-specific protocol amendment dated 20 June 2016. Participants in the CHU substudy were to be randomized 1:1 into 1 of 2 treatment groups: erenumab 140 mg using a prefilled syringe or erenumab 140 mg using an autoinjector/pen. Day 1 of the CHU substudy corresponded with any OLTP study visit up through Week 256, as long as the participant had received at least 2 doses of erenumab 140 mg. During the CHU substudy, participants initially self-administered IP under site supervision on substudy day 1, and then self-administered IP at home on substudy days 29 and 57.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Migraine
Keywords
migraine, headache, prevention, prophylaxis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
In the DBTP participants were randomized to one of four arms. In the optional CHU substudy participants were randomized into one of two treatment groups.
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
483 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Participants received placebo on day 1 and at weeks 4 and 8 by subcutaneous injection during the double-blind treatment phase. In the open-label treatment phase participants received 70 mg erenumab QM from week 12 to week 264 (last dose). After Protocol Amendment 3, participants still on study had their dose increased to 140 mg QM.
Arm Title
Erenumab 7 mg QM
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received erenumab 7 mg on day 1 and at weeks 4 and 8 by subcutaneous injection during the double-blind treatment phase. In the open-label treatment phase participants received 70 mg erenumab QM from week 12 to week 264 (last dose). After Protocol Amendment 3, participants still on study had their dose increased to 140 mg QM.
Arm Title
Erenumab 21 mg QM
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received erenumab 21 mg on day 1 and at weeks 4 and 8 by subcutaneous injection during the double-blind treatment phase. In the open-label treatment phase participants received 70 mg erenumab QM from week 12 to week 264 (last dose). After Protocol Amendment 3, participants still on study had their dose increased to 140 mg QM.
Arm Title
Erenumab 70 mg QM
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received erenumab 70 mg on day 1 and at weeks 4 and 8 by subcutaneous injection during the double-blind treatment phase. In the open-label treatment phase participants received 70 mg erenumab QM from week 12 to week 264 (last dose). After Protocol Amendment 3, participants still on study had their dose increased to 140 mg QM.
Arm Title
CHU Substudy: Erenumab 140 mg PFS
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants in the open-label treatment phase in the United States randomized to self-administer 140 mg erenumab via two 70 mg injections using a prefilled syringe (PFS) on CHU substudy day 1 (under study site supervision), and at home on day 29 (week 4) and day 57 (week 8).
Arm Title
CHU Substudy: Erenumab 140 mg AI/Pen
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants in the open-label treatment phase in the United States randomized to self-administer 140 mg erenumab via two 70 mg injections using an autoinjector/pen (AI)/pen) on CHU substudy day 1 (under study site supervision), and at home on day 29 (week 4) and day 57 (week 8).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Erenumab
Other Intervention Name(s)
AMG 334, Aimovig™
Intervention Description
Administered by study site staff once a month (QM) as a subcutaneous injection
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Administered by study site staff once a month (QM) as a subcutaneous injection
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Erenumab PFS
Intervention Description
Erenumab supplied in a single-use prefilled syringe for self-administration in the CHU substudy
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Erenumab AI/Pen
Intervention Description
Erenumab supplied in a single-use autoinjector/pen for self-administration in the CHU substudy
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Monthly Migraine Days at Week 12
Description
A migraine day was any calendar day in which the participant experienced a qualified migraine headache (onset, continuation, or recurrence of the migraine headache). A qualified migraine headache was defined as a migraine with or without aura. The change from baseline in monthly migraine days was calculated as the number of migraine days during the last 4 weeks of the 12-week double-blind treatment phase - the number of migraine days during the 4-week baseline phase.
Time Frame
4-week baseline phase and the last 4 weeks of the 12-week double-blind treatment phase
Title
CHU Substudy: Number of Participants Who Self-administered a Full Dose, Partial Dose, or No Dose of Erenumab
Description
To assess participants ability to administer a full dose of erenumab in home-use at day 29 (week 4) and day 57 (week 8), site staff called participants and asked whether the participant administered a full, partial, or no dose of erenumab. A full dose means that the entire volume of both prefilled syringes or autoinjector/pens were injected. Discontinued prior to dosing day indicates participants who had discontinued the investigational product and did not attempt to self-administer on day 29 or 57.
Time Frame
CHU substudy day 29 (week 4) and day 57 (week 8)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in Monthly Migraine Days at Week 12
Description
A migraine day was any calendar day in which the participant experienced a qualified migraine headache (onset, continuation, or recurrence of the migraine headache). A qualified migraine headache was defined either as a migraine without aura or a migraine with aura. Monthly migraine days were calculated as the number of migraine days in the 4-week baseline phase and during the last 4 weeks of double-blind treatment. At least a 50% reduction from baseline in monthly migraine days was determined if the change in monthly migraine days from the 4-week baseline phase to the last 4 weeks of the 12-week double-blind treatment phase * 100 / baseline monthly migraine days was less than or equal to -50%.
Time Frame
4-week baseline phase and the last 4 weeks of the 12-week double-blind treatment phase
Title
Change From Baseline in Monthly Migraine Attacks at Week 12
Description
A migraine attack is an episode of any qualified migraine headache or migraine specific medication intakes for aura only. A migraine attack that was interrupted by sleep or that temporarily remits and then recurs within 48 hours or an attack treated successfully with medication but that relapses within 48 hours was considered to be one attack. The change from baseline in monthly migraine attacks was calculated as the number of migraine attacks during the last 4 weeks of the 12-week double-blind treatment phase - the number of migraine attacks during the 4-week baseline phase.
Time Frame
4-week baseline phase and the last 4 weeks of the 12-week double-blind treatment phase
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events in the Double-blind Treatment Phase
Description
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial subject, including worsening of a pre-existing medical condition and laboratory value changes that require treatment or adjustment in current therapy. AEs were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03: Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting daily activities Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Death related to AE A serious adverse event is an AE that meets at least 1 of the following criteria: fatal life threatening requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity congenital anomaly/birth defect other medically important serious event
Time Frame
From first dose of study drug in the double-blind treatment phase until the first dose of study drug in the open-label treatment phase (12 weeks) or up to 12 weeks after last dose for participants who did not enter the open-label treatment phase.
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events in the Open-label Treatment Phase
Description
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial subject, including worsening of a pre-existing medical condition and laboratory value changes that require treatment or adjustment in current therapy. AEs were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03: Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting daily activities Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Death related to AE A serious adverse event is an AE that meets at least 1 of the following criteria: fatal life threatening requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity congenital anomaly/birth defect other medically important serious event
Time Frame
From first dose in the open-label treatment phase up to 12 weeks (participants receiving 70 mg only) or 16 weeks (participants with dose increased to 140 mg) after the last dose; a maximum of 268 weeks.
Title
CHU Substudy: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events During the CHU Substudy
Description
AEs were graded using the CTCAE version 4.03: Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting daily activities Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Death related to AE A serious adverse event is an AE that meets at least 1 of the following criteria: fatal life threatening requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity congenital anomaly/birth defect other medically important serious event An adverse device effect is any AE related to the use of a medical device, including AEs resulting from insufficient or inadequate instructions for use, any malfunction of the device, or use error or from intentional misuse of the device.
Time Frame
From first dose in the CHU substudy to end of substudy (up to 12 weeks)
Title
Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-erenumab Antibodies During the Double-blind Treatment Phase
Description
Two validated assays were used to detect the presence of anti-erenumab antibodies. First, an electrochemiluminescent bridging immunoassay was used to detect binding antibodies (screening assay) and confirm antibodies (confirmatory assay) capable of binding erenumab. Second, a cell-based bioassay was used to test positive binding antibody samples for neutralizing activity against erenumab. Participants who developed anti-erenumab antibodies are participants who were negative or had no result at baseline but positive at any time postbaseline during the DBTP. If a sample was positive for binding antibodies and demonstrated neutralizing activity at the same time point, the participant was defined as positive for neutralizing antibodies.
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-erenumab Antibodies During the Open-label Treatment Phase
Description
Two validated assays were used to detect the presence of anti-erenumab antibodies. First, an electrochemiluminescent bridging immunoassay was used to detect binding antibodies (screening assay) and confirm antibodies (confirmatory assay) capable of binding erenumab. Second, a cell-based bioassay was used to test positive binding antibody samples for neutralizing activity against erenumab. Participants who developed anti-erenumab antibodies are participants who were negative prior to the first OLTP dose but positive at any time during the OLTP, or participants with no data prior to first dose in OLTP with any post-baseline positive results. If a sample was positive for binding antibodies and demonstrated neutralizing activity at the same time point, the participant was defined as positive for neutralizing antibodies.
Time Frame
From week 12 up to 12 weeks (participants receiving 70 mg only) or 16 weeks (participants with dose increased to 140 mg) after the last dose; maximum 268 weeks.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: History of migraine for more than12 months prior to screening Migraine frequency: ≥ 4 and ≤ 14 migraine days per month in each of the 3 months prior to screening and during baseline phase Headache frequency: < 15 headache days per month (with > 50% of the headache days being migraine days) in each of the 3 months prior to screening and during baseline phase Demonstrated at least 80% compliance with the eDiary during baseline phase Exclusion Criteria: Older than 50 years of age at migraine onset History of cluster headache or basilar or hemiplegic migraine headache Unable to differentiate migraine from other headaches No therapeutic response with > 2 of the following eight medication categories for prophylactic treatment of migraine after an adequate therapeutic trial. Medication categories are: Category 1: Divalproex sodium, sodium valproate Category 2: Topiramate Category 3: Beta blockers (for example: atenolol, bisoprolol, metoprolol, nadolol, nebivolol, pindolol, propranolol, timolol) Category 4: Tricyclic antidepressants (for example: amitriptyline, nortriptyline, protriptyline) Category 5: Venlafaxine, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, milnacipran Category 6: Flunarizine, verapamil Category 7: Lisinopril, candesartan Category 8: Butterbur, feverfew, magnesium (≥ 600 mg/day), riboflavin (≥ 100 mg/day) Overuse of acute migraine medications in any month during the 3 months prior to screening or during screening
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
MD
Organizational Affiliation
Amgen
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85032
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Long Beach
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90806
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
National City
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91950
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Newport Beach
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92663
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94109
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Santa Monica
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90404
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Sherman Oaks
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91403
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Spring Valley
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91978
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Danbury
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06810
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Fairfield
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06824
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Stamford
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06905
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Bradenton
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34205
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Melbourne
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32935
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Palm Beach Gardens
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33410
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
West Palm Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33407
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Decatur
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30033
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Wichita
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
67207
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Lexington
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40513
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Louisville
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40213
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Watertown
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02472
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Worcester
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
01605
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Ann Arbor
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Kalamazoo
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
49009
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Southfield
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48034
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Plymouth
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55441
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63141
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Springfield
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
65807
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Rochester
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14609
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Greensboro
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27405
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Raleigh
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27612
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19107
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37203
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Arlington
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76017
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78731
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75214
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75231
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77074
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84106
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84124
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Falls Church
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22042
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Virginia Beach
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23454
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M4S 1Y2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H2L 4M1
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Aarhus C
ZIP/Postal Code
8000
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Glostrup
ZIP/Postal Code
2600
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Helsinki
ZIP/Postal Code
00100
Country
Finland
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Mikkeli
ZIP/Postal Code
50100
Country
Finland
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Oulu
ZIP/Postal Code
90220
Country
Finland
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Tampere
ZIP/Postal Code
33100
Country
Finland
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Turku
ZIP/Postal Code
20100
Country
Finland
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
10117
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
10409
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
10435
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Bochum
ZIP/Postal Code
44789
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Essen
ZIP/Postal Code
45133
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
20246
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Leipzig
ZIP/Postal Code
04107
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Hamar
ZIP/Postal Code
2317
Country
Norway
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Sandvika
ZIP/Postal Code
1337
Country
Norway
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Stavanger
ZIP/Postal Code
4005
Country
Norway
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Ålesund
ZIP/Postal Code
6003
Country
Norway
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Falköping
ZIP/Postal Code
521 37
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Lund
ZIP/Postal Code
222 22
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Stockholm
ZIP/Postal Code
112 45
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Stockholm
ZIP/Postal Code
114 33
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Vällingby
ZIP/Postal Code
162 68
Country
Sweden

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data sharing requests relating to this study will be considered beginning 18 months after the study has ended and either 1) the product and indication (or other new use) have been granted marketing authorization in both the US and Europe or 2) clinical development for the product and/or indication discontinues and the data will not be submitted to regulatory authorities. There is no end date for eligibility to submit a data sharing request for this study.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Qualified researchers may submit a request containing the research objectives, the Amgen product(s) and Amgen study/studies in scope, endpoints/outcomes of interest, statistical analysis plan, data requirements, publication plan, and qualifications of the researcher(s). In general, Amgen does not grant external requests for individual patient data for the purpose of re-evaluating safety and efficacy issues already addressed in the product labelling. Requests are reviewed by a committee of internal advisors, and if not approved, may be further arbitrated by a Data Sharing Independent Review Panel. Upon approval, information necessary to address the research question will be provided under the terms of a data sharing agreement. This may include anonymized individual patient data and/or available supporting documents, containing fragments of analysis code where provided in analysis specifications. Further details are available at the URL below.
IPD Sharing URL
https://www.amgen.com/datasharing
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26879279
Citation
Sun H, Dodick DW, Silberstein S, Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, Ashina M, Saper J, Cady R, Chon Y, Dietrich J, Lenz R. Safety and efficacy of AMG 334 for prevention of episodic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2016 Apr;15(4):382-90. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00019-3. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28835404
Citation
Ashina M, Dodick D, Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, Silberstein S, Zhang F, Gage JR, Cheng S, Mikol DD, Lenz RA. Erenumab (AMG 334) in episodic migraine: Interim analysis of an ongoing open-label study. Neurology. 2017 Sep 19;89(12):1237-1243. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004391. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31146544
Citation
Ashina M, Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, Silberstein S, Dodick D, Rippon GA, Klatt J, Xue F, Chia V, Zhang F, Cheng S, Mikol DD. Long-term safety and tolerability of erenumab: Three-plus year results from a five-year open-label extension study in episodic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2019 Oct;39(11):1455-1464. doi: 10.1177/0333102419854082. Epub 2019 May 30.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Cheng S, Picard H, Zhang F, Eisele O, Mikol DD. Efficacy and safety of erenumab for migraine prevention: an overview. Japanese Journal of Headache. 2019; 45 : 493-505.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33400330
Citation
Ashina M, Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, Silberstein S, Dodick DW, Xue F, Zhang F, Paiva da Silva Lima G, Cheng S, Mikol DD. Long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in migraine prevention: Results from a 5-year, open-label treatment phase of a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Neurol. 2021 May;28(5):1716-1725. doi: 10.1111/ene.14715. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
35272533
Citation
Zhou Y, Zhang F, Starcevic Manning M, Hu Z, Hsu CP, Chen PW, Peng C, Loop B, Mytych DT, Paiva da Silva Lima G. Immunogenicity of erenumab: A pooled analysis of six placebo-controlled trials with long-term extensions. Cephalalgia. 2022 Jul;42(8):749-760. doi: 10.1177/03331024221075621. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31707815
Citation
Ashina M, Kudrow D, Reuter U, Dolezil D, Silberstein S, Tepper SJ, Xue F, Picard H, Zhang F, Wang A, Zhou Y, Hong F, Klatt J, Mikol DD. Long-term tolerability and nonvascular safety of erenumab, a novel calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist for prevention of migraine: A pooled analysis of four placebo-controlled trials with long-term extensions. Cephalalgia. 2019 Dec;39(14):1798-1808. doi: 10.1177/0333102419888222. Epub 2019 Nov 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31852816
Citation
Kudrow D, Pascual J, Winner PK, Dodick DW, Tepper SJ, Reuter U, Hong F, Klatt J, Zhang F, Cheng S, Picard H, Eisele O, Wang J, Latham JN, Mikol DD. Vascular safety of erenumab for migraine prevention. Neurology. 2020 Feb 4;94(5):e497-e510. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008743. Epub 2019 Dec 18. Erratum In: Neurology. 2020 Jun 9;94(23):1052.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33764538
Citation
Sakai F, Takeshima T, Tatsuoka Y, Hirata K, Cheng S, Numachi Y, Peng C, Xue F, Mikol DD. Long-term efficacy and safety during open-label erenumab treatment in Japanese patients with episodic migraine. Headache. 2021 Apr;61(4):653-661. doi: 10.1111/head.14096. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34928306
Citation
Ashina M, Goadsby PJ, Dodick DW, Tepper SJ, Xue F, Zhang F, Brennan F, Paiva da Silva Lima G. Assessment of Erenumab Safety and Efficacy in Patients With Migraine With and Without Aura: A Secondary Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Neurol. 2022 Feb 1;79(2):159-168. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.4678.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://www.amgentrials.com
Description
AmgenTrials clinical trials website

Learn more about this trial

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Erenumab (AMG 334) in Migraine Prevention

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs