search
Back to results

Closing the Loop in Adults With Sub-optimally Controlled Type 1 Diabetes Under Free Living Conditions (AP@home04)

Primary Purpose

Type 1 Diabetes

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Florence D2A or similar closed loop glucose control system
CSII with real-time CGM
Sponsored by
University of Cambridge
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Type 1 Diabetes focused on measuring Type 1 diabetes, Closed loop insulin delivery, Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring, Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The subject has type 1 diabetes as defined by WHO
  2. The subject is 18 years of age or older
  3. The subject will have been on an insulin pump for at least 6 months with good knowledge of insulin self-adjustment including carbohydrate counting
  4. The subject is treated with one of the rapid acting insulin analogues (Insulin Aspart, Insulin Lispro or Insulin Glulisine)
  5. HbA1c ≥7.5% (58mmol/mmol) and ≤ 10% (86 mmol/mmol) based on analysis from central laboratory or equivalent
  6. The subject is willing to perform regular finger-prick blood glucose monitoring, with at least 6 measurements per day
  7. The subject is willing to wear closed-loop system at home and at work place
  8. The subject is willing to follow study specific instructions
  9. The subject is willing to upload pump and CGM data at regular intervals
  10. Female subjects of child bearing age should be on effective contraception and must have a negative urine-HCG pregnancy test at screening. In addition in Germany, women of childbearing potential must use a highly effective method of birth control, which is defined as those which result in a low failure rate (i.e. less than 1% per year) and must use two independent methods of contraception, e.g. diaphragm and spermicide-coated condom.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Non-type 1 diabetes mellitus
  2. Any other physical or psychological disease or condition likely to interfere with the normal conduct of the study and interpretation of the study results
  3. Current treatment with drugs known to have significant interference with glucose metabolism, such as systemic corticosteroids, as judged by the investigator
  4. Known or suspected allergy against insulin
  5. Subjects with clinically significant nephropathy, neuropathy or proliferative retinopathy as judged by the investigator
  6. Significantly reduced hypoglycaemia awareness as judged by the investigator
  7. More than one episode of severe hypoglycaemia as defined by American Diabetes Association (31) in preceding 6 months (Severe hypoglycaemia is defined as an event requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrates, glucagon, or take other corrective actions).
  8. Random C-peptide > 100pmol/l with concomitant plasma glucose >4 mM(72 mg/dl)
  9. Total daily insulin dose > 2 IU/kg/day
  10. Subject is pregnant or breast feeding or planning pregnancy in near future (within next 3 months)
  11. Severe visual impairment
  12. Severe hearing impairment
  13. Subjects using implanted internal pacemaker
  14. Lack of reliable telephone facility for contact
  15. Subject not proficient in English (UK) or German (Germany and Austria)
  16. Subjects who are living alone

Additional exclusion criteria specific for Austria and Germany

  1. Positive results on urine drug screen (amphetamines/metamphetamines, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, cannabinoids, cocaine, opiates).
  2. Positive alcohol breath test.

Additional exclusion criteria specific for Germany only

  1. Positive reaction to any of the following tests: hepatitis B surface (HBs) antigen, anti-hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) antibodies, anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 1 antibodies, anti-HIV2 antibodies.
  2. Significantly reduced hypoglycaemia awareness withGold score ≥ 4 according to Geddes J et al, Diabetes Care 2007
  3. Serious macro- and microangiopathy
  4. Serious anomalies of the skin
  5. Serious skin diseases (e.g. psoriasis vulgaris, bacterial skin diseases) located at places of the body, which potentially are possible to be used for localisation of the glucose sensor)
  6. Renal insufficiency
  7. Epilepsy
  8. Eating disorders (like bulimia or anorexia nervosa)
  9. Disorders of the lipid metabolism
  10. Blood transfusion requiring patients
  11. Psychiatric diseases and related conditions
  12. Patients with frequent catheter abscesses having occurred in connection with the pump therapy
  13. Patients with medically documented allergy towards the adhesive (glue) of plasters
  14. Abnormal blood values for:

    • the creatinine clearance,
    • erythropoietin,
    • TSH.
  15. Patients with the following concomitant medications or misuse of substances:

    • steroids,
    • anticoagulant therapies.
  16. Patients with a planned intervention under general anaesthesia.
  17. Patients who do shift work

Sites / Locations

  • Medical University of Graz
  • Profil Institut für Stoffwechselforschung GmbH
  • University of Cambridge

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Florence D2A Closed Loop Glucose control

CSII with real-time CGM

Arm Description

Subjects glucose levels are controlled by Florence D2A or similar closed loop insulin delivery system

Subject glucose level controlled by usual insulin pump therapy in conjunction with real time continuous glucose monitoring (FreeStyle Navigator CGM)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Time spent in the target glucose range from 3.9 to 10.0 mmol/l based on subcutaneous glucose monitoring
Time spent in the target glucose range from 3.9 to 10.0 mmol/l based on subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) during the 90 days of home stay. Intention to treat basis.

Secondary Outcome Measures

HbA1c
Measure of average glycaemic control during study period
Insulin dose
Total, basal and bolus insulin dose during 90 days of home periods
Adverse Events
Safety evaluation will comprise the number of episodes of hypoglycaemia, significant ketonemia (> 3.0mmol/l)as well as nature and severity of any other adverse events
Utility Evaluation
Utility evaluation is the frequency and duration of use of the closed-loop system at home and time between failures of closed-loop system components.
Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome
Time spent above and below the target glucose 3.9 to 10.0 mmol/l, during the 90 days of home periods
Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome
Average,standard deviation and coefficient of variation of glucose levels during 90 days of home periods
Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome
The time with glucose levels < 3.5 mmol/l and <2.8 mmol/l during 90 days of home periods
Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome
The time with glucose levels in the significant hyperglycaemia,(glucose levels > 16.7 mmol/l during 90 days of home periods
Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome
Low Blood Glucose Index during 90 days of home periods
Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome
Duration of periods when sensor glucose values was below 3.5mmol/l for at least 20 minutes
Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome
The "Area Under the Curve" below 3.5 mmol/l during 90 days home periods
Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome
Between 24 hour period variability: Coefficient of variation of CGM glucose between 24 hour periods (midnight to midnight)
Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome
Glucose concentration in the target range (3.9-10.0mmol/L), and above and below target range based on adjusted CGM. Adjustment described in Hovorka R et. al.; Diabetes Technol Ther 14:1-9, 2012
Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome during overnight period between 23:00 and 08:00
Time spent with CGM glucose concentration in the target range (3.9-8.0mmol/L), Mean CGM glucose levels, The AUC below 3.5mmol/l, CV of CGM glucose levels, Coefficient of variation of CGM glucose between nights and Total insulin dose during overnight period between 23:00 and 08:00
Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome during day period between 08:00 to 23:00
Time spent with CGM glucose concentration in the target range (3.9-10.0mmol/L), Mean CGM glucose levels, The AUC below 3.5mmol/l, CV of CGM glucose levels, Coefficient of variation of CGM glucose between days and Total insulin dose during day period between 08:00 to 23:00

Full Information

First Posted
August 30, 2013
Last Updated
June 4, 2015
Sponsor
University of Cambridge
Collaborators
Profil Institut für Stoffwechselforschung GmbH, Medical University of Graz
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01961622
Brief Title
Closing the Loop in Adults With Sub-optimally Controlled Type 1 Diabetes Under Free Living Conditions
Acronym
AP@home04
Official Title
An Open-label, Multi-centre, Randomised, Two-period, Crossover Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Utility of 12 Week Day and Night Automated Closed-loop Glucose Control Under Free Living Conditions Compared to Conventional Insulin Pump Therapy Combined With Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes With Sub-optimal Glucose Control
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Cambridge
Collaborators
Profil Institut für Stoffwechselforschung GmbH, Medical University of Graz

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The main objective of this study is to determine whether day and night closed-loop insulin delivery for 12 weeks under free living conditions is superior to addition of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes and sub-optimal glucose control on insulin pump therapy. This is an open-label, multi centre, randomised, crossover design study, involving a 6 to 8 week run-in period, during which glucose control will be optimised by a professional pump educator, followed by two 3 months study periods during which glucose levels will be controlled either by an automated closed-loop system or by subjects usual insulin pump therapy augmented with real-time continuous glucose monitoring in random order. A total of up to 42 adults (aiming for 30 completed subjects) aged 18 years and older with T1D on insulin pump therapy will be recruited through diabetes clinics and other established methods in participating centres. Subjects who drop out of the study within the first 6 weeks of the first intervention arm will be replaced. Subjects will receive appropriate training in the safe use of closed-loop insulin delivery system. Subjects will have regular contact with the study team during the home study phase including 24/7 telephone support. Subjects will be discouraged from international travel during the first two weeks of closed-loop use. The primary outcome is time spent in target range between 3.9 and 10.0 mmol/L as recorded by CGM (adjusted for potential over-estimation) during home stay. Secondary outcomes are the HbA1c, time spent with glucose levels above and below target, as recorded by CGM, and other CGM-based metrics.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Type 1 Diabetes
Keywords
Type 1 diabetes, Closed loop insulin delivery, Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring, Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
33 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Florence D2A Closed Loop Glucose control
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subjects glucose levels are controlled by Florence D2A or similar closed loop insulin delivery system
Arm Title
CSII with real-time CGM
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subject glucose level controlled by usual insulin pump therapy in conjunction with real time continuous glucose monitoring (FreeStyle Navigator CGM)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Florence D2A or similar closed loop glucose control system
Intervention Description
Subject's glucose level will be controlled by the Florence D2A or similar automated closed loop glucose control system. The system comprises of FreeStyle Navigator 2 ® Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) System (Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, CA, USA), Dana R Diabecare subcutaneous insulin infusion pump (Sooil Corp. Seoul, South Korea)or similar insulin pump, and MPC-based glucose control algorithm running on a smartphone
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
CSII with real-time CGM
Intervention Description
Subject glucose level controlled by usual insulin pump therapy in conjunction with real time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time spent in the target glucose range from 3.9 to 10.0 mmol/l based on subcutaneous glucose monitoring
Description
Time spent in the target glucose range from 3.9 to 10.0 mmol/l based on subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) during the 90 days of home stay. Intention to treat basis.
Time Frame
90 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
HbA1c
Description
Measure of average glycaemic control during study period
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Insulin dose
Description
Total, basal and bolus insulin dose during 90 days of home periods
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Adverse Events
Description
Safety evaluation will comprise the number of episodes of hypoglycaemia, significant ketonemia (> 3.0mmol/l)as well as nature and severity of any other adverse events
Time Frame
10 months
Title
Utility Evaluation
Description
Utility evaluation is the frequency and duration of use of the closed-loop system at home and time between failures of closed-loop system components.
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome
Description
Time spent above and below the target glucose 3.9 to 10.0 mmol/l, during the 90 days of home periods
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome
Description
Average,standard deviation and coefficient of variation of glucose levels during 90 days of home periods
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome
Description
The time with glucose levels < 3.5 mmol/l and <2.8 mmol/l during 90 days of home periods
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome
Description
The time with glucose levels in the significant hyperglycaemia,(glucose levels > 16.7 mmol/l during 90 days of home periods
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome
Description
Low Blood Glucose Index during 90 days of home periods
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome
Description
Duration of periods when sensor glucose values was below 3.5mmol/l for at least 20 minutes
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome
Description
The "Area Under the Curve" below 3.5 mmol/l during 90 days home periods
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome
Description
Between 24 hour period variability: Coefficient of variation of CGM glucose between 24 hour periods (midnight to midnight)
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome
Description
Glucose concentration in the target range (3.9-10.0mmol/L), and above and below target range based on adjusted CGM. Adjustment described in Hovorka R et. al.; Diabetes Technol Ther 14:1-9, 2012
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome during overnight period between 23:00 and 08:00
Description
Time spent with CGM glucose concentration in the target range (3.9-8.0mmol/L), Mean CGM glucose levels, The AUC below 3.5mmol/l, CV of CGM glucose levels, Coefficient of variation of CGM glucose between nights and Total insulin dose during overnight period between 23:00 and 08:00
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) based outcome during day period between 08:00 to 23:00
Description
Time spent with CGM glucose concentration in the target range (3.9-10.0mmol/L), Mean CGM glucose levels, The AUC below 3.5mmol/l, CV of CGM glucose levels, Coefficient of variation of CGM glucose between days and Total insulin dose during day period between 08:00 to 23:00
Time Frame
90 days
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Accuracy of CGM
Description
CGM accuracy during 3 months home period; Capillary glucose vs. CGM will be evaluated using standard measures of numerical and clinical accuracy including absolute relative deviation and error grid analysis
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Per Protocol Analysis
Description
Per protocol analysis will be conducted to explore the relationship between usage of study treatments and study outcomes.
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Effect of study intervention based on pre-study glycaemic control
Description
Following outcomes will be calculated separately for participants with baseline HbA1c <8.5% vs. ≥ 8.5% Time spent with CGM glucose concentration in the target range (3.9-10.0mmol/L), Time spent with CGM glucose levels in hypoglycaemic range (< 3.9 mmol/L), Time spent with CGM glucose levels in hyperglycaemic range (> 10.0 mmol/L), Mean CGM glucose levels and the AUC below 3.5mmol/l based on continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring
Time Frame
90 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: The subject has type 1 diabetes as defined by WHO The subject is 18 years of age or older The subject will have been on an insulin pump for at least 6 months with good knowledge of insulin self-adjustment including carbohydrate counting The subject is treated with one of the rapid acting insulin analogues (Insulin Aspart, Insulin Lispro or Insulin Glulisine) HbA1c ≥7.5% (58mmol/mmol) and ≤ 10% (86 mmol/mmol) based on analysis from central laboratory or equivalent The subject is willing to perform regular finger-prick blood glucose monitoring, with at least 6 measurements per day The subject is willing to wear closed-loop system at home and at work place The subject is willing to follow study specific instructions The subject is willing to upload pump and CGM data at regular intervals Female subjects of child bearing age should be on effective contraception and must have a negative urine-HCG pregnancy test at screening. In addition in Germany, women of childbearing potential must use a highly effective method of birth control, which is defined as those which result in a low failure rate (i.e. less than 1% per year) and must use two independent methods of contraception, e.g. diaphragm and spermicide-coated condom. Exclusion Criteria: Non-type 1 diabetes mellitus Any other physical or psychological disease or condition likely to interfere with the normal conduct of the study and interpretation of the study results Current treatment with drugs known to have significant interference with glucose metabolism, such as systemic corticosteroids, as judged by the investigator Known or suspected allergy against insulin Subjects with clinically significant nephropathy, neuropathy or proliferative retinopathy as judged by the investigator Significantly reduced hypoglycaemia awareness as judged by the investigator More than one episode of severe hypoglycaemia as defined by American Diabetes Association (31) in preceding 6 months (Severe hypoglycaemia is defined as an event requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrates, glucagon, or take other corrective actions). Random C-peptide > 100pmol/l with concomitant plasma glucose >4 mM(72 mg/dl) Total daily insulin dose > 2 IU/kg/day Subject is pregnant or breast feeding or planning pregnancy in near future (within next 3 months) Severe visual impairment Severe hearing impairment Subjects using implanted internal pacemaker Lack of reliable telephone facility for contact Subject not proficient in English (UK) or German (Germany and Austria) Subjects who are living alone Additional exclusion criteria specific for Austria and Germany Positive results on urine drug screen (amphetamines/metamphetamines, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, cannabinoids, cocaine, opiates). Positive alcohol breath test. Additional exclusion criteria specific for Germany only Positive reaction to any of the following tests: hepatitis B surface (HBs) antigen, anti-hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) antibodies, anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 1 antibodies, anti-HIV2 antibodies. Significantly reduced hypoglycaemia awareness withGold score ≥ 4 according to Geddes J et al, Diabetes Care 2007 Serious macro- and microangiopathy Serious anomalies of the skin Serious skin diseases (e.g. psoriasis vulgaris, bacterial skin diseases) located at places of the body, which potentially are possible to be used for localisation of the glucose sensor) Renal insufficiency Epilepsy Eating disorders (like bulimia or anorexia nervosa) Disorders of the lipid metabolism Blood transfusion requiring patients Psychiatric diseases and related conditions Patients with frequent catheter abscesses having occurred in connection with the pump therapy Patients with medically documented allergy towards the adhesive (glue) of plasters Abnormal blood values for: the creatinine clearance, erythropoietin, TSH. Patients with the following concomitant medications or misuse of substances: steroids, anticoagulant therapies. Patients with a planned intervention under general anaesthesia. Patients who do shift work
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Roman Hovorka, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Cambridge
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Medical University of Graz
City
Graz
ZIP/Postal Code
A8036
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Profil Institut für Stoffwechselforschung GmbH
City
Neuss
ZIP/Postal Code
D41460
Country
Germany
Facility Name
University of Cambridge
City
Cambridge
ZIP/Postal Code
CB2 0QQ
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
20138357
Citation
Hovorka R, Allen JM, Elleri D, Chassin LJ, Harris J, Xing D, Kollman C, Hovorka T, Larsen AM, Nodale M, De Palma A, Wilinska ME, Acerini CL, Dunger DB. Manual closed-loop insulin delivery in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a phase 2 randomised crossover trial. Lancet. 2010 Feb 27;375(9716):743-51. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61998-X. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21493665
Citation
Hovorka R, Kumareswaran K, Harris J, Allen JM, Elleri D, Xing D, Kollman C, Nodale M, Murphy HR, Dunger DB, Amiel SA, Heller SR, Wilinska ME, Evans ML. Overnight closed loop insulin delivery (artificial pancreas) in adults with type 1 diabetes: crossover randomised controlled studies. BMJ. 2011 Apr 13;342:d1855. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1855.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21343892
Citation
Hovorka R. Closed-loop insulin delivery: from bench to clinical practice. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2011 Feb 22;7(7):385-95. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2011.32.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26379095
Citation
Thabit H, Tauschmann M, Allen JM, Leelarathna L, Hartnell S, Wilinska ME, Acerini CL, Dellweg S, Benesch C, Heinemann L, Mader JK, Holzer M, Kojzar H, Exall J, Yong J, Pichierri J, Barnard KD, Kollman C, Cheng P, Hindmarsh PC, Campbell FM, Arnolds S, Pieber TR, Evans ML, Dunger DB, Hovorka R. Home Use of an Artificial Beta Cell in Type 1 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2129-2140. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1509351. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25186158
Citation
Leelarathna L, Dellweg S, Mader JK, Barnard K, Benesch C, Ellmerer M, Heinemann L, Kojzar H, Thabit H, Wilinska ME, Wysocki T, Pieber TR, Arnolds S, Evans ML, Hovorka R; AP@home consortium. Assessing the effectiveness of 3 months day and night home closed-loop insulin delivery in adults with suboptimally controlled type 1 diabetes: a randomised crossover study protocol. BMJ Open. 2014 Sep 3;4(9):e006075. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006075.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Closing the Loop in Adults With Sub-optimally Controlled Type 1 Diabetes Under Free Living Conditions

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs