search
Back to results

A Study Of PF-06463922 An ALK/ROS1 Inhibitor In Patients With Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer With Specific Molecular Alterations

Primary Purpose

ALK-positive Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and ROS1-positive NSCLC

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
PF-06463922
Crizotinib
Sponsored by
Pfizer
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for ALK-positive Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and ROS1-positive NSCLC focused on measuring Phase 1, Phase 2, safety, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, efficacy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria

  • Evidence of histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of metastatic NSCLC (Stage IV, AJCC v7.0) that carries an ALK rearrangement, as determined by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved FISH assay (Abbott Molecular Inc) or by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) (Ventana Inc), or a ROS1 rearrangement as determined by FISH or RT PCR or Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) via a local diagnostic test (LDT). All patients (ALK positive and ROS1 positive) must have archival tissue sample available and collected prior to enrollment.
  • Disease Status Requirements:

Phase 1: ALK-positive NSCLC and ROS1-positive patients must either be treatment naïve in the advanced setting or have had disease progression after at least 1 previous ALK/ROS1 inhibitor therapy(ies).

Phase 2:

ALK-positive NSCLC patients must either be or have had:

  • Treatment naïve (ie, no prior chemotherapy in the metastatic disease setting and no prior ALK inhibitor therapy allowed).
  • Disease progression after crizotinib only. No prior chemotherapy is allowed in the metastatic disease setting.
  • Disease progression after crizotinib and 1 or 2 prior regimens of chemotherapy in the metastatic disease setting.
  • Disease progression after 1 prior ALK inhibitor therapy other than crizotinib. Patients may have had any number of prior chemotherapy regimens in any disease setting.
  • Disease progression after 2 prior ALK inhibitor therapies. Patients may have had any number of prior chemotherapy regimens in any disease setting.
  • Disease progression after 3 prior ALK inhibitor therapies. Patients may have had any number of prior chemotherapy regimens in any disease setting.

ROS1-positive NSCLC patients may be:

  • Treatment naïve (ie, no prior chemotherapy in the metastatic disease setting and no prior ROS inhibitor therapy).
  • Any number of prior therapies (ie, chemotherapy and/or ROS inhibitor therapies).

    • Tumor Requirements:

All Patients must have at least one measurable target extracranial lesion according to RECIST v1.1. In addition patients with asymptomatic CNS metastases (including patients asymptomatic by means of stable or decreasing doses of steroids within the last 2 weeks prior to study entry) will be eligible. Patients who have leptomeningeal disease (LM) or carcinomatous meningitis (CM) are eligible.

  • Adequate Bone Marrow, Pancreatic Function, Renal Function and Liver Function.
  • Negative Serum pregnancy test for females of childbearing potential Exclusion Criteria
  • Radiation therapy (except palliative to relieve bone pain) within 2 weeks of study entry. Whole brain radiation must have completed at least 4 weeks prior to study entry.
  • Systemic anti cancer therapy completed within a minimum of 5 half lives of study entry.
  • Prior therapy with an antibody or drug specifically targeting T-cell co-stimulation or immune checkpoint pathways, including, but not limited to, anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-PD-L2, anti-CD137, or anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen 4 (anti-CTLA-4) antibody.
  • Active and clinically significant bacterial, fungal, or viral infection including hepatitis B (HBV), hepatitis C (HCV), known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) related illness.
  • Clinically significant cardiovascular disease (that is, active or <3 months prior to enrollment): cerebral vascular accident/stroke, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association Classification Class ≥ II), second-degree or third-degree AV block (unless paced) or any AV block with PR >220 msec. Ongoing cardiac dysrhythmias of NCI CTCAE Grade ≥2, uncontrolled atrial fibrillation of any grade, bradycardia defined as <50 bpm (unless patient is otherwise healthy such as long-distance runners, etc.), machine-read ECG with QTc >470 msec, or congenital long QT syndrome.
  • History of extensive, disseminated, bilateral or presence of Grade 3 or 4 interstitial fibrosis or interstitial lung disease including a history of pneumonitis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, interstitial pneumonia, interstitial lung disease, obliterative bronchiolitis and pulmonary fibrosis.
  • Current use or anticipated need for food or drugs that are known strong or moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors, inducers and substrates; drugs that are CYP2C9 substrates; drugs that are sensitive CYP2B6 substrates; drugs that are strong CYP2C19 inhibitors; drugs that are strong CYP2C8 inhibitors; and drugs that are P-gp substrates.

Sites / Locations

  • Highlands Oncology Group/Research
  • Highlands Oncology Group
  • Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
  • UC Irvine Medical Center
  • University of Colorado Cancer Center
  • University of Colorado Hospital
  • MDZ: Yale-New Haven Hospital
  • Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale-New Haven
  • Georgetown University Medical Center
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • Dana Farber Cancer Institute
  • Karmanos Cancer Institute
  • Karmanos Center Institute
  • Karmanos Cancer Institute
  • Siteman Cancer Center-West County
  • Barnes-Jewish Hospital
  • Washington University School of Medicine
  • Siteman Cancer Center-South County
  • Rockefeller Patient Pavilion - Memorial Sloan Kettering
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
  • Rochester Regional Health System
  • SUNY Upstate Medical University
  • The Ohio State University
  • The Ohio State University
  • The Ohio State University
  • Fox Chase Cancer Center
  • Sarah Cannon Research Institute (Pharmacy)
  • Chris O'Brien Lifehouse
  • Chris O'Brien Lifehouse
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
  • Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
  • Royal Melbourne Hospital
  • University Hospital Antwerp
  • British Columbia Cancer Agency-Vancouver Centre
  • The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre
  • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
  • CHU Grenoble/ Hôpital Albert Michallon
  • CHU de Rennes - Hôpital Pontchaillou - CIC Inserm
  • CHU de Rennes - Hôpital Pontchaillou
  • Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse (IUCT-O)
  • Institut Gustave Roussy (comite poumon-pneumologie)
  • Institut Gustave Roussy- Pharmacie-Unite Essais Cliniques
  • Universitaetsklinik Koeln
  • Department of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital
  • Struttura Operativa Complessa Oncologia
  • Dipartimento di Oncologia Medica, UO Medicina 1Q A, Unita' Nuovi Farmaci e Terapie Innovative
  • Unita di Farmacologia Clinica e Nuovi Farmaci
  • Oncologia Medica
  • Aichi Cancer Center Hospital
  • Nagoya University Hospital
  • National Cancer Center Hospital East
  • National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center
  • Hokkaido University Hospital
  • Hyogo Cancer Center
  • Kindai University Hospital
  • Shizuoka Cancer Center
  • National Cancer Center Hospital
  • National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center
  • The Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR
  • Seoul National University Hospital / Department of Internal Medicine
  • National University Hospital
  • National University Hospital Medical Centre
  • National Cancer Center
  • National Cancer Center
  • Hospital Universitario Quiron Madrid
  • Clinica Universidad De Navarra
  • Hospital Universitario Quiron Dexeus
  • Hospital Universitari de la Vall D'Hebron Edificio General. Planta Baja. UITM. Servicio de Oncologia
  • Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV)
  • Kantonsspital Winterthur
  • National Taiwan University Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Other

Arm Label

PF-06463922

Crizotinib

Arm Description

ALK+ NSCLC patients who are treatment naïve may be eligible to receive crizotinib following PF-06463922 as a substudy to the main study.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With Cycle 1 Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) in Phase 1
DLT was defined as any of the following adverse events (AEs) attributable to PF-06463922: (1) hematologic: grade 4 neutropenia for >7 days; febrile neutropenia; grade >=3 neutropenic infection; grade >=3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding; grade 4 thrombocytopenia; (2) non-hematologic: grade >=3 pancreatitis; grade >=3 toxicities (excluding grade >=3 laboratory abnormalities not requiring dose modifications) persisting after optimal treatment with standard medical therapy; symptomatic grade >=3 QTc prolongation, or asymptomatic grade >=3 prolongation that had been confirmed by repeat testing and re-evaluation by a qualified person, and persisted after correction of reversible causes; >=20% decrease from baseline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF); (3) other: failure to deliver at least 16 out of the 21 prescribed daily total doses due to toxicities attributable to study drug; failure to restart dosing after 21 days (1 cycle) delay due to toxicities attributable to study drug.
Percentage of Participants With Overall and Intracranial Objective Response (Phase 2)
Objective response (OR) refers to confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) version 1.1. Intracranial OR refers to confirmed CR or PR considering only lesions within brain. Results presented here were based on independent central review.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants With Overall and Intracranial Objective Response (Phase 1)
Objective response (OR) refers to confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) version 1.1. Intracranial OR refers to confirmed CR or PR considering only lesions within brain. Results presented here were based on independent central review.
Time to Tumor Response (TTR) and Intracranial TTR (Phase 1)
Time to tumor response (TTR) was defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment to the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR). For participants whose objective response proceeded from PR to CR, the onset of PR was taken as the onset of response. TTR was only calculated for the subgroup of participants with a confirmed objective tumor response. Intracranial TTR was only calculated for participants with confirmed intracranial objective response. Results presented here were based on independent central review.
Duration of Response (DOR) and Intracranial DOR (Phase 1)
Duration of Response (DOR) was defined as the time from the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of disease progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. DOR was only calculated for the subgroup of participants with a confirmed objective tumor response. Intracranial DOR was only calculated for participants with confirmed intracranial objective response. Results presented here were based on independent central review.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Disease Control and Intracranial Disease Control at 12 Weeks (Phase 1)
Tumor response was evaluated according to RECIST version 1.1, and disease control was defined as confirmed complete response (CR), confirmed partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD). Intracranial assessment was only performed for participants CNS metastases. Results presented here were based on independent central review.
Probability of First Event Being a Central Nervous System (CNS) Progression, Non CNS Progression, or Death (Phase 1)
The probability of the first event being a CNS progression, a non-CNS progression, or death was evaluated with a competing risk approach by estimating cumulative incidence functions (range: 0-1) relative to the analysis set. The time to first event being a Competing Event (either "CNS progression" or "non CNS progression" or "Death") was defined as time from first dose until the date of that specific event. Participants not known to have any of the Competing Events were censored on the date they were last assessed for disease status for PFS. Participants who presented one type of event were counted as a competing cause of failure for the analysis of other type of events. For each type of event, the cumulative incidence function corresponding to the nearest time point preceding 1 year is presented. The results are based on independent central review.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) (Phase 1)
PFS was defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment to the first documentation of objective disease progression or to death on study due to any cause, whichever came first. Results presented here were based on independent central review.
Overall Survival (OS) (Phase 1)
OS was defined as the time from first dose to the date of death due to any cause. For participants still alive at the time of analysis, the OS time was censored on the last date the participants were known to be alive. Estimates of OS and its 95% confidence interval were determined using Kaplan-Meier method.
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of PF-06463922 Following Single Oral Doses (Phase 1)
Maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) of PF-06463922 was observed directly from data.
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of PF-06463922 Following Multiple Oral Doses (Phase 1)
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of PF-06463922 was observed directly from data.
Time for Cmax (Tmax) of PF-06463922 Following Single Oral Doses (Phase 1)
Tmax of PF-06463922 was observed directly from data as time of first occurrence.
Time for Cmax (Tmax) of PF-06463922 Following Multiple Oral Doses (Phase 1)
Tmax of PF-06463922 was observed directly from data as time of first occurrence.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero to Time Tau (AUCtau) of PF-06463922 Following Single Oral Doses (Phase 1)
Tau refers to the dosing interval, and it equals to 12 or 24 hours for BID or QD dosing, respectively. AUCtau was determined using linear/log trapezoidal method.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero to Time Tau (AUCtau) of PF-06463922 Following Multiple Oral Doses (Phase 1)
Tau refers to the dosing interval, and it equals to 12 or 24 hours for BID or QD dosing, respectively. AUCtau was determined using linear/log trapezoidal method.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of PF-06463922 Following Single Oral Doses (Phase 1)
AUCinf was calculated as AUClast + (Clast*/kel), where AUClast was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration, Clast* was the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point estimated from the log-linear regression analysis, and kel was the rate constant for terminal phase.
Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of PF-06463922 Following Single Oral Doses (Phase 1)
Clearance of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. CL/F was calculated as dose/AUCinf, where AUCinf was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time.
Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of PF-06463922 Following Multiple Oral Doses (Phase 1)
Clearance of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. CL/F was calculated as dose/AUCinf, where AUCinf was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time.
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of PF-06463922 Following Single Oral Doses (Phase 1)
Vz/F was defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug, and calculated as dose/(AUCinf*kel), where AUCinf was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time, kel was the rate constant for terminal phase.
Observed Accumulation Ratio (Rac) of PF-06463922 Following Multiple Oral Doses (Phase 1)
Rac was calculated as Day 15 AUCtau/Day -7 AUCtau or Day 1 AUCtau, where AUCtau was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (12 and 24 hours for BID and QD dosing regimen, respectively).
Terminal Half-Life of PF-06463922 Following Single Oral Doses (Phase 1)
Terminal plasma half-life was defined as the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half, and calculated as loge(2)/kel, where kel was the rate constant for terminal phase.
Steady State Accumulation Ratio (Rss) of PF-06463922 Following Multiple Oral Doses (Phase 1)
Rss was calculated as Day 15 AUCtau/Day -7 AUCinf, where AUCtau was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (12 and 24 hours for BID and QD dosing regimen, respectively), and AUCinf was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time.
Renal Clearance (CLr) of PF-06463922 (Phase 1)
Renal clearance was calculated as Aetau/AUCtau, where Aetau was the cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine up to dosing interval tau (24 hours for QD dosing regimen), and AUCtau was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (24 hours for QD dosing regimen).
Percent of PF-06463922 Recovered Unchanged in Urine up to Dosing Interval (AEtau%) (Phase 1)
Dosing interval was 24 hours for QD dosing regimen. Aetau% was calculated as 100*Ae24/dose, where Ae24 was the cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine up to 24 hours post-dose.
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Midazolam (Phase 1)
Cmax of midazolam was observed directly from data. Only participants in 25 mg and 150 mg QD groups were given midazolam. Day -7 data reflected the PK assessment before administration of PF-06463922, and Cycle 1 Day 15 data reflected the PK assessment after multiple doses of PF-06463922 were administered.
Time for Cmax (Tmax) of Midazolam (Phase 1)
Tmax of midazolam was observed directly from data as time of first occurrence. Only participants in 25 mg and 150 mg QD groups were given midazolam. Day -7 data reflect the PK assessment before administration of PF-06463922, and Cycle 1 Day 15 data reflect the PK assessment after multiple doses of PF-06463922 were administered.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Midazolam (Phase 1)
Area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) of midazolam was determined using linear/log trapezoidal method. Only participants in 25 mg and 150 mg QD groups were given midazolam. Day -7 data reflect the PK assessment before administration of PF-06463922, and Cycle 1 Day 15 data reflect the PK assessment after multiple doses of PF-06463922 were administered.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Midazolam (Phase 1)
AUCinf was calculated as AUClast + (Clast*/kel), where AUClast was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration, Clast* was the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point estimated from the log-linear regression analysis, and kel was the rate constant for terminal phase. Only participants in 25 mg and 150 mg QD groups were given midazolam. Day -7 data reflect the PK assessment before administration of PF-06463922, and Cycle 1 Day 15 data reflect the PK assessment after multiple doses of PF-06463922 were administered.
Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of Midazolam (Phase 1)
Clearance of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. CL/F was calculated as dose/AUCinf, where AUCinf was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time. Only participants in 25 mg and 150 mg QD groups were given midazolam. Day -7 data reflect the PK assessment before administration of PF-06463922, and Cycle 1 Day 15 data reflect the PK assessment after multiple doses of PF-06463922 were administered.
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of Midazolam (Phase 1)
Vz/F was defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug, and calculated as dose/(AUCinf*kel), where AUCinf was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time, kel was the rate constant for terminal phase. Only participants in 25 mg and 150 mg QD groups were given midazolam. Day -7 data reflect the PK assessment before administration of PF-06463922, and Cycle 1 Day 15 data reflect the PK assessment after multiple doses of PF-06463922 were administered.
Terminal Half-Life of Midazolam (Phase 1)
Terminal plasma half-life was defined as the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half, and calculated as loge(2)/kel, where kel was the rate constant for terminal phase. Only participants in 25 mg and 150 mg QD groups were given midazolam. Day -7 data reflect the PK assessment before administration of PF-06463922, and Cycle 1 Day 15 data reflect the PK assessment after multiple doses of PF-06463922 were administered.
Number of Participants With ALK Mutation Based on Plasma CNA Analysis (Phase 1)
Plasma circulating nucleic acid (CNA) samples were analyzed for ALK kinase domain mutations by digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) BEAMing technology. Number of participants with one or more ALK mutations is presented.
Number of Participants With ALK Mutation Based on Tumor Tissue Analysis (Phase 1)
Tumor tissues from archived tissue specimens and/or a de novo biopsy were analyzed for ALK kinase domain mutations. Number of participants with one or more ALK mutations is presented.
Number of Participants Who Improved, Worsened or Remained Stable in EORTC QLQ-C30 (Phase 1)
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionaires (EORTC QLQ)-C30 (version 3.0) consists of 30 questions assessing 5 functional domains (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social), global quality of life (QoL), disease/treatment related symptoms (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation and diarrhoea), and the perceived financial impact of disease. Each scale was transformed to a range of 0 to 100 using standard EORTC algorithm. For global QoL and functional scales, higher score indicate better performance, and improvement was defined as an increase of at least 10 points, worsening was defined as a decrease of at least 10 points. For symptom scales, higher score indicates worse symptoms, and improvement was defined as a decrease of at least 10 points, worsening was defined as an increase of at least 10 points. All scales which had not improved nor worsened were considered stable.
Number of Participants Who Improved, Worsened or Remained Stable in EORTC QLQ-LC13 (Phase 1)
EORTC QLQ-LC13 is the lung cancer module of EORTC QLQ-C30 and includes questions specific to the disease associated symptoms (dyspnea, cough, hemoptysis, and site specific pain), treatment-related symptoms (sore mouth, dysphagia, neuropathy and alopecia), and analgesic use of lung cancer patients. The scale was transformed to a range of 0 to 100 using standard EORTC algorithm. Higher score indicates worse symptoms, and improvement was defined as a decrease of at least 10 points, worsening was defined as an increase of at least 10 points. All scales which had not improved nor worsened were considered stable.
Change From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score (Phase 1)
In Phase 1, the MMSE was collected to assess mental status. The MMSE is a 30 item questionnaire that tests 5 areas of cognitive function: orientation, registration, attention and calculation, recall and language. The maximum score is 30. A score of 23 or lower is indicative of cognitive impairment. The MMSE was removed under Amendment 6 of the study protocol, and not required for Phase 2, as the tool was not considered meaningful for assessment of cognitive function.
Time to Tumor Response (TTR) and Intracranial TTR (Phase 2)
Time to tumor response (TTR) was defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment to the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR). For participants whose objective response proceeded from PR to CR, the onset of PR was taken as the onset of response. TTR was only calculated for the subgroup of participants with a confirmed objective tumor response. Intracranial TTR was only calculated for participants with confirmed intracranial objective response. Results presented here were based on independent central review.
Duration of Response (DOR) and Intracranial DOR (Phase 2)
Duration of Response (DOR) was defined as the time from the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of disease progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. DOR was only calculated for the subgroup of participants with a confirmed objective tumor response. Intracranial DOR was only calculated for participants with confirmed intracranial objective response. Results presented here were based on independent central review.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Disease Control and Intracranial Disease Control at 12 Weeks (Phase 2)
Tumor response was evaluated according to RECIST version 1.1, and disease control was defined as confirmed complete response (CR), confirmed partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD). Intracranial assessment was only performed for participants CNS metastases. Results presented here were based on independent central review.
Time to Progression (TTP) on the Last Prior Therapy (Phase 2)
TTP on the last prior therapy was defined as time from the first dose date of the last prior treatment regimen to the date of progression.
Time to Tumor Progression (TTP) and Intracranial TTP (Phase 2)
Time to progression (TTP) was defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment to the first documentation of objective disease progression. Intracranial TTP was defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documentation of objective progression of intracranial disease, based on either new brain metastases or progression of existing brain metastases. Results presented here were based on independent central review.
Probability of First Event Being a Central Nervous System (CNS) Progression, Non CNS Progression, or Death (Phase 2)
The probability of the first event being a CNS progression, a non-CNS progression, or death was evaluated with a competing risk approach by estimating cumulative incidence functions (range: 0-1) relative to the analysis set. The time to first event being a Competing Event (either "CNS progression" or "non CNS progression" or "Death") was defined as time from first dose until the date of that specific event. Participants not known to have any of the Competing Events were censored on the date they were last assessed for disease status for PFS. Participants who presented one type of event were counted as a competing cause of failure for the analysis of other type of events. For each type of event, the cumulative incidence function corresponding to the nearest time point preceding 1 year is presented. The results are based on independent central review.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) (Phase 2)
PFS was defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment to the first documentation of objective disease progression or to death on study due to any cause, whichever came first. Results presented here were based on independent central review.
Overall Survival (Phase 2)
OS was defined as the time from first dose to the date of death due to any cause. For participants still alive at the time of analysis, the OS time was censored on the last date the participants were known to be alive. Estimates of OS and its 95% confidence interval were determined using Kaplan-Meier method.
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of PF-06463922 (Phase 2)
Maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) of PF-06463922 was observed directly from data.
Time for Cmax (Tmax) of PF-06463922 (Phase 2)
Tmax of PF-06463922 was observed directly from data as time of first occurrence.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of PF-06463922 (Phase 2)
AUCinf was calculated as AUClast + (Clast*/kel), where AUClast was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration, Clast* was the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point estimated from the log-linear regression analysis, and kel was the rate constant for terminal phase.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero to Time Tau (AUCtau) of PF-06463922 (Phase 2)
Tau refers to the dosing interval, and it equals to 24 hours for QD dosing which was adopted in Phase 2. AUCtau was determined using linear/log trapezoidal method.
Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of PF-06463922 (Phase 2)
Clearance of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. CL/F was calculated as dose/AUCinf, where AUCinf was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time.
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of PF-06463922 (Phase 2)
Vz/F was defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug, and calculated as dose/(AUCinf*kel), where AUCinf was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time, kel was the rate constant for terminal phase.
Terminal Half-Life of PF-06463922 (Phase 2)
Terminal plasma half-life was defined as the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half, and calculated as loge(2)/kel, where kel was the rate constant for terminal phase.
Observed Accumulation Ratio (Rac) of PF-06463922 Following Multiple Oral Doses (Phase 2)
Rac was calculated as Day 15 AUCtau/Day -7 AUCtau, where AUCtau was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (24 hours for QD dosing regimen which was adopted in Phase 2).
Steady State Accumulation Ratio (Rss) of PF-06463922 Following Multiple Oral Doses (Phase 2)
Rss was calculated as Day 15 AUCtau/Day -7 AUCinf, where AUCtau was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (24 hours for QD dosing regimen which was adopted in Phase 2), and AUCinf was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time.
Number of Participants With ALK Mutation Based on Plasma CNA Analysis (Phase 2)
Plasma CNA samples were analyzed for ALK kinase domain mutations by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). Number of participants with one or more ALK mutations is presented.
Number of Participants With ALK Mutation Based on Tumor Tissue Analysis (Phase 2)
Tumor tissues from archived tissue specimens and/or a de novo biopsy were analyzed for ALK kinase domain mutations. Number of participants with one or more ALK mutations is presented.
Number of Participants Who Improved, Worsened or Remained Stable in EORTC QLQ-C30 (Phase 2)
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionaires (EORTC QLQ)-C30 (version 3.0) consists of 30 questions assessing 5 functional domains (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social), global quality of life (QoL), disease/treatment related symptoms (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation and diarrhoea), and the perceived financial impact of disease. Each scale was transformed to a range of 0 to 100 using standard EORTC algorithm. For global QoL and functional scales, higher score indicate better performance, and improvement was defined as an increase of at least 10 points, worsening was defined as a decrease of at least 10 points. For symptom scales, higher score indicates worse symptoms, and improvement was defined as a decrease of at least 10 points, worsening was defined as an increase of at least 10 points. All scales which had not improved nor worsened were considered stable.
Number of Participants Who Improved, Worsened or Remained Stable in EORTC QLQ-LC13 (Phase 2)
EORTC QLQ-LC13 is the lung cancer module of EORTC QLQ-C30 and includes questions specific to the disease associated symptoms (dyspnea, cough, hemoptysis, and site specific pain), treatment-related symptoms (sore mouth, dysphagia, neuropathy and alopecia), and analgesic use of lung cancer patients. The scale was transformed to a range of 0 to 100 using standard EORTC algorithm. Higher score indicates worse symptoms, and improvement was defined as a decrease of at least 10 points, worsening was defined as an increase of at least 10 points. All scales which had not improved nor worsened were considered stable.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (Phase 1 and Phase 2)
AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device, regardless of the causal relationship to study treatment. Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs which occurred for the first time during the effective duration of treatment or AEs that increased in severity during treatment. Serious AEs (SAEs) were defined as any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life-threatening (immediate risk of death); required inpatient hospitalization or caused prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduction normal life functions). AEs included SAEs and non-serious AEs. Causality to study treatment was determined by the investigator. Severity was graded according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities (Phase 1 and Phase 2) - Hematology
Hematology evaluation included hemoglobin, platelets, white blood cell, absolute neutrophils, absolute lymphocytes, absolute monocytes, absolute eosinophils and absolute basophils.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities (Phase 1 and Phase 2) - Chemistry
Chemistry evaluation included alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase, sodium, potassium, magnesium, chloride, total calcium, total bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) or urea, creatinine, uric acid, glucose (non-fasted), albumin, phosphorus or phosphate, serum total amylase and serum lipase.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities (Phase 1 and Phase 2) - Coagulation, Lipids and Urinalysis
Coagulation evaluation included activated partial thromboplastin time, international normalized ratio (INR), and prothrombin time. Lipid evaluation included total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL), high density lipoprotein (HDL) and triglycerides. Urinalysis included urine protein and urine blood.
Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Meeting Pre-defined Criteria (Phase 1 and Phase 2)
Blood pressure (BP), including systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP), and pulse rate were recorded in sitting position. Body weight was also measured.
Number of Participants With Maximum Decrease From Baseline Greater Than or Equal to 20 Percent in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) (Phase 1 and Phase 2)
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) was determined by electrocardiogram (ECG) measurement. Baseline was defined as the measurement prior to the first dose of study treatment.
Number of Participants With Absolute Values and Change From Baseline in QTcF Meeting Pre-defined Criteria (Phase 1 and Phase 2)
Triplicate 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) were performed approximately 2 minutes apart to determine mean QTc interval (QT interval corrected for heart rate). QT interval was corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula to provide QTcF. Absolute values and changes from baseline were summarized according to pre-defined criteria. Baseline was defined as the last evaluation on or prior to the first dose of study treatment.
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation and Suicidal Behavior (Phase 2)
The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) was used to analyze participants' suicidal ideation and behavior, and it is a unique, simple and short method of assessing both behavior and ideation that tracks all suicidal events and provides a summary of suicidality. It assesses the lethality of attempts and other features of ideation (frequency, duration, controllability, reasons for ideation and deterrents), all of which are significantly predictive of completed suicide.
Change From Baseline in Total Scores for Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)-II (Mood Assessment) (Phase 2)
The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)-II is a 21-item self-report scale, with each item rated by participants on a 4-point scale (ranging from 0-3). The scale includes items capturing mood, (loss of pleasure, sadness, and irritability), suicidal ideation, and cognitive signs (punitive thoughts, self-criticism, self-dislike, pessimism, and poor concentration) as well as somatic signs (appetite, sleep, fatigue and libido). Scores were obtained by adding up the total points from the series of answers. Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms. The standardized cutoffs are as follows: 0-13: minimal depression; 14-19: mild depression; 20-28: moderate depression; 29-63: severe depression.
Change From Baseline in Total Scores for Detection Test (Cognitive Function Assessment) (Phase 2)
The Detection Test is a measure of psychomotor function and uses a well validated simple reaction time paradigm with playing card stimuli. In this test, the on-screen instructions ask: "Has the card turned over?". A playing card is presented face down in the center of the screen. The card flips over so it is face up. As soon as the card flips over the participant must press "Yes". The participant is encouraged to work as quickly as they can and be as accurate as possible. The speed and accuracy of each response are recorded and mean of the log10 transformed reaction times for correct responses is calculated. Lower values of least square mean change from baseline indicate performance decline. Upper limit of 95% confidence interval of -0.00 or lower indicate statistically significant decline of performance over baseline at that cycle.
Change From Baseline in Total Scores for Identification Test (Cognitive Function Assessment) (Phase 2)
The Identification Test is a measure of visual attention and uses a well validated choice reaction time paradigm with playing card stimuli. In this task, the playing cards are all red or black jokers. The on-screen instructions ask: "Is the card red?". A playing card is presented face down in the center of the screen. The card flips over so it is face up. As soon as it flips over the participant must decide whether the card is red or not. If it is red the participant should press "Yes", and if it is not red the participant should press "No". The participant is encouraged to work as quickly and accurately as possible. The speed and accuracy of each response are recorded and mean of the log10 transformed reaction times for correct responses is calculated. Lower values of least square mean change from baseline indicate performance decline. Upper limit of 95% confidence interval of -0.00 or lower indicate statistically significant decline of performance over baseline at that cycle.
Change From Baseline in Total Scores for One Back Test (Cognitive Function Assessment) (Phase 2)
The One Back Test is a measure of working memory and uses a well validated n back paradigm with playing cards. In this task, the on-screen instructions ask: "Is the previous card the same?". A playing card is presented in the center of the screen. The participant must decide whether the card is the same as the previous card. If it is the same the participant should press "Yes", and if not press "No". The participant is encouraged to work as quickly and accurately as possible. The speed and accuracy of each response are recorded, mean of the log10 transformed reaction times for correct responses is used to demonstrate speed of performance, and the arcsine transformation of the square root of the proportion of correct responses is used to demonstrate accuracy. Lower values of least square mean change from baseline indicate performance decline. Upper limit of 95% confidence interval of -0.00 or lower indicate statistically significant decline of performance over baseline at that cycle.
Change From Baseline in Total Scores for International Shopping List Test (Cognitive Function Assessment) (Phase 2)
The International Shopping List task is a measure of verbal learning and uses a well validated list learning paradigm administered using a computer. High frequencies, high imagery, concrete nouns (items from a shopping list) were read to the participant at the rate of one word every 2 seconds. Once all 12 words had been read, the participant was asked to recall as many of the words as quickly as possible. The words recalled by the participant were marked on the computer screen. When the participant could recall no more words, the same list was read again. The words recalled by the participant were recorded. This was then repeated a third time. Total number of correct responses on 3 consecutive trials at a single assessment was recorded. Lower values of least square mean change from baseline indicate performance decline. Upper limit of 95% confidence interval of -0.00 or lower indicate statistically significant decline of performance over baseline at that cycle.
Change From Baseline in Total Scores for International Shopping List Test-Delayed Recall (Cognitive Function Assessment) (Phase 2)
This test was performed in the same way as the International Shopping List Test, with the exception that, the delayed recall condition required the participant to recall the words from the list 15 30 minutes later without having the list read again. During the recognition condition, the qualified personnel read a shopping list item that may or may not have been on the original list and the participant had to respond either affirmatively (if the item was on the original list) or negatively (if it was not). Total number of correct responses made in remembering the word list after a delay was recorded. Lower values of least square mean change from baseline indicate performance decline. Upper limit of 95% confidence interval of -0.00 or lower indicate statistically significant decline of performance over baseline at that cycle.

Full Information

First Posted
October 16, 2013
Last Updated
June 5, 2023
Sponsor
Pfizer
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01970865
Brief Title
A Study Of PF-06463922 An ALK/ROS1 Inhibitor In Patients With Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer With Specific Molecular Alterations
Official Title
PHASE 1/2 STUDY OF PF-06463922 (AN ALK/ROS1 TYROSINE KINASE INHIBITOR) IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER HARBORING SPECIFIC MOLECULAR ALTERATIONS
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 8, 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 15, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 24, 2023 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Pfizer

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Phase 1 and 2 trial to study the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, patient reported outcomes and efficacy of PF-06463922 in ALK + advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients and ROS1+ advanced non small cell lung cancer patients .

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
ALK-positive Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and ROS1-positive NSCLC
Keywords
Phase 1, Phase 2, safety, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, efficacy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 1, Phase 2
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
334 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
PF-06463922
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Crizotinib
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
ALK+ NSCLC patients who are treatment naïve may be eligible to receive crizotinib following PF-06463922 as a substudy to the main study.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
PF-06463922
Intervention Description
Oral, starting dose 10mg once a day, dose escalation in Phase 1 until recommended Phase 2 dose determined, continuous daily dosing, cycles lasting 21 days
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Crizotinib
Other Intervention Name(s)
Xalkori
Intervention Description
Oral, starting dose of 250 mg BID continuous daily dosing every 21 days
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Cycle 1 Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) in Phase 1
Description
DLT was defined as any of the following adverse events (AEs) attributable to PF-06463922: (1) hematologic: grade 4 neutropenia for >7 days; febrile neutropenia; grade >=3 neutropenic infection; grade >=3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding; grade 4 thrombocytopenia; (2) non-hematologic: grade >=3 pancreatitis; grade >=3 toxicities (excluding grade >=3 laboratory abnormalities not requiring dose modifications) persisting after optimal treatment with standard medical therapy; symptomatic grade >=3 QTc prolongation, or asymptomatic grade >=3 prolongation that had been confirmed by repeat testing and re-evaluation by a qualified person, and persisted after correction of reversible causes; >=20% decrease from baseline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF); (3) other: failure to deliver at least 16 out of the 21 prescribed daily total doses due to toxicities attributable to study drug; failure to restart dosing after 21 days (1 cycle) delay due to toxicities attributable to study drug.
Time Frame
Cycle 1 (21 days)
Title
Percentage of Participants With Overall and Intracranial Objective Response (Phase 2)
Description
Objective response (OR) refers to confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) version 1.1. Intracranial OR refers to confirmed CR or PR considering only lesions within brain. Results presented here were based on independent central review.
Time Frame
3 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With Overall and Intracranial Objective Response (Phase 1)
Description
Objective response (OR) refers to confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) version 1.1. Intracranial OR refers to confirmed CR or PR considering only lesions within brain. Results presented here were based on independent central review.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Time to Tumor Response (TTR) and Intracranial TTR (Phase 1)
Description
Time to tumor response (TTR) was defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment to the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR). For participants whose objective response proceeded from PR to CR, the onset of PR was taken as the onset of response. TTR was only calculated for the subgroup of participants with a confirmed objective tumor response. Intracranial TTR was only calculated for participants with confirmed intracranial objective response. Results presented here were based on independent central review.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Duration of Response (DOR) and Intracranial DOR (Phase 1)
Description
Duration of Response (DOR) was defined as the time from the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of disease progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. DOR was only calculated for the subgroup of participants with a confirmed objective tumor response. Intracranial DOR was only calculated for participants with confirmed intracranial objective response. Results presented here were based on independent central review.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving Disease Control and Intracranial Disease Control at 12 Weeks (Phase 1)
Description
Tumor response was evaluated according to RECIST version 1.1, and disease control was defined as confirmed complete response (CR), confirmed partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD). Intracranial assessment was only performed for participants CNS metastases. Results presented here were based on independent central review.
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Probability of First Event Being a Central Nervous System (CNS) Progression, Non CNS Progression, or Death (Phase 1)
Description
The probability of the first event being a CNS progression, a non-CNS progression, or death was evaluated with a competing risk approach by estimating cumulative incidence functions (range: 0-1) relative to the analysis set. The time to first event being a Competing Event (either "CNS progression" or "non CNS progression" or "Death") was defined as time from first dose until the date of that specific event. Participants not known to have any of the Competing Events were censored on the date they were last assessed for disease status for PFS. Participants who presented one type of event were counted as a competing cause of failure for the analysis of other type of events. For each type of event, the cumulative incidence function corresponding to the nearest time point preceding 1 year is presented. The results are based on independent central review.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) (Phase 1)
Description
PFS was defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment to the first documentation of objective disease progression or to death on study due to any cause, whichever came first. Results presented here were based on independent central review.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Overall Survival (OS) (Phase 1)
Description
OS was defined as the time from first dose to the date of death due to any cause. For participants still alive at the time of analysis, the OS time was censored on the last date the participants were known to be alive. Estimates of OS and its 95% confidence interval were determined using Kaplan-Meier method.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of PF-06463922 Following Single Oral Doses (Phase 1)
Description
Maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) of PF-06463922 was observed directly from data.
Time Frame
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 for 25 mg QD and 150 mg QD groups; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 hours post-dose on Day -7 for all other groups.
Title
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of PF-06463922 Following Multiple Oral Doses (Phase 1)
Description
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of PF-06463922 was observed directly from data.
Time Frame
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (24-hour samples not collected for BID groups).
Title
Time for Cmax (Tmax) of PF-06463922 Following Single Oral Doses (Phase 1)
Description
Tmax of PF-06463922 was observed directly from data as time of first occurrence.
Time Frame
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 for 25 mg QD and 150 mg QD groups; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 hours post-dose on Day -7 for all other groups.
Title
Time for Cmax (Tmax) of PF-06463922 Following Multiple Oral Doses (Phase 1)
Description
Tmax of PF-06463922 was observed directly from data as time of first occurrence.
Time Frame
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (24-hour samples not collected for BID groups).
Title
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero to Time Tau (AUCtau) of PF-06463922 Following Single Oral Doses (Phase 1)
Description
Tau refers to the dosing interval, and it equals to 12 or 24 hours for BID or QD dosing, respectively. AUCtau was determined using linear/log trapezoidal method.
Time Frame
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 for 25 mg QD and 150 mg QD groups; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 24 hours post-dose on Day -7 for all other groups.
Title
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero to Time Tau (AUCtau) of PF-06463922 Following Multiple Oral Doses (Phase 1)
Description
Tau refers to the dosing interval, and it equals to 12 or 24 hours for BID or QD dosing, respectively. AUCtau was determined using linear/log trapezoidal method.
Time Frame
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (24-hour samples not collected for BID groups)
Title
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of PF-06463922 Following Single Oral Doses (Phase 1)
Description
AUCinf was calculated as AUClast + (Clast*/kel), where AUClast was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration, Clast* was the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point estimated from the log-linear regression analysis, and kel was the rate constant for terminal phase.
Time Frame
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 for 25 mg QD and 150 mg QD groups; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 hours post-dose on Day -7 for all other groups.
Title
Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of PF-06463922 Following Single Oral Doses (Phase 1)
Description
Clearance of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. CL/F was calculated as dose/AUCinf, where AUCinf was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time.
Time Frame
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 for 25 mg QD and 150 mg QD groups; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 hours post-dose on Day -7 for all other groups.
Title
Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of PF-06463922 Following Multiple Oral Doses (Phase 1)
Description
Clearance of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. CL/F was calculated as dose/AUCinf, where AUCinf was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time.
Time Frame
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (24-hour samples not collected for BID groups)
Title
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of PF-06463922 Following Single Oral Doses (Phase 1)
Description
Vz/F was defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug, and calculated as dose/(AUCinf*kel), where AUCinf was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time, kel was the rate constant for terminal phase.
Time Frame
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle1 Day 1 for 25 mg QD and 150 mg QD groups; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 hours post-dose on Day -7 for all other groups.
Title
Observed Accumulation Ratio (Rac) of PF-06463922 Following Multiple Oral Doses (Phase 1)
Description
Rac was calculated as Day 15 AUCtau/Day -7 AUCtau or Day 1 AUCtau, where AUCtau was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (12 and 24 hours for BID and QD dosing regimen, respectively).
Time Frame
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (24-hour samples not collected for BID groups)
Title
Terminal Half-Life of PF-06463922 Following Single Oral Doses (Phase 1)
Description
Terminal plasma half-life was defined as the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half, and calculated as loge(2)/kel, where kel was the rate constant for terminal phase.
Time Frame
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 for 25 mg QD and 150 mg QD groups; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 hours post-dose on Day -7 for all other groups.
Title
Steady State Accumulation Ratio (Rss) of PF-06463922 Following Multiple Oral Doses (Phase 1)
Description
Rss was calculated as Day 15 AUCtau/Day -7 AUCinf, where AUCtau was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (12 and 24 hours for BID and QD dosing regimen, respectively), and AUCinf was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time.
Time Frame
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (24-hour samples not collected for BID groups)
Title
Renal Clearance (CLr) of PF-06463922 (Phase 1)
Description
Renal clearance was calculated as Aetau/AUCtau, where Aetau was the cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine up to dosing interval tau (24 hours for QD dosing regimen), and AUCtau was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (24 hours for QD dosing regimen).
Time Frame
0-4 hours, 4-12 hours and 12-24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15
Title
Percent of PF-06463922 Recovered Unchanged in Urine up to Dosing Interval (AEtau%) (Phase 1)
Description
Dosing interval was 24 hours for QD dosing regimen. Aetau% was calculated as 100*Ae24/dose, where Ae24 was the cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine up to 24 hours post-dose.
Time Frame
0-4 hours, 4-12 hours and 12-24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15
Title
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Midazolam (Phase 1)
Description
Cmax of midazolam was observed directly from data. Only participants in 25 mg and 150 mg QD groups were given midazolam. Day -7 data reflected the PK assessment before administration of PF-06463922, and Cycle 1 Day 15 data reflected the PK assessment after multiple doses of PF-06463922 were administered.
Time Frame
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post-dose on Day -7 and pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15
Title
Time for Cmax (Tmax) of Midazolam (Phase 1)
Description
Tmax of midazolam was observed directly from data as time of first occurrence. Only participants in 25 mg and 150 mg QD groups were given midazolam. Day -7 data reflect the PK assessment before administration of PF-06463922, and Cycle 1 Day 15 data reflect the PK assessment after multiple doses of PF-06463922 were administered.
Time Frame
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post-dose on Day -7 and pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15
Title
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Midazolam (Phase 1)
Description
Area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) of midazolam was determined using linear/log trapezoidal method. Only participants in 25 mg and 150 mg QD groups were given midazolam. Day -7 data reflect the PK assessment before administration of PF-06463922, and Cycle 1 Day 15 data reflect the PK assessment after multiple doses of PF-06463922 were administered.
Time Frame
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post-dose on Day -7 and pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15
Title
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Midazolam (Phase 1)
Description
AUCinf was calculated as AUClast + (Clast*/kel), where AUClast was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration, Clast* was the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point estimated from the log-linear regression analysis, and kel was the rate constant for terminal phase. Only participants in 25 mg and 150 mg QD groups were given midazolam. Day -7 data reflect the PK assessment before administration of PF-06463922, and Cycle 1 Day 15 data reflect the PK assessment after multiple doses of PF-06463922 were administered.
Time Frame
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post-dose on Day -7 and pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15
Title
Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of Midazolam (Phase 1)
Description
Clearance of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. CL/F was calculated as dose/AUCinf, where AUCinf was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time. Only participants in 25 mg and 150 mg QD groups were given midazolam. Day -7 data reflect the PK assessment before administration of PF-06463922, and Cycle 1 Day 15 data reflect the PK assessment after multiple doses of PF-06463922 were administered.
Time Frame
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post-dose on Day -7 and pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15
Title
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of Midazolam (Phase 1)
Description
Vz/F was defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug, and calculated as dose/(AUCinf*kel), where AUCinf was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time, kel was the rate constant for terminal phase. Only participants in 25 mg and 150 mg QD groups were given midazolam. Day -7 data reflect the PK assessment before administration of PF-06463922, and Cycle 1 Day 15 data reflect the PK assessment after multiple doses of PF-06463922 were administered.
Time Frame
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post-dose on Day -7 and pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15
Title
Terminal Half-Life of Midazolam (Phase 1)
Description
Terminal plasma half-life was defined as the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half, and calculated as loge(2)/kel, where kel was the rate constant for terminal phase. Only participants in 25 mg and 150 mg QD groups were given midazolam. Day -7 data reflect the PK assessment before administration of PF-06463922, and Cycle 1 Day 15 data reflect the PK assessment after multiple doses of PF-06463922 were administered.
Time Frame
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post-dose on Day -7 and pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15
Title
Number of Participants With ALK Mutation Based on Plasma CNA Analysis (Phase 1)
Description
Plasma circulating nucleic acid (CNA) samples were analyzed for ALK kinase domain mutations by digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) BEAMing technology. Number of participants with one or more ALK mutations is presented.
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Participants With ALK Mutation Based on Tumor Tissue Analysis (Phase 1)
Description
Tumor tissues from archived tissue specimens and/or a de novo biopsy were analyzed for ALK kinase domain mutations. Number of participants with one or more ALK mutations is presented.
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Participants Who Improved, Worsened or Remained Stable in EORTC QLQ-C30 (Phase 1)
Description
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionaires (EORTC QLQ)-C30 (version 3.0) consists of 30 questions assessing 5 functional domains (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social), global quality of life (QoL), disease/treatment related symptoms (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation and diarrhoea), and the perceived financial impact of disease. Each scale was transformed to a range of 0 to 100 using standard EORTC algorithm. For global QoL and functional scales, higher score indicate better performance, and improvement was defined as an increase of at least 10 points, worsening was defined as a decrease of at least 10 points. For symptom scales, higher score indicates worse symptoms, and improvement was defined as a decrease of at least 10 points, worsening was defined as an increase of at least 10 points. All scales which had not improved nor worsened were considered stable.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2-25, Day 1 of every other cycle after Cycle 25, end of treatment (up to 3 years)
Title
Number of Participants Who Improved, Worsened or Remained Stable in EORTC QLQ-LC13 (Phase 1)
Description
EORTC QLQ-LC13 is the lung cancer module of EORTC QLQ-C30 and includes questions specific to the disease associated symptoms (dyspnea, cough, hemoptysis, and site specific pain), treatment-related symptoms (sore mouth, dysphagia, neuropathy and alopecia), and analgesic use of lung cancer patients. The scale was transformed to a range of 0 to 100 using standard EORTC algorithm. Higher score indicates worse symptoms, and improvement was defined as a decrease of at least 10 points, worsening was defined as an increase of at least 10 points. All scales which had not improved nor worsened were considered stable.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2-25, Day 1 of every other cycle after Cycle 25, end of treatment (up to 3 years)
Title
Change From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score (Phase 1)
Description
In Phase 1, the MMSE was collected to assess mental status. The MMSE is a 30 item questionnaire that tests 5 areas of cognitive function: orientation, registration, attention and calculation, recall and language. The maximum score is 30. A score of 23 or lower is indicative of cognitive impairment. The MMSE was removed under Amendment 6 of the study protocol, and not required for Phase 2, as the tool was not considered meaningful for assessment of cognitive function.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle, and end of treatment (up to 3 years)
Title
Time to Tumor Response (TTR) and Intracranial TTR (Phase 2)
Description
Time to tumor response (TTR) was defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment to the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR). For participants whose objective response proceeded from PR to CR, the onset of PR was taken as the onset of response. TTR was only calculated for the subgroup of participants with a confirmed objective tumor response. Intracranial TTR was only calculated for participants with confirmed intracranial objective response. Results presented here were based on independent central review.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Duration of Response (DOR) and Intracranial DOR (Phase 2)
Description
Duration of Response (DOR) was defined as the time from the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of disease progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. DOR was only calculated for the subgroup of participants with a confirmed objective tumor response. Intracranial DOR was only calculated for participants with confirmed intracranial objective response. Results presented here were based on independent central review.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving Disease Control and Intracranial Disease Control at 12 Weeks (Phase 2)
Description
Tumor response was evaluated according to RECIST version 1.1, and disease control was defined as confirmed complete response (CR), confirmed partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD). Intracranial assessment was only performed for participants CNS metastases. Results presented here were based on independent central review.
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Time to Progression (TTP) on the Last Prior Therapy (Phase 2)
Description
TTP on the last prior therapy was defined as time from the first dose date of the last prior treatment regimen to the date of progression.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Time to Tumor Progression (TTP) and Intracranial TTP (Phase 2)
Description
Time to progression (TTP) was defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment to the first documentation of objective disease progression. Intracranial TTP was defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documentation of objective progression of intracranial disease, based on either new brain metastases or progression of existing brain metastases. Results presented here were based on independent central review.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Probability of First Event Being a Central Nervous System (CNS) Progression, Non CNS Progression, or Death (Phase 2)
Description
The probability of the first event being a CNS progression, a non-CNS progression, or death was evaluated with a competing risk approach by estimating cumulative incidence functions (range: 0-1) relative to the analysis set. The time to first event being a Competing Event (either "CNS progression" or "non CNS progression" or "Death") was defined as time from first dose until the date of that specific event. Participants not known to have any of the Competing Events were censored on the date they were last assessed for disease status for PFS. Participants who presented one type of event were counted as a competing cause of failure for the analysis of other type of events. For each type of event, the cumulative incidence function corresponding to the nearest time point preceding 1 year is presented. The results are based on independent central review.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) (Phase 2)
Description
PFS was defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment to the first documentation of objective disease progression or to death on study due to any cause, whichever came first. Results presented here were based on independent central review.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Overall Survival (Phase 2)
Description
OS was defined as the time from first dose to the date of death due to any cause. For participants still alive at the time of analysis, the OS time was censored on the last date the participants were known to be alive. Estimates of OS and its 95% confidence interval were determined using Kaplan-Meier method.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of PF-06463922 (Phase 2)
Description
Maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) of PF-06463922 was observed directly from data.
Time Frame
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 hours post-dose on Day -7 and pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15
Title
Time for Cmax (Tmax) of PF-06463922 (Phase 2)
Description
Tmax of PF-06463922 was observed directly from data as time of first occurrence.
Time Frame
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 hours post-dose on Day -7 and pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15
Title
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of PF-06463922 (Phase 2)
Description
AUCinf was calculated as AUClast + (Clast*/kel), where AUClast was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration, Clast* was the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point estimated from the log-linear regression analysis, and kel was the rate constant for terminal phase.
Time Frame
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 hours post-dose on Day -7
Title
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero to Time Tau (AUCtau) of PF-06463922 (Phase 2)
Description
Tau refers to the dosing interval, and it equals to 24 hours for QD dosing which was adopted in Phase 2. AUCtau was determined using linear/log trapezoidal method.
Time Frame
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post-dose on Day -7 and pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15
Title
Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of PF-06463922 (Phase 2)
Description
Clearance of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. CL/F was calculated as dose/AUCinf, where AUCinf was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time.
Time Frame
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 hours post-dose on Day -7 and pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15
Title
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of PF-06463922 (Phase 2)
Description
Vz/F was defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug, and calculated as dose/(AUCinf*kel), where AUCinf was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time, kel was the rate constant for terminal phase.
Time Frame
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 hours post-dose on Day -7
Title
Terminal Half-Life of PF-06463922 (Phase 2)
Description
Terminal plasma half-life was defined as the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half, and calculated as loge(2)/kel, where kel was the rate constant for terminal phase.
Time Frame
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 hours post-dose on Day -7
Title
Observed Accumulation Ratio (Rac) of PF-06463922 Following Multiple Oral Doses (Phase 2)
Description
Rac was calculated as Day 15 AUCtau/Day -7 AUCtau, where AUCtau was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (24 hours for QD dosing regimen which was adopted in Phase 2).
Time Frame
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15
Title
Steady State Accumulation Ratio (Rss) of PF-06463922 Following Multiple Oral Doses (Phase 2)
Description
Rss was calculated as Day 15 AUCtau/Day -7 AUCinf, where AUCtau was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (24 hours for QD dosing regimen which was adopted in Phase 2), and AUCinf was the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time.
Time Frame
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15
Title
Number of Participants With ALK Mutation Based on Plasma CNA Analysis (Phase 2)
Description
Plasma CNA samples were analyzed for ALK kinase domain mutations by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). Number of participants with one or more ALK mutations is presented.
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Participants With ALK Mutation Based on Tumor Tissue Analysis (Phase 2)
Description
Tumor tissues from archived tissue specimens and/or a de novo biopsy were analyzed for ALK kinase domain mutations. Number of participants with one or more ALK mutations is presented.
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Participants Who Improved, Worsened or Remained Stable in EORTC QLQ-C30 (Phase 2)
Description
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionaires (EORTC QLQ)-C30 (version 3.0) consists of 30 questions assessing 5 functional domains (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social), global quality of life (QoL), disease/treatment related symptoms (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation and diarrhoea), and the perceived financial impact of disease. Each scale was transformed to a range of 0 to 100 using standard EORTC algorithm. For global QoL and functional scales, higher score indicate better performance, and improvement was defined as an increase of at least 10 points, worsening was defined as a decrease of at least 10 points. For symptom scales, higher score indicates worse symptoms, and improvement was defined as a decrease of at least 10 points, worsening was defined as an increase of at least 10 points. All scales which had not improved nor worsened were considered stable.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Number of Participants Who Improved, Worsened or Remained Stable in EORTC QLQ-LC13 (Phase 2)
Description
EORTC QLQ-LC13 is the lung cancer module of EORTC QLQ-C30 and includes questions specific to the disease associated symptoms (dyspnea, cough, hemoptysis, and site specific pain), treatment-related symptoms (sore mouth, dysphagia, neuropathy and alopecia), and analgesic use of lung cancer patients. The scale was transformed to a range of 0 to 100 using standard EORTC algorithm. Higher score indicates worse symptoms, and improvement was defined as a decrease of at least 10 points, worsening was defined as an increase of at least 10 points. All scales which had not improved nor worsened were considered stable.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (Phase 1 and Phase 2)
Description
AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device, regardless of the causal relationship to study treatment. Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs which occurred for the first time during the effective duration of treatment or AEs that increased in severity during treatment. Serious AEs (SAEs) were defined as any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life-threatening (immediate risk of death); required inpatient hospitalization or caused prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduction normal life functions). AEs included SAEs and non-serious AEs. Causality to study treatment was determined by the investigator. Severity was graded according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities (Phase 1 and Phase 2) - Hematology
Description
Hematology evaluation included hemoglobin, platelets, white blood cell, absolute neutrophils, absolute lymphocytes, absolute monocytes, absolute eosinophils and absolute basophils.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities (Phase 1 and Phase 2) - Chemistry
Description
Chemistry evaluation included alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase, sodium, potassium, magnesium, chloride, total calcium, total bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) or urea, creatinine, uric acid, glucose (non-fasted), albumin, phosphorus or phosphate, serum total amylase and serum lipase.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities (Phase 1 and Phase 2) - Coagulation, Lipids and Urinalysis
Description
Coagulation evaluation included activated partial thromboplastin time, international normalized ratio (INR), and prothrombin time. Lipid evaluation included total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL), high density lipoprotein (HDL) and triglycerides. Urinalysis included urine protein and urine blood.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Meeting Pre-defined Criteria (Phase 1 and Phase 2)
Description
Blood pressure (BP), including systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP), and pulse rate were recorded in sitting position. Body weight was also measured.
Time Frame
Baseline, Days 1, 8 and 15 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycles 2-25 for Phase 1 (Cycles 2-38 for Phase 2), Day 1 of every other cycle thereafter, end of treatment (up to 3 years)
Title
Number of Participants With Maximum Decrease From Baseline Greater Than or Equal to 20 Percent in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) (Phase 1 and Phase 2)
Description
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) was determined by electrocardiogram (ECG) measurement. Baseline was defined as the measurement prior to the first dose of study treatment.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2-3, Day 1 of every other cycle from Cycle 5 up to 18 months for Phase 1 (up to 30 months for Phase 2), every 4 cycles thereafter, and end of treatment (up to 3 years)
Title
Number of Participants With Absolute Values and Change From Baseline in QTcF Meeting Pre-defined Criteria (Phase 1 and Phase 2)
Description
Triplicate 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) were performed approximately 2 minutes apart to determine mean QTc interval (QT interval corrected for heart rate). QT interval was corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula to provide QTcF. Absolute values and changes from baseline were summarized according to pre-defined criteria. Baseline was defined as the last evaluation on or prior to the first dose of study treatment.
Time Frame
Phase 1: baseline, Days 1, 8 and 15 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycles 2-25, end of treatment (up to 3 years); Phase 2: baseline, Days 1, 8 and 15 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycles 2-5, end of treatment (up to 3 years)
Title
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation and Suicidal Behavior (Phase 2)
Description
The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) was used to analyze participants' suicidal ideation and behavior, and it is a unique, simple and short method of assessing both behavior and ideation that tracks all suicidal events and provides a summary of suicidality. It assesses the lethality of attempts and other features of ideation (frequency, duration, controllability, reasons for ideation and deterrents), all of which are significantly predictive of completed suicide.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Change From Baseline in Total Scores for Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)-II (Mood Assessment) (Phase 2)
Description
The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)-II is a 21-item self-report scale, with each item rated by participants on a 4-point scale (ranging from 0-3). The scale includes items capturing mood, (loss of pleasure, sadness, and irritability), suicidal ideation, and cognitive signs (punitive thoughts, self-criticism, self-dislike, pessimism, and poor concentration) as well as somatic signs (appetite, sleep, fatigue and libido). Scores were obtained by adding up the total points from the series of answers. Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms. The standardized cutoffs are as follows: 0-13: minimal depression; 14-19: mild depression; 20-28: moderate depression; 29-63: severe depression.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2-5, Day 1 of every other cycle from Cycle 6, and end of treatment (up to 3 years)
Title
Change From Baseline in Total Scores for Detection Test (Cognitive Function Assessment) (Phase 2)
Description
The Detection Test is a measure of psychomotor function and uses a well validated simple reaction time paradigm with playing card stimuli. In this test, the on-screen instructions ask: "Has the card turned over?". A playing card is presented face down in the center of the screen. The card flips over so it is face up. As soon as the card flips over the participant must press "Yes". The participant is encouraged to work as quickly as they can and be as accurate as possible. The speed and accuracy of each response are recorded and mean of the log10 transformed reaction times for correct responses is calculated. Lower values of least square mean change from baseline indicate performance decline. Upper limit of 95% confidence interval of -0.00 or lower indicate statistically significant decline of performance over baseline at that cycle.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2-5, Day 1 of every other cycle from Cycle 6, and end of treatment (up to 3 years)
Title
Change From Baseline in Total Scores for Identification Test (Cognitive Function Assessment) (Phase 2)
Description
The Identification Test is a measure of visual attention and uses a well validated choice reaction time paradigm with playing card stimuli. In this task, the playing cards are all red or black jokers. The on-screen instructions ask: "Is the card red?". A playing card is presented face down in the center of the screen. The card flips over so it is face up. As soon as it flips over the participant must decide whether the card is red or not. If it is red the participant should press "Yes", and if it is not red the participant should press "No". The participant is encouraged to work as quickly and accurately as possible. The speed and accuracy of each response are recorded and mean of the log10 transformed reaction times for correct responses is calculated. Lower values of least square mean change from baseline indicate performance decline. Upper limit of 95% confidence interval of -0.00 or lower indicate statistically significant decline of performance over baseline at that cycle.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2-5, Day 1 of every other cycle from Cycle 6, and end of treatment (up to 3 years)
Title
Change From Baseline in Total Scores for One Back Test (Cognitive Function Assessment) (Phase 2)
Description
The One Back Test is a measure of working memory and uses a well validated n back paradigm with playing cards. In this task, the on-screen instructions ask: "Is the previous card the same?". A playing card is presented in the center of the screen. The participant must decide whether the card is the same as the previous card. If it is the same the participant should press "Yes", and if not press "No". The participant is encouraged to work as quickly and accurately as possible. The speed and accuracy of each response are recorded, mean of the log10 transformed reaction times for correct responses is used to demonstrate speed of performance, and the arcsine transformation of the square root of the proportion of correct responses is used to demonstrate accuracy. Lower values of least square mean change from baseline indicate performance decline. Upper limit of 95% confidence interval of -0.00 or lower indicate statistically significant decline of performance over baseline at that cycle.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2-5, Day 1 of every other cycle from Cycle 6, and end of treatment (up to 3 years)
Title
Change From Baseline in Total Scores for International Shopping List Test (Cognitive Function Assessment) (Phase 2)
Description
The International Shopping List task is a measure of verbal learning and uses a well validated list learning paradigm administered using a computer. High frequencies, high imagery, concrete nouns (items from a shopping list) were read to the participant at the rate of one word every 2 seconds. Once all 12 words had been read, the participant was asked to recall as many of the words as quickly as possible. The words recalled by the participant were marked on the computer screen. When the participant could recall no more words, the same list was read again. The words recalled by the participant were recorded. This was then repeated a third time. Total number of correct responses on 3 consecutive trials at a single assessment was recorded. Lower values of least square mean change from baseline indicate performance decline. Upper limit of 95% confidence interval of -0.00 or lower indicate statistically significant decline of performance over baseline at that cycle.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2-5, Day 1 of every other cycle from Cycle 6, and end of treatment (up to 3 years)
Title
Change From Baseline in Total Scores for International Shopping List Test-Delayed Recall (Cognitive Function Assessment) (Phase 2)
Description
This test was performed in the same way as the International Shopping List Test, with the exception that, the delayed recall condition required the participant to recall the words from the list 15 30 minutes later without having the list read again. During the recognition condition, the qualified personnel read a shopping list item that may or may not have been on the original list and the participant had to respond either affirmatively (if the item was on the original list) or negatively (if it was not). Total number of correct responses made in remembering the word list after a delay was recorded. Lower values of least square mean change from baseline indicate performance decline. Upper limit of 95% confidence interval of -0.00 or lower indicate statistically significant decline of performance over baseline at that cycle.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2-5, Day 1 of every other cycle from Cycle 6, and end of treatment (up to 3 years)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria Evidence of histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of metastatic NSCLC (Stage IV, AJCC v7.0) that carries an ALK rearrangement, as determined by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved FISH assay (Abbott Molecular Inc) or by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) (Ventana Inc), or a ROS1 rearrangement as determined by FISH or RT PCR or Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) via a local diagnostic test (LDT). All patients (ALK positive and ROS1 positive) must have archival tissue sample available and collected prior to enrollment. Disease Status Requirements: Phase 1: ALK-positive NSCLC and ROS1-positive patients must either be treatment naïve in the advanced setting or have had disease progression after at least 1 previous ALK/ROS1 inhibitor therapy(ies). Phase 2: ALK-positive NSCLC patients must either be or have had: Treatment naïve (ie, no prior chemotherapy in the metastatic disease setting and no prior ALK inhibitor therapy allowed). Disease progression after crizotinib only. No prior chemotherapy is allowed in the metastatic disease setting. Disease progression after crizotinib and 1 or 2 prior regimens of chemotherapy in the metastatic disease setting. Disease progression after 1 prior ALK inhibitor therapy other than crizotinib. Patients may have had any number of prior chemotherapy regimens in any disease setting. Disease progression after 2 prior ALK inhibitor therapies. Patients may have had any number of prior chemotherapy regimens in any disease setting. Disease progression after 3 prior ALK inhibitor therapies. Patients may have had any number of prior chemotherapy regimens in any disease setting. ROS1-positive NSCLC patients may be: Treatment naïve (ie, no prior chemotherapy in the metastatic disease setting and no prior ROS inhibitor therapy). Any number of prior therapies (ie, chemotherapy and/or ROS inhibitor therapies). Tumor Requirements: All Patients must have at least one measurable target extracranial lesion according to RECIST v1.1. In addition patients with asymptomatic CNS metastases (including patients asymptomatic by means of stable or decreasing doses of steroids within the last 2 weeks prior to study entry) will be eligible. Patients who have leptomeningeal disease (LM) or carcinomatous meningitis (CM) are eligible. Adequate Bone Marrow, Pancreatic Function, Renal Function and Liver Function. Negative Serum pregnancy test for females of childbearing potential Exclusion Criteria Radiation therapy (except palliative to relieve bone pain) within 2 weeks of study entry. Whole brain radiation must have completed at least 4 weeks prior to study entry. Systemic anti cancer therapy completed within a minimum of 5 half lives of study entry. Prior therapy with an antibody or drug specifically targeting T-cell co-stimulation or immune checkpoint pathways, including, but not limited to, anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-PD-L2, anti-CD137, or anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen 4 (anti-CTLA-4) antibody. Active and clinically significant bacterial, fungal, or viral infection including hepatitis B (HBV), hepatitis C (HCV), known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) related illness. Clinically significant cardiovascular disease (that is, active or <3 months prior to enrollment): cerebral vascular accident/stroke, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association Classification Class ≥ II), second-degree or third-degree AV block (unless paced) or any AV block with PR >220 msec. Ongoing cardiac dysrhythmias of NCI CTCAE Grade ≥2, uncontrolled atrial fibrillation of any grade, bradycardia defined as <50 bpm (unless patient is otherwise healthy such as long-distance runners, etc.), machine-read ECG with QTc >470 msec, or congenital long QT syndrome. History of extensive, disseminated, bilateral or presence of Grade 3 or 4 interstitial fibrosis or interstitial lung disease including a history of pneumonitis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, interstitial pneumonia, interstitial lung disease, obliterative bronchiolitis and pulmonary fibrosis. Current use or anticipated need for food or drugs that are known strong or moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors, inducers and substrates; drugs that are CYP2C9 substrates; drugs that are sensitive CYP2B6 substrates; drugs that are strong CYP2C19 inhibitors; drugs that are strong CYP2C8 inhibitors; and drugs that are P-gp substrates.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Organizational Affiliation
Pfizer
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Highlands Oncology Group/Research
City
Fayetteville
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72703
Country
United States
Facility Name
Highlands Oncology Group
City
Rogers
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72758
Country
United States
Facility Name
Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
City
Orange
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92868-3201
Country
United States
Facility Name
UC Irvine Medical Center
City
Orange
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92868-3201
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Colorado Cancer Center
City
Aurora
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80045
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Colorado Hospital
City
Aurora
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80045
Country
United States
Facility Name
MDZ: Yale-New Haven Hospital
City
New Haven
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06504
Country
United States
Facility Name
Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale-New Haven
City
New Haven
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06510
Country
United States
Facility Name
Georgetown University Medical Center
City
Washington
State/Province
District of Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
20007
Country
United States
Facility Name
Massachusetts General Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Brigham and Women's Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02115
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dana Farber Cancer Institute
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02215
Country
United States
Facility Name
Karmanos Cancer Institute
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Karmanos Center Institute
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Karmanos Cancer Institute
City
Farmington Hills
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48334
Country
United States
Facility Name
Siteman Cancer Center-West County
City
Creve Coeur
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63141
Country
United States
Facility Name
Barnes-Jewish Hospital
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Facility Name
Washington University School of Medicine
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Facility Name
Siteman Cancer Center-South County
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63129
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rockefeller Patient Pavilion - Memorial Sloan Kettering
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10022
Country
United States
Facility Name
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10065
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rochester Regional Health System
City
Rochester
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14621
Country
United States
Facility Name
SUNY Upstate Medical University
City
Syracuse
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
13210
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Ohio State University
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43205
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Ohio State University
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43210
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Ohio State University
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43221
Country
United States
Facility Name
Fox Chase Cancer Center
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19111
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sarah Cannon Research Institute (Pharmacy)
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37203
Country
United States
Facility Name
Chris O'Brien Lifehouse
City
Sydney Local Health District [rpa]
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2050
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Chris O'Brien Lifehouse
City
Sydney
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2050
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
City
Sydney
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2050
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
City
Melbourne
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3000
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Royal Melbourne Hospital
City
Parkville
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3050
Country
Australia
Facility Name
University Hospital Antwerp
City
Edegem
ZIP/Postal Code
2650
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
British Columbia Cancer Agency-Vancouver Centre
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V5Z 4E6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K1H 8L6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5G 2M9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
CHU Grenoble/ Hôpital Albert Michallon
City
Grenoble Cedex 9
ZIP/Postal Code
38043
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU de Rennes - Hôpital Pontchaillou - CIC Inserm
City
Rennes Cedex 9
ZIP/Postal Code
35033
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU de Rennes - Hôpital Pontchaillou
City
Rennes Cedex 9
ZIP/Postal Code
35033
Country
France
Facility Name
Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse (IUCT-O)
City
Toulouse Cedex 9
ZIP/Postal Code
31059
Country
France
Facility Name
Institut Gustave Roussy (comite poumon-pneumologie)
City
Villejuif Cedex
ZIP/Postal Code
94805
Country
France
Facility Name
Institut Gustave Roussy- Pharmacie-Unite Essais Cliniques
City
Villejuif
ZIP/Postal Code
94805
Country
France
Facility Name
Universitaetsklinik Koeln
City
Cologne
ZIP/Postal Code
50937
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Department of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital
City
Shatin
Country
Hong Kong
Facility Name
Struttura Operativa Complessa Oncologia
City
Aviano (PN)
ZIP/Postal Code
33081
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Dipartimento di Oncologia Medica, UO Medicina 1Q A, Unita' Nuovi Farmaci e Terapie Innovative
City
Milano
ZIP/Postal Code
20132
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Unita di Farmacologia Clinica e Nuovi Farmaci
City
Milano
ZIP/Postal Code
20141
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Oncologia Medica
City
Perugia
ZIP/Postal Code
06132
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Aichi Cancer Center Hospital
City
Nagoya
State/Province
Aichi
ZIP/Postal Code
464-8681
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Nagoya University Hospital
City
Nagoya
State/Province
Aichi
ZIP/Postal Code
466-8560
Country
Japan
Facility Name
National Cancer Center Hospital East
City
Kashiwa
State/Province
Chiba
ZIP/Postal Code
277-8577
Country
Japan
Facility Name
National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center
City
Matsuyama
State/Province
Ehime
ZIP/Postal Code
791-0280
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Hokkaido University Hospital
City
Sapporo
State/Province
Hokkaido
ZIP/Postal Code
060-8648
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Hyogo Cancer Center
City
Akashi
State/Province
Hyogo
ZIP/Postal Code
673-8558
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Kindai University Hospital
City
Osakasayama
State/Province
Osaka
ZIP/Postal Code
589-8511
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Shizuoka Cancer Center
City
Sunto-gun
State/Province
Shizuoka
ZIP/Postal Code
411-8777
Country
Japan
Facility Name
National Cancer Center Hospital
City
Chuo-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
104-0045
Country
Japan
Facility Name
National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center
City
Fukuoka
ZIP/Postal Code
811-1395
Country
Japan
Facility Name
The Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR
City
Koto-ku, Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
135-8550
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Seoul National University Hospital / Department of Internal Medicine
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
03080
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
National University Hospital
City
Singapore
ZIP/Postal Code
119074
Country
Singapore
Facility Name
National University Hospital Medical Centre
City
Singapore
ZIP/Postal Code
119082
Country
Singapore
Facility Name
National Cancer Center
City
Singapore
ZIP/Postal Code
168583
Country
Singapore
Facility Name
National Cancer Center
City
Singapore
ZIP/Postal Code
169610
Country
Singapore
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Quiron Madrid
City
Pozuelo de Alarcón
State/Province
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28223
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Clinica Universidad De Navarra
City
Pamplona
State/Province
Navarra
ZIP/Postal Code
31008
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Quiron Dexeus
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08028
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitari de la Vall D'Hebron Edificio General. Planta Baja. UITM. Servicio de Oncologia
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08035
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV)
City
Lausanne
ZIP/Postal Code
1011
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
Kantonsspital Winterthur
City
Winterthur
ZIP/Postal Code
8401
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
National Taiwan University Hospital
City
Taipei
ZIP/Postal Code
100
Country
Taiwan

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
IPD Sharing URL
https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35660971
Citation
Soo RA, Huat Tan E, Hayashi H, Seto T, Lin CC, Ou SI, Kim DW, Liu G, Abbattista A, Martini JF, Hooi Wong C, Toffalorio F, Solomon BJ. Efficacy and safety of lorlatinib in Asian and non-Asian patients with ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Subgroup analysis of a global phase 2 trial. Lung Cancer. 2022 Jul;169:67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.05.012. Epub 2022 May 23.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
35026476
Citation
Ou SI, Solomon BJ, Shaw AT, Gadgeel SM, Besse B, Soo RA, Abbattista A, Toffalorio F, Wiltshire R, Bearz A. Continuation of Lorlatinib in ALK-Positive NSCLC Beyond Progressive Disease. J Thorac Oncol. 2022 Apr;17(4):568-577. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.12.011. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33973232
Citation
Chen J, Ruiz-Garcia A, James LP, Peltz G, Thurm H, Clancy J, Hibma J. Lorlatinib Exposure-Response Analyses for Safety and Efficacy in a Phase I/II Trial to Support Benefit-Risk Assessment in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Nov;110(5):1273-1281. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2228. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33937954
Citation
Chen J, O'Gorman MT, James LP, Klamerus KJ, Mugundu G, Pithavala YK. Pharmacokinetics of Lorlatinib After Single and Multiple Dosing in Patients with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK)-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results from a Global Phase I/II Study. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2021 Oct;60(10):1313-1324. doi: 10.1007/s40262-021-01015-z. Epub 2021 May 3.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32344248
Citation
Peters S, Shaw AT, Besse B, Felip E, Solomon BJ, Soo RA, Bearz A, Gadgeel SM, Lin CC, Kao S, Seto T, Masters ET, Abbattista A, Clancy JS, Thurm H, Reisman A, Peltz G, Ross Camidge D. Impact of lorlatinib on patient-reported outcomes in patients with advanced ALK-positive or ROS1-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2020 Jun;144:10-19. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.02.011. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32060867
Citation
Bauer TM, Shaw AT, Johnson ML, Navarro A, Gainor JF, Thurm H, Pithavala YK, Abbattista A, Peltz G, Felip E. Brain Penetration of Lorlatinib: Cumulative Incidences of CNS and Non-CNS Progression with Lorlatinib in Patients with Previously Treated ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Target Oncol. 2020 Feb;15(1):55-65. doi: 10.1007/s11523-020-00702-4.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31669155
Citation
Shaw AT, Solomon BJ, Chiari R, Riely GJ, Besse B, Soo RA, Kao S, Lin CC, Bauer TM, Clancy JS, Thurm H, Martini JF, Peltz G, Abbattista A, Li S, Ou SI. Lorlatinib in advanced ROS1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 1-2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Dec;20(12):1691-1701. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30655-2. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30413378
Citation
Solomon BJ, Besse B, Bauer TM, Felip E, Soo RA, Camidge DR, Chiari R, Bearz A, Lin CC, Gadgeel SM, Riely GJ, Tan EH, Seto T, James LP, Clancy JS, Abbattista A, Martini JF, Chen J, Peltz G, Thurm H, Ou SI, Shaw AT. Lorlatinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a global phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Dec;19(12):1654-1667. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30649-1. Epub 2018 Nov 6. Erratum In: Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20(1):e10.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29074098
Citation
Shaw AT, Felip E, Bauer TM, Besse B, Navarro A, Postel-Vinay S, Gainor JF, Johnson M, Dietrich J, James LP, Clancy JS, Chen J, Martini JF, Abbattista A, Solomon BJ. Lorlatinib in non-small-cell lung cancer with ALK or ROS1 rearrangement: an international, multicentre, open-label, single-arm first-in-man phase 1 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Dec;18(12):1590-1599. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30680-0. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26698910
Citation
Shaw AT, Friboulet L, Leshchiner I, Gainor JF, Bergqvist S, Brooun A, Burke BJ, Deng YL, Liu W, Dardaei L, Frias RL, Schultz KR, Logan J, James LP, Smeal T, Timofeevski S, Katayama R, Iafrate AJ, Le L, McTigue M, Getz G, Johnson TW, Engelman JA. Resensitization to Crizotinib by the Lorlatinib ALK Resistance Mutation L1198F. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 7;374(1):54-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1508887. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
https://trialinfoemail.pfizer.com/pages/landing.aspx?StudyID=B7461001&StudyName=A%20Study%20Of%20PF-06463922%20An%20ALK/ROS1%20Inhibitor%20In%20Patients%20With%20Advanced%20Non%20Small%20Cell%20Lung%20Cancer%20With%20Specific%20Molecular%20Alterations
Description
To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.

Learn more about this trial

A Study Of PF-06463922 An ALK/ROS1 Inhibitor In Patients With Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer With Specific Molecular Alterations

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs