search
Back to results

Cisplatin vs Paclitaxel for Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Primary Purpose

Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cisplatin
Paclitaxel
Sponsored by
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Triple Negative Breast Cancer focused on measuring TRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER, CISPLATIN, PACLITAXEL

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants must meet the following criteria on screening examination to be eligible to participate in the study
  2. Pathologic documentation of invasive breast cancer by biopsy (FNA alone is not adequate).
  3. AJCC clinical stage I with T1 > 1.5 cm, stage II or III invasive breast cancer.
  4. Participants with multicentric or bilateral disease are eligible if at least one lesion meets stage eligibility criteria for the study and no tumor is HER2-positive.
  5. Tumors must be HER2 negative defined as HER2 0 or 1+ by immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays and /or lack of gene amplification by FISH defined as a ratio < 2 on invasive tumor by local review.
  6. ER and PgR status by IHC must be known. Tumor must be ER and PR negative (≤5% staining) by local review.
  7. Known BRCA1/2 (BReast CAncer) status is not required for study entry. However patients known to have a germline deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation should be encouraged to consider a preoperative trial specifically designed for BRCA1/2 carriers, if available.
  8. Breast imaging should include imaging of the ipsilateral axilla. For subjects with a clinically positive axilla, a needle aspiration, core biopsy or SLN procedure will be performed to confirm the presence of metastatic disease in the lymph nodes.

For patients with a clinically negative axilla, baseline assessment of the axilla will be performed at the discretion of the treating investigator.

For patients with pathologically positive axillary lymph nodes prior to preoperative therapy, a level I and II lymph node dissection at the time of definitive surgery is recommended.

9. Patients with a prior history of contra-lateral breast cancer are eligible if they have no evidence of recurrence of their initial primary breast cancer within the last 5 years.

10. Women ≥ 18 years of age. 11. ECOG performance status ≤1 (see Appendix A). 12. Laboratory Evaluation

  1. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,500 / mm3
  2. Platelet count ≥ 100,000/ mm3
  3. Bilirubin ≤ 1.5x upper limit of normal (ULN), for patients with Gilbert syndrome, direct bilirubin will be measured instead of total bilirubin
  4. ALT, AST ≤3.0 x ULN ALK Phos <2.5 x ULN
  5. Creatinine ≤ 1.5 mg/dl or creatinine clearance ≥ 60 cc/min
  6. Hemoglobin ≥ 9 mg/dl
  7. Use of an effective means of contraception is required in subjects of childbearing potential since study agents are known to be teratogenic. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately. Women of child-bearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception (barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation.
  8. Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document
  9. Individuals with a history of other malignancies are eligible if they have been disease-free for at least 5 years and are deemed by the investigator to be at low risk for recurrence of that malignancy and did not receive prior chemotherapy. Individuals with the following cancers are eligible if diagnosed and treated within the past 5 years: cervical cancer in situ, and basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin.
  10. Patient must be willing to undergo mandatory research biopsy and blood draw. Prior to biopsy procedures patients must be able to be off medications that could increase the risk of bleeding

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants with axillary adenopathy only are not eligible for this study.
  2. Prior chemotherapy: Prior non-taxane or platinum containing chemotherapy will be allowed if the prior exposure was at least 5 years ago and the exposure is thought not to potentially interact with the primary outcome of the trial or put the patient at undue risk, and should be reviewed with study PI on a case by case basis.
  3. Any prior treatment for the current breast cancer, including chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, radiation or experimental therapy.
  4. Ipsilateral breast recurrence, unless prior treatment consisted of excision alone for DCIS or breast conserving treatment and hormonal therapy for DCIS or invasive breast cancer.
  5. Ongoing use of any other investigational or study agents.
  6. Peripheral neuropathy of any etiology > grade 1 (NCI CTCAE Version 4.0- Appendix B)
  7. Significant hearing loss that would prevent cisplatin administration.
  8. Renal dysfunction for which exposure to cisplatin would be unsafe or require cisplatin dose modification (i.e., Cre > 1.5 mg/dl or GFR < 60 cc/min).

Sites / Locations

  • University of Alabama
  • Indiana University- Simon Cancer Center
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  • South Shore Hospital
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center-Basking Ridge
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center-Monmouth
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center-Commack
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center-West Harrison
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center-Rockville Centre
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center-Sleepy Hollow
  • University of North Carolina- Lineberger Cancer Center
  • Duke University
  • Universtiy of Pittsburgh- Magee-Womens Hospital
  • Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
  • Baylor College of Medicine
  • Seattle Cancer Alliance at EvergreenHealth
  • University of Washignton

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Arm A: Cisplatin

Arm B: Paclitaxel

Arm Description

Cisplatin given by IV infusion at a dose of 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (1 cycle) for 4 cycles as preoperative chemotherapy. Participants with inadequate clinical response after 12 weeks (as judged either clinically or radiologically by a provider) were able to crossover to an alternative provider-selected preoperative chemotherapy regimen. Definitive breast surgery following no later than 42 days after administration of last chemotherapy.

Paclitaxel given by IV infusion at a dose of 80 mg/m2 weekly for 12 weeks (4 cycles) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Participants with inadequate clinical response after 12 weeks (as judged either clinically or radiologically by a provider) were able to 'crossover' to an alternative provider-selected preoperative chemotherapy regimen. Definitive breast surgery following no later than 42 days after administration of last chemotherapy.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With Pathologic Response by HR-deficiency (HRD) Status
Pathologic response was assessed using the MD Anderson residual cancer burden (RCB) method (Symmans et al. JCO 2007). Responders are defined as RCB 0/1 and non-responders as RCB 2/3. Participants who crossed over due inadequate clinical response after 12 weeks were counted as non-responders. HRD status was determined with baseline diagnostic tissue using the HRD assay (Myriad Genetics, Inc.; required minimum 100 mm2 of tumor tissue) which detects impaired double-strand DNA break repair. The positive threshold for HRD was a score >/= 33.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number With Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) by HR-deficiency (HRD) Status
Pathologic response was assessed using the MD Anderson residual cancer burden (RCB) method (Symmans et al. JCO 2007). pCR is defined as RCB-0. HRD status was determined with baseline diagnostic tissue using the HRD assay (Myriad Genetics, Inc.; required minimum 100 mm2 of tumor tissue) which detects impaired double-strand DNA break repair. The positive threshold for HRD was a score >/= 33.
Number of Pathologic Response
Pathologic response was assessed using the MD Anderson residual cancer burden (RCB) method (Symmans et al. JCO 2007). Responders are defined as RCB 0/1 and non-responders as RCB 2/3. Participants who crossed over due inadequate clinical response after 12 weeks were counted as non-responders. HRD status was determined with baseline diagnostic tissue using the HRD assay (Myriad Genetics, Inc.; required minimum 100 mm2 of tumor tissue) which detects impaired double-strand DNA break repair. The positive threshold for HRD was a score >/= 33.
Number With Pathologic Response
Pathologic response was assessed using the MD Anderson residual cancer burden (RCB) method (Symmans et al. JCO 2007). Responders are defined as RCB 0/1 and non-responders as RCB 2/3. Participants who crossed over due inadequate clinical response after 12 weeks were counted as non-responders. HRD status was determined with baseline diagnostic tissue using the HRD assay (Myriad Genetics, Inc.; required minimum 100 mm2 of tumor tissue) which detects impaired double-strand DNA break repair. The positive threshold for HRD was a score >/= 33.
Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of HRD Score
Pathologic response was assessed using the MD Anderson residual cancer burden (RCB) method (Symmans et al. JCO 2007). Responders are defined as RCB 0/1 and non-responders as RCB 2/3. Participants who crossed over due inadequate clinical response after 12 weeks were counted as non-responders. HRD status was determined with baseline diagnostic tissue using the HRD assay (Myriad Genetics, Inc.; required minimum 100 mm2 of tumor tissue) which detects impaired double-strand DNA break repair. The positive threshold for HRD was a score >/= 33. PPV was calculated as the probability of pathological response among the HRD positive group.

Full Information

First Posted
October 28, 2013
Last Updated
June 15, 2023
Sponsor
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Collaborators
Myriad Genetics, Inc., Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01982448
Brief Title
Cisplatin vs Paclitaxel for Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Official Title
A Randomized Phase II Study of Preoperative Cisplatin Versus Paclitaxel in Patients With Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Evaluating the Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) Biomarker
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Collaborators
Myriad Genetics, Inc., Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a phase II study randomizing patients with stage I with T1 > 1.5 cm, stage II or III triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) to preoperative cisplatin versus paclitaxel. The study is designed to evaluate the ability of the Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) assay to predict pathologic response to preoperative chemotherapy.
Detailed Description
Cisplatin and paclitaxel are active in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Despite different mechanisms of action, effective predictive biomarkers to preferentially inform drug selection have not been identified. The homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) assay (Myriad Genetics, Inc.) detects impaired double-strand DNA break repair and may identify patients with BRCA1/2-proficient tumors that are sensitive to DNA-targeting therapy. The primary objective of TBCRC 030 was to detect an association of HRD with pathologic response (residual cancer burden (RCB)-0/1) to singleagent cisplatin or paclitaxel. This prospective phase II study enrolled patients with germline BRCA1/2 wild-type/unknown stage I-III TNBC in a 12-week randomized study of preoperative cisplatin or paclitaxel. The HRD assay was carried out on baseline tissue; positive HRD was defined as a score >=33. Crossover to an alternative chemotherapy was offered if there was inadequate response.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Keywords
TRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER, CISPLATIN, PACLITAXEL

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
147 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Arm A: Cisplatin
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Cisplatin given by IV infusion at a dose of 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (1 cycle) for 4 cycles as preoperative chemotherapy. Participants with inadequate clinical response after 12 weeks (as judged either clinically or radiologically by a provider) were able to crossover to an alternative provider-selected preoperative chemotherapy regimen. Definitive breast surgery following no later than 42 days after administration of last chemotherapy.
Arm Title
Arm B: Paclitaxel
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Paclitaxel given by IV infusion at a dose of 80 mg/m2 weekly for 12 weeks (4 cycles) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Participants with inadequate clinical response after 12 weeks (as judged either clinically or radiologically by a provider) were able to 'crossover' to an alternative provider-selected preoperative chemotherapy regimen. Definitive breast surgery following no later than 42 days after administration of last chemotherapy.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cisplatin
Other Intervention Name(s)
Platinol ®-AQ
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Paclitaxel
Other Intervention Name(s)
Taxol
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Pathologic Response by HR-deficiency (HRD) Status
Description
Pathologic response was assessed using the MD Anderson residual cancer burden (RCB) method (Symmans et al. JCO 2007). Responders are defined as RCB 0/1 and non-responders as RCB 2/3. Participants who crossed over due inadequate clinical response after 12 weeks were counted as non-responders. HRD status was determined with baseline diagnostic tissue using the HRD assay (Myriad Genetics, Inc.; required minimum 100 mm2 of tumor tissue) which detects impaired double-strand DNA break repair. The positive threshold for HRD was a score >/= 33.
Time Frame
Evaluated after definitive breast surgery, up to 4-5 months from enrollment.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number With Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) by HR-deficiency (HRD) Status
Description
Pathologic response was assessed using the MD Anderson residual cancer burden (RCB) method (Symmans et al. JCO 2007). pCR is defined as RCB-0. HRD status was determined with baseline diagnostic tissue using the HRD assay (Myriad Genetics, Inc.; required minimum 100 mm2 of tumor tissue) which detects impaired double-strand DNA break repair. The positive threshold for HRD was a score >/= 33.
Time Frame
Evaluated after definitive breast surgery, up to 4-5 months from enrollment.
Title
Number of Pathologic Response
Description
Pathologic response was assessed using the MD Anderson residual cancer burden (RCB) method (Symmans et al. JCO 2007). Responders are defined as RCB 0/1 and non-responders as RCB 2/3. Participants who crossed over due inadequate clinical response after 12 weeks were counted as non-responders. HRD status was determined with baseline diagnostic tissue using the HRD assay (Myriad Genetics, Inc.; required minimum 100 mm2 of tumor tissue) which detects impaired double-strand DNA break repair. The positive threshold for HRD was a score >/= 33.
Time Frame
Evaluated after definitive breast surgery, up to 4-5 months from enrollment.
Title
Number With Pathologic Response
Description
Pathologic response was assessed using the MD Anderson residual cancer burden (RCB) method (Symmans et al. JCO 2007). Responders are defined as RCB 0/1 and non-responders as RCB 2/3. Participants who crossed over due inadequate clinical response after 12 weeks were counted as non-responders. HRD status was determined with baseline diagnostic tissue using the HRD assay (Myriad Genetics, Inc.; required minimum 100 mm2 of tumor tissue) which detects impaired double-strand DNA break repair. The positive threshold for HRD was a score >/= 33.
Time Frame
Evaluated after definitive breast surgery, up to 4-5 months from enrollment.
Title
Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of HRD Score
Description
Pathologic response was assessed using the MD Anderson residual cancer burden (RCB) method (Symmans et al. JCO 2007). Responders are defined as RCB 0/1 and non-responders as RCB 2/3. Participants who crossed over due inadequate clinical response after 12 weeks were counted as non-responders. HRD status was determined with baseline diagnostic tissue using the HRD assay (Myriad Genetics, Inc.; required minimum 100 mm2 of tumor tissue) which detects impaired double-strand DNA break repair. The positive threshold for HRD was a score >/= 33. PPV was calculated as the probability of pathological response among the HRD positive group.
Time Frame
Evaluated after definitive breast surgery, up to 4-5 months from enrollment.

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Participants must meet the following criteria on screening examination to be eligible to participate in the study Pathologic documentation of invasive breast cancer by biopsy (FNA alone is not adequate). AJCC clinical stage I with T1 > 1.5 cm, stage II or III invasive breast cancer. Participants with multicentric or bilateral disease are eligible if at least one lesion meets stage eligibility criteria for the study and no tumor is HER2-positive. Tumors must be HER2 negative defined as HER2 0 or 1+ by immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays and /or lack of gene amplification by FISH defined as a ratio < 2 on invasive tumor by local review. ER and PgR status by IHC must be known. Tumor must be ER and PR negative (≤5% staining) by local review. Known BRCA1/2 (BReast CAncer) status is not required for study entry. However patients known to have a germline deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation should be encouraged to consider a preoperative trial specifically designed for BRCA1/2 carriers, if available. Breast imaging should include imaging of the ipsilateral axilla. For subjects with a clinically positive axilla, a needle aspiration, core biopsy or SLN procedure will be performed to confirm the presence of metastatic disease in the lymph nodes. For patients with a clinically negative axilla, baseline assessment of the axilla will be performed at the discretion of the treating investigator. For patients with pathologically positive axillary lymph nodes prior to preoperative therapy, a level I and II lymph node dissection at the time of definitive surgery is recommended. 9. Patients with a prior history of contra-lateral breast cancer are eligible if they have no evidence of recurrence of their initial primary breast cancer within the last 5 years. 10. Women ≥ 18 years of age. 11. ECOG performance status ≤1 (see Appendix A). 12. Laboratory Evaluation Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,500 / mm3 Platelet count ≥ 100,000/ mm3 Bilirubin ≤ 1.5x upper limit of normal (ULN), for patients with Gilbert syndrome, direct bilirubin will be measured instead of total bilirubin ALT, AST ≤3.0 x ULN ALK Phos <2.5 x ULN Creatinine ≤ 1.5 mg/dl or creatinine clearance ≥ 60 cc/min Hemoglobin ≥ 9 mg/dl Use of an effective means of contraception is required in subjects of childbearing potential since study agents are known to be teratogenic. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately. Women of child-bearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception (barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation. Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document Individuals with a history of other malignancies are eligible if they have been disease-free for at least 5 years and are deemed by the investigator to be at low risk for recurrence of that malignancy and did not receive prior chemotherapy. Individuals with the following cancers are eligible if diagnosed and treated within the past 5 years: cervical cancer in situ, and basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Patient must be willing to undergo mandatory research biopsy and blood draw. Prior to biopsy procedures patients must be able to be off medications that could increase the risk of bleeding Exclusion Criteria: Participants with axillary adenopathy only are not eligible for this study. Prior chemotherapy: Prior non-taxane or platinum containing chemotherapy will be allowed if the prior exposure was at least 5 years ago and the exposure is thought not to potentially interact with the primary outcome of the trial or put the patient at undue risk, and should be reviewed with study PI on a case by case basis. Any prior treatment for the current breast cancer, including chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, radiation or experimental therapy. Ipsilateral breast recurrence, unless prior treatment consisted of excision alone for DCIS or breast conserving treatment and hormonal therapy for DCIS or invasive breast cancer. Ongoing use of any other investigational or study agents. Peripheral neuropathy of any etiology > grade 1 (NCI CTCAE Version 4.0- Appendix B) Significant hearing loss that would prevent cisplatin administration. Renal dysfunction for which exposure to cisplatin would be unsafe or require cisplatin dose modification (i.e., Cre > 1.5 mg/dl or GFR < 60 cc/min).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Erica Mayer, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Alabama
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35294
Country
United States
Facility Name
Indiana University- Simon Cancer Center
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Johns Hopkins University
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21287
Country
United States
Facility Name
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02215
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02215
Country
United States
Facility Name
South Shore Hospital
City
Weymouth
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02190
Country
United States
Facility Name
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center-Basking Ridge
City
Basking Ridge
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07920
Country
United States
Facility Name
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center-Monmouth
City
Middletown
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07748
Country
United States
Facility Name
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center-Commack
City
Commack
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11725
Country
United States
Facility Name
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center-West Harrison
City
Harrison
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10604
Country
United States
Facility Name
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10065
Country
United States
Facility Name
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center-Rockville Centre
City
Rockville Centre
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11570
Country
United States
Facility Name
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center-Sleepy Hollow
City
Sleepy Hollow
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10591
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of North Carolina- Lineberger Cancer Center
City
Chapel Hill
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27599
Country
United States
Facility Name
Duke University
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27710
Country
United States
Facility Name
Universtiy of Pittsburgh- Magee-Womens Hospital
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15213
Country
United States
Facility Name
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37232
Country
United States
Facility Name
Baylor College of Medicine
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Seattle Cancer Alliance at EvergreenHealth
City
Kirkland
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98034
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Washignton
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98195
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
32798689
Citation
Mayer EL, Abramson V, Jankowitz R, Falkson C, Marcom PK, Traina T, Carey L, Rimawi M, Specht J, Miller K, Stearns V, Tung N, Perou C, Richardson AL, Componeschi K, Trippa L, Tan-Wasielewski Z, Timms K, Krop I, Wolff AC, Winer EP. TBCRC 030: a phase II study of preoperative cisplatin versus paclitaxel in triple-negative breast cancer: evaluating the homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) biomarker. Ann Oncol. 2020 Nov;31(11):1518-1525. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.2064. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
Results Reference
result
Links:
URL
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32798689/
Description
Related Info

Learn more about this trial

Cisplatin vs Paclitaxel for Triple Negative Breast Cancer

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs