search
Back to results

Cryoablation, Radiofrequency Ablation, or Microwave Ablation in Treating Patients With Metastatic Sarcoma Stable on Chemotherapy

Primary Purpose

Osteosarcoma, Sarcoma

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Microwave ablation
Cryoablation
Radiofrequency ablation
BPI-Short form
FACT-G7
Sponsored by
Washington University School of Medicine
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Osteosarcoma

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed high-grade metastatic sarcoma that has been stable on 6-12 cycles of one chemotherapeutic regimen (cytotoxic or biologic) although a change in chemotherapy is allowed if it is a result of toxicity/tolerability rather than progression. A patient must not have evidence of progression at any time while on chemotherapy in order to be eligible for this trial.
  • Measurable disease defined as lesions that can be accurately measured in at least one dimension (longest diameter to be recorded) as ≥10 mm with CT scan, PET CT, or MRI exam.
  • At least 18 years of age.
  • ECOG performance status ≤ 2 (Karnofsky ≥60%)
  • Normal bone marrow and organ function as defined below:

    • Leukocytes ≥ 3,000/mcL
    • Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/mcl
    • Platelets ≥ 100,000/mcl
    • Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x IULN or 3x IULN with normal ALT and AST in patients with Gilbert's disease
    • AST(SGOT)/ALT(SGPT) ≤ 3.0 x IULN
    • Creatinine less than the institutional upper limit of normal OR creatinine clearance ≥ 50 mL/min/1.73 m2
    • INR<1.5 or patient off Coumadin at the time of ablation
  • No more than 10 treatable lesions as evaluated by an experienced interventional oncologic radiologist for eligibility and lesion accessibility as the ablation of more than 10 lesions becomes technically infeasible. These lesions must be treated in a two- to three-week time period from initial interventional radiology evaluation. Lung and liver lesions can range from 1 cm to 7 cm for a single lesion and no greater than 5 cm for multiple lesions. There are no size criteria for the osseous lesions.
  • The lesions will be amenable to a safe, ultrasound/computed tomographic/fluoroscopic guided percutaneous approach. The targeted metastases must be sufficiently separable from the central nervous system, major peripheral motor nerves, bowel, and bladder. All lesions must be amenable to treatment.
  • If patients have received radiation therapy, there must be a one-month washout period.
  • Women of childbearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control, abstinence) prior to study entry and for the duration of ablation. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while participating in this study, she must inform her treating physician immediately.
  • Patient (or legally authorized representative if applicable) must be able to understand and willing to sign an IRB approved written informed consent document.

Exclusion Criteria

  • History of other malignancy ≤ 5 years previous with the exception of basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin which were treated with local resection only, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or localized prostate cancer.
  • Receiving any other investigational agents simultaneously or within 3 weeks following ablation procedure.
  • Known brain metastases. Patients with known brain metastases must be excluded from this clinical trial because of their poor prognosis and because they often develop progressive neurologic dysfunction that would confound the evaluation of neurologic and other adverse events.
  • Intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.
  • Pregnant and/or breastfeeding.
  • Patients whose treatment plans include continuing chemotherapy after ablation as per the treating physician, as ablation therapy is meant to serve as maintenance therapy in lieu of chemotherapy.

Sites / Locations

  • Washington University School of Medicine

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Treatment (ablation)

Arm Description

Patients undergo cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation, or microwave ablation of each lesion. Patients complete pain survey (BPI-Short form) and quality of life questionnaires (FACT-G7)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Progression-free Rate
Defined as the percentage of patients with no progression (local recurrence of an ablated lesion or the appearance of a new lesion) after ablation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Overall Survival (OS)
-Defined as time from diagnosis of metastatic disease to the time of death
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Following Ablation Procedure as Measured by the Participant's Lack of Energy
Measured with the FACT-G7 validated survey. Final assessment at time of disease progression. The question participant was asked was "I have a lack of energy" 7 questions about quality of life with answers that range from 0=not at all to 4 = very much Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis will be used to take into account the correlation of repeated measures from the same subject. Contrast statements will be used to compare mean QOL scores between any two times. All analyses will be two-sided at a significance level of 0.05. This statistical analysis was not able to be performed due to the sample size being too small.
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Following Ablation Procedure as Measured by the Participant's Nausea
Measured with the FACT-G7 validated survey. Final assessment at time of disease progression. The question participant was asked was "I have nausea" 7 questions about quality of life with answers that range from 0=not at all to 4 = very much Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis will be used to take into account the correlation of repeated measures from the same subject. Contrast statements will be used to compare mean QOL scores between any two times. All analyses will be two-sided at a significance level of 0.05. This statistical analysis was not able to be performed due to the sample size being too small.
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Following Ablation Procedure as Measured by the Participant's Worry That the Condition Will Get Worse
Measured with the FACT-G7 validated survey. Final assessment at time of disease progression. The question participant was asked was "I worry that my condition will get worse" 7 questions about quality of life with answers that range from 0=not at all to 4 = very much Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis will be used to take into account the correlation of repeated measures from the same subject. Contrast statements will be used to compare mean QOL scores between any two times. All analyses will be two-sided at a significance level of 0.05. This statistical analysis was not able to be performed due to the sample size being too small.
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Following Ablation Procedure as Measured by the Ability of the Participant to Enjoy Life
Measured with the FACT-G7 validated survey. Final assessment at time of disease progression. The question participant was asked was "I am able to enjoy life" 7 questions about quality of life with answers that range from 0=not at all to 4 = very much Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis will be used to take into account the correlation of repeated measures from the same subject. Contrast statements will be used to compare mean QOL scores between any two times. All analyses will be two-sided at a significance level of 0.05. This statistical analysis was not able to be performed due to the sample size being too small.
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Following Ablation Procedure as Measured by the Ability of the Participant to Sleep Well
Measured with the FACT-G7 validated survey. Final assessment at time of disease progression. The question participant was asked was "I am sleeping well" 7 questions about quality of life with answers that range from 0=not at all to 4 = very much Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis will be used to take into account the correlation of repeated measures from the same subject. Contrast statements will be used to compare mean QOL scores between any two times. All analyses will be two-sided at a significance level of 0.05. This statistical analysis was not able to be performed due to the sample size being too small.
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Following Ablation Procedure as Measured by the Contentment of the Participant's Qualify of Life
Measured with the FACT-G7 validated survey. Final assessment at time of disease progression. The question participant was asked was "I am content with the quality of my life right now" 7 questions about quality of life with answers that range from 0=not at all to 4 = very much Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis will be used to take into account the correlation of repeated measures from the same subject. Contrast statements will be used to compare mean QOL scores between any two times. All analyses will be two-sided at a significance level of 0.05. This statistical analysis was not able to be performed due to the sample size being too small.
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Following Ablation Procedure as Measured by the Participant's Pain
Measured with the FACT-G7 validated survey. Final assessment at time of disease progression. The question participant was asked was "I have pain" 7 questions about quality of life with answers that range from 0=not at all to 4 = very much Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis will be used to take into account the correlation of repeated measures from the same subject. Contrast statements will be used to compare mean QOL scores between any two times. All analyses will be two-sided at a significance level of 0.05. This statistical analysis was not able to be performed due to the sample size being too small.
Change in Pain Following Ablation Procedure
Measured using the Brief Pain Inventory. Final assessment at time of disease progression. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis will be used to take into account the correlation of repeated measures from the same subject. Contrast statements will be used to compare mean BPI scores between any two times. All analyses will be two-sided at a significance level of 0.05.

Full Information

First Posted
November 11, 2013
Last Updated
August 23, 2018
Sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01986829
Brief Title
Cryoablation, Radiofrequency Ablation, or Microwave Ablation in Treating Patients With Metastatic Sarcoma Stable on Chemotherapy
Official Title
Tumor Ablation in Metastatic Sarcoma Stable on Chemotherapy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Slow accrual
Study Start Date
February 3, 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 8, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 8, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This phase II trial studies how well cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation, or microwave ablation works in treating patients with metastatic sarcoma stable on chemotherapy. Cryoablation kills tumor cells by freezing them. Radiofrequency ablation uses a high-frequency, electric current to kill tumor cells. Microwave ablation kills tumor cells by heating them to several degrees above body temperature.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Osteosarcoma, Sarcoma

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
9 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Treatment (ablation)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients undergo cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation, or microwave ablation of each lesion. Patients complete pain survey (BPI-Short form) and quality of life questionnaires (FACT-G7)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Microwave ablation
Intervention Description
Microwave ablation will be predominantly used on metastatic soft tissue lesions and will include use of Covidien's Evident™ MWA System. Microwave ablation is performed under ultrasound, CT, and occasional fluoroscopic guidance with CT fluoroscopy available for intermittent use in probe placement and CT monitoring of ablation. Microwave antennae from Covidien (Mansfield, MA) are either introduced into the lesion co-axially through a bone biopsy needle or directly into the lesions that are amenable to such, i.e., soft tissue, lung, liver, and large lytic lesions with extensive bone destruction.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Cryoablation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Cryosurgery, Cryosurgical ablation
Intervention Description
Cryoablation is performed under ultrasound, CT and occasional fluoroscopic guidance with CT fluoroscopy available for intermittent use in cyroprobe placement and CT monitoring of ablation. Cryoprobes from Endocare Inc. (Irvine CA) or Galil Medical (Arden Hills MN) are either introduced into the lesion co-axially through a bone biopsy needle or directly into the lesions that are amenable to such, i.e., soft tissue, lung, liver, and large lytic lesions with extensive bone destruction.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Radiofrequency ablation
Intervention Description
-Radiofrequency ablation will be predominantly used on metastatic spine lesions and will include use of the Dfine STAR ablation probe. This probe will be placed coaxially through an introducer needle into the spinal metastatic lesion.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
BPI-Short form
Intervention Description
-Prior to ablation, 1 day post-ablation, 1 month post-ablation (from first procedure if more than 1 is done), and time of disease progression
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
FACT-G7
Intervention Description
-Prior to ablation, 1 day post-ablation, 1 month post-ablation (from first procedure if more than 1 is done), and time of disease progression
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression-free Rate
Description
Defined as the percentage of patients with no progression (local recurrence of an ablated lesion or the appearance of a new lesion) after ablation.
Time Frame
3 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall Survival (OS)
Description
-Defined as time from diagnosis of metastatic disease to the time of death
Time Frame
Assessed up to 5 years
Title
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Following Ablation Procedure as Measured by the Participant's Lack of Energy
Description
Measured with the FACT-G7 validated survey. Final assessment at time of disease progression. The question participant was asked was "I have a lack of energy" 7 questions about quality of life with answers that range from 0=not at all to 4 = very much Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis will be used to take into account the correlation of repeated measures from the same subject. Contrast statements will be used to compare mean QOL scores between any two times. All analyses will be two-sided at a significance level of 0.05. This statistical analysis was not able to be performed due to the sample size being too small.
Time Frame
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (1-month post ablation), and disease progression (up to 5 years post-ablation)
Title
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Following Ablation Procedure as Measured by the Participant's Nausea
Description
Measured with the FACT-G7 validated survey. Final assessment at time of disease progression. The question participant was asked was "I have nausea" 7 questions about quality of life with answers that range from 0=not at all to 4 = very much Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis will be used to take into account the correlation of repeated measures from the same subject. Contrast statements will be used to compare mean QOL scores between any two times. All analyses will be two-sided at a significance level of 0.05. This statistical analysis was not able to be performed due to the sample size being too small.
Time Frame
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (1-month post ablation), and disease progression (up to 5 years post-ablation)
Title
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Following Ablation Procedure as Measured by the Participant's Worry That the Condition Will Get Worse
Description
Measured with the FACT-G7 validated survey. Final assessment at time of disease progression. The question participant was asked was "I worry that my condition will get worse" 7 questions about quality of life with answers that range from 0=not at all to 4 = very much Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis will be used to take into account the correlation of repeated measures from the same subject. Contrast statements will be used to compare mean QOL scores between any two times. All analyses will be two-sided at a significance level of 0.05. This statistical analysis was not able to be performed due to the sample size being too small.
Time Frame
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (1-month post ablation), and disease progression (up to 5 years post-ablation)
Title
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Following Ablation Procedure as Measured by the Ability of the Participant to Enjoy Life
Description
Measured with the FACT-G7 validated survey. Final assessment at time of disease progression. The question participant was asked was "I am able to enjoy life" 7 questions about quality of life with answers that range from 0=not at all to 4 = very much Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis will be used to take into account the correlation of repeated measures from the same subject. Contrast statements will be used to compare mean QOL scores between any two times. All analyses will be two-sided at a significance level of 0.05. This statistical analysis was not able to be performed due to the sample size being too small.
Time Frame
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (1-month post ablation), and disease progression (up to 5 years post-ablation)
Title
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Following Ablation Procedure as Measured by the Ability of the Participant to Sleep Well
Description
Measured with the FACT-G7 validated survey. Final assessment at time of disease progression. The question participant was asked was "I am sleeping well" 7 questions about quality of life with answers that range from 0=not at all to 4 = very much Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis will be used to take into account the correlation of repeated measures from the same subject. Contrast statements will be used to compare mean QOL scores between any two times. All analyses will be two-sided at a significance level of 0.05. This statistical analysis was not able to be performed due to the sample size being too small.
Time Frame
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (1-month post ablation), and disease progression (up to 5 years post-ablation)
Title
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Following Ablation Procedure as Measured by the Contentment of the Participant's Qualify of Life
Description
Measured with the FACT-G7 validated survey. Final assessment at time of disease progression. The question participant was asked was "I am content with the quality of my life right now" 7 questions about quality of life with answers that range from 0=not at all to 4 = very much Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis will be used to take into account the correlation of repeated measures from the same subject. Contrast statements will be used to compare mean QOL scores between any two times. All analyses will be two-sided at a significance level of 0.05. This statistical analysis was not able to be performed due to the sample size being too small.
Time Frame
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (1-month post ablation), and disease progression (up to 5 years post-ablation)
Title
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Following Ablation Procedure as Measured by the Participant's Pain
Description
Measured with the FACT-G7 validated survey. Final assessment at time of disease progression. The question participant was asked was "I have pain" 7 questions about quality of life with answers that range from 0=not at all to 4 = very much Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis will be used to take into account the correlation of repeated measures from the same subject. Contrast statements will be used to compare mean QOL scores between any two times. All analyses will be two-sided at a significance level of 0.05. This statistical analysis was not able to be performed due to the sample size being too small.
Time Frame
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (1-month post ablation), and disease progression (up to 5 years post-ablation)
Title
Change in Pain Following Ablation Procedure
Description
Measured using the Brief Pain Inventory. Final assessment at time of disease progression. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis will be used to take into account the correlation of repeated measures from the same subject. Contrast statements will be used to compare mean BPI scores between any two times. All analyses will be two-sided at a significance level of 0.05.
Time Frame
Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (1-month post ablation), and disease progression (up to 5 years post-ablation)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Histologically or cytologically confirmed high-grade metastatic sarcoma that has been stable on 6-12 cycles of one chemotherapeutic regimen (cytotoxic or biologic) although a change in chemotherapy is allowed if it is a result of toxicity/tolerability rather than progression. A patient must not have evidence of progression at any time while on chemotherapy in order to be eligible for this trial. Measurable disease defined as lesions that can be accurately measured in at least one dimension (longest diameter to be recorded) as ≥10 mm with CT scan, PET CT, or MRI exam. At least 18 years of age. ECOG performance status ≤ 2 (Karnofsky ≥60%) Normal bone marrow and organ function as defined below: Leukocytes ≥ 3,000/mcL Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/mcl Platelets ≥ 100,000/mcl Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x IULN or 3x IULN with normal ALT and AST in patients with Gilbert's disease AST(SGOT)/ALT(SGPT) ≤ 3.0 x IULN Creatinine less than the institutional upper limit of normal OR creatinine clearance ≥ 50 mL/min/1.73 m2 INR<1.5 or patient off Coumadin at the time of ablation No more than 10 treatable lesions as evaluated by an experienced interventional oncologic radiologist for eligibility and lesion accessibility as the ablation of more than 10 lesions becomes technically infeasible. These lesions must be treated in a two- to three-week time period from initial interventional radiology evaluation. Lung and liver lesions can range from 1 cm to 7 cm for a single lesion and no greater than 5 cm for multiple lesions. There are no size criteria for the osseous lesions. The lesions will be amenable to a safe, ultrasound/computed tomographic/fluoroscopic guided percutaneous approach. The targeted metastases must be sufficiently separable from the central nervous system, major peripheral motor nerves, bowel, and bladder. All lesions must be amenable to treatment. If patients have received radiation therapy, there must be a one-month washout period. Women of childbearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control, abstinence) prior to study entry and for the duration of ablation. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while participating in this study, she must inform her treating physician immediately. Patient (or legally authorized representative if applicable) must be able to understand and willing to sign an IRB approved written informed consent document. Exclusion Criteria History of other malignancy ≤ 5 years previous with the exception of basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin which were treated with local resection only, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or localized prostate cancer. Receiving any other investigational agents simultaneously or within 3 weeks following ablation procedure. Known brain metastases. Patients with known brain metastases must be excluded from this clinical trial because of their poor prognosis and because they often develop progressive neurologic dysfunction that would confound the evaluation of neurologic and other adverse events. Intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements. Pregnant and/or breastfeeding. Patients whose treatment plans include continuing chemotherapy after ablation as per the treating physician, as ablation therapy is meant to serve as maintenance therapy in lieu of chemotherapy.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Brian Van Tine, M.D., Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Washington University School of Medicine
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Washington University School of Medicine
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29487221
Citation
Hirbe AC, Jennings J, Saad N, Giardina JD, Tao Y, Luo J, Berry S, Toeniskoetter J, Van Tine BA. A Phase II Study of Tumor Ablation in Patients with Metastatic Sarcoma Stable on Chemotherapy. Oncologist. 2018 Jul;23(7):760-e76. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0536. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://www.siteman.wustl.edu
Description
Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine

Learn more about this trial

Cryoablation, Radiofrequency Ablation, or Microwave Ablation in Treating Patients With Metastatic Sarcoma Stable on Chemotherapy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs