search
Back to results

Epidural Analgesia Versus IV Analgesia in Lumbar Spine Fusions

Primary Purpose

Lumbar Spine Fusion, Pain, Back Pain

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Epidural Catheter - Dilaudid
Dilaudid
Sponsored by
Duke University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Lumbar Spine Fusion

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients who are scheduled for elective Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Baseline cognitive deficits sufficient to make objective pain self-assessments unreliable in the estimation of the Study Investigators.
  • Inability to follow directions or comprehend the English language.
  • Females who are pregnant as determined by positive pregnancy test on or before the day of surgery.
  • Prisoners.
  • Patient refusal to provide informed consent.
  • Allergy to amide local anesthetics (lidocaine, bupivacaine, ropivacaine).

Sites / Locations

  • Duke University Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Intravenous opioids

Epidural Catheter

Arm Description

This is the standard of care method for post-operative analgesia following lumbar spine fusion surgery. Participants randomly assigned to this arm will receive Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IVPCA) with dilaudid (or other opioid) for post-operative pain control.

The intervention to be tested in this study against standard intravenous opioids is infusion of local anesthetic and dilaudid via epidural catheter for post-operative pain control in patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion surgery.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Post-operative Pain as Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
The VAS scale ranges from 0 to 100 mm with the lower score indicating less pain and the higher score indicating greater pain.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Patient Satisfaction With Perioperative Analgesia
Patients will be assessed for satisfaction with their peri-operative analgesia in the recovery room and each day of their epidural infusion or intravenous opioid infusion by the Acute Pain Service, and at their surgical follow-up visit. Likert scale ranges from 1 to 5 (1=very satisfied and 5=Very Dissatisfied).
Patient Satisfaction With Perioperative Analgesia
Patients will be assessed for satisfaction with their peri-operative analgesia in the recovery room and each day of their epidural infusion or intravenous opioid infusion by the Acute Pain Service, and at their surgical follow-up visit. Likert scale ranges from 1 to 5 (1=very satisfied and 5=Very Dissatisfied).
Patient Satisfaction With Overall Care
Likert scale ranges from 1 to 5 (1=very satisfied and 5=Very Dissatisfied).
Number of Participants With Events of Special Interest
Patients will be assessed for development of a deep vein thrombosis after surgery, and surgical site infection.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Related to the Study
Patients will be assessed in the recovery room and each day of their epidural or intravenous opioid infusions, and at their surgical follow-up visit.
Total Post-operative Opioid Consumption
Number of Participants Experiencing Delirium
Number of Participants Experiencing Delirium
Number of Participants Experiencing Delirium
Number of Participants Readmitted to Hospital Within 30 Days of Surgery
Length of Hospital Stay
Wound Infection Rates

Full Information

First Posted
January 3, 2013
Last Updated
January 10, 2017
Sponsor
Duke University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01986946
Brief Title
Epidural Analgesia Versus IV Analgesia in Lumbar Spine Fusions
Official Title
A Comparison of Epidural Analgesia With Standard Care Following Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Prospective Randomized Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Lack of recruitment.
Study Start Date
October 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Duke University

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Protocol Title - A Comparison of Epidural Analgesia with Standard Care Following Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Prospective Randomized Study Purpose of the Study - This prospective randomized study will enroll 200 patients undergoing elective Lumbar Spinal Fusion at Duke University Hospital. The primary objective is to determine the effect of epidural analgesia, as compared with standard care, on post-operative analgesia. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that patients undergoing Lumbar Spinal Fusion surgery with epidural catheter placement will have superior post-operative analgesia compared to patients undergoing standard care.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Lumbar Spine Fusion, Pain, Back Pain

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
17 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intravenous opioids
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
This is the standard of care method for post-operative analgesia following lumbar spine fusion surgery. Participants randomly assigned to this arm will receive Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IVPCA) with dilaudid (or other opioid) for post-operative pain control.
Arm Title
Epidural Catheter
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The intervention to be tested in this study against standard intravenous opioids is infusion of local anesthetic and dilaudid via epidural catheter for post-operative pain control in patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion surgery.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Epidural Catheter - Dilaudid
Intervention Description
Placement of an epidural catheter to administer local anesthetic and opioid (dilaudid) to the epidural space will be studied as compared to use of intravenous opioid (dilaudid) for pain control following lumbar spine fusion surgery.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Dilaudid
Intervention Description
Patients in this arm will receive intravenous patient-controlled opioid analgesia (Dilaudid).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Post-operative Pain as Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Description
The VAS scale ranges from 0 to 100 mm with the lower score indicating less pain and the higher score indicating greater pain.
Time Frame
Postoperative day 1
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Patient Satisfaction With Perioperative Analgesia
Description
Patients will be assessed for satisfaction with their peri-operative analgesia in the recovery room and each day of their epidural infusion or intravenous opioid infusion by the Acute Pain Service, and at their surgical follow-up visit. Likert scale ranges from 1 to 5 (1=very satisfied and 5=Very Dissatisfied).
Time Frame
Post-operative Day 1
Title
Patient Satisfaction With Perioperative Analgesia
Description
Patients will be assessed for satisfaction with their peri-operative analgesia in the recovery room and each day of their epidural infusion or intravenous opioid infusion by the Acute Pain Service, and at their surgical follow-up visit. Likert scale ranges from 1 to 5 (1=very satisfied and 5=Very Dissatisfied).
Time Frame
6-Week Follow up Visit
Title
Patient Satisfaction With Overall Care
Description
Likert scale ranges from 1 to 5 (1=very satisfied and 5=Very Dissatisfied).
Time Frame
6-Week Follow up Visit
Title
Number of Participants With Events of Special Interest
Description
Patients will be assessed for development of a deep vein thrombosis after surgery, and surgical site infection.
Time Frame
Post-operative Day 30
Title
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Related to the Study
Description
Patients will be assessed in the recovery room and each day of their epidural or intravenous opioid infusions, and at their surgical follow-up visit.
Time Frame
6-week Follow up Visit
Title
Total Post-operative Opioid Consumption
Time Frame
during hospitalization (approximately 3-8 days)
Title
Number of Participants Experiencing Delirium
Time Frame
Post-operative Day 1
Title
Number of Participants Experiencing Delirium
Time Frame
Post-operative Day 2
Title
Number of Participants Experiencing Delirium
Time Frame
Post-operative Day 3
Title
Number of Participants Readmitted to Hospital Within 30 Days of Surgery
Time Frame
Post-operative Day 30
Title
Length of Hospital Stay
Time Frame
during hospitalization (approximately 3-8 days)
Title
Wound Infection Rates
Time Frame
during hospitalization (approximately 3-8 days)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Adult patients who are scheduled for elective Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion surgery Exclusion Criteria: Baseline cognitive deficits sufficient to make objective pain self-assessments unreliable in the estimation of the Study Investigators. Inability to follow directions or comprehend the English language. Females who are pregnant as determined by positive pregnancy test on or before the day of surgery. Prisoners. Patient refusal to provide informed consent. Allergy to amide local anesthetics (lidocaine, bupivacaine, ropivacaine).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Erin L Manning, MD/PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Duke University Hospital Department of Anesthesiology
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Carlos Bagley, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Duke University Hospital Department of Neurosurgery
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Duke University Hospital
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27710
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
14612482
Citation
Block BM, Liu SS, Rowlingson AJ, Cowan AR, Cowan JA Jr, Wu CL. Efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2003 Nov 12;290(18):2455-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.18.2455.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22486142
Citation
Abrishamkar S, Eshraghi N, Feizi A, Talakoub R, Rafiei A, Rahmani P. Analgesic effects of ketamine infusion on postoperative pain after fusion and instrumentation of the lumbar spine: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Med Arh. 2012;66(2):107-10. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2012.66.107-110.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15125846
Citation
Sekar C, Rajasekaran S, Kannan R, Reddy S, Shetty TA, Pithwa YK. Preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief in lumbosacral spine surgeries: a randomized controlled trial. Spine J. 2004 May-Jun;4(3):261-4. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.11.009.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9280026
Citation
Cohen BE, Hartman MB, Wade JT, Miller JS, Gilbert R, Chapman TM. Postoperative pain control after lumbar spine fusion. Patient-controlled analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Aug 15;22(16):1892-6; discussion 1896-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199708150-00016.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15644759
Citation
Sucato DJ, Duey-Holtz A, Elerson E, Safavi F. Postoperative analgesia following surgical correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison of continuous epidural analgesia and patient-controlled analgesia. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jan 15;30(2):211-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000150832.53604.64.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16261108
Citation
Yukawa Y, Kato F, Ito K, Terashima T, Horie Y. A prospective randomized study of preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain in the patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion: continuous subcutaneous morphine, continuous epidural morphine, and diclofenac sodium. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Nov 1;30(21):2357-61. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000184377.31427.fa.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22850657
Citation
Parker SL, Lerner J, McGirt MJ. Effect of minimally invasive technique on return to work and narcotic use following transforaminal lumbar inter-body fusion: a review. Prof Case Manag. 2012 Sep-Oct;17(5):229-35. doi: 10.1097/NCM.0b013e3182529c05.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Epidural Analgesia Versus IV Analgesia in Lumbar Spine Fusions

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs