Lesion Progression After Icon Treatment in Young Adults
Primary Purpose
Caries, Salivary Function, Tooth Sensitivity
Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Resin infiltration
Mock treatment
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional prevention trial for Caries focused on measuring Icon
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Be age 19 years and older
Have at least two vital carious teeth with caries ranging from enamel to just into dentin.
- If the lesion is not on a 3rd molar
- If the lesion is not developmental.
- If the lesion is not cavitated
- Be a regular dental attendee able to return for assessments
- Be in good medical health and able to tolerate the dental procedure
- Have no chronic periodontitis which could compromise tooth retention.
- Have normal salivary function.
- Have normal bone levels
- No lingering cold sensitivity
- No periapical sensitivity
- No sensitivity to percussion
Exclusion Criteria:
- Do not meet the inclusion criteria
- Are not able to tolerate the time required for the study
- There is a history of an adverse reaction to any materials used in the study
- They are irregular dental attendees
- They maintain an unacceptable standard of oral hygiene.
- They have chronic periodontitis
- There is severe salivary gland dysfunction or reduced salivary flow is observed
- They are unable to return for recall appointments
Sites / Locations
- University of Alabama
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Sham Comparator
Arm Label
Resin infiltration
Mock treatment
Arm Description
One proximal caries lesion (split mouth design) per patient will be treated using the resin infiltrant "Icon" (DMG, Hamburg, Germany) according to manufactures´ instructions.
A second proximal caries lesion of each patient (split mouth design) will receive a placebo treatment to mimic "resin infiltration".
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Number of Invasive Interventions (Fillings)
Cumulative number of study lesions that have progressed to a state were an invasive intervention (filling) has been required to restore the teeth as determined via an dental examination (baseline versus 3 year follow up).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Number of Lesions That Changed in Size (E1->E2->D1->D2-> Filling)
Change in categorical lesion depth (progression to next depth category lesion; E1->E2->D1->D2->filling) as measured by pairwise comparison of radiographs (baseline versus follow up time point). E1 (lesion within the outer half of enamel), E2 (inner half of enamel), D1 (outer third of dentin), D2 (middle third of dentin). Reference: Anusavice K. Present and future approaches for the control of caries. J Dent Educ. 2005;69(5):538-854.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01988337
First Posted
November 7, 2013
Last Updated
September 6, 2022
Sponsor
DMG Dental Material Gesellschaft mbH
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01988337
Brief Title
Lesion Progression After Icon Treatment in Young Adults
Official Title
Double Blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Lesion Progression After Treatment With Icon vs. Placebo in Caries Lesions in Young Adults Over 36 Months
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
September 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Slower than expected tooth decay in placebo group and insufficient recruitment.
Study Start Date
August 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2018 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
DMG Dental Material Gesellschaft mbH
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This is a three year single site clinical evaluation of a FDA approved (510(k):K100062) lesion penetrating resin used to infiltrate and hamper progression of proximal carious lesions. The purpose of this study is to compare lesion progression infiltrated with (Icon, Hamburg, Germany) to a similar sized lesion in the same patient treated with a placebo. The study is designed as a randomized, controlled, prospective clinical trial with a three year follow-up evaluation period.
The clinical site will enroll 150 subjects (in the age range of 19 years or older) with 2 study lesions. The patients will be evaluated at six time points over a period of 3 years. Lesion status and caries risk will be monitored at 6-month intervals, while radiographic evaluation will be conducted at 12-month intervals at 1-, 2- and 3-year recall visits.
Detailed Description
Introduction Dental caries is the most widespread of all diseases. It causes destruction of tooth structure by dissolving the enamel on the outside of the tooth first and then progressing into the inside of the tooth. While it is possible to use traditional dental fillings to replace diseased tooth structure, it is far better to slow down or reverse the disease process so that no fillings are needed. One of the most difficult places to use preventive or non-surgical treatment is the contact area between teeth. Recently there is evolving interest in using composites to infiltrate enamel and dentin areas that have just begun to be destroyed by caries. The infiltration technique arrests the lesion progression by sealing the porous surface and restores the damage avoiding ongoing acidic damage of tooth structure.
Objective Assess the clinical efficacy s of using Icon to infiltrate initial lesions below the tooth surfaces that exist on the contact surfaces between posterior teeth as a means of stabilizing diseased tooth structure and arresting further lesion development.
Materials and Methods One hundred fifty volunteers (19+ years) with two early lesions in posterior teeth will be enrolled into a clinical trial to evaluate the clinical efficacy of infiltrating the lesions as compared to current watch-and-wait approaches that are combined with good oral hygiene and fluoride application. Each subject will have a treated lesion and a control lesion. Only small early lesions without clinical signs of surface cavitation will be selected. The control lesions will be stabilized through a normal preventive regimen, while the treatment lesions will be infiltrated with a resin. Lesion status will be monitored every six months by clinical examination and as well using annual radiographs.
Clinical Significance Infiltrating a caries lesion is a potential effective strategy to strengthen damaged tooth structure and to reduce caries progression without any surgical intervention.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Caries, Salivary Function, Tooth Sensitivity
Keywords
Icon
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Split-mouth design
Masking
ParticipantCare Provider
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
56 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Resin infiltration
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
One proximal caries lesion (split mouth design) per patient will be treated using the resin infiltrant "Icon" (DMG, Hamburg, Germany) according to manufactures´ instructions.
Arm Title
Mock treatment
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
A second proximal caries lesion of each patient (split mouth design) will receive a placebo treatment to mimic "resin infiltration".
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Resin infiltration
Other Intervention Name(s)
Icon (DMG, Germany), approximal resin infiltration kit
Intervention Description
The study is a split-mouth design. One tooth with a proximal caries lesion will randomly receive the infiltrating resin (Icon) while the other will receive a placebo, according to the manufactures´ instruction for Icon. In short, teeth will be isolated with a rubber dam and the tooth surface cleaned with non-fluoride prophylactic paste and pumice. The Icon material will be applied following the manufacturer's instructions and light cured, followed by polished using interproximal finishing/polishing strips (Sof Lex, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN). Subjects will be given a letter to take to their local dentist asking them not to treat the selected lesions without informing the investigator first.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Mock treatment
Intervention Description
For the mock treatment the procedure will be identical to the "Resin Infiltration" intervention, with the exception that a placebo will be used. Essentially, syringes identical to the Icon materials will be supplied by DMG for the placebo procedure. The syringes will be filled with solutions having the same consistency and color as the Icon material.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Invasive Interventions (Fillings)
Description
Cumulative number of study lesions that have progressed to a state were an invasive intervention (filling) has been required to restore the teeth as determined via an dental examination (baseline versus 3 year follow up).
Time Frame
3 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Lesions That Changed in Size (E1->E2->D1->D2-> Filling)
Description
Change in categorical lesion depth (progression to next depth category lesion; E1->E2->D1->D2->filling) as measured by pairwise comparison of radiographs (baseline versus follow up time point). E1 (lesion within the outer half of enamel), E2 (inner half of enamel), D1 (outer third of dentin), D2 (middle third of dentin). Reference: Anusavice K. Present and future approaches for the control of caries. J Dent Educ. 2005;69(5):538-854.
Time Frame
6 months and 12 months
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Number of Lesions With Sensitivity to Percussion, Papillary Bleeding, Cold Response
Description
Teeth included in the study were clincially assed for sensitivity to percussion, papillary bleeding, cold response.
Time Frame
6 months and 12 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
19 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Be age 19 years and older
Have at least two vital carious teeth with caries ranging from enamel to just into dentin.
If the lesion is not on a 3rd molar
If the lesion is not developmental.
If the lesion is not cavitated
Be a regular dental attendee able to return for assessments
Be in good medical health and able to tolerate the dental procedure
Have no chronic periodontitis which could compromise tooth retention.
Have normal salivary function.
Have normal bone levels
No lingering cold sensitivity
No periapical sensitivity
No sensitivity to percussion
Exclusion Criteria:
Do not meet the inclusion criteria
Are not able to tolerate the time required for the study
There is a history of an adverse reaction to any materials used in the study
They are irregular dental attendees
They maintain an unacceptable standard of oral hygiene.
They have chronic periodontitis
There is severe salivary gland dysfunction or reduced salivary flow is observed
They are unable to return for recall appointments
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nate O. Lawson
Organizational Affiliation
Birmingham, Alabama 35294; US
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Alabama
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35294
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Lesion Progression After Icon Treatment in Young Adults
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs