search
Back to results

Early Investigation of High Precision Radiotherapy Prior to Commencing Standard Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer (BOOSTER)

Primary Purpose

Prostate Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Australia
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Dose escalation using stereotactic boost
Sponsored by
Royal North Shore Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Prostate Cancer focused on measuring Prostate Cancer, Dose escalation, Stereotactic, SBRT, Hypofractionation

Eligibility Criteria

35 Years - 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)MaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically proven prostate adenocarcinoma
  • PSA obtained within three months prior to enrollment.
  • International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) score <15
  • No contraindication to MRI (pacemaker, severe claustrophobia)
  • Patient must be able to have fiducial markers placed in the prostate (if on anticoagulants, must be cleared by LMO or cardiologist).
  • ECOG performance status 0-2
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous pelvic radiotherapy
  • Prior total prostatectomy
  • Unwilling or unable to give informed consent
  • Unwilling or unable to complete quality of life questionnaires.

Sites / Locations

  • Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Dose escalation using stereotactic boost

Arm Description

Dose level allocation - Participants will be allocated to the current dose level, or if the current dose level has been filled and acceptable toxicity has been established, they will be enrolled into the next dose level

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Acute toxicity
Portion of patients with grade 3 or greater genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicity assessed using the Modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Toxicity Scale.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Late toxicity
At a median follow up of 18 months, Kaplan Meir statistics will be used to estimate the 2 year late Gastrointestinal and Genitourinary Toxicity using the modified RTOG scale.
Cumulative toxicity rate:
The cumulative incidence of treatment related Grade 2 or higher GI or GU toxicity allowing for competing risk (death without prior toxicity event) and loss to follow up (censoring).
Biochemical failure (PSA failure)
Nadir PSA at three months and over duration of follow-up. This will be compared to historical controls from our prospective database stratified by initial PSA and androgen deprivation use / duration (nil vs. short term vs. long term). When patients have reached a median follow-up of 24 months and 48 months, actuarial Kaplan Meir statistics will be used to estimate the 3 year and 5 year freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) using the Nadir + 2.0 definition.
change in Quality of Life
Patient reported QOL using the validated EPIC SF-36 questionnaire will be collected at baseline, 3 months, 9 months and 21-24 months. Analysis will be performed (a) using the mean scores, with a 10 point deterioration deemed clinically significant and (b) as a change from baseline per individual patient using the 21-24 month questionnaire. A 10-20 point deterioration will be deemed mild-moderate and a >20 point deterioration will be deemed significant. Kaplan Meir statistics will be used to estimate the proportion of patients with a ≥10 point, or ≥20 point deterioration at appropriate time points.

Full Information

First Posted
November 25, 2013
Last Updated
June 10, 2021
Sponsor
Royal North Shore Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02004223
Brief Title
Early Investigation of High Precision Radiotherapy Prior to Commencing Standard Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
Acronym
BOOSTER
Official Title
Phase I Dose Escalation Study of Stereotactic BOOST for Prostate cancER
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Royal North Shore Hospital

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Current standard treatment for prostate cancer involves giving patients approximately 40 doses of radiotherapy, one dose per day over an 8 week period. The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of giving two separate high doses of a special type of precision radiotherapy to the prostate and then 5 weeks (instead of 8 weeks) of standard radiotherapy. Hypothesis: It is safe to give patients an extra two doses of high-precision radiotherapy prior to commencing a shorter period of standard radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Detailed Description
Prostate cancer accounts for one third of all new cancer diagnoses in men and approximately 30% of men will have External Beam Radiotherapy (EBRT) as primary local therapy. Local persistence of prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy is under-appreciated. Prostate cancer has a long natural history and the consequences of local persistence may not be realized for many years. Prostate cancer has a slow growth with a potential doubling time ranging from weeks to months (median 42 days) which has led to the hypothesis that prostate cancer will behave more like a late reacting tissue(1). Brenner et al. (2) used data from prostate Low Dose Rate (LDR) permanent seed implants and EBRT series to derive an alpha/beta of approximately 1.5. Many groups have also calculated the alpha/beta ratio to be in the < 3.0 range(3). If the alpha/beta ratio for prostate cancer is lower than the surrounding normal tissues (Brenner et al. have estimated the alpha/beta for the rectum to be over 5.0), doses greater than 2 Gy (hypofractionation) will afford an advantage as there will be a greater sensitivity of prostate cancer to radiation, as compared to the bladder or rectum. This benefit has been exploited for many years with High Dose Rate (HDR) brachytherapy using Iridium -192. Typical doses for HDR are 19Gy in two fractions in addition to 46Gy in 23 fractions of EBRT (4). With reference to our own institutional data from HDR brachytherapy we calculated the dose distribution in recently treated patients. Due to the nature of the iridium dose distribution, there are considerable areas of much higher dose delivered; 200% of the dose (38Gy) to 12.7% of the target volume, 150% (13.75Gy) to 32.6% of the target volume and 125% (11.9Gy) to 60.1% of the target. Despite the high doses to the periphery of the prostate it is possible to limit the dose to the rectum and bladder to 1cc < 75% (14.25Gy) and the 1cc urethra to <125% (23.75Gy) (4). HDR brachytherapy series have reported durable long term Biochemical Failure Free Survival (BFFS), which are as good or better than comparable external beam or surgical series(5). However despite the low toxicity and excellent biochemical outcomes, HDR brachytherapy utilization in Australia is low, with under 300 cases in total per year. This is due to the logistical difficulty of HDR brachytherapy, anaesthetic requirements, nursing care and patient discomfort. There have been five published studies investigating stereotactic boost in addition to standard fractionation EBRT without using brachytherapy, four reports with the Cyberknife platform (6-9) and one with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) (10). All of these series have early follow up (FU) with reported BFFS between 77% and 100%. The largest experience is from Katz et al. (8) who reported 73 patients with both intermediate (n= 41) and high risk (n=32) disease. They treated patients with the Cyberknife platform to deliver between 18 and 21 Gy in three fractions in addition to 45 Gy in 25 fractions EBRT. With a median follow up of 33 months, BFFS was 89.5% and 77.7% for the intermediate and high risk patients respectively. A 5 mm expansion from the prostate to the Planned Treatment Volume (PTV) was used except posteriorly, where the margin was 3mm. There was 7% Grade 2 acute genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, with late Grade 2 estimates at three years of 5.5% (GU) and 8.2% (GI). Three other series using Cyberknife to mimic HDR were reported between 2008 and 2012 (6, 7, 9). These studies used margins of 0-2 mm posteriorly and 3-5 mm in other directions and reported low rates of Grade 2 and Grade 3 toxicity. Two of these reports specifically attempted to reproduce the heterogeneity of HDR with large areas of the PTV receiving >125% (40% to 45%) and >150% (5% to 10%) of the prescribed dose. Miralbell et al. (10) reported a Linac based IMRT boost in 50 patients in 2010. This series used an endorectal balloon but no image guidance, which may be the cause of their unacceptably high five year estimates of late GI Grade 2 toxicity of 26%. Primary objective: The primary study goal is to assess the acute toxicity of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) boost with three increasing dose levels. Secondary objectives: Nadir PSA at three months and over duration of follow-up Three year and five year Freedom From Biochemical Failure (FFBF) (Nadir + 2.0) Planning feasibility (Minor and Major planning violations) Late Gastrointestinal and Genitourinary Toxicity (modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scale) Patient reported QOL (EPIC-SF-12) Hypothesis: It is safe to dose escalate prostate cancer treatment with a stereotactic boost of up to 30Gy in two fractions to the dominant nodule combined with external beam radiotherapy of 46Gy in 23 fractions with < 15% Grade 2 acute morbidity and < 5% Grade 3 acute morbidity.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Prostate Cancer
Keywords
Prostate Cancer, Dose escalation, Stereotactic, SBRT, Hypofractionation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
42 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Dose escalation using stereotactic boost
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Dose level allocation - Participants will be allocated to the current dose level, or if the current dose level has been filled and acceptable toxicity has been established, they will be enrolled into the next dose level
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Dose escalation using stereotactic boost
Intervention Description
This is a dose escalation study. Participants will be allocated to the current dose level, or if the current dose level has been filled and acceptable toxicity has been established, they will be enrolled into the next dose level. The first dose level will be 20Gy in 2 fractions to PTV and 25Gy to Gross Target Volume (GTV) if identified. The second dose level will be 22Gy in 2 fractions to PTV and 27.5Gy to GTV if identified. The dose level will be 24 Gy in 2 fractions to PTV and 30Gy to GTV if identified. Following stereotactic boost, all participants will receive 46Gy in 23 fractions radiotherapy to the prostate / seminal vesicles +/- lymph nodes.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Acute toxicity
Description
Portion of patients with grade 3 or greater genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicity assessed using the Modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Toxicity Scale.
Time Frame
Assessed up to 12 weeks post treatment.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Late toxicity
Description
At a median follow up of 18 months, Kaplan Meir statistics will be used to estimate the 2 year late Gastrointestinal and Genitourinary Toxicity using the modified RTOG scale.
Time Frame
Up to five years
Title
Cumulative toxicity rate:
Description
The cumulative incidence of treatment related Grade 2 or higher GI or GU toxicity allowing for competing risk (death without prior toxicity event) and loss to follow up (censoring).
Time Frame
From the date of treatment completion assessed up to 5 years
Title
Biochemical failure (PSA failure)
Description
Nadir PSA at three months and over duration of follow-up. This will be compared to historical controls from our prospective database stratified by initial PSA and androgen deprivation use / duration (nil vs. short term vs. long term). When patients have reached a median follow-up of 24 months and 48 months, actuarial Kaplan Meir statistics will be used to estimate the 3 year and 5 year freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) using the Nadir + 2.0 definition.
Time Frame
Up to 5 years.
Title
change in Quality of Life
Description
Patient reported QOL using the validated EPIC SF-36 questionnaire will be collected at baseline, 3 months, 9 months and 21-24 months. Analysis will be performed (a) using the mean scores, with a 10 point deterioration deemed clinically significant and (b) as a change from baseline per individual patient using the 21-24 month questionnaire. A 10-20 point deterioration will be deemed mild-moderate and a >20 point deterioration will be deemed significant. Kaplan Meir statistics will be used to estimate the proportion of patients with a ≥10 point, or ≥20 point deterioration at appropriate time points.
Time Frame
From baseline assessed up to 5 years.

10. Eligibility

Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
35 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Histologically proven prostate adenocarcinoma PSA obtained within three months prior to enrollment. International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) score <15 No contraindication to MRI (pacemaker, severe claustrophobia) Patient must be able to have fiducial markers placed in the prostate (if on anticoagulants, must be cleared by LMO or cardiologist). ECOG performance status 0-2 Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document. Exclusion Criteria: Previous pelvic radiotherapy Prior total prostatectomy Unwilling or unable to give informed consent Unwilling or unable to complete quality of life questionnaires.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Thomas N Eade, MBBS
Organizational Affiliation
Royal North Shore Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital
City
St Leonards
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2065
Country
Australia

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Early Investigation of High Precision Radiotherapy Prior to Commencing Standard Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs