search
Back to results

Allo vs Hypomethylating/Best Supportive Care in MDS (BMTCTN1102)

Primary Purpose

MDS

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant
Hypomethylating Therapy / Best Supportive Care
Sponsored by
Medical College of Wisconsin
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for MDS focused on measuring Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Eligibility Criteria

50 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients fulfilling the following criteria will be eligible for entry into this study:

    1. Patients with de novo MDS who have, or have previously had, Intermediate-2 or High risk disease as determined by the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS). Current Intermediate-2 or High risk disease is NOT a requirement.
    2. Patients must have an acceptable MDS subtype:

      • Refractory cytopenia with unilineage dysplasia (RCUD) (includes refractory anemia (RA))
      • Refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts (RARS)
      • Refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB-1)
      • Refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB-2)
      • Refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia (RCMD)
      • Myelodysplastic syndrome with isolated del(5q) (5q-syndrome)
      • Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), unclassifiable
    3. Patients must have fewer than 20% marrow blasts within 60 days of consent.
    4. Patients may have received prior therapy for the treatment of MDS, including but not limited to: growth factor, transfusion support, immunomodulatory (IMID) therapy, DNA hypomethylating therapy, or cytotoxic chemotherapy prior to enrollment.
    5. Age 50.0-75.0 years.
    6. Karnofsky performance status > 70 or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) ≤ 1.
    7. Patients are eligible if no formal unrelated donor search has been activated prior to date of consent. A formal unrelated donor search begins at the time at which samples are requested from potential National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) donors. Patients who have started a sibling donor search or who have found a matched sibling donor are eligible.
    8. Patients and physicians must be willing to comply with treatment assignment:

      1. No intent to proceed with alloHCT using donor sources not specified in this protocol, including human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched related or unrelated donors (< 6/6 HLA related matched or < 8/8 HLA unrelated matched) or umbilical cord blood unit(s).
      2. No intent to use myeloablative conditioning regimens.
      3. Intent to proceed with RIC alloHCT if a matched sibling or matched unrelated donor is identified. There is no requirement as to the timing of the transplantation.
    9. Patients must be considered to be suitable RIC alloHCT candidates at the time of enrollment based on medical history, physical examination, and available laboratory tests. Specific testing for organ function is not required for eligibility but, if available, these tests should be used to judge eligibility.
    10. Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with the following will be ineligible for registration onto this study:

    1. Therapy-related MDS (defined as the occurrence of MDS due to prior exposure to systemic chemotherapy and/or radiation for malignancy)
    2. Current or prior diagnosis of AML
    3. Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia or myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm (unacceptable MDS subtypes); uncontrolled bacterial, viral or fungal infection (currently taking medication and with progression or no clinical improvement) at time of enrollment.
    4. Patients with prior malignancies, except treated non-melanoma skin cancer or treated cervical carcinoma in situ. Cancer treated with curative surgery without chemotherapy/radiation therapy > 5 years previously will be allowed. Cancer treated with curative surgery < 5 years previously will not be allowed unless approved by the Protocol Officer or one of the Protocol Chairs.
    5. Prior autologous or allogeneic HCT
    6. Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection
    7. Patients of childbearing potential unwilling to use contraceptive techniques
    8. Patients with psychosocial conditions that would prevent study compliance

Sites / Locations

  • City of Hope National Medical Center
  • Stanford Hospital and Clinics
  • University of Florida College of Medicine
  • H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center
  • Emory University
  • University of Chicago
  • University of Kansas Hospital
  • University of Kentucky
  • University of Maryland Medical Systems - Greenebaum Cancer Center
  • Johns Hopkins
  • Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham & Women's
  • Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Karmanos Cancer Institute/BMT
  • Mayo Clinic - Rochester
  • Washington University/Barnes Jewish Hospital
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center
  • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
  • Mount Sinai Hospital
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • University of North Carolina Hospital at Chapel Hill
  • University of North Carolina
  • Duke University Medical Center
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences
  • Jewish Hospital BMT Program
  • University Hospitals of Cleveland/ Case Western
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • Ohio State/Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital
  • Oregon Health & Science University
  • University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  • Baylor College of Medicine/The Methodist Hospital
  • University of Texas/MD Anderson CRC
  • University of Utah Med School
  • Virginia Commonwealth University MCV Hospitals
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  • West Virginia University Hospital
  • Medical College of Wisconsin

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Transplant

Hypomethylating Therapy / Best Supportive Care

Arm Description

Reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (RIC-alloHCT)

The specific non-transplant treatment regimen will be at the discretion of the treating physician.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)
The primary endpoint for this study is overall survival (OS) at three years post-consent. Death from any cause will be considered an event for this endpoint. Surviving participants are censored at the time of last follow-up. Three year OS estimates are adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, performance status, IPSS score, duration of disease, and response to prior hypomethylating therapy. The results posted are from the February 2020 interim analysis per protocol study design. Two interim analyses for efficacy were performed previously in January and November 2019 and presented to the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB). Results at the second analysis was crossing the efficacy boundary. Subsequently, the DSMB approved early release of study data as of February 2020.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants With Leukemia-free Survival (LFS)
LFS is defined as the time from the date of patient consent to the date of progression to AML or death from any cause, whichever comes first. Progression to AML is defined as > 20% leukemic blasts in bone marrow or in the peripheral blood. Death from any cause or transformation of MDS to AML are considered events for this endpoint. Participants without either event are censored at the time of last follow-up. Three year leukemia-free survival probability estimates are adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, performance status, IPSS score, duration of disease, and response to prior hypomethylating therapy.
Quality of Life (QOL) - Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)
QOL will be compared between the 2 arms using the FACT-G instrument. FACT-G evaluates the health-related quality of life (HQL) of patients receiving treatment for cancer. FACT-G consists of four subscales developed and normed in cancer patients: Physical Well-being, Social/Family Well-being, Emotional Well-being, and Functional Well-being. The FACT-G score ranges 0-108. Each subscale is positively scored, with higher scores indicating better functioning. The self-reported questionnaire will be completed at enrollment and at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months from consent. Results shown are FACT-G total scores.
Quality of Life (QOL) - Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (MOS SF-36)
SF36 is being used in this protocol as a generic measure of quality of life (QOL). The self-reported questionnaires are completed at enrollment and at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months from consent. The MOS SF-36 instrument is a general assessment of health QOL with eight components: Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Pain Index, General Health Perceptions, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role Emotional, and Mental Health Index. The sub scores for each of the eight components were computed based on the raw categorical values from the survey and range 0-100 with higher scores indicating better outcomes for each domain. Then overall Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) are computed using standardized algorithm for SF36. MCS and PCS scores range 0-100 with higher score indicating positive outcome. To facilitate comparison of the results with published norms, PCS and MCS are used as the outcome measures in summarizing the SF-36 data.
Quality of Life (QOL) - EQ-5D
QOL will be compared between the 2 arms using the EQ-5D survey. The EQ-5D contains a five-item survey with three response levels per item measuring mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D takes approximately 1 minute to complete (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2005). The EQ-5D score ranges -0.224 to 1. The maximum score of 1 indicates the best health state, by contrast with the scores of individual questions, where higher scores indicate more severe or frequent problems. The self-reported questionnaire will be completed at enrollment and at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months from consent.
Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS) in As-treated Population
Time to event outcomes will be analyzed from the time of consent. Death from any cause will be considered an event for this endpoint. Surviving participants are censored at the time of last follow-up. Three-year OS estimates are adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, performance status, IPSS score, duration of disease, and response to prior hypomethylating therapy.
Percentage of Participants With Leukemia-free Survival (LFS) in As-treated Population
LFS is defined as the time from the date of patient consent to the date of progression to AML or death from any cause, whichever comes first. Progression to AML is defined as > 20% leukemic blasts in bone marrow or in the peripheral blood. Death from any cause or transformation of MDS to AML are considered events for this endpoint. Participants without either event are censored at the time of last follow-up. Three year leukemia-free survival probability estimates are adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, performance status, IPSS score, duration of disease, and response to prior hypomethylating therapy.
Percentage of Participants on HCT Arm With Overall Survival (OS)
The time to event outcomes is evaluated from the time of transplant. Death from any cause will be considered an event for this endpoint. Surviving participants are censored at the time of last follow-up. OS estimates are adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, performance status, IPSS score, duration of disease, and response to prior hypomethylating therapy.
Percentage of Participants on HCT Arm With Disease Relapse
Outcome Measure Description: The time to event outcomes is evaluated from the time of transplant. Disease relapse is defined as: Satisfying criteria for evolution into acute leukemia; or reappearance of pre-transplant morphologic abnormalities, detected in bone marrow specimens; or reappearance of pre-transplant cytogenetic abnormality in at least one metaphase on each of two separate consecutive examinations at least one month apart, regardless of the number of metaphases analyzed; or institution of any therapy to treat relapsed disease (institution of any therapy not meant for maintenance or prevention), including withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy or DLI. Relapse estimates are adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, performance status, IPSS score, duration of disease, and response to prior hypomethylating therapy.
Percentage of Participants on HCT Arm With Disease-free Survival (DFS)
The time to event outcomes is evaluated from the time of transplant. Death or disease relapse/progression will be considered as events for this endpoint. Surviving participants are censored at the time of last follow-up. DFS estimates are adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, performance status, IPSS score, duration of disease, and response to prior hypomethylating therapy.
Percentage of Participants on HCT Arm With Treatment-related Mortality
The time to event outcomes is evaluated from the time of transplant. The events are deaths prior to disease relapse. TRM estimates are adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, performance status, IPSS score, duration of disease, and response to prior hypomethylating therapy.
Percentage of Participants on HCT Arm With Grade II-IV Acute GVHD (aGVHD)
Grade II-IV aGVHD is the event. aGVHD will be graded according to the BMT CTN Manual of Procedures (MOP). Staging for skin: Stage 1. <25% rash; 2. 25-50%; 3. >50%; 4. generalized erythroderma with bullae. Staging for GI: Stage 1. Diarrhea>500ml/d or persistent nausea; 2. >1000ml/d; 3. >1500ml/d; 4. Large volume diarrhea and severe abdominal pain +- ileus. Staging for Liver: Stage 1. bilirubin 2-3mg/dl; 2. bilirubin 3-6 mg/dl; 3. bilirubin 6-15 mg/dl; 4. bilirubin>15mg/dl. aGVHD grading is performed by the consensus conference criteria (Przepiorka et al. 1995). Grade I aGVHD is defined as Skin stage of 1-2 and stage 0 for both GI and liver organs. Grade II is stage 3 of skin, or stage 1 of GI, or stage 1 of liver. Grade III is stage 2-4 for GI, or stage 2-3 of liver. Grade IV is stage 4 of skin, or stage 4 of liver.
Percentage of Participants on HCT Arm With Grade III-IV Acute GVHD
The time to event outcomes is evaluated from the time of transplant. Grade III-IV Acute GVHD will be considered as events for this endpoint.
Percentage of Participants on HCT Arm With Chronic GVHD
The time to event outcomes is evaluated from the time of transplant. Chronic GVHD will be considered as events for this endpoint. Data will be collected and reviewed according to the recommendations of the NIH Consensus Criteria. Eight organs will be scored on a 0-3 scale to reflect degree of chronic GVHD involvement. Liver and pulmonary function test results and use of systemic therapy for treatment of chronic GVHD will also be recorded. This secondary endpoint of chronic GVHD will include mild, moderate and severe chronic GVHD based on NIH Consensus Criteria.

Full Information

First Posted
December 16, 2013
Last Updated
March 1, 2023
Sponsor
Medical College of Wisconsin
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Cancer Institute (NCI), Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network, National Marrow Donor Program
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02016781
Brief Title
Allo vs Hypomethylating/Best Supportive Care in MDS (BMTCTN1102)
Official Title
A Multi-Center Biologic Assignment Trial Comparing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant to Hypomethylating Therapy or Best Supportive Care in Patients w/Intermediate-2 & High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (BMTCTN1102)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 16, 2013 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 5, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 5, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Medical College of Wisconsin
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Cancer Institute (NCI), Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network, National Marrow Donor Program

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study is designed as a multicenter trial, with biological assignment to one of two study arms; Arm 1: Reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (RIC-alloHCT), Arm 2: Non-Transplant Therapy/Best Supportive Care.
Detailed Description
Background: MDS is a clonal disorder of hematopoietic precursors and stem cells, which may evolve to a terminal phase resembling acute leukemia. A subject of clinical urgency for researchers, clinicians, patients, and health care underwriters such as Medicare, is the role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) in the treatment of older patients with higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). The use of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens has extended HCT to the care of older patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and lymphoma and a number of retrospective and phase II trials for patients with MDS now show the curative potential of RIC alloHCT in selected patients. This protocol is designed to evaluate the relative benefits of RIC alloHCT compared to non-transplant therapies focusing on overall survival. This will be done by having patients biologically assigned to the alloHCT arm or the hypomethylating therapy/best supportive care arm and following them for survival at 3 years.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
MDS
Keywords
Myelodysplastic Syndrome

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Two arms will enroll and have data collected on them simultaneously.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Masking Description
No parties are masked in this trial.
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
384 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Transplant
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (RIC-alloHCT)
Arm Title
Hypomethylating Therapy / Best Supportive Care
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The specific non-transplant treatment regimen will be at the discretion of the treating physician.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant
Other Intervention Name(s)
RIC alloHCT
Intervention Description
Bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplant.from a fully matched related (6/6) or unrelated (8/8) donor. The specific transplant treatment regimen will be at the discretion of the treating physician but is required to be reduced-intensity.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Hypomethylating Therapy / Best Supportive Care
Other Intervention Name(s)
Non-transplant
Intervention Description
The specific non-transplant treatment regimen will be at the discretion of the treating physician.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)
Description
The primary endpoint for this study is overall survival (OS) at three years post-consent. Death from any cause will be considered an event for this endpoint. Surviving participants are censored at the time of last follow-up. Three year OS estimates are adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, performance status, IPSS score, duration of disease, and response to prior hypomethylating therapy. The results posted are from the February 2020 interim analysis per protocol study design. Two interim analyses for efficacy were performed previously in January and November 2019 and presented to the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB). Results at the second analysis was crossing the efficacy boundary. Subsequently, the DSMB approved early release of study data as of February 2020.
Time Frame
3 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With Leukemia-free Survival (LFS)
Description
LFS is defined as the time from the date of patient consent to the date of progression to AML or death from any cause, whichever comes first. Progression to AML is defined as > 20% leukemic blasts in bone marrow or in the peripheral blood. Death from any cause or transformation of MDS to AML are considered events for this endpoint. Participants without either event are censored at the time of last follow-up. Three year leukemia-free survival probability estimates are adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, performance status, IPSS score, duration of disease, and response to prior hypomethylating therapy.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Quality of Life (QOL) - Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)
Description
QOL will be compared between the 2 arms using the FACT-G instrument. FACT-G evaluates the health-related quality of life (HQL) of patients receiving treatment for cancer. FACT-G consists of four subscales developed and normed in cancer patients: Physical Well-being, Social/Family Well-being, Emotional Well-being, and Functional Well-being. The FACT-G score ranges 0-108. Each subscale is positively scored, with higher scores indicating better functioning. The self-reported questionnaire will be completed at enrollment and at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months from consent. Results shown are FACT-G total scores.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Quality of Life (QOL) - Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (MOS SF-36)
Description
SF36 is being used in this protocol as a generic measure of quality of life (QOL). The self-reported questionnaires are completed at enrollment and at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months from consent. The MOS SF-36 instrument is a general assessment of health QOL with eight components: Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Pain Index, General Health Perceptions, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role Emotional, and Mental Health Index. The sub scores for each of the eight components were computed based on the raw categorical values from the survey and range 0-100 with higher scores indicating better outcomes for each domain. Then overall Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) are computed using standardized algorithm for SF36. MCS and PCS scores range 0-100 with higher score indicating positive outcome. To facilitate comparison of the results with published norms, PCS and MCS are used as the outcome measures in summarizing the SF-36 data.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Quality of Life (QOL) - EQ-5D
Description
QOL will be compared between the 2 arms using the EQ-5D survey. The EQ-5D contains a five-item survey with three response levels per item measuring mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D takes approximately 1 minute to complete (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2005). The EQ-5D score ranges -0.224 to 1. The maximum score of 1 indicates the best health state, by contrast with the scores of individual questions, where higher scores indicate more severe or frequent problems. The self-reported questionnaire will be completed at enrollment and at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months from consent.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS) in As-treated Population
Description
Time to event outcomes will be analyzed from the time of consent. Death from any cause will be considered an event for this endpoint. Surviving participants are censored at the time of last follow-up. Three-year OS estimates are adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, performance status, IPSS score, duration of disease, and response to prior hypomethylating therapy.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Percentage of Participants With Leukemia-free Survival (LFS) in As-treated Population
Description
LFS is defined as the time from the date of patient consent to the date of progression to AML or death from any cause, whichever comes first. Progression to AML is defined as > 20% leukemic blasts in bone marrow or in the peripheral blood. Death from any cause or transformation of MDS to AML are considered events for this endpoint. Participants without either event are censored at the time of last follow-up. Three year leukemia-free survival probability estimates are adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, performance status, IPSS score, duration of disease, and response to prior hypomethylating therapy.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Percentage of Participants on HCT Arm With Overall Survival (OS)
Description
The time to event outcomes is evaluated from the time of transplant. Death from any cause will be considered an event for this endpoint. Surviving participants are censored at the time of last follow-up. OS estimates are adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, performance status, IPSS score, duration of disease, and response to prior hypomethylating therapy.
Time Frame
27 months post-transplant
Title
Percentage of Participants on HCT Arm With Disease Relapse
Description
Outcome Measure Description: The time to event outcomes is evaluated from the time of transplant. Disease relapse is defined as: Satisfying criteria for evolution into acute leukemia; or reappearance of pre-transplant morphologic abnormalities, detected in bone marrow specimens; or reappearance of pre-transplant cytogenetic abnormality in at least one metaphase on each of two separate consecutive examinations at least one month apart, regardless of the number of metaphases analyzed; or institution of any therapy to treat relapsed disease (institution of any therapy not meant for maintenance or prevention), including withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy or DLI. Relapse estimates are adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, performance status, IPSS score, duration of disease, and response to prior hypomethylating therapy.
Time Frame
27 months post-transplant
Title
Percentage of Participants on HCT Arm With Disease-free Survival (DFS)
Description
The time to event outcomes is evaluated from the time of transplant. Death or disease relapse/progression will be considered as events for this endpoint. Surviving participants are censored at the time of last follow-up. DFS estimates are adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, performance status, IPSS score, duration of disease, and response to prior hypomethylating therapy.
Time Frame
27 months post-transplant
Title
Percentage of Participants on HCT Arm With Treatment-related Mortality
Description
The time to event outcomes is evaluated from the time of transplant. The events are deaths prior to disease relapse. TRM estimates are adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, performance status, IPSS score, duration of disease, and response to prior hypomethylating therapy.
Time Frame
27 months post-transplant
Title
Percentage of Participants on HCT Arm With Grade II-IV Acute GVHD (aGVHD)
Description
Grade II-IV aGVHD is the event. aGVHD will be graded according to the BMT CTN Manual of Procedures (MOP). Staging for skin: Stage 1. <25% rash; 2. 25-50%; 3. >50%; 4. generalized erythroderma with bullae. Staging for GI: Stage 1. Diarrhea>500ml/d or persistent nausea; 2. >1000ml/d; 3. >1500ml/d; 4. Large volume diarrhea and severe abdominal pain +- ileus. Staging for Liver: Stage 1. bilirubin 2-3mg/dl; 2. bilirubin 3-6 mg/dl; 3. bilirubin 6-15 mg/dl; 4. bilirubin>15mg/dl. aGVHD grading is performed by the consensus conference criteria (Przepiorka et al. 1995). Grade I aGVHD is defined as Skin stage of 1-2 and stage 0 for both GI and liver organs. Grade II is stage 3 of skin, or stage 1 of GI, or stage 1 of liver. Grade III is stage 2-4 for GI, or stage 2-3 of liver. Grade IV is stage 4 of skin, or stage 4 of liver.
Time Frame
27 months post-transplant
Title
Percentage of Participants on HCT Arm With Grade III-IV Acute GVHD
Description
The time to event outcomes is evaluated from the time of transplant. Grade III-IV Acute GVHD will be considered as events for this endpoint.
Time Frame
27 months post-transplant
Title
Percentage of Participants on HCT Arm With Chronic GVHD
Description
The time to event outcomes is evaluated from the time of transplant. Chronic GVHD will be considered as events for this endpoint. Data will be collected and reviewed according to the recommendations of the NIH Consensus Criteria. Eight organs will be scored on a 0-3 scale to reflect degree of chronic GVHD involvement. Liver and pulmonary function test results and use of systemic therapy for treatment of chronic GVHD will also be recorded. This secondary endpoint of chronic GVHD will include mild, moderate and severe chronic GVHD based on NIH Consensus Criteria.
Time Frame
27 months post-transplant

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients fulfilling the following criteria will be eligible for entry into this study: Patients with de novo MDS who have, or have previously had, Intermediate-2 or High risk disease as determined by the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS). Current Intermediate-2 or High risk disease is NOT a requirement. Patients must have an acceptable MDS subtype: Refractory cytopenia with unilineage dysplasia (RCUD) (includes refractory anemia (RA)) Refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts (RARS) Refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB-1) Refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB-2) Refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia (RCMD) Myelodysplastic syndrome with isolated del(5q) (5q-syndrome) Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), unclassifiable Patients must have fewer than 20% marrow blasts within 60 days of consent. Patients may have received prior therapy for the treatment of MDS, including but not limited to: growth factor, transfusion support, immunomodulatory (IMID) therapy, DNA hypomethylating therapy, or cytotoxic chemotherapy prior to enrollment. Age 50.0-75.0 years. Karnofsky performance status > 70 or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) ≤ 1. Patients are eligible if no formal unrelated donor search has been activated prior to date of consent. A formal unrelated donor search begins at the time at which samples are requested from potential National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) donors. Patients who have started a sibling donor search or who have found a matched sibling donor are eligible. Patients and physicians must be willing to comply with treatment assignment: No intent to proceed with alloHCT using donor sources not specified in this protocol, including human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched related or unrelated donors (< 6/6 HLA related matched or < 8/8 HLA unrelated matched) or umbilical cord blood unit(s). No intent to use myeloablative conditioning regimens. Intent to proceed with RIC alloHCT if a matched sibling or matched unrelated donor is identified. There is no requirement as to the timing of the transplantation. Patients must be considered to be suitable RIC alloHCT candidates at the time of enrollment based on medical history, physical examination, and available laboratory tests. Specific testing for organ function is not required for eligibility but, if available, these tests should be used to judge eligibility. Signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Patients with the following will be ineligible for registration onto this study: Therapy-related MDS (defined as the occurrence of MDS due to prior exposure to systemic chemotherapy and/or radiation for malignancy) Current or prior diagnosis of AML Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia or myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm (unacceptable MDS subtypes); uncontrolled bacterial, viral or fungal infection (currently taking medication and with progression or no clinical improvement) at time of enrollment. Patients with prior malignancies, except treated non-melanoma skin cancer or treated cervical carcinoma in situ. Cancer treated with curative surgery without chemotherapy/radiation therapy > 5 years previously will be allowed. Cancer treated with curative surgery < 5 years previously will not be allowed unless approved by the Protocol Officer or one of the Protocol Chairs. Prior autologous or allogeneic HCT Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection Patients of childbearing potential unwilling to use contraceptive techniques Patients with psychosocial conditions that would prevent study compliance
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mary Horowitz, MD, MS
Organizational Affiliation
Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), Medical College of Wisconsin
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
City of Hope National Medical Center
City
Duarte
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91010
Country
United States
Facility Name
Stanford Hospital and Clinics
City
Stanford
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94305
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Florida College of Medicine
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32610-0277
Country
United States
Facility Name
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33624
Country
United States
Facility Name
Emory University
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30322
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Chicago
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60637-1470
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Kansas Hospital
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66160
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Kentucky
City
Lexington
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40536
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Maryland Medical Systems - Greenebaum Cancer Center
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Johns Hopkins
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21231
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham & Women's
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02115
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Massachusetts General Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02115
Country
United States
Facility Name
Karmanos Cancer Institute/BMT
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic - Rochester
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905
Country
United States
Facility Name
Washington University/Barnes Jewish Hospital
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Nebraska Medical Center
City
Omaha
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68198
Country
United States
Facility Name
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
City
Buffalo
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14263
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mount Sinai Hospital
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10029
Country
United States
Facility Name
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10065
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of North Carolina Hospital at Chapel Hill
City
Chapel Hill
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27599
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of North Carolina
City
Chapel Hill
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27599
Country
United States
Facility Name
Duke University Medical Center
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27705
Country
United States
Facility Name
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27157
Country
United States
Facility Name
Jewish Hospital BMT Program
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45236
Country
United States
Facility Name
University Hospitals of Cleveland/ Case Western
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44106
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ohio State/Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43210
Country
United States
Facility Name
Oregon Health & Science University
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97239-3098
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37232-8210
Country
United States
Facility Name
Baylor College of Medicine/The Methodist Hospital
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Texas/MD Anderson CRC
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Utah Med School
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84132
Country
United States
Facility Name
Virginia Commonwealth University MCV Hospitals
City
Richmond
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23298
Country
United States
Facility Name
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98109
Country
United States
Facility Name
West Virginia University Hospital
City
Morgantown
State/Province
West Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
26506
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medical College of Wisconsin
City
Milwaukee
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53211
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Results will be published in a manuscript and supporting information submitted to NIH BioLINCC (including data dictionaries, case report forms, data submission documentation, documentation for outcomes dataset, etc where indicated).
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Within 6 months of official study closure at participating sites.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Available to the public
IPD Sharing URL
https://biolincc.nhlbi.nih.gov/home/
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24972249
Citation
Saber W, Le Rademacher J, Sekeres M, Logan B, Lewis M, Mendizabal A, Leifer E, Appelbaum FR, Horowitz MM, Nakamura R, Cutler CS. Multicenter biologic assignment trial comparing reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant to hypomethylating therapy or best supportive care in patients aged 50 to 75 with intermediate-2 and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network #1102 study rationale, design, and methods. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014 Oct;20(10):1566-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.06.010. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34106753
Citation
Nakamura R, Saber W, Martens MJ, Ramirez A, Scott B, Oran B, Leifer E, Tamari R, Mishra A, Maziarz RT, McGuirk J, Westervelt P, Vasu S, Patnaik M, Kamble R, Forman SJ, Sekeres MA, Appelbaum F, Mendizabal A, Logan B, Horowitz M, Cutler C. Biologic Assignment Trial of Reduced-Intensity Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Based on Donor Availability in Patients 50-75 Years of Age With Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndrome. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Oct 20;39(30):3328-3339. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.03380. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://bethematch.org
Description
National Marrow Donor Program

Learn more about this trial

Allo vs Hypomethylating/Best Supportive Care in MDS (BMTCTN1102)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs