search
Back to results

Efficacy of a Combined Ergonomic Health Promotion Intervention on Employee Health

Primary Purpose

Sedentary, Overweight

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Active Workstation Intervention
Ergonomic Intervention
Email Intervention
Bluetooth enabled device (Wahoo Fitness Blue SC sensor) and accompanying iPod application.
Sponsored by
University of Iowa
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Sedentary

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • We will recruit overweight/obese (body mass index 25.0-40.0 kg/m2) adults (18-65 years) working in full-time (minimum 35 hours/week), sedentary (self-report sitting >75% work time) occupations at an independent work site.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Working in an office that will not meet the space or electrical requirements of the active workstation, acute or chronic illness not under treatment of a provider, orthopedic limitations that prohibit physical activity, current or planned pregnancy, hospitalization from a physical or mental disorder in the past six months and/or taking medication that may impair physical activity

Sites / Locations

  • University of Iowa

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Experimental Group

Active Control

Arm Description

This group will receive the seated active workstation intervention, the ergonomic intervention and the email intervention for 16 weeks.

This group will receive the ergonomic intervention and email intervention only for 16 weeks. This group will not receive a seated active workstation.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in Occupational Physical Activity From Baseline to 16 Weeks
Occupational physical activity (primary outcome) will be measured objectively with the GENEActiv physical activity monitor. The monitor will be worn on the right ankle and will be worn for 5 working days during all non-bathing hours. The outcome measure will be change in occupational activity (average counts/work day) from baseline to 16 weeks. The measure will be calculated as follows: 16 weeks value - baseline value.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
February 21, 2014
Last Updated
September 20, 2017
Sponsor
University of Iowa
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02071420
Brief Title
Efficacy of a Combined Ergonomic Health Promotion Intervention on Employee Health
Official Title
Efficacy of a Combined Ergonomic Health Promotion Intervention on Employee Health
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Iowa

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Our objective in this pilot study is to test the combined effect of a) replacing office workers' sedentary workstations with active workstations (LifeBalance Station) and b) optimizing computer workstation ergonomics on daily occupational sedentary time, cardiometabolic risk factors, musculoskeletal symptom health outcomes and work productivity.
Detailed Description
Primary Aim: To compare the effects of providing sedentary employees with seated active workstations in combination with an ergonomic intervention and regular motivational emails (experimental group) against the ergonomic intervention and regular emails only (active control group) on occupational sedentary behavior over 16 weeks. Hypothesis: The addition of a seated active workstation will result in significant reductions in daily occupational sedentary time compared to the active control group. Secondary Aims: To compare the effects of the experimental group against the active control group on secondary measures of cardiometabolic disease risk factors, musculoskeletal discomfort, cognitive function and work productivity. Hypothesis 1: The experimental group will result in reduced cardiometabolic disease risk, musculoskeletal discomfort and work limitations compared to the active control group.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Sedentary, Overweight

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Experimental Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
This group will receive the seated active workstation intervention, the ergonomic intervention and the email intervention for 16 weeks.
Arm Title
Active Control
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
This group will receive the ergonomic intervention and email intervention only for 16 weeks. This group will not receive a seated active workstation.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Active Workstation Intervention
Intervention Description
Participants in the experimental group will receive a seated active workstation at their work setting for 16 weeks.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Ergonomic Intervention
Intervention Description
Participants of both arms will receive a face to face ergonomic workstation optimization intervention. This consultation will take 30 minutes to complete and will be performed at the participant's actual work station.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Email Intervention
Intervention Description
Participants of both arms will receive three emails per week for 16 weeks. Messages will be consistent with what they hear in the ergonomic intervention (e.g., encourage taking breaks from sitting at work and adjusting posture to be in line with ergonomic principles).
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Bluetooth enabled device (Wahoo Fitness Blue SC sensor) and accompanying iPod application.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Occupational Physical Activity From Baseline to 16 Weeks
Description
Occupational physical activity (primary outcome) will be measured objectively with the GENEActiv physical activity monitor. The monitor will be worn on the right ankle and will be worn for 5 working days during all non-bathing hours. The outcome measure will be change in occupational activity (average counts/work day) from baseline to 16 weeks. The measure will be calculated as follows: 16 weeks value - baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline and 16 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: We will recruit overweight/obese (body mass index 25.0-40.0 kg/m2) adults (18-65 years) working in full-time (minimum 35 hours/week), sedentary (self-report sitting >75% work time) occupations at an independent work site. Exclusion Criteria: Working in an office that will not meet the space or electrical requirements of the active workstation, acute or chronic illness not under treatment of a provider, orthopedic limitations that prohibit physical activity, current or planned pregnancy, hospitalization from a physical or mental disorder in the past six months and/or taking medication that may impair physical activity
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lucas Carr, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Iowa
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Iowa
City
Iowa City
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
52242
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26260492
Citation
Carr LJ, Leonhard C, Tucker S, Fethke N, Benzo R, Gerr F. Total Worker Health Intervention Increases Activity of Sedentary Workers. Am J Prev Med. 2016 Jan;50(1):9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.06.022. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy of a Combined Ergonomic Health Promotion Intervention on Employee Health

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs