search
Back to results

Patient and Provider Glucose Reporting Preferences Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP)

Primary Purpose

Type 1 Diabetes

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Continuous Glucose Monitor
Self Monitoring Blood Glucose
Clinician
Sponsored by
HealthPartners Institute
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional health services research trial for Type 1 Diabetes

Eligibility Criteria

7 Years - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Type 1 Diabetics

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Less than the age of 7
  • Non-English Speaker

Sites / Locations

  • Eda Cengiz
  • Larry Deeb
  • Henry Ford
  • Park Nicollet International Diabetes Center
  • The Diabetes Center, PLLC
  • St. Vincent's
  • Columbia University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Other

Other

Other

Arm Label

Continuous Glucose Monitoring

Self Monitoring Blood Glucose

Clinicians

Arm Description

Participants will wear Continuous Glucose Monitoring for two weeks.

Participants will self test for two weeks.

Clinicians completing study visits.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Portion of Study Participants Reporting Greater Utility From AGP vs. Traditional Glucose Data Reports
Patients will use either SMBG or CGM for a two week period following their screening visit. At the end of the two week period they will return to the study site to download their device and have an AGP report printed. They will then complete a preference and utility survey.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
February 25, 2014
Last Updated
February 29, 2016
Sponsor
HealthPartners Institute
Collaborators
The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02074384
Brief Title
Patient and Provider Glucose Reporting Preferences Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP)
Official Title
Understanding Patient and Provider Glucose Reporting Preferences in Type 1 Diabetes: Cloud Based Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
HealthPartners Institute
Collaborators
The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
International Diabetes Center (IDC) proposes a preference and usability study of glucose data acquisition and reporting, evaluating streamlined standardized cloud-based glucose reporting including work flow as well as patient and clinician preference at Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) Exchange sites to enhance standard Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) reporting. This phase 2 project assesses the efficacy of standardized glucose data report generation and preferred report presentation format; both are necessary to increase use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data to improve care processes and outcomes for Type 1 diabetes.
Detailed Description
Patient participation in diabetes treatment has relied upon episodic self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). SMBG assists patients and clinicians with adjustments of insulin, identification of hypoglycemia, nutritional intake and activity in order to optimize diabetes control. SMBG however is subject to bias dependent upon the testing frequency and timing. In contrast, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems capture continuous 24-hour glucose data uninterrupted and unbiased. It provides valuable information about daily/nightly alterations in glucose patterns. Unfortunately SMBG, CGM and insulin pump devices have proprietary software with unique data standards, acquisition methods, reports, and graphic displays. These differences make evaluation and comparison of SMBG or CGM data difficult for clinicians and patients. IDC created an Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) report to reduce challenges of device specific reports through a standardized report which is produced from any device with streamlined graphic displays of glucose trends. The phase 1 project (2012), gathered expert stakeholders (clinical, research, industry, patients) who validated data standards and recommended changes to the CGM-AGP reports. These changes are now integrated into a secure cloud-based infrastructure for AGP reporting. Phase 2 of this project is a usability and preference study of glucose reporting systems. It will include an in depth study of 6 T1D Ex clinical sites. The T1D Exchange Clinic Network was formed to support the development of a large registry of adults and children with type 1 diabetes for the purpose of conducting multiple studies proposed by T1D Exchange investigators, and other researchers, patients, and companies. The 6 sites will be selected for an in-depth study utilizing middleware data collection services (Diasend or SweetSpot) to facilitate efficient collection of data from diverse devices. These middleware solutions integrate with the captūrAGP system to automatically produce an AGP report. These sites will test the feasibility of AGP cloud reporting while collecting patient and clinician opinions on report preference. All 6 sites participating in phase 2 will collect patient and clinician preference measures. Two study sites will undergo time in motion (TIM) measurement and workflow mapping of current process. This TIM sub-study includes workflow mapping of current and cloud-based processes utilizing Toyota Lean (Kaizen) methodology. Sites 3 - 6 will receive enhanced designs through the adaptive trial method with learnings applied from sites 1 and 2. A key deliverable of this study is patient and clinician insight into their utilization of CGM reporting technologies. Recognizing that adoption of technology is often stymied by time constraints, report reliability and ease of interpretation, these variables will be examined. The goal of phase 2 is to analyze the viability of standard reporting and to evaluate preference (patient and clinicians) for and perceived value of different types of glucose pattern reports (AGP vs. device) including clinical practice time saved.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Type 1 Diabetes

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
161 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Continuous Glucose Monitoring
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Participants will wear Continuous Glucose Monitoring for two weeks.
Arm Title
Self Monitoring Blood Glucose
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Participants will self test for two weeks.
Arm Title
Clinicians
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Clinicians completing study visits.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Continuous Glucose Monitor
Other Intervention Name(s)
Dexcom G4 professional version Continuous Glucose Monitor
Intervention Description
CGM device for measurement of interstitial glucose on a 24/7 continuous cycle.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Self Monitoring Blood Glucose
Intervention Description
Participants will use their own SMBG device.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Clinician
Intervention Description
Survey of clinicians after study visits
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Portion of Study Participants Reporting Greater Utility From AGP vs. Traditional Glucose Data Reports
Description
Patients will use either SMBG or CGM for a two week period following their screening visit. At the end of the two week period they will return to the study site to download their device and have an AGP report printed. They will then complete a preference and utility survey.
Time Frame
At the end of the two week SMBG or CGM period

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
7 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Type 1 Diabetics Exclusion Criteria: Less than the age of 7 Non-English Speaker
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Richard Bergenstal, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Park Nicollet
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Deborah Mulllen, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Park Nicollet
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Eda Cengiz
City
New Haven
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06511
Country
United States
Facility Name
Larry Deeb
City
Tallahassee
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32308
Country
United States
Facility Name
Henry Ford
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Park Nicollet International Diabetes Center
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55416
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Diabetes Center, PLLC
City
Ocean Springs
State/Province
Mississippi
ZIP/Postal Code
39564
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Vincent's
City
Billings
State/Province
Montana
ZIP/Postal Code
59101
Country
United States
Facility Name
Columbia University
City
New York City
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10032
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Patient and Provider Glucose Reporting Preferences Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs