search
Back to results

Are Serious Games Promoting Mobility an Attractive Alternative to Conventional Self-training for Elderly People?

Primary Purpose

Mobility Limitations, Geriatric Disorder

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Switzerland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
serious games
Conventional self-training
Sponsored by
Klinik Valens
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Mobility Limitations focused on measuring elderly, exercise program, self-training, mobility, computer-based learning games, serious game, balance, training adherence, training compliance, Kinect ®, Fit Bit ®

Eligibility Criteria

65 Years - undefined (Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. +65 years old
  2. Ability to walk independently over 20meters, with or without walking aids.
  3. Self-training prescribed by the doctor
  4. sufficient written and spoken knowledge of German to fill out questionnaires, with or without help.
  5. Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Cognitive impairment, defined as a Mini-Mental-State Examination (MMSE) score < 26.
  2. Other limiting disorders hampering the practice of computer-based games (e.g. visual impairment, numbness, vertigo)

Sites / Locations

  • Walenstadtberg Klinik

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

serious games self-training program

Conventional self-training program

Arm Description

Serious games are played, using Kinect® and Fit Bit®. This program is performed during the 10 days of the intervention on a self-training basis and 2 specific time-slot (2x30 min) per day are allocated for this program.

conventional physical exercises are performed during the 10 days of the intervention, on a self-training basis and 2 specific time-slot (2x30 min) per day are allocated for this program.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Intensity of self-training
Self-training intensity is defined as the frequency of training sessions (f) multiplied by the duration (T) of each training session. The training intensity (f x T) of the 10-days intervention are summated. These data are recorded daily in a logbook by the patient himself from t1 (which equates to approximately day 4 after admission) till the end of the intervention (t2) i.e. 10 workings days later. The logbook is then collected for data extraction at the end of the intervention (t2), which equates to approximately day 16-17 after patient's admission in the clinic.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Berg Balance Scale
The intervention lasts 10 working days (from t1 to t2), starting from day 4 of the patient's admission in the rehabilitation center. The Berg Balance Scale is a clinical test for static and dynamic balance abilities. It is assessed before the start of the intervention (t1), i.e. approximately at day 1-2 after admission and again at the end of the intervention phase (t2) 10 working days later, i.e. approximately at day 16-17 after admission.
Falls Efficacy Scale - International version
The intervention phase lasts 10 working days (from t1 to t2), starting from day 4 of the patient's admission in the rehabilitation center. The Falls Efficacy Scale is a questionnaire measuring the fear of falling. It is assessed before the start of the intervention (t1), i.e. approximately at day 1-2 after admission and again at the end of the intervention phase (t2) 10 working days later, i.e. approximately at day 16-17 after admission.
Local dynamic stability
Local Dynamic Stability (LDS), a non-linear gait stability index, has been advocated as an early indicator of risk for falls. LDS is measured with a tri-axial accelerometer and quantified by calculating Lyapunov exponent.

Full Information

First Posted
February 6, 2014
Last Updated
February 27, 2019
Sponsor
Klinik Valens
Collaborators
State Secretariat for Education Research and Innovation, Switzerland, Office Ambient Assisted Living
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02077049
Brief Title
Are Serious Games Promoting Mobility an Attractive Alternative to Conventional Self-training for Elderly People?
Official Title
Are Serious Games Promoting Mobility an Attractive Alternative to Conventional Self-training for Elderly People? A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
March 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Klinik Valens
Collaborators
State Secretariat for Education Research and Innovation, Switzerland, Office Ambient Assisted Living

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The main objective of this study is to determine whether elderly people in rehabilitation setting show higher adherence to self-training when using computer-based-learning games (i.e. the so called serious games) than when performing conventional exercises. Secondly the study explores to which extend balance and mobility performances vary according to the mode of self-training. The primary study hypothesis is that elderly people practice longer and more frequently with serious games than with a conventional exercise booklet. The secondary hypothesis is that patients experience a significant higher improvement in their balance capacity by using serious games compared to patients performing conventional exercises.
Detailed Description
Background: The Swiss population, and in Europe in general, is getting older. Due to this evolving demographic trend, the need to develop specific healthcare services for this age group is becoming crucial. From the international literature, evidence-based findings have demonstrated that physical abilities of elderly people can be increased, and institutional placement and mortality can be reduced through specific inpatient rehabilitation programs (Bachmann, Finger et al. 2010). Adults 65 years and older should carry out aerobic physical activities for at least 150 minutes of moderate intensity or for 75 minutes of high intensity in a week. Besides it is strongly recommended that senior adults perform strengthening exercises minimum twice a week and activities promoting balance minimum thrice a week (WHO 2010; NIH 2013). In order to increase the training intensity and thus the independence in activities of daily living, older patients admitted in Kliniken Valens are instructed with a customized self-training program, in addition to the usual rehabilitation services. As for therapist-assisted sessions, this self-training program leads to significant improvement of patient's physical performance (Olney, Nymark et al. 2006) and represents therefore a proven, efficient and cost-effective intervention for inpatient settings. However, the compliance of elderly people to execute self-training exercises varies considerably. These programs are often considered as tedious and boring, and so prematurely stopped (Phillips, Schneider et al. 2004). An alternative to increase patient's motivation could be through serious games practice. Kliniken Valens has already experienced promising results with computer-based games such as the Nintendo Wii® (Schnurr and Oesch 2012). Methods: In this study participants are categorized in 4 strata according to their Berg Balance Score (BBS) (≤ 44 or ≥45) and their computer skills. Subsequently they are allocated randomly either in the intervention group or in the control group. In addition to the usual rehabilitation services provided in the clinic, participants of both groups are entitled to 2 additional time-slots (2 x 30 min/day) devoted to self-training and this during the 10 days of the intervention period. This protocol ensures the same conditions for each participant to perform or not self-training exercises. For safety measures, participants with a low BBS (<45) perform the program in siting, whereas those with a higher BBS (≥45) practice in standing position (in front of a bench). The time frame of the intervention phase (from t1 to t2) lasts 10 working days and starts after self-training exercises have been instructed. In other words, t1 equates to approximately day 4 after the patient's admission in the clinic and t2 is 10 working days later, i.e. approximately day 16 after admission. Intervention group: The participants are instructed by experienced physiotherapists on serious games with Kinect®. Additionally, participants wear the Fit Bit® (an activity tracker device) and are encouraged to walk and climb stairs instead of using the escalator. Finally participants are asked to write down in a logbook, the frequency and duration of their self-training sessions. Control group: As in the usual rehabilitation services, experienced physiotherapists arrange a customized self-training program, instruct the exercises and deliver a hand-out. Additionally, patients are encouraged to walk and climb stairs instead of using the escalator. Finally participants are asked to write down in a logbook, the frequency and duration of their self-training sessions. Data collection: Data on self-training's intensity (primary outcome) are extracted from the logbook at post-intervention (t2) i.e. after the 10 working days of the intervention phase. The Berg Balance Scale and the Falls Efficacy Scale (secondary outcomes) are completed by a blinded researcher at pre- and post-intervention (before t1 and after t2) i.e. approximately at day 1-2 after admission and day 16-17 after admission. Data analysis: Data are analyzed using the statistical software for social sciences (SPSS). The statistical analysis of the two groups is performed following a normal distribution of data, with an unmatched t-test. For non-normal distributions, the Mann-Whitney U test is used.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Mobility Limitations, Geriatric Disorder
Keywords
elderly, exercise program, self-training, mobility, computer-based learning games, serious game, balance, training adherence, training compliance, Kinect ®, Fit Bit ®

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
InvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
54 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
serious games self-training program
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Serious games are played, using Kinect® and Fit Bit®. This program is performed during the 10 days of the intervention on a self-training basis and 2 specific time-slot (2x30 min) per day are allocated for this program.
Arm Title
Conventional self-training program
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
conventional physical exercises are performed during the 10 days of the intervention, on a self-training basis and 2 specific time-slot (2x30 min) per day are allocated for this program.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
serious games
Other Intervention Name(s)
Kinect®, Xbox®, Windows®, Fit Bit®
Intervention Description
Execution of computer-based games that stimulate patient's mobility. The game is displayed on a Television (TV) screen and the patient's movements are detected by the sensors of the Kinect® camera, requiring therefore no game console. The Fit Bit®, a mobility tracker device, is attached at the patient's belt the whole day and measure all the trips performed and stairs climbed. This serious games program is instructed individually by experienced physiotherapists.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Conventional self-training
Other Intervention Name(s)
gymnastic exercises, home exercises, physical exercises
Intervention Description
Participants perform conventional physical exercises that train their balance capabilities. There are instructed by experienced physiotherapists and are adapted to each patient's physical abilities. Detailed handouts are distributed to each participants.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Intensity of self-training
Description
Self-training intensity is defined as the frequency of training sessions (f) multiplied by the duration (T) of each training session. The training intensity (f x T) of the 10-days intervention are summated. These data are recorded daily in a logbook by the patient himself from t1 (which equates to approximately day 4 after admission) till the end of the intervention (t2) i.e. 10 workings days later. The logbook is then collected for data extraction at the end of the intervention (t2), which equates to approximately day 16-17 after patient's admission in the clinic.
Time Frame
The intensity of self-training is recorded every day and thus from the begining (t1) till the end (t2) of the intervention phase ie. during 10 working days.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Berg Balance Scale
Description
The intervention lasts 10 working days (from t1 to t2), starting from day 4 of the patient's admission in the rehabilitation center. The Berg Balance Scale is a clinical test for static and dynamic balance abilities. It is assessed before the start of the intervention (t1), i.e. approximately at day 1-2 after admission and again at the end of the intervention phase (t2) 10 working days later, i.e. approximately at day 16-17 after admission.
Time Frame
The test is performed at the before the start of the intervention (t1) and again at after the end of the intervention (t2) i.e. after 10 working days
Title
Falls Efficacy Scale - International version
Description
The intervention phase lasts 10 working days (from t1 to t2), starting from day 4 of the patient's admission in the rehabilitation center. The Falls Efficacy Scale is a questionnaire measuring the fear of falling. It is assessed before the start of the intervention (t1), i.e. approximately at day 1-2 after admission and again at the end of the intervention phase (t2) 10 working days later, i.e. approximately at day 16-17 after admission.
Time Frame
The questionnaire is completed at the before the start of the intervention (t1) and again at after the end of the intervention (t2) i.e. after 10 working days
Title
Local dynamic stability
Description
Local Dynamic Stability (LDS), a non-linear gait stability index, has been advocated as an early indicator of risk for falls. LDS is measured with a tri-axial accelerometer and quantified by calculating Lyapunov exponent.
Time Frame
The test is performed at the before the start of the intervention (t1) and again at after the end of the intervention (t2) i.e. after 10 working days.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: +65 years old Ability to walk independently over 20meters, with or without walking aids. Self-training prescribed by the doctor sufficient written and spoken knowledge of German to fill out questionnaires, with or without help. Informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Cognitive impairment, defined as a Mini-Mental-State Examination (MMSE) score < 26. Other limiting disorders hampering the practice of computer-based games (e.g. visual impairment, numbness, vertigo)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Peter Oesch, PhD PT
Organizational Affiliation
Kliniken Valens
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Walenstadtberg Klinik
City
Walenstadtberg
State/Province
Saint Gallen
ZIP/Postal Code
8881
Country
Switzerland

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
Citation
Schnurr B, & Oesch P. Sind Nintendo Wii-Balancespiele eine machbare Alternative zum herkömmlichen Selbsttraining des Gleichgewichts nach Schlaganfall? Ergoscience (4): 147-156, 2012.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20406866
Citation
Bachmann S, Finger C, Huss A, Egger M, Stuck AE, Clough-Gorr KM. Inpatient rehabilitation specifically designed for geriatric patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2010 Apr 20;340:c1718. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1718.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26180873
Citation
Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK305057/
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15221728
Citation
Phillips EM, Schneider JC, Mercer GR. Motivating elders to initiate and maintain exercise. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Jul;85(7 Suppl 3):S52-7; quiz S58-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.03.012.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16410482
Citation
Olney SJ, Nymark J, Brouwer B, Culham E, Day A, Heard J, Henderson M, Parvataneni K. A randomized controlled trial of supervised versus unsupervised exercise programs for ambulatory stroke survivors. Stroke. 2006 Feb;37(2):476-81. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000199061.85897.b7. Epub 2006 Jan 12.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28330455
Citation
Oesch P, Kool J, Fernandez-Luque L, Brox E, Evertsen G, Civit A, Hilfiker R, Bachmann S. Exergames versus self-regulated exercises with instruction leaflets to improve adherence during geriatric rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2017 Mar 23;17(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0467-7.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26346751
Citation
Hasselmann V, Oesch P, Fernandez-Luque L, Bachmann S. Are exergames promoting mobility an attractive alternative to conventional self-regulated exercises for elderly people in a rehabilitation setting? Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2015 Sep 7;15:108. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0106-0.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Are Serious Games Promoting Mobility an Attractive Alternative to Conventional Self-training for Elderly People?

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs