Implementation of Illness Management and Recovery in Mental Health Services
Primary Purpose
Bipolar Disorder, Schizophrenia, Affective Disorders, Psychotic
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Norway
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Illness Management and Recovery
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional health services research trial for Bipolar Disorder focused on measuring Implementation process, implementation strategy, Implementation research, evidence based practice, recovery, Illness management and recovery
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria Therapists:
- Voluntary recruited therapists in the participating mental health services
- trained and consulted in IMR
Inclusion Criteria Patients:
- Adults (18+)
- Associated with one of the participating mental health services
- symptoms on or diagnosis of severe mental illness with or without drug abuse
- giving informed consent verbally and in writing
Exclusion Criteria Patients:
- Patients with acute risk of suicidal behaviour
- not able to communicate in Norwegian
Sites / Locations
- Ahus R&D Mental Health Services
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Other
Arm Label
IMR therapists, IMR patients
Arm Description
30 voluntary therapists from 9 mental health services will be trained and coached in IMR. 40 patients from the 9 mental health services will receive Illness Management and Recovery from the therapists in training.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
The Illness Management Fidelity Scale (SAMHSA, 2009)
Assesses the degree of fidelity with 13 items on a 5-point likert scale where 5 indicates full implementation and 0 indicates no implementation
Secondary Outcome Measures
The Illness Management & Recovery Treatment Integrity Scale (IT-IS) (McGuire et al., 2012
A 16-item scale measuring clinicians' faithful replication of the model
The Adult State Hope Scale (Snyder et al., 1996)
A 6-item self-report scale of patients' hope and optimism
The Illness Management and Recovery Scale (SAMHSA, 2009)
Assessing patients' recovery outcomes in the IMR program with 15 items.
General Organizational Index (SAMHSA, 2009)
A 12-item scale measuring organisational outcome of implementation by common agency practices that support evidence-based practices
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02077829
First Posted
February 25, 2014
Last Updated
January 11, 2016
Sponsor
University Hospital, Akershus
Collaborators
Romeriksprosjektet, Helse Sor-Ost
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02077829
Brief Title
Implementation of Illness Management and Recovery in Mental Health Services
Official Title
Implementation of Illness Management and Recovery in Mental Health Services: Facilitators and Barriers in the Implementation Process.
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
January 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 2015 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital, Akershus
Collaborators
Romeriksprosjektet, Helse Sor-Ost
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to examine the barriers and facilitators of implementing Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) in Norwegian mental health services.
Detailed Description
IMR is an evidence-based practice developed for people with severe mental illnesses. It is based on the principles of recovery to help people set individual meaningful goals for their lives and gain illness self-management skills and thereby contribute to their individual recovery-process. IMR can be given individually or in groups, once a week for 10-12 months.
In this project the investigators will implement Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) in mental health services. The implementation strategy are carried out according to the IMR toolkits which include informational and training materials, implementation recommendations, and fidelity scales to facilitate use of the model in routine practices. The implementation process and outcome will be of main focus.
The study has an observational prospective cohort design. 30 therapists from 9 different mental health services will be trained and supervised in IMR. The investigators aim to enrol 40 patients. The primary outcome is therapists' fidelity to the model and organisational implementation outcome. Secondary outcomes are patients' level of functioning and hope.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Bipolar Disorder, Schizophrenia, Affective Disorders, Psychotic, Mood Disorders, Mental Disorders
Keywords
Implementation process, implementation strategy, Implementation research, evidence based practice, recovery, Illness management and recovery
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
40 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
IMR therapists, IMR patients
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
30 voluntary therapists from 9 mental health services will be trained and coached in IMR.
40 patients from the 9 mental health services will receive Illness Management and Recovery from the therapists in training.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Illness Management and Recovery
Other Intervention Name(s)
IMR
Intervention Description
Evidence-based practice given individually or in groups, weekly for 10-12 months.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The Illness Management Fidelity Scale (SAMHSA, 2009)
Description
Assesses the degree of fidelity with 13 items on a 5-point likert scale where 5 indicates full implementation and 0 indicates no implementation
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The Illness Management & Recovery Treatment Integrity Scale (IT-IS) (McGuire et al., 2012
Description
A 16-item scale measuring clinicians' faithful replication of the model
Time Frame
12 months
Title
The Adult State Hope Scale (Snyder et al., 1996)
Description
A 6-item self-report scale of patients' hope and optimism
Time Frame
12 months
Title
The Illness Management and Recovery Scale (SAMHSA, 2009)
Description
Assessing patients' recovery outcomes in the IMR program with 15 items.
Time Frame
About 11 months after start of intervention
Title
General Organizational Index (SAMHSA, 2009)
Description
A 12-item scale measuring organisational outcome of implementation by common agency practices that support evidence-based practices
Time Frame
12 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria Therapists:
Voluntary recruited therapists in the participating mental health services
trained and consulted in IMR
Inclusion Criteria Patients:
Adults (18+)
Associated with one of the participating mental health services
symptoms on or diagnosis of severe mental illness with or without drug abuse
giving informed consent verbally and in writing
Exclusion Criteria Patients:
Patients with acute risk of suicidal behaviour
not able to communicate in Norwegian
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kristin S. Heiervang, Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Akershus University Hospital, Research & Development, Mental Health Services
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Ahus R&D Mental Health Services
City
Lørenskog
ZIP/Postal Code
1478
Country
Norway
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31190179
Citation
Egeland KM, Hauge MI, Ruud T, Ogden T, Heiervang KS. Significance of Leaders for Sustained Use of Evidence-Based Practices: A Qualitative Focus-Group Study with Mental Health Practitioners. Community Ment Health J. 2019 Nov;55(8):1344-1353. doi: 10.1007/s10597-019-00430-8. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
28127388
Citation
Egeland KM, Ruud T, Ogden T, Fardig R, Lindstrom JC, Heiervang KS. How to implement Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) in mental health service settings: evaluation of the implementation strategy. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2017 Jan 23;11:13. doi: 10.1186/s13033-017-0120-z. eCollection 2017.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Implementation of Illness Management and Recovery in Mental Health Services
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs