search
Back to results

Diagnostic Accuracy of Gallium-68-DOTATATE PET/CT Compared to Indium-111-pentetreotide Scintigraphy (SPECT/CT) for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (GaIN)

Primary Purpose

Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
Switzerland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Gallium-68-DOTATATE PET/CT (index test)
Indium-111-Octreoscan (standard test)
Sponsored by
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors focused on measuring NET, Gallium-68-DOTATATE, PET/CT, Indium-111-pentetreotide scintigraphy, octreoscan, GEP-NET, gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Signed written informed consent with full understanding of the study procedures and the investigational nature of the study
  • Patient referred to Indium-111-pentetreotide scintigraphy., which was performed as part of clinical routine care
  • Inclusion criteria specific for cases only
  • Histologically established GEP-NET (new or recurrent)
  • Tumor mass remaining after initial biopsy or surgery
  • Inclusion criteria specific for controls only
  • 5.6. Suspicion of any NET (new or recurrent) but no established diagnosis or established diagnosis of any NET (new or recurrent) but no remaining tumor mass after surgery

Exclusion Criteria

  • Previous inclusion in the same study with the following exception: a patient may be included as case if she/he was previously included as control
  • Gastric type 2 ECL cell neuroendocrine tumors
  • Pregnant or nursing women
  • Known intolerance to any protocol required diagnostic intervention
  • Patient's lack of accountability, inability to appreciate the nature, meaning and consequences of the study and to formulate his/her own wishes correspondingly
  • Exclusion criteria specific for controls only
  • Patients for whom it remains unclear whether the tumor was completely removed

Sites / Locations

  • Nuclear Medicine, Bern University Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Other

Arm Label

All patients

Arm Description

Subsequent performance of index test and standard test

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of patients correctly identified as having GEP-NET by using Gallium-68-DOTATATE PET/CT and Indium-111-pentetreotide scintigraphy (SPECT/CT)
Number of patients correctly identified as not having GEP-NET by using Gallium-68-DOTATATE PET/CT and Indium-111-pentetreotide scintigraphy (SPECT/CT)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Patient satisfaction
Measured by patient satisfaction questionnaire relating to Indium-111-pentetreotide scintigraphy
Number of patients with adverse events

Full Information

First Posted
February 26, 2014
Last Updated
September 5, 2016
Sponsor
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
Collaborators
University of Lausanne Hospitals, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland, University of Bern, SWAN Isotopen AG, Bern
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02078843
Brief Title
Diagnostic Accuracy of Gallium-68-DOTATATE PET/CT Compared to Indium-111-pentetreotide Scintigraphy (SPECT/CT) for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
Acronym
GaIN
Official Title
Diagnostic Accuracy of Gallium-68-DOTATATE PET/CT Compared to Indium-111-pentetreotide Scintigraphy (SPECT/CT) for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Superiority of one imaging method
Study Start Date
March 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
August 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
Collaborators
University of Lausanne Hospitals, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland, University of Bern, SWAN Isotopen AG, Bern

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The investigators hypothesize that the new imaging method Gallium-68-DOTATATE has a higher diagnostic value in the detection of neuroendocrine tumors than the established imaging method Indium-111-Octreoscan. Therefore, the investigators will perform both imaging procedures in patients with suspected or confirmed neuroendocrine tumors. Subsequently, the investigators will compare the diagnostic performance of both methods.
Detailed Description
Background Neuroendocrine tumors Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are heterogeneous slow-growing neoplasms, occurring in 1-4/100,000 people per year. They origin from endocrine cells that derive from entodermal stem cells and are characterized by an endocrine metabolism and a typical pathologic pattern. Slow metabolic rates of NET, small lesion size and variable anatomical localization have represented the major limits for lesions diagnosis. The diagnostic workup for NET has relied on conventional morphological imaging procedures including computed tomography (CT), ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with gamma camera functional imaging, namely whole-body somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS). SRS show a higher diagnostic accuracy than CT for NET diagnosis at both the primary and metastatic site, but there is still room for improvement. Novel PET tracers specifically developed for NET may increase diagnostic accuracy considerably as outlined below. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) As NET have high affinity somatostatin receptors, scintigraphic methods have been developed in the early nineties to allow in vivo imaging. SRS using Indium-111-DTPA-octreotide (Indium-111-pentetreotide scintigraphy), is the most widely used diagnostic test. Although rather sensitive and helpful for whole body staging compared to traditional imaging methods, this technique has pitfalls, one of them being the poor spatial resolution, leading to the development of PET-based imaging. Gallium-68-DOTA-peptide PET In the past decade, several positron emitting tracers have been developed for NET imaging. 68Ga-DOTA-peptides are a group of PET tracers that specifically bind to somatostatin receptors (SSTR) over-expressed on NET cells. Gallium-68-DOTA-peptides structure can be summarized in (1) the active part binding to SSTR (TOC, NOC, TATE), (2) the chelant (DOTA) and (3) the isotope (68Ga). Indications to perform 68Ga -DOTA-peptides studies in NET patients include: staging, re-staging after therapy, identification of the site of the unknown primary tumor in patients with proven NET secondary lesions and selection of cases eligible for therapy with somatostatin analogues. 68Ga-DOTA-TOC was the first tracer to be employed in NET imaging and was reported to present a high tumor to non-tumor contrast and a higher sensitivity compared to SRS . The study with the largest patients population (84 pts with NET), reported sensitivity (97%) for DOTA-TOC PET to be superior to CT (61%) and SRS (52%) for the detection of NET lesions, especially in case of small tumors at nodal or bone level. In a comparison study of 51 patients with well differentiated NET, PET with Gallium-DOTA-TOC performed better than CT and SRS for the early detection of bone NET secondary lesions (sensitivity of 97%, specificity of 92%). 68Ga-DOTA-TATE is characterized by a very high affinity for SSTR2 with a considerably higher affinity than 111In-DTPA octreotide. In a recent study, 51 patients with established NET (35 negative and 16 equivocal for uptake on SRS) were examined by 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET. 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET identified significantly more lesions than SRS and changed management in 36 patients (70.6%), who were subsequently deemed suitable for peptide receptor-targeted therapy. Rationale of the study 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy is the current standard for the detection of NET, even though its diagnostic accuracy is less than optimal. In the past decade, several 68Ga-DOTA-peptides have been developed for NET imaging, which showed a better detection for NET than 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy in a small number of studies. These studies had several limitations, most importantly the inclusion of rather small and heterogeneous patient populations. The aim of this study is to prospectively compare the diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT with 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy in a well-defined population of consecutive patients with established GEP-NET or patients with suspicion of NET with indication for a scintigraphy. Objective The objective of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Gallium-68-DOTATATE PET/CT with Indium-111-pentetreotide scintigraphy (SPECT/CT) for the diagnosis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) in consecutive patients with established GEP-NET or patients with suspicion of NET with indication for a scintigraphy. The working hypothesis is that Gallium-68-DOTATATE PET/CT is superior to Indium-111-pentetreotide scintigraphy (SPECT/CT) in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Methods The present study is a multi-center assessor-blind diagnostic case-control study of Gallium-68-DOTATATE PET/CT compared to Indium-111-pentetreotide scintigraphy (SPECT/CT) in consecutive patients with established GEP-NET or patients with suspicion of NET with indication for a scintigraphy. The study is conducted at the University Hospital Basel, Bern University Hospital, and CHUV Lausanne. The University Clinics of Nuclear Medicine of Basel, Bern and Lausanne, as well as Endocrinology, Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition of Bern will accrue consecutive patients with established GEP-NET or patients with suspicion of GEP-NET that meet eligibility criteria. All patients will undergo Gallium-68-DOTATATE PET/CT as index test and Indium-111-pentetreotide scintigraphy as standard test. Both results will be compared with histology and the follow-up results as diagnostic gold standards.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
Keywords
NET, Gallium-68-DOTATATE, PET/CT, Indium-111-pentetreotide scintigraphy, octreoscan, GEP-NET, gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Phase 1, Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
54 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
All patients
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Subsequent performance of index test and standard test
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Gallium-68-DOTATATE PET/CT (index test)
Intervention Description
Somatostatin-based imaging tracer
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Indium-111-Octreoscan (standard test)
Intervention Description
Somatostatin-based imaging tracer
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of patients correctly identified as having GEP-NET by using Gallium-68-DOTATATE PET/CT and Indium-111-pentetreotide scintigraphy (SPECT/CT)
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Number of patients correctly identified as not having GEP-NET by using Gallium-68-DOTATATE PET/CT and Indium-111-pentetreotide scintigraphy (SPECT/CT)
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Patient satisfaction
Description
Measured by patient satisfaction questionnaire relating to Indium-111-pentetreotide scintigraphy
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Number of patients with adverse events
Time Frame
6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥ 18 years Signed written informed consent with full understanding of the study procedures and the investigational nature of the study Patient referred to Indium-111-pentetreotide scintigraphy., which was performed as part of clinical routine care Inclusion criteria specific for cases only Histologically established GEP-NET (new or recurrent) Tumor mass remaining after initial biopsy or surgery Inclusion criteria specific for controls only 5.6. Suspicion of any NET (new or recurrent) but no established diagnosis or established diagnosis of any NET (new or recurrent) but no remaining tumor mass after surgery Exclusion Criteria Previous inclusion in the same study with the following exception: a patient may be included as case if she/he was previously included as control Gastric type 2 ECL cell neuroendocrine tumors Pregnant or nursing women Known intolerance to any protocol required diagnostic intervention Patient's lack of accountability, inability to appreciate the nature, meaning and consequences of the study and to formulate his/her own wishes correspondingly Exclusion criteria specific for controls only Patients for whom it remains unclear whether the tumor was completely removed
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Thomas Krause, Prof. Dr. med.
Organizational Affiliation
Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Berne
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christoph Stettler, Prof. Dr. med.
Organizational Affiliation
Division of Endocrinology, University Hospital Bern
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Nuclear Medicine, Bern University Hospital
City
Bern
ZIP/Postal Code
3010
Country
Switzerland

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
19690033
Citation
Gabriel M, Oberauer A, Dobrozemsky G, Decristoforo C, Putzer D, Kendler D, Uprimny C, Kovacs P, Bale R, Virgolini IJ. 68Ga-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotide PET for assessing response to somatostatin-receptor-mediated radionuclide therapy. J Nucl Med. 2009 Sep;50(9):1427-34. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.053421. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19617343
Citation
Putzer D, Gabriel M, Henninger B, Kendler D, Uprimny C, Dobrozemsky G, Decristoforo C, Bale RJ, Jaschke W, Virgolini IJ. Bone metastases in patients with neuroendocrine tumor: 68Ga-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotide PET in comparison to CT and bone scintigraphy. J Nucl Med. 2009 Aug;50(8):1214-21. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.060236. Epub 2009 Jul 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17225119
Citation
Antunes P, Ginj M, Zhang H, Waser B, Baum RP, Reubi JC, Maecke H. Are radiogallium-labelled DOTA-conjugated somatostatin analogues superior to those labelled with other radiometals? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007 Jul;34(7):982-93. doi: 10.1007/s00259-006-0317-x. Epub 2007 Jan 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10774879
Citation
Reubi JC, Schar JC, Waser B, Wenger S, Heppeler A, Schmitt JS, Macke HR. Affinity profiles for human somatostatin receptor subtypes SST1-SST5 of somatostatin radiotracers selected for scintigraphic and radiotherapeutic use. Eur J Nucl Med. 2000 Mar;27(3):273-82. doi: 10.1007/s002590050034.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20484441
Citation
Srirajaskanthan R, Kayani I, Quigley AM, Soh J, Caplin ME, Bomanji J. The role of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET in patients with neuroendocrine tumors and negative or equivocal findings on 111In-DTPA-octreotide scintigraphy. J Nucl Med. 2010 Jun;51(6):875-82. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.066134. Epub 2010 May 19.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Diagnostic Accuracy of Gallium-68-DOTATATE PET/CT Compared to Indium-111-pentetreotide Scintigraphy (SPECT/CT) for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs