A Study of Atezolizumab in Participants With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Bladder Cancer (Cohort 2)
Primary Purpose
Bladder Cancer
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Atezolizumab
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Bladder Cancer focused on measuring anti-PD-L1, PD-L1, MPDL3280A, PD-1, bladder cancer, atezolizumab, Tecentriq
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Histologically or cytologically documented locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium (including renal pelvis, ureters, urinary bladder, urethra)
- Representative tumor specimens as specified by the protocol
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1
- Life expectancy greater than or equal to (>=) 12 weeks
- Measurable disease, as defined by RECIST v1.1
- Adequate hematologic and end organ function
Cohort 2-Specific Inclusion Criteria
- Disease progression during or following treatment with at least one platinum-containing regimen (e.g., gemcitabine and cisplatin [GC], methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin [MVAC], CarboGem, etc.) for inoperable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma or disease recurrence.
- A regimen was defined as participants receiving at least two cycles of a platinum-containing regimen. Participants who had received one cycle of a platinum-containing regimen but discontinued due to Grade 4 hematologic toxicity or Grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity could also be eligible.
- Participants who received prior adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy and progressed within 12 months of treatment with a platinum-containing adjuvant/neoadjuvant regimen were considered as second-line participants.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any approved anti-cancer therapy within 3 weeks prior to initiation of study treatment
- Treatment with any other investigational agent or participation in another clinical trial with therapeutic intent within 28 days prior to enrollment
- Active or untreated central nervous system (CNS) metastases as determined by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation during screening and prior radiographic assessments
- Leptomeningeal disease
- Uncontrolled tumor-related pain
- Uncontrolled pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, or ascites requiring recurrent drainage procedures (once monthly or more frequently)
- Uncontrolled hypercalcemia (greater than [>] 1.5 millimoles per liter [mmol/L] ionized calcium or Ca > 12 milligrams per deciliter [mg/dL] or corrected serum calcium > upper limits of normal [ULN]) or symptomatic hypercalcemia requiring continued use of bisphosphonate therapy or denosumab
- Malignancies other than urothelial bladder cancer within 5 years prior to Cycle 1, Day 1, with the exception of those with a negligible risk of metastasis or death treated with expected curative outcome or incidental prostate cancer
- Pregnant and lactating women
- History of autoimmune disease
- History of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, organizing pneumonia, drug-induced pneumonitis, idiopathic pneumonitis, or evidence of active pneumonitis on screening chest CT scan
- Serum albumin less than (<) 2.5 grams per deciliter (g/dL)
- Positive test for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and/or active hepatitis B or hepatitis C or tuberculosis
- Severe infections within 4 weeks prior to Cycle 1, Day 1
- Significant cardiovascular disease
- Major surgical procedure other than for diagnosis within 28 days prior to Cycle 1, Day 1
- Prior allogeneic stem cell or solid organ transplant
- Administration of a live, attenuated vaccine within 4 weeks before Cycle 1, Day 1
- Any other diseases, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination finding, or clinical laboratory finding giving reasonable suspicion of a disease or condition that contraindicates the use of an investigational drug or that may affect the interpretation of the results or render the patient at high risk from treatment complications
- Prior treatment with CD137 agonists or immune checkpoint blockade therapies, including anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (anti-CTLA-4), anti-programmed death-1 receptor (anti-PD-1), and anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) therapeutic antibodies
Sites / Locations
- University of Alabama At Birmingham
- Pinnacle Oncology Hematology
- Arizona Oncology - HOPE Wilmot
- UCLA
- The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute - W LA Office
- USC Norris Cancer Center
- UCSF
- Kaiser Permanente - San Marcos
- Stanford Cancer Center
- Kaiser Permanente; Oncology Clinical Trials
- Rocky Mountain Cancer Center - Aurora
- University Of Colorado
- University of Connecticut Health Center
- Yale Cancer Center ; Medical Oncology
- Georgetown University Medical Center Lombardi Cancer Center
- Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
- Piedmont Cancer Institute, PC
- University of Chicago; Hematology/Oncology
- Ingalls Memorial Hospital
- Indiana University Health; Goshen Center for Cancer Care
- Norton Cancer Institute
- Massachusetts General Hospital;Oncology
- Dana Farber Cancer Inst. ; Dept. of Medical Oncology
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School; Department of Medicine
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center
- Karmanos Cancer Institute
- Minnesota Oncology Minneapolis
- Mayo Clinic - Rochester
- Urology Cancer Center & GU Research Network
- Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada
- New York Oncology Hematology, P.C.
- NYU Langone Medical Center
- Mount Sinai School of Medicine - Tisch Cancer Institute
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
- Oncology Hematology Care Inc
- Case Western Reserve Univ; Hem/Onc
- Cleveland Clinic
- Willamette Valley Cancer Ctr - 520 Country Club
- Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University
- Sarah Cannon Cancer Center - Tennessee Oncology, Pllc
- Ctr for Cancer and Blood Disorders
- Texas Oncology - Houston (Gessner)
- Houston Methodist Hospital
- University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
- Virginia Cancer Specialists, PC
- Virginia Oncology Associates - Lake Wright Cancer Center
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
- Bcca - Cancer Center Southern Interior
- BCCA-Vancouver Cancer Centre
- Lakeridge Health Oshawa; Oncology
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre; Oncology
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre
- University Health Network; Princess Margaret Hospital; Medical Oncology Dept
- McGill University; Sir Mortimer B Davis Jewish General Hospital; Oncology
- APHP - Hospital Saint Louis
- Hopital Foch; Oncologie
- Institut Gustave Roussy; Oncologie Medicale
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin; CC 8: Chirurgische Medizin; Klinik für Urologie
- Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf; Urologische Klinik
- Universitätsklinikum Freiburg; Chirurgische Klinik; Abteilung Urologie
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf Onkologisches Zentrum Medizinische Klinik II
- Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU München; Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik
- Irccs Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori (Int);S.C. Medicina Oncologica 2
- Azienda USL8 Arezzo-Presidio Ospedaliero 1 San Donato;U.O.C. Oncologia
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoekziekenhuis
- Clinica Universitaria de Navarra; Servicio de Oncologia
- Hospital Univ Vall d'Hebron; Servicio de Oncologia
- Institut Catala d Oncologia Hospital Duran i Reynals
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon; Servicio de Oncologia
- Hospital Ramon y Cajal; Servicio de Oncologia
- Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre; Servicio de Oncologia
- Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio; Servicio de Oncologia
- University Hospital Birmingham The Cancer Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital
- Barts and The London
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute
- Royal Marsden Hospital; Dept of Medical Oncology
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Cohort 2: Participants With Second-line or Beyond Treatments
Arm Description
Participants with advanced disease who had disease progression during or following treatment with at least one platinum-containing chemotherapy regimen in the metastatic setting will receive atezolizumab 1200 mg via IV infusion on Day 1 of 21-day cycles until loss of clinical benefit or unmanageable toxicity.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Objective Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) as Assessed by the Independent Review Facility (IRF) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Tumor response was assessed by the IRF according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and (if applicable) normalization of tumor marker levels. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (<) 10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as greater than or equal to (≥) 30 percent (%) decrease in sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions in reference to Baseline sum LD. Response was to be confirmed ≥4 weeks after the initial assessment of CR or PR. The percentage of participants with a confirmed objective response of CR or PR was reported. The exact 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method.
Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Objective Response of CR or PR as Assessed by the Investigator According Modified RECIST
Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to modified RECIST. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new measurable or unmeasurable lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to Baseline sum LD. Response was to be confirmed ≥4 weeks after the initial assessment of CR or PR. The percentage of participants with a confirmed objective response of CR or PR was reported. The exact 95% CI was calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by the IRF According to RECIST v1.1
DOR was defined as the time from the initial occurrence of documented CR or PR (whichever occurred first) until documented disease progression or death due to any cause on study, whichever occurred first. Tumor response was assessed by the IRF according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and (if applicable) normalization of tumor marker levels. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to Baseline sum LD. Disease progression or progressive disease (PD) was defined as ≥20% increase in sum LD in reference to the smallest on-study sum LD, or the appearance of new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Response was to be confirmed ≥4 weeks after the initial assessment of CR or PR.
DOR as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST v1.1
DOR was defined as the time from the initial occurrence of documented CR or PR (whichever occurred first) until documented disease progression or death due to any cause on study, whichever occurred first. Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and (if applicable) normalization of tumor marker levels. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to Baseline sum LD. Disease progression or PD was defined as ≥20% increase in sum LD in reference to the smallest on-study sum LD, or the appearance of new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Response was to be confirmed ≥4 weeks after the initial assessment of CR or PR.
DOR as Assessed by the Investigator According to Modified RECIST
DOR was defined as the time from the initial occurrence of documented CR or PR (whichever occurred first) until documented disease progression or death due to any cause on study, whichever occurred first. Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to modified RECIST. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new measurable or unmeasurable lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to Baseline sum LD. Disease progression or PD was defined as ≥20% increase in sum LD in reference to the smallest on-study sum LD. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Response was to be confirmed ≥4 weeks after the initial assessment of CR or PR.
Percentage of Participants With Death or Disease Progression as Assessed by the IRF According to RECIST v1.1
Tumor response was assessed by the IRF according to RECIST v1.1. Disease progression or PD was defined as ≥20% increase in sum LD in reference to the smallest on-study sum LD, or the appearance of new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The percentage of participants who died or experienced PD was reported.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the IRF According to RECIST v1.1
PFS was defined as the time from start of treatment to the first event of death or PD. Tumor response was assessed by the IRF according to RECIST v1.1. Disease progression or PD was defined as ≥20% increase in sum LD in reference to the smallest on-study sum LD, or the appearance of new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Percentage of Participants With Death or Disease Progression as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST v1.1
Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. Disease progression or PD was defined as ≥20% increase in sum LD in reference to the smallest on-study sum LD, or the appearance of new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The percentage of participants who died or experienced PD was reported.
PFS as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST v1.1
PFS was defined as the time from start of treatment to the first event of death or PD. Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. Disease progression or PD was defined as ≥20% increase in sum LD in reference to the smallest on-study sum LD, or the appearance of new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Percentage of Participants With Death or Disease Progression as Assessed by the Investigator According to Modified RECIST
Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to modified RECIST. Disease progression or PD was defined as ≥20% increase in sum LD in reference to the smallest on-study sum LD. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The percentage of participants who died or experienced PD was reported.
PFS as Assessed by the Investigator According to Modified RECIST
PFS was defined as the time from start of treatment to the first event of death or PD. Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to modified RECIST. Disease progression or PD was defined as ≥20% increase in sum LD in reference to the smallest on-study sum LD. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Objective Response of CR or PR as Assessed by the Investigator According RECIST v1.1
Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and (if applicable) normalization of tumor marker levels. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to Baseline sum LD. Response was to be confirmed ≥4 weeks after the initial assessment of CR or PR. The percentage of participants with a confirmed objective response of CR or PR was reported. The exact 95% CI was calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method.
Percentage of Participants Who Died
The percentage of participants who died from any cause was reported.
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from start of treatment to the time of death from any cause on study.
Percentage of Participants Alive at 1-year
Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Atezolizumab
Minimum Serum Concentration (Cmin) of Atezolizumab
Percentage of Participants Positive for Anti-therapeutic Antibodies (ATA) to Atezolizumab
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02108652
Brief Title
A Study of Atezolizumab in Participants With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Bladder Cancer (Cohort 2)
Official Title
A Phase II, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Atezolizumab in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Bladder Cancer
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 31, 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 31, 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 28, 2023 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This Phase II, single-arm study is designed to evaluate the effect of atezolizumab treatment in participants with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial bladder cancer. Participants will be enrolled into 1 of 2 cohorts. Cohort 1 will consist of participants who are treatment-naïve and ineligible for cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. The results of Cohort 1 are reported separately (NCT02951767). Cohort 2 (reported here) will contain participants who have progressed during or following a prior platinum-based chemotherapy regimen. Participants in both cohorts will be given a 1200 milligrams (mg) intravenous (IV) dose of atezolizumab on Day 1 of 21-day cycles. Treatment of participants in Cohort 1 will continue until disease progression per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) or unmanageable toxicity. Treatment of participants in Cohort 2 will continue until loss of clinical benefit or unmanageable toxicity.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Bladder Cancer
Keywords
anti-PD-L1, PD-L1, MPDL3280A, PD-1, bladder cancer, atezolizumab, Tecentriq
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
310 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Cohort 2: Participants With Second-line or Beyond Treatments
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants with advanced disease who had disease progression during or following treatment with at least one platinum-containing chemotherapy regimen in the metastatic setting will receive atezolizumab 1200 mg via IV infusion on Day 1 of 21-day cycles until loss of clinical benefit or unmanageable toxicity.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Atezolizumab
Other Intervention Name(s)
MPDL3280A, Tecentriq
Intervention Description
Atezolizumab 1200 mg given by IV infusion on Day 1 of 21-day cycles until disease progression per RECIST v1.1 criteria/loss of clinical benefit or unmanageable toxicity.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Objective Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) as Assessed by the Independent Review Facility (IRF) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Description
Tumor response was assessed by the IRF according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and (if applicable) normalization of tumor marker levels. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (<) 10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as greater than or equal to (≥) 30 percent (%) decrease in sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions in reference to Baseline sum LD. Response was to be confirmed ≥4 weeks after the initial assessment of CR or PR. The percentage of participants with a confirmed objective response of CR or PR was reported. The exact 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method.
Time Frame
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
Title
Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Objective Response of CR or PR as Assessed by the Investigator According Modified RECIST
Description
Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to modified RECIST. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new measurable or unmeasurable lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to Baseline sum LD. Response was to be confirmed ≥4 weeks after the initial assessment of CR or PR. The percentage of participants with a confirmed objective response of CR or PR was reported. The exact 95% CI was calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method.
Time Frame
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by the IRF According to RECIST v1.1
Description
DOR was defined as the time from the initial occurrence of documented CR or PR (whichever occurred first) until documented disease progression or death due to any cause on study, whichever occurred first. Tumor response was assessed by the IRF according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and (if applicable) normalization of tumor marker levels. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to Baseline sum LD. Disease progression or progressive disease (PD) was defined as ≥20% increase in sum LD in reference to the smallest on-study sum LD, or the appearance of new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Response was to be confirmed ≥4 weeks after the initial assessment of CR or PR.
Time Frame
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
Title
DOR as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST v1.1
Description
DOR was defined as the time from the initial occurrence of documented CR or PR (whichever occurred first) until documented disease progression or death due to any cause on study, whichever occurred first. Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and (if applicable) normalization of tumor marker levels. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to Baseline sum LD. Disease progression or PD was defined as ≥20% increase in sum LD in reference to the smallest on-study sum LD, or the appearance of new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Response was to be confirmed ≥4 weeks after the initial assessment of CR or PR.
Time Frame
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
Title
DOR as Assessed by the Investigator According to Modified RECIST
Description
DOR was defined as the time from the initial occurrence of documented CR or PR (whichever occurred first) until documented disease progression or death due to any cause on study, whichever occurred first. Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to modified RECIST. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new measurable or unmeasurable lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to Baseline sum LD. Disease progression or PD was defined as ≥20% increase in sum LD in reference to the smallest on-study sum LD. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Response was to be confirmed ≥4 weeks after the initial assessment of CR or PR.
Time Frame
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
Title
Percentage of Participants With Death or Disease Progression as Assessed by the IRF According to RECIST v1.1
Description
Tumor response was assessed by the IRF according to RECIST v1.1. Disease progression or PD was defined as ≥20% increase in sum LD in reference to the smallest on-study sum LD, or the appearance of new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The percentage of participants who died or experienced PD was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
Title
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the IRF According to RECIST v1.1
Description
PFS was defined as the time from start of treatment to the first event of death or PD. Tumor response was assessed by the IRF according to RECIST v1.1. Disease progression or PD was defined as ≥20% increase in sum LD in reference to the smallest on-study sum LD, or the appearance of new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Time Frame
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
Title
Percentage of Participants With Death or Disease Progression as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST v1.1
Description
Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. Disease progression or PD was defined as ≥20% increase in sum LD in reference to the smallest on-study sum LD, or the appearance of new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The percentage of participants who died or experienced PD was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
Title
PFS as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST v1.1
Description
PFS was defined as the time from start of treatment to the first event of death or PD. Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. Disease progression or PD was defined as ≥20% increase in sum LD in reference to the smallest on-study sum LD, or the appearance of new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Time Frame
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
Title
Percentage of Participants With Death or Disease Progression as Assessed by the Investigator According to Modified RECIST
Description
Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to modified RECIST. Disease progression or PD was defined as ≥20% increase in sum LD in reference to the smallest on-study sum LD. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The percentage of participants who died or experienced PD was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
Title
PFS as Assessed by the Investigator According to Modified RECIST
Description
PFS was defined as the time from start of treatment to the first event of death or PD. Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to modified RECIST. Disease progression or PD was defined as ≥20% increase in sum LD in reference to the smallest on-study sum LD. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Time Frame
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
Title
Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Objective Response of CR or PR as Assessed by the Investigator According RECIST v1.1
Description
Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and (if applicable) normalization of tumor marker levels. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to Baseline sum LD. Response was to be confirmed ≥4 weeks after the initial assessment of CR or PR. The percentage of participants with a confirmed objective response of CR or PR was reported. The exact 95% CI was calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method.
Time Frame
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Died
Description
The percentage of participants who died from any cause was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline until death (data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
Title
Overall Survival (OS)
Description
OS was defined as the time from start of treatment to the time of death from any cause on study.
Time Frame
Baseline until death (data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
Title
Percentage of Participants Alive at 1-year
Time Frame
1-year
Title
Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Atezolizumab
Time Frame
Pre-dose (0 hours) and 30 minutes post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Cycle length = 21 days)
Title
Minimum Serum Concentration (Cmin) of Atezolizumab
Time Frame
Pre-dose (0 hours) on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 (Cycle length = 21 days)
Title
Percentage of Participants Positive for Anti-therapeutic Antibodies (ATA) to Atezolizumab
Time Frame
Day 1 of all cycles (Cycle length = 21 days) and at treatment discontinuation (data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Histologically or cytologically documented locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium (including renal pelvis, ureters, urinary bladder, urethra)
Representative tumor specimens as specified by the protocol
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1
Life expectancy greater than or equal to (>=) 12 weeks
Measurable disease, as defined by RECIST v1.1
Adequate hematologic and end organ function
Cohort 2-Specific Inclusion Criteria
Disease progression during or following treatment with at least one platinum-containing regimen (e.g., gemcitabine and cisplatin [GC], methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin [MVAC], CarboGem, etc.) for inoperable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma or disease recurrence.
A regimen was defined as participants receiving at least two cycles of a platinum-containing regimen. Participants who had received one cycle of a platinum-containing regimen but discontinued due to Grade 4 hematologic toxicity or Grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity could also be eligible.
Participants who received prior adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy and progressed within 12 months of treatment with a platinum-containing adjuvant/neoadjuvant regimen were considered as second-line participants.
Exclusion Criteria:
Any approved anti-cancer therapy within 3 weeks prior to initiation of study treatment
Treatment with any other investigational agent or participation in another clinical trial with therapeutic intent within 28 days prior to enrollment
Active or untreated central nervous system (CNS) metastases as determined by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation during screening and prior radiographic assessments
Leptomeningeal disease
Uncontrolled tumor-related pain
Uncontrolled pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, or ascites requiring recurrent drainage procedures (once monthly or more frequently)
Uncontrolled hypercalcemia (greater than [>] 1.5 millimoles per liter [mmol/L] ionized calcium or Ca > 12 milligrams per deciliter [mg/dL] or corrected serum calcium > upper limits of normal [ULN]) or symptomatic hypercalcemia requiring continued use of bisphosphonate therapy or denosumab
Malignancies other than urothelial bladder cancer within 5 years prior to Cycle 1, Day 1, with the exception of those with a negligible risk of metastasis or death treated with expected curative outcome or incidental prostate cancer
Pregnant and lactating women
History of autoimmune disease
History of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, organizing pneumonia, drug-induced pneumonitis, idiopathic pneumonitis, or evidence of active pneumonitis on screening chest CT scan
Serum albumin less than (<) 2.5 grams per deciliter (g/dL)
Positive test for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and/or active hepatitis B or hepatitis C or tuberculosis
Severe infections within 4 weeks prior to Cycle 1, Day 1
Significant cardiovascular disease
Major surgical procedure other than for diagnosis within 28 days prior to Cycle 1, Day 1
Prior allogeneic stem cell or solid organ transplant
Administration of a live, attenuated vaccine within 4 weeks before Cycle 1, Day 1
Any other diseases, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination finding, or clinical laboratory finding giving reasonable suspicion of a disease or condition that contraindicates the use of an investigational drug or that may affect the interpretation of the results or render the patient at high risk from treatment complications
Prior treatment with CD137 agonists or immune checkpoint blockade therapies, including anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (anti-CTLA-4), anti-programmed death-1 receptor (anti-PD-1), and anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) therapeutic antibodies
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
Hoffmann-La Roche
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Alabama At Birmingham
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35294
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pinnacle Oncology Hematology
City
Scottsdale
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85258
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arizona Oncology - HOPE Wilmot
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85710
Country
United States
Facility Name
UCLA
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90024
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute - W LA Office
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90025
Country
United States
Facility Name
USC Norris Cancer Center
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90033
Country
United States
Facility Name
UCSF
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94143-0106
Country
United States
Facility Name
Kaiser Permanente - San Marcos
City
San Marcos
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92069
Country
United States
Facility Name
Stanford Cancer Center
City
Stanford
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94305-5820
Country
United States
Facility Name
Kaiser Permanente; Oncology Clinical Trials
City
Vallejo
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94589
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rocky Mountain Cancer Center - Aurora
City
Aurora
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80012
Country
United States
Facility Name
University Of Colorado
City
Aurora
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80045
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Connecticut Health Center
City
Farmington
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Yale Cancer Center ; Medical Oncology
City
New Haven
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06520
Country
United States
Facility Name
Georgetown University Medical Center Lombardi Cancer Center
City
Washington
State/Province
District of Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
20057
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
City
Jacksonville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32224
Country
United States
Facility Name
Piedmont Cancer Institute, PC
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30318
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Chicago; Hematology/Oncology
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60637
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ingalls Memorial Hospital
City
Harvey
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60426
Country
United States
Facility Name
Indiana University Health; Goshen Center for Cancer Care
City
Goshen
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46526
Country
United States
Facility Name
Norton Cancer Institute
City
Louisville
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40402
Country
United States
Facility Name
Massachusetts General Hospital;Oncology
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dana Farber Cancer Inst. ; Dept. of Medical Oncology
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02115
Country
United States
Facility Name
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School; Department of Medicine
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02215
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center
City
Ann Arbor
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48109
Country
United States
Facility Name
Karmanos Cancer Institute
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Minnesota Oncology Minneapolis
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55404
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic - Rochester
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905
Country
United States
Facility Name
Urology Cancer Center & GU Research Network
City
Omaha
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68130
Country
United States
Facility Name
Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89128
Country
United States
Facility Name
New York Oncology Hematology, P.C.
City
Albany
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
12208
Country
United States
Facility Name
NYU Langone Medical Center
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10016
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mount Sinai School of Medicine - Tisch Cancer Institute
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10029
Country
United States
Facility Name
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10065
Country
United States
Facility Name
Oncology Hematology Care Inc
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45242
Country
United States
Facility Name
Case Western Reserve Univ; Hem/Onc
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44106
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195
Country
United States
Facility Name
Willamette Valley Cancer Ctr - 520 Country Club
City
Eugene
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97401-8122
Country
United States
Facility Name
Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19107
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sarah Cannon Cancer Center - Tennessee Oncology, Pllc
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37203
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ctr for Cancer and Blood Disorders
City
Fort Worth
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Oncology - Houston (Gessner)
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77024
Country
United States
Facility Name
Houston Methodist Hospital
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78229
Country
United States
Facility Name
Virginia Cancer Specialists, PC
City
Fairfax
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22031
Country
United States
Facility Name
Virginia Oncology Associates - Lake Wright Cancer Center
City
Norfolk
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23502
Country
United States
Facility Name
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98109
Country
United States
Facility Name
Bcca - Cancer Center Southern Interior
City
Kelowna
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V1Y 5L3
Country
Canada
Facility Name
BCCA-Vancouver Cancer Centre
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V5Z 4E6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Lakeridge Health Oshawa; Oncology
City
Oshawa
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L1G 2B9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre; Oncology
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K1H 8L6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M4N 3M5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
University Health Network; Princess Margaret Hospital; Medical Oncology Dept
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5G 2M9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
McGill University; Sir Mortimer B Davis Jewish General Hospital; Oncology
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H3T 1E2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
APHP - Hospital Saint Louis
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75475
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopital Foch; Oncologie
City
Suresnes
ZIP/Postal Code
92151
Country
France
Facility Name
Institut Gustave Roussy; Oncologie Medicale
City
Villejuif
ZIP/Postal Code
94800
Country
France
Facility Name
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin; CC 8: Chirurgische Medizin; Klinik für Urologie
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
12200
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf; Urologische Klinik
City
Düsseldorf
ZIP/Postal Code
40225
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum Freiburg; Chirurgische Klinik; Abteilung Urologie
City
Freiburg
ZIP/Postal Code
79106
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf Onkologisches Zentrum Medizinische Klinik II
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
20246
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU München; Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik
City
München
ZIP/Postal Code
81675
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Irccs Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori (Int);S.C. Medicina Oncologica 2
City
Milano
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
20133
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda USL8 Arezzo-Presidio Ospedaliero 1 San Donato;U.O.C. Oncologia
City
Arezzo
State/Province
Toscana
ZIP/Postal Code
52100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoekziekenhuis
City
Amsterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
1066 CX
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Clinica Universitaria de Navarra; Servicio de Oncologia
City
Pamplona
State/Province
Navarra
ZIP/Postal Code
31008
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Univ Vall d'Hebron; Servicio de Oncologia
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08035
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Institut Catala d Oncologia Hospital Duran i Reynals
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08908
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon; Servicio de Oncologia
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28007
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Ramon y Cajal; Servicio de Oncologia
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28034
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre; Servicio de Oncologia
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28041
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio; Servicio de Oncologia
City
Sevilla
ZIP/Postal Code
41013
Country
Spain
Facility Name
University Hospital Birmingham The Cancer Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital
City
Birmingham
ZIP/Postal Code
B15 2TH
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Barts and The London
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
EC1M 6BQ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Sarah Cannon Research Institute
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
W1G 6AD
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Royal Marsden Hospital; Dept of Medical Oncology
City
Sutton
ZIP/Postal Code
SM2 5PT
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust
City
Wirral
ZIP/Postal Code
L63 4JY
Country
United Kingdom
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35410325
Citation
Holm JS, Funt SA, Borch A, Munk KK, Bjerregaard AM, Reading JL, Maher C, Regazzi A, Wong P, Al-Ahmadie H, Iyer G, Tamhane T, Bentzen AK, Herschend NO, De Wolf S, Snyder A, Merghoub T, Wolchok JD, Nielsen M, Rosenberg JE, Bajorin DF, Hadrup SR. Neoantigen-specific CD8 T cell responses in the peripheral blood following PD-L1 blockade might predict therapy outcome in metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2022 Apr 11;13(1):1935. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29342-0.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33241650
Citation
Shemesh CS, Chan P, Legrand FA, Shames DS, Das Thakur M, Shi J, Bailey L, Vadhavkar S, He X, Zhang W, Bruno R. Pan-cancer population pharmacokinetics and exposure-safety and -efficacy analyses of atezolizumab in patients with high tumor mutational burden. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2020 Dec;8(6):e00685. doi: 10.1002/prp2.685.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29489427
Citation
Teo MY, Seier K, Ostrovnaya I, Regazzi AM, Kania BE, Moran MM, Cipolla CK, Bluth MJ, Chaim J, Al-Ahmadie H, Snyder A, Carlo MI, Solit DB, Berger MF, Funt S, Wolchok JD, Iyer G, Bajorin DF, Callahan MK, Rosenberg JE. Alterations in DNA Damage Response and Repair Genes as Potential Marker of Clinical Benefit From PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade in Advanced Urothelial Cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun 10;36(17):1685-1694. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.7740. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29273410
Citation
Perez-Gracia JL, Loriot Y, Rosenberg JE, Powles T, Necchi A, Hussain SA, Morales-Barrera R, Retz MM, Niegisch G, Duran I, Theodore C, Grande E, Shen X, Wang J, Nelson B, Derleth CL, van der Heijden MS. Atezolizumab in Platinum-treated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Outcomes by Prior Number of Regimens. Eur Urol. 2018 Mar;73(3):462-468. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.11.023. Epub 2017 Dec 20. Erratum In: Eur Urol. 2019 Mar;75(3):e82-e83.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
28950298
Citation
Necchi A, Joseph RW, Loriot Y, Hoffman-Censits J, Perez-Gracia JL, Petrylak DP, Derleth CL, Tayama D, Zhu Q, Ding B, Kaiser C, Rosenberg JE. Atezolizumab in platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: post-progression outcomes from the phase II IMvigor210 study. Ann Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;28(12):3044-3050. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx518.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
28552987
Citation
Snyder A, Nathanson T, Funt SA, Ahuja A, Buros Novik J, Hellmann MD, Chang E, Aksoy BA, Al-Ahmadie H, Yusko E, Vignali M, Benzeno S, Boyd M, Moran M, Iyer G, Robins HS, Mardis ER, Merghoub T, Hammerbacher J, Rosenberg JE, Bajorin DF. Contribution of systemic and somatic factors to clinical response and resistance to PD-L1 blockade in urothelial cancer: An exploratory multi-omic analysis. PLoS Med. 2017 May 26;14(5):e1002309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002309. eCollection 2017 May.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
27939400
Citation
Balar AV, Galsky MD, Rosenberg JE, Powles T, Petrylak DP, Bellmunt J, Loriot Y, Necchi A, Hoffman-Censits J, Perez-Gracia JL, Dawson NA, van der Heijden MS, Dreicer R, Srinivas S, Retz MM, Joseph RW, Drakaki A, Vaishampayan UN, Sridhar SS, Quinn DI, Duran I, Shaffer DR, Eigl BJ, Grivas PD, Yu EY, Li S, Kadel EE 3rd, Boyd Z, Bourgon R, Hegde PS, Mariathasan S, Thastrom A, Abidoye OO, Fine GD, Bajorin DF; IMvigor210 Study Group. Atezolizumab as first-line treatment in cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2017 Jan 7;389(10064):67-76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32455-2. Epub 2016 Dec 8. Erratum In: Lancet. 2017 Aug 26;390(10097):848.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26952546
Citation
Rosenberg JE, Hoffman-Censits J, Powles T, van der Heijden MS, Balar AV, Necchi A, Dawson N, O'Donnell PH, Balmanoukian A, Loriot Y, Srinivas S, Retz MM, Grivas P, Joseph RW, Galsky MD, Fleming MT, Petrylak DP, Perez-Gracia JL, Burris HA, Castellano D, Canil C, Bellmunt J, Bajorin D, Nickles D, Bourgon R, Frampton GM, Cui N, Mariathasan S, Abidoye O, Fine GD, Dreicer R. Atezolizumab in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progressed following treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2016 May 7;387(10031):1909-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00561-4. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
A Study of Atezolizumab in Participants With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Bladder Cancer (Cohort 2)
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs