search
Back to results

Effect of Kinesiotaping on Ankle Stability

Primary Purpose

Sprain and Strain of Ankle

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Switzerland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Leukotape K
Sham kinesiotape
Sponsored by
Clinique Romande de Readaptation
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Sprain and Strain of Ankle focused on measuring Kinestiotaping, Basketball players, Effect of kinesiotaping, on postural stability

Eligibility Criteria

15 Years - 35 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • active elite basketball players

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no history of ankle sprain in the last 6 weeks
  • no history of any other lower limbs lesion in the last 6 weeks

Sites / Locations

  • Clinique Romande de Réadaptation

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Leukotape K, basketball training

Sham, basketball training

Arm Description

Use of Leukotape K to ensure stability of the ankle in basketball players

Use of sham tape

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Effect of kinesiotaping on postural stability
To assess postural stability, the following parameters will be measured: Autonomy: This measure represents the time the subject can stay on the mobile board without the use of his hand to maintain equilibrium. Mean axis spacing: This measure will be performed using an accelerometer localized on the sternum of the subjects. This device will allow us to calculate displacement of the chest (degrees of inclination). Mean error of the board: This parameter represents numerically the inclination of the board during the test. It allows to estimate the stability of the subjects' ankle (unit=degrees). The larger this value is the lower the stability will be. An estimation of total equilibrium between each subject will be assessed using the two parameters listed here above (mean axis spacing + mean error of the board) following recommendation of the manufacturer.

Secondary Outcome Measures

EVA scale to evaluate the sensation of postural stability

Full Information

First Posted
March 14, 2014
Last Updated
January 29, 2019
Sponsor
Clinique Romande de Readaptation
Collaborators
University of Lausanne
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02115217
Brief Title
Effect of Kinesiotaping on Ankle Stability
Official Title
Effect of Kinesiotaping on Ankle Stability in a Population of Elite Basketball Players
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
November 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Clinique Romande de Readaptation
Collaborators
University of Lausanne

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Ankles sprains are the most popular injuries in basketball players. They are traumatic injuries, which happen most of the time in specific situations, like landing on another player's foot, or during changes of direction. Neuromuscular exercises are very important to improve ankle stability and reduce risks of sprains. However various external support such as ankles braces and rigid tape, are also used in order to prevent injury. The kinesiotape (KT) is a new but broadly used method in the world of athletes. Created by KenzoKase, in 1980, this kind of tape has a tremendous success with athletes and is today commonly used during practices and/or competitions. The main property of this tape is its elasticity, which is supposed to improve proprioception and, thus ankle stability, but these aspects have not been investigated yet.
Detailed Description
Aim: Compare the effects of a kinesiotape (KT) with a sham treatment (KT put with no effects) and a control condition (absence of tape) in basketball players from the Swiss national league through balance tests on an unstable surface. Hypotheses: A KT positioned on the lateral side of the leg improves ankle stability in basketball players while balancing on an unstable surface. Method: 30 subjects will be recruited from different basketball teams affiliated to the Swiss national league. They will have to perform some postural stability tests on both unstable ("Delos") and stable surfaces ("Single Les Stance", "Star Excursion Balance Test", "Cross Over Hop Test for Distance") under three different conditions. The three condition will be as followed : with a KT positioned on the lateral side of the leg, with a sham tape or without tape. The three sessions will be spaced in time (7 days of wash out). The order of the three interventions (KT, Sham tape, no tape) will be randomized (cross over) to avoid the bias of learning processes. Neither the subjects nor the examiner will be aware of the "tape condition" (double blind); a physiotherapist will be in charge of positioning the tape according to the tested condition. The sequence of the tests will be the same for all subjects and breaks are scheduled to avoid the effect of the fatigue. An anamnesis of all subjects will be done in order to evaluate history of injuries. At the end of each session, a visual analogical scale will be completed by the athlete to obtain a personal feeling of stability . The subject will be also asked to determine which condition was tested. Expected results: the application of a KT on the lateral side of the leg improves postural stability on instable surfaces in elite basketball players. Field's importance: the application of KT may reduce the risk of ankle sprains and the recurrence of sprains in a population of athletes at risk.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Sprain and Strain of Ankle
Keywords
Kinestiotaping, Basketball players, Effect of kinesiotaping, on postural stability

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
20 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Leukotape K, basketball training
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Use of Leukotape K to ensure stability of the ankle in basketball players
Arm Title
Sham, basketball training
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Use of sham tape
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Leukotape K
Other Intervention Name(s)
Leukotape K, Johnson & Johnson
Intervention Description
All interventions will be performed by a qualified physiotherapist in a standardized manner. Tape will be extended to the recommended length (120%) and applied along the outer side of the leg, along the path of the peroneal muscle. Starting in the middle of the foot arch, the tape ends 1 cm below tibial head.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Sham kinesiotape
Intervention Description
KT put with no effects
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Effect of kinesiotaping on postural stability
Description
To assess postural stability, the following parameters will be measured: Autonomy: This measure represents the time the subject can stay on the mobile board without the use of his hand to maintain equilibrium. Mean axis spacing: This measure will be performed using an accelerometer localized on the sternum of the subjects. This device will allow us to calculate displacement of the chest (degrees of inclination). Mean error of the board: This parameter represents numerically the inclination of the board during the test. It allows to estimate the stability of the subjects' ankle (unit=degrees). The larger this value is the lower the stability will be. An estimation of total equilibrium between each subject will be assessed using the two parameters listed here above (mean axis spacing + mean error of the board) following recommendation of the manufacturer.
Time Frame
For each subject outcome will be assessed in the 3 weeks following the beginning of the study.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
EVA scale to evaluate the sensation of postural stability
Time Frame
Assessment will be performed within 3 weeks after the beginning of the study

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
15 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
35 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: active elite basketball players Exclusion Criteria: no history of ankle sprain in the last 6 weeks no history of any other lower limbs lesion in the last 6 weeks
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yan Eggel, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Clinique Romande de Readaptation
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lia Volpe, Student
Organizational Affiliation
Institut des Sciences du Sport de l'Université de Lausanne
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Olivier Dériaz, Md, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Institut de Recherche en Readaptation
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jérôme Barral, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Institut des Sciences du Sport de l'Université de Lausanne
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Clinique Romande de Réadaptation
City
Sion
State/Province
Valais
ZIP/Postal Code
1951
Country
Switzerland

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Effect of Kinesiotaping on Ankle Stability

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs