Clinical Evaluation of BackStop in Patients Undergoing Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy
Primary Purpose
Kidney Stones
Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
BackStop
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Kidney Stones
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- patient with solitary ureteral stone ranging from 5mm to 15mm diameter
- able to tolerate general anesthesia
- clinical indication for treatment by ureteroscopic lithotripsy
- must be willing and able to participate in any follow-up visits
- provide informed consent
- have a CT scan demonstrating the stone
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) or any other extracorporeal or percutaneous lithotripsy procedure as primary procedure
- any co-morbidity or condition that would necessitate exclusion of patient (physician opinion)
- renal or ureteral anatomical abnormality
- multiple stones in the indicated ureter
- stones in the indicated kidney
- patient is immunocompromised
- multiple organ dysfunction syndrome
- has an absolute or relative solitary kidney mass
- >= Stage 3 chronic kidney disease
- bilateral ureteral obstructing stones
- staghorn calculi
- impaction of several stone fragments (Steinstrasse)
- uncorrected coagulopathy/thrombocytopenia
- urethral and/or ureteral stricture
- reconstructive urinary surgery
Sites / Locations
- USC Institute of Urology
- Urology of Virginia
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
No Intervention
Arm Label
BackStop
Control
Arm Description
Patients randomized to the Experimental arm will receive the BackStop gel during their ureteroscopic lithotripsy to prevent retrograde migration of stones or stone fragments.
Patients randomized to the control group will not use any devices to prevent retrograde migration of stones and stone fragments during their ureteroscopic lithotripsy.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Rate of Prevention of Retrograde Stone or Stone Fragment Migration
Prevention of retrograde stone migration (Yes/No)
Secondary Outcome Measures
Stone-free Rate
Presence or absence of residual stone fragments at 2 month follow up after lithotripsy
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02122341
First Posted
April 18, 2014
Last Updated
April 29, 2019
Sponsor
University of Southern California
Collaborators
Urology of Virginia
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02122341
Brief Title
Clinical Evaluation of BackStop in Patients Undergoing Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy
Official Title
Post FDA-Approval Clinical Evaluation of BackStopTM in Patients Undergoing Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Study has halted prematurely as we were not able to meet our target accrual.
Study Start Date
April 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2016 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Southern California
Collaborators
Urology of Virginia
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this clinical study is to evaluate BackStop, a polymer-based device that is intended to be used during ureteroscopic lithotripsy to prevent retrograde stone migration.
Detailed Description
During ureteroscopic treatment for ureteral stones, lithotripsy, irrigation, and manipulation of the stone often pushes stone away into the kidney itself. This phenomenon is called retropulsion, which is defined as clinically significant retrograde migration of stone or stone fragments. Movement of stones retrograde into the renal pelvis could potentially add and complicate the surgery further. Often scopes need to be changed in order to reach the stone, and chasing these stones will add time to the surgery and require more valuable resources. Furthermore, sometimes a second operation will need to be done when these retropulsed fragments could not be all found and cleaned out.
A number of devices have been developed to prevent such migration including stone baskets and conical devices. These are wire-based devices which have the potential of injuring the ureter. Because of safety concerns and that there is limited data available on the effectiveness of these devices; these are not widely used by urologists. BackStop has recently been developed as another tool to prevent retropulsion. It is a water soluble gel that is injected proximal to the stone. This creates a physical barrier that prevents stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteral calculus.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Kidney Stones
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
35 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
BackStop
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients randomized to the Experimental arm will receive the BackStop gel during their ureteroscopic lithotripsy to prevent retrograde migration of stones or stone fragments.
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Patients randomized to the control group will not use any devices to prevent retrograde migration of stones and stone fragments during their ureteroscopic lithotripsy.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
BackStop
Intervention Description
BackStop™ is a FDA approved device. It is intended for use during ureteroscopic lithotripsy to prevent retrograde migration of stones and stone fragments. It is comprised of a solution of a thermosensitive polymer, a purified version of poloxamer 407 having been fractionated in saline. BackStop™, which is injected above the stone, is provided in sterile, pre-filled 2.5ml and 5ml syringes along with and a corresponding injector and a catheter (3F or 5F).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rate of Prevention of Retrograde Stone or Stone Fragment Migration
Description
Prevention of retrograde stone migration (Yes/No)
Time Frame
At the time of surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Stone-free Rate
Description
Presence or absence of residual stone fragments at 2 month follow up after lithotripsy
Time Frame
2 months
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Need for Secondary Procedures
Description
Need for secondary procedures of patients who had stone migration
Time Frame
Up to 3 months
Title
Time for BackStop Injection
Description
Time required to deliver BackStop beginning with insertion of BackStop catheter and ending with its removal subsequent to the delivery of BackStop
Time Frame
Minutes during Surgery
Title
Duration of Lithotripsy Procedure
Description
Duration of Lithotripsy Procedure
Time Frame
during surgery
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
patient with solitary ureteral stone ranging from 5mm to 15mm diameter
able to tolerate general anesthesia
clinical indication for treatment by ureteroscopic lithotripsy
must be willing and able to participate in any follow-up visits
provide informed consent
have a CT scan demonstrating the stone
Exclusion Criteria:
patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) or any other extracorporeal or percutaneous lithotripsy procedure as primary procedure
any co-morbidity or condition that would necessitate exclusion of patient (physician opinion)
renal or ureteral anatomical abnormality
multiple stones in the indicated ureter
stones in the indicated kidney
patient is immunocompromised
multiple organ dysfunction syndrome
has an absolute or relative solitary kidney mass
>= Stage 3 chronic kidney disease
bilateral ureteral obstructing stones
staghorn calculi
impaction of several stone fragments (Steinstrasse)
uncorrected coagulopathy/thrombocytopenia
urethral and/or ureteral stricture
reconstructive urinary surgery
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Matthew Dunn, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
USC Institute of Urology
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
USC Institute of Urology
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90089
Country
United States
Facility Name
Urology of Virginia
City
Virginia Beach
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23462
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
9334635
Citation
Segura JW, Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Dretler SP, Kahn RI, Lingeman JE, Macaluso JN Jr. Ureteral Stones Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. The American Urological Association. J Urol. 1997 Nov;158(5):1915-21. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64173-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11590294
Citation
International Conference on Harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use.. ICH harmonized tripartite guideline: Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. J Postgrad Med. 2001 Jan-Mar;47(1):45-50. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10646679
Citation
Hendrikx AJ, Strijbos WE, de Knijff DW, Kums JJ, Doesburg WH, Lemmens WA. Treatment for extended-mid and distal ureteral stones: SWL or ureteroscopy? Results of a multicenter study. J Endourol. 1999 Dec;13(10):727-33. doi: 10.1089/end.1999.13.727.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10360494
Citation
Pardalidis NP, Kosmaoglou EV, Kapotis CG. Endoscopy vs. extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of distal ureteral stones: ten years' experience. J Endourol. 1999 Apr;13(3):161-4. doi: 10.1089/end.1999.13.161.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12796655
Citation
Chow GK, Patterson DE, Blute ML, Segura JW. Ureteroscopy: effect of technology and technique on clinical practice. J Urol. 2003 Jul;170(1):99-102. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000070883.44091.24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9895254
Citation
Knispel HH, Klan R, Heicappell R, Miller K. Pneumatic lithotripsy applied through deflected working channel of miniureteroscope: results in 143 patients. J Endourol. 1998 Dec;12(6):513-5. doi: 10.1089/end.1998.12.513.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7805707
Citation
Robert M, Bennani A, Guiter J, Averous M, Grasset D. Treatment of 150 ureteric calculi with the Lithoclast. Eur Urol. 1994;26(3):212-5. doi: 10.1159/000475382.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20171695
Citation
Rane A, Bradoo A, Rao P, Shivde S, Elhilali M, Anidjar M, Pace K, D'A Honey JR. The use of a novel reverse thermosensitive polymer to prevent ureteral stone retropulsion during intracorporeal lithotripsy: a randomized, controlled trial. J Urol. 2010 Apr;183(4):1417-21. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.023. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
Results Reference
background
Links:
URL
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfMAUDE/TextSearch.cfm
Description
FDA MAUDE database online (accessed date July 8, 2007)
Learn more about this trial
Clinical Evaluation of BackStop in Patients Undergoing Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs