The Antidepressive Effect of rTMS as add-on to ECT (TMS)
Primary Purpose
Depression
Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Denmark
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Low frequency (1 hz) rTMS, as add-on to ECT
Sham-rTMS
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Depression focused on measuring Depression,, ECT,, rTMS,, Right prefrontal,, antidepressive efficacy
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients admitted to the Psychiatric Hospital of Aarhus
- Patients referred for ECT
- Age 18-80 years
- Moderate or severely depressed patients (ICD-10(DSM-IV)
- HAM-D score (17-item) ≥20 and/or Ham-D subscale ≥10.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Organic brain disease
- Epilepsy or disposition to epilepsy
- Metallic objects in chest or brain
- Cardiac pacemaker
- Somatic diseases associated with brain dysfunction
- Pregnancy
- Severe agitation or delirium
- Alcohol or drug dependence (ICD-10)
- Use of coercive measures
- The patient does not wish to participate
Sites / Locations
- Aarhus University Hospital, Risskov
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Sham Comparator
Arm Label
low frequency rTMS
Sham-rTMS
Arm Description
Right prefrontal Low frequency (1 hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, administered with 2 sessions each week
Sham right prefrontal rTMS 2 times a week
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Remission
The Hamilton (17 -item) Rating Scale for Depression is a clinician-administered assessement scale, that contains 17 items pertaining to symptoms of depression experienced over the past week. The total range is 0-52.Higher scores mean a worse outcomeRemission is defined by a Hamilton 17-item total score < 8.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Response
The Hamilton (17 -item) Rating Scale for Depression is a clinician-administered assessement scale, that contains 17 items pertaining to symptoms of depression experienced over the past week. The total range is 0-52.Higher scores mean a worse outcome. Response is defined by a reduction in the Hamilton 17 item score of >= 50%
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02123485
Brief Title
The Antidepressive Effect of rTMS as add-on to ECT
Acronym
TMS
Official Title
The Antidepressant Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ( rTMS) as add-on to Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT). A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
recruiting of patients difficult combined by lack of money
Study Start Date
April 1, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 1, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 1, 2019 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Aarhus
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The aim of the present study is to investigate in which degree low frequency right prefrontal rTMS used ad add-on may potentiate the antidepressant effect of unilateral ECT and accelerate remission .
To investigate the correlation between blood concentration of specific inflammation makers and change in depressive symptoms during treatment
Detailed Description
ECT is a well-established and effective method for the treatment of severe depression. During the last decades, rTMS has appeared as a potential new non-invasive antidepressant method, which may be a potential alternative to ECT due to fewer side effects.
Both methods expose the brain to an electric current. But while ECT is associated with global cerebral stimulation elicited by an epileptic seizure, rTMS implies non-convulsive focal stimulation through a time varying magnetic field. Thus, the antidepressant effect of rTMS does not depend on seizure activity and consequently requires no anesthesia. In addition, rTMS seems not to be associated with cognitive disturbances.
Previous research indicates that the antidepressant effect of rTMS is associated with specific stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The majority of clinically controlled studies have used high frequency stimulation of the left frontal cortex (1-4). Few have used right prefrontal low frequency rTMS, which has less side effects, such as local discomfort and a lower risk of releasing epileptic seizures, than high frequency stimulation (5-10). Both models have been used with varying results. Meta-analysis of the antidepressant effect of rTMS (11,x) have found a modest, statistically significant antidepressant effect but generally definite conclusions on the antidepressant effect of rTMS has been difficult to draw, probably because of small and selected study populations, varying ways of stimulation and other confounding factors in the clinical setting.
The important clinical question of whether rTMS may substitute ECT in the treatment of depression has almost exclusively been elucidated in studies using high frequency stimulation of the left frontal cortex. Some of these suggest that the effectiveness of rTMS is equal to that of ECT in non-delusional patients (12-19). However, a recent investigation has compared the antidepressant efficacy and side effects of right prefrontal low frequency rTMS with ECT. In this study the mean Hamilton total 17-item (HAM-D score) scores were reduced significantly over time in both groups (ECT: p<0.001, rTMS: p<0.001); but ECT was more effective than rTMS on a short term after 3 weeks of treatment. The outcome did not point to right frontal low frequency rTMS as a first line substitute for ECT, but it might have place in the treatment of depression as add on to other types of treatment.
ECT is normally administered 3 times a week for 3-4 weeks. Daily treatment sessions might accelerate remission, but is impossible because of cognitive side effects. However, rTMS seems not to be associated with reduction in cognitive performance and might potentiate the antidepressant efficacy of ECT. Therefore the investigators have found it clinical interesting to investigate in which degree low frequency right prefrontal rTMS used ad add-on may potentiate the antidepressant effect of unilateral ECT and accelerate remission .
In addition we want to investigate te correlation between change in depressive symptoms and
-blood concentration of specific inflammation CNS- makers
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Depression
Keywords
Depression,, ECT,, rTMS,, Right prefrontal,, antidepressive efficacy
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
35 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
low frequency rTMS
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Right prefrontal Low frequency (1 hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, administered with 2 sessions each week
Arm Title
Sham-rTMS
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Sham right prefrontal rTMS 2 times a week
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Low frequency (1 hz) rTMS, as add-on to ECT
Intervention Description
Right prefrontal Low frequency (1 hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as add-on to ECT.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Sham-rTMS
Intervention Description
Right prefrontal Low frequency (1 hz) sham-stimulation using af double blind placebo coil as add-on to ECT.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Remission
Description
The Hamilton (17 -item) Rating Scale for Depression is a clinician-administered assessement scale, that contains 17 items pertaining to symptoms of depression experienced over the past week. The total range is 0-52.Higher scores mean a worse outcomeRemission is defined by a Hamilton 17-item total score < 8.
Time Frame
7 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Response
Description
The Hamilton (17 -item) Rating Scale for Depression is a clinician-administered assessement scale, that contains 17 items pertaining to symptoms of depression experienced over the past week. The total range is 0-52.Higher scores mean a worse outcome. Response is defined by a reduction in the Hamilton 17 item score of >= 50%
Time Frame
7 weeks
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients admitted to the Psychiatric Hospital of Aarhus
Patients referred for ECT
Age 18-80 years
Moderate or severely depressed patients (ICD-10(DSM-IV)
HAM-D score (17-item) ≥20 and/or Ham-D subscale ≥10.
Exclusion Criteria:
Organic brain disease
Epilepsy or disposition to epilepsy
Metallic objects in chest or brain
Cardiac pacemaker
Somatic diseases associated with brain dysfunction
Pregnancy
Severe agitation or delirium
Alcohol or drug dependence (ICD-10)
Use of coercive measures
The patient does not wish to participate
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Poul Erik Buchholtz, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Poul Erik Buchholtz, MD Telephone: 004578472109 Email: poulhans@rm.dk
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Aarhus University Hospital, Risskov
City
Aarhus
State/Province
Risskov
ZIP/Postal Code
8240
Country
Denmark
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
The Antidepressive Effect of rTMS as add-on to ECT
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs