BiventRicular Pacing in prolongEd Atrio-Ventricular intervaL: the REAL-CRT Study (REAL-CRT)
Primary Purpose
First Degree Atrioventricular Block
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker
Dual chamber pacemaker
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for First Degree Atrioventricular Block focused on measuring Cardiac Resynchronization therapy, Minimized Right ventricular pacing, Prolonged AV conduction
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with standard indications to stimulation with a high probability of paced beats according to the clinical evaluation of the investigators:
- First degree AV block (PR ≥ 220 ms) and indication for pacing
- Paroxysmal AV block second degree (Type I and Type II) associated with long-PR (PR ≥ 220 ms)
- Patient must be able to attend all required follow-up visits at the study center.
- LVEF> 35%
Exclusion Criteria :
- Patient is less than 18 years of age.
- Patients with a life expectancy less than 12 months
- Indication for CRT in class I and II
- Third-degree AV block
- Patients currently enrolled in other studies / logs
- Patients who are not able to understand and sign an informed consent
- State of current or planned pregnancy within 12 months of enrollment
- Inability to understand and complete the questionnaire QOL
Sites / Locations
- Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'AnnaRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
Right ventricular stimulation
Biventricular Stimulation
Arm Description
patients with conventional Right Ventricular Stimulation (only RV) with optimized algorithms for minimization of pacing
Patients with biventricular stimulation (Right Ventricle and Left Ventricle)
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
LVEF
LVEF (Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: such as the assessment of systolic function of the left ventricle)
LVESV
LVESV (Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume: such as the assessment of left ventricular remodeling)
Secondary Outcome Measures
echocardiographic left ventricular measures
. Structure and cardiac function:
Left ventricular End Systolic Diameter, Left ventricular End Diastolic Diameter
Left Ventricular End Systolic
Echocardiographic altrial measures
Size of the left atrium (diameter and volume)
Clinical outcome
Clinical benefit:
6 minute walking test
quality of life questionnaire
New York Heart Association class
number and duration of hospitalizations
Atrial fibrillation (AF)
Incidence of AF:
incidence of persistent AF
burden of FA
new onset of AF
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02150538
Brief Title
BiventRicular Pacing in prolongEd Atrio-Ventricular intervaL: the REAL-CRT Study
Acronym
REAL-CRT
Official Title
BiventRicular Pacing in prolongEd Atrio-Ventricular intervaL: the REAL-CRT Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
September 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2016 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2016 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Gianluca Botto
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study was designed to evaluate the potential benefits of treatment with biventricular device in patients with normal systolic function , indication for pacing and impaired atrio-ventricular conduction , by comparing the treatment with dual-chamber device . The REAL -CRT study is designed to test the hypothesis that, in patients with atrioventricular block of I degree and standard pacing indications , biventricular pacing is superior to single stimulation of the right ventricle (RV) with optimized algorithms for minimization of pacing , as assessed by echocardiography an endpoint defined in terms of maintenance over time of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ) and left ventricular end-systolic volume ( LVESV ) .
Detailed Description
Clinical data suggest that biventricular pacing is able to preserve the myocardial performance more effectively than the right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular block and mild systolic dysfunction . In particular, some studies have shown that medical therapy in these patients could be responsible for an increase in the cumulative percentage of chronic pacing over the 40% threshold , the threshold associated with a higher incidence of atrial fibrillation and hospitalization for heart failure and ventricular arrhythmias . In addition , patients with pre-existing left ventricular dysfunction and indication for pacing standards have improved left ventricular systolic function , exercise capacity and quality of life as a result of biventricular pacing as compared with Right ventricular pacing . These results suggest that biventricular pacing is a feasible option for permanent pacing in patients who have normal systolic function of the left ventricle and that this can be altered from the adverse effects of conventional Right ventricular pacing on systolic function of the left ventricle . This reality has prompted physicians to assess the value and role of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT ) in patients with prolonged Atrio-Ventricular (AV) conduction . Note the deleterious effects of chronic stimulation of the right ventricle , the optimal pacing mode should always be considered in these patients at the time of implantation . This study was designed to evaluate the potential benefits of treatment with biventricular device in patients with normal systolic function , indication for pacing and impaired atrio-ventricular conduction, by comparing it with the treatment with dual chamber device
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
First Degree Atrioventricular Block
Keywords
Cardiac Resynchronization therapy, Minimized Right ventricular pacing, Prolonged AV conduction
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
164 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Right ventricular stimulation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
patients with conventional Right Ventricular Stimulation (only RV) with optimized algorithms for minimization of pacing
Arm Title
Biventricular Stimulation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients with biventricular stimulation (Right Ventricle and Left Ventricle)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker
Intervention Description
biventricular stimulation with cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker (crt-p)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Dual chamber pacemaker
Intervention Description
right ventricular stimulation with dual chamber pacemaker
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
LVEF
Description
LVEF (Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: such as the assessment of systolic function of the left ventricle)
Time Frame
2 years
Title
LVESV
Description
LVESV (Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume: such as the assessment of left ventricular remodeling)
Time Frame
2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
echocardiographic left ventricular measures
Description
. Structure and cardiac function:
Left ventricular End Systolic Diameter, Left ventricular End Diastolic Diameter
Left Ventricular End Systolic
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Echocardiographic altrial measures
Description
Size of the left atrium (diameter and volume)
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Clinical outcome
Description
Clinical benefit:
6 minute walking test
quality of life questionnaire
New York Heart Association class
number and duration of hospitalizations
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Atrial fibrillation (AF)
Description
Incidence of AF:
incidence of persistent AF
burden of FA
new onset of AF
Time Frame
2 years
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients with standard indications to stimulation with a high probability of paced beats according to the clinical evaluation of the investigators:
First degree AV block (PR ≥ 220 ms) and indication for pacing
Paroxysmal AV block second degree (Type I and Type II) associated with long-PR (PR ≥ 220 ms)
Patient must be able to attend all required follow-up visits at the study center.
LVEF> 35%
Exclusion Criteria :
Patient is less than 18 years of age.
Patients with a life expectancy less than 12 months
Indication for CRT in class I and II
Third-degree AV block
Patients currently enrolled in other studies / logs
Patients who are not able to understand and sign an informed consent
State of current or planned pregnancy within 12 months of enrollment
Inability to understand and complete the questionnaire QOL
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gianluca Botto
Organizational Affiliation
S. Anna Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Anna
City
Como
ZIP/Postal Code
22100
Country
Italy
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gianluca Botto
Email
clinical-realcrt@isis.it
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gianluca Botto
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31722381
Citation
Botto GL, Iuliano A, Occhetta E, Belotti G, Russo G, Campari M, Valsecchi S, Stabile G. A randomized controlled trial of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with prolonged atrioventricular interval: the REAL-CRT pilot study. Europace. 2020 Feb 1;22(2):299-305. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz321.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
BiventRicular Pacing in prolongEd Atrio-Ventricular intervaL: the REAL-CRT Study
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs