search
Back to results

Implementation Trial of Evidence Based Practices for Mood Disorders

Primary Purpose

Bipolar Disorder, Treatment Resistant Depression

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Evidence Based Quality Improvement
Sponsored by
University of Arkansas
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Bipolar Disorder focused on measuring Screening, Mood Stabilizers, Computer delivered psychotherapy, Peer Support, Telepsychiatry, Implementation, Rural

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 100 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

Full sample - screening positive for depression Bipolar Disorder sample - screening positive for depression, screening positive for bipolar disorder, not currently in a manic state Treatment Resistant Depression - screening positive for depression, screening negative for bipolar disorder, currently prescribed an antidepressant by primary care provider

Exclusion Criteria:

Full sample - none Bipolar Disorder sample - currently in a manic state Treatment Resistant Depression - none

Sites / Locations

  • Mainline Health Systems Inc.
  • Boston Mountain Rural Health Center
  • Lee County Cooperative Clinic
  • ARcare
  • Jefferson Comprehensive Care System
  • East Arkansas Family Health Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Implementation

Control

Arm Description

Evidence Based Quality Improvement

Usual Quality Improvement

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Patient Reach
For patients in the Bipolar Depression Sample and Treatment Resistant Depression Sample, we will measure psychotherapy reach defined as the percentage of patients who report using the on-line cognitive behavioral therapy computer program. We will measure peer support reach defined as the percentage of patients who report using the Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance website chat room. We will measure tele-psychiatry reach as the percentage of patients who report seeing a tele-psychiatrist. For the Bipolar Depression Sample, we will measure diagnostic reach defined as the percentage of patients who are assigned a Bipolar Disorder diagnosis and mood stabilizer reach as the percentage of patients who are prescribed a mood stabilizer. For the Treatment Resistant Depression Sample, we will measure antidepressant prescription change reach as the percentage of patients who are prescribed a different antidepressant than the one prescribed when they screened positive for depression.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
May 27, 2014
Last Updated
December 7, 2017
Sponsor
University of Arkansas
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02150577
Brief Title
Implementation Trial of Evidence Based Practices for Mood Disorders
Official Title
Partnership for Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices in Rural Primary Care
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 1, 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 1, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 1, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Arkansas

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The objective of this Implementation Trial is to evaluate the implementation of evidence based practices for Bipolar Disorder and Treatment Resistant Depression in small rural Federally Qualified Health Centers. The evidence based practices chosen and adapted by Health Center providers and patients in consultation with clinical experts include: screening for and diagnosing Bipolar Disorder, prescribing mood stabilizers, on-line cognitive behavioral therapy, on-line peer support, collaborative care management and tele-psychiatry consultation. A quasi-experimental study design will be used, with each of the six participating Federally Qualified Health Centers choosing one implementation clinic and one control clinic. Implementation outcomes include: reach, adoption, implementation-fidelity and effectiveness. Providers and patients may choose to use all, any or none of the evidence based practices based on their needs and preferences. Data will be collected from chart review and patient surveys will be administered by an Interactive Voice Response telephone system.
Detailed Description
The objective of this Implementation Trial is to evaluate the implementation of evidence based practices for Bipolar Disorder and Treatment Resistant Depression in small rural Federally Qualified Health Centers. The evidence based practices were chosen and adapted by Health Center providers and patients in consultation with clinical experts. The evidence based practices include: screening for and diagnosing Bipolar Disorder, prescribing one of five mood stabilizers, on-line cognitive behavioral therapy (Beating the Blues), on-line peer support (Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance), collaborative care management and tele-psychiatry consultation. These evidence based practices were chosen based on the strength of the research evidence and the feasibility of implementation in small primary clinics serving a low income rural patient population. Providers may choose to use all, any or none of the evidence based practices with their patients. Patients may choose to adhere to all, any, or none of the treatment recommendations prescribed by their provider. A quasi-experimental study design will be used. There are Federally Qualified Health Centers participating in the Implementation Trial. Each Federally Qualified Health Center chose one implementation clinic and one control clinic. Patients will be enrolled from both implementation and control clinics and outcomes will be compared for the three month period following enrollment. Implementation outcomes are based on the "RE-AIM" framework and include: reach, adoption, implementation-fidelity and effectiveness. Reach represents the proportion of patients who receive evidence based practices. Reach will be compiled at the patient level. Adoption represents the proportion of providers delivering evidence based practices. Provider adoption will be compiled at the primary care provider level. Implementation-Fidelity represents whether the evidence based practices are being delivered as intended. Implementation will be compiled at the patient level. Effectiveness represents the clinical improvement experienced by patients. Effectiveness will be compiled at the patient level. Data will be collected from chart review and patient surveys will be administered by an Interactive Voice Response telephone system. There will be three samples. The Full Sample will be all patients screening positive for depression on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9) screening tool during the 9 month enrollment period. The PHQ9 is used to routinely screen patients for depression at participating clinics. The Full Sample is expected to include approximately 2,400 patients. The Bipolar Depression Sample will be patients screening positive for depression, screening positive for Bipolar Disorder (on the CIDI), and providing informed consent to collect primary data. The Treatment Resistant Depression Sample will be patients screening positive for depression, screening negative for Bipolar Disorder, currently prescribed an antidepressant, and providing informed consent to collect primary data. The purpose of the "currently prescribed an antidepressant" inclusion criterion is to identify patients who do not respond to treatment. This inclusion criterion will be determined from chart review. We expect approximately 40 patients from each of six Federally Qualified Health Centers (two clinics per system) to be eligible for the Bipolar Depression and Treatment Resistant Depression samples and to provide informed consent. Thus, the combined size of the Bipolar Depression and Treatment Resistant Depression samples is expected to be 240. Health Center evaluation staff will test differences in patient outcomes at implementation and control sites using ordinary least squares and logistic regression analyses that will control for demographic characteristics. Compared to patients at control sites, we hypothesize that patients with a positive depression screen at implementation sites will be more likely to be screened for Bipolar Disorder than patients at control sites. With automated chart review data for 2,400 patients, we will have 84% power to detect a 5% (e.g., 25% versus 20%) difference in Bipolar Disorder screening rates. Compared to patients at control sites, we hypothesize that patients in the Bipolar Disorder Sample at implementation sites will be more likely to see receive a Bipolar diagnosis, be prescribed a mood stabilizer, engage in on-line cognitive behavioral therapy, engage in on-line peer support, receive collaborative care management, have a tele-psychiatry consultation, experience depression symptom improvement and report greater satisfaction. For the Bipolar Disorder Sample, we plan to enroll approximately 20 patients from each of six Federally Qualified Health Centers (two clinics per system) and expect at least a 75% follow-up rate (n=90), which will give us 79% power to detect a 25% (e.g., 15% versus 40%) difference in Bipolar Disorder specific outcomes (e.g., diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder). Compared to patients at control sites, we hypothesize that patients in the Treatment Resistant Depression Sample at implementation sites will be more likely to have their antidepressant prescription changed, engage in on-line cognitive behavioral therapy, engage in on-line peer support, receive collaborative care management, have a tele-psychiatry consultation, experience depression symptom improvement and report greater satisfaction. For the Treatment Resistant Depression Sample, we plan to enroll approximately 20 patients from each of six Federally Qualified Health Centers (two clinics per system) and expect at least a 75% follow-up rate (n=90), which will give us 79% power to detect a 25% (e.g., 15% versus 40%) difference in Treatment Resistant Depression specific outcomes (e.g., antidepressant prescription changed). For the combined Bipolar Disorder Sample and Treatment Resistant Depression Sample, we plan to enroll approximately 40 patients from each of six Federally Qualified Health Centers (two clinics per system) and expect at least a 75% follow-up rate (n=180), which will give us 87% power to detect a 15% (e.g., 25% versus 40%) difference in trans-diagnostic outcomes (e.g., satisfaction).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Bipolar Disorder, Treatment Resistant Depression
Keywords
Screening, Mood Stabilizers, Computer delivered psychotherapy, Peer Support, Telepsychiatry, Implementation, Rural

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
291 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Implementation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Evidence Based Quality Improvement
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Usual Quality Improvement
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Evidence Based Quality Improvement
Intervention Description
Facilitation of the identification, adoption, adaption and implementation of evidence based practices.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Patient Reach
Description
For patients in the Bipolar Depression Sample and Treatment Resistant Depression Sample, we will measure psychotherapy reach defined as the percentage of patients who report using the on-line cognitive behavioral therapy computer program. We will measure peer support reach defined as the percentage of patients who report using the Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance website chat room. We will measure tele-psychiatry reach as the percentage of patients who report seeing a tele-psychiatrist. For the Bipolar Depression Sample, we will measure diagnostic reach defined as the percentage of patients who are assigned a Bipolar Disorder diagnosis and mood stabilizer reach as the percentage of patients who are prescribed a mood stabilizer. For the Treatment Resistant Depression Sample, we will measure antidepressant prescription change reach as the percentage of patients who are prescribed a different antidepressant than the one prescribed when they screened positive for depression.
Time Frame
3 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
100 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Full sample - screening positive for depression Bipolar Disorder sample - screening positive for depression, screening positive for bipolar disorder, not currently in a manic state Treatment Resistant Depression - screening positive for depression, screening negative for bipolar disorder, currently prescribed an antidepressant by primary care provider Exclusion Criteria: Full sample - none Bipolar Disorder sample - currently in a manic state Treatment Resistant Depression - none
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Geoffrey Curran, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Arkansas
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Mainline Health Systems Inc.
City
Eudora
State/Province
Arkansas
Country
United States
Facility Name
Boston Mountain Rural Health Center
City
Huntsville
State/Province
Arkansas
Country
United States
Facility Name
Lee County Cooperative Clinic
City
Marianna
State/Province
Arkansas
Country
United States
Facility Name
ARcare
City
Melbourne
State/Province
Arkansas
Country
United States
Facility Name
Jefferson Comprehensive Care System
City
Pine Bluff
State/Province
Arkansas
Country
United States
Facility Name
East Arkansas Family Health Center
City
West Memphis
State/Province
Arkansas
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22982852
Citation
Hunt JB, Curran G, Kramer T, Mouden S, Ward-Jones S, Owen R, Fortney J. Partnership for implementation of evidence-based mental health practices in rural federally qualified health centers: theory and methods. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012 Fall;6(3):389-98. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0039.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Implementation Trial of Evidence Based Practices for Mood Disorders

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs